Leo Li wrote:
On 7/31/06, Gregory Shimansky [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
2006/7/31, Jimmy, Jing Lv [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Besides, Harmony VM now has actually support the feature of
JVMTI
on which we can implement instrument.
Ah, can it work now? It'll be great convenient if so.
Hello Daniel,
Glad to know you are working on JNDI. As far as I know, the package is
still incomplete (No JNDI-ldap development discussion in mailing list
before :-) ). You may want to refer to this wiki page:
http://wiki.apache.org/harmony/component_development_status
Thanks a lot.
Best
Hi, it looks like your friend needs to install Microsoft Platform SDK on his
PC .
Another solution is to download and update version of dbghelp library from
msdn site.
I didn't check the second solution.
If you don't not succeed for some reason, simply modify
nt_exception_filter.cpp file
Hi Daniel,
I don't think that there is any special reason for the absence of the
classes you mention; the package looks to be incomplete because of lack
of time. So far as I am aware there is no one actively working in this
area so any contributions you could make would be a terrific help to
I've tried to update dbghelp yesterday, but it didn't work, will try
after installing Platform SDK soon. Thank you very much, Aleksey.
Aleksey Ignatenko wrote:
Hi, it looks like your friend needs to install Microsoft Platform SDK
on his
PC .
Another solution is to download and update version
Andrew Zhang wrote:
On 7/31/06, Mikhail Fursov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 7/31/06, Andrew Zhang [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Shall we follow RI or spec? I'd like to suggest follow RI for this
specific
case, because:
1. If we follow spec, it may cause legacy applications fail.
I do not
Hi Alex,
some ways we can achieve this. Do we want to finish deciding that
before the migration, or are we confident that we will get to a point
where a decision is made and we can start transitioning beforehand?
Well, IMHO adding some extra javadoc tag will not break anything.
There are
Alexei Zakharov wrote:
Hi,
I have created this new thread as a single place for discussions
started in Re: [testing] Peace and [classlib] Testing conventions –
a proposal threads.
What did we have in the previous threads?
* Test classification proposed by Vladimir
* Test classification and
Aleksey Ignatenko wrote:
Hi, it looks like your friend needs to install Microsoft Platform SDK on
his
PC .
Another solution is to download and update version of dbghelp library from
msdn site.
I vaguely remember that Microsoft license allows to include dbghelp.dll
to binary distributions.
Daniel,
Thank you for the new optimized version. We've analyzed your version
and found it's very good. We can accept you version as default for
Harmony but we'd like to add some improvements. :)
I've updated H-935 and attach diffs for your code. We added
optimization for small BigDecimal's
Hi all.
Harmony implementation of java.text.Bidi returns directional runs
(getRunStart(), getRunLimit(), getRunLevel()) in visual order if
paragraph reading order is Right-to-Left. I mean the first run is at the
end of character buffer, and the last is at the beginning. I'd expect
directional
Hi Richard,
Not sure if we really want to involve another migration: TestNG javadoc
- TestNG annotation. Any comments?
Well, IMHO this depends on time constraints - when do we plan to have
the support for anotations? If the answer is about a couple of weeks -
no problem, we can wait. But if
Anton,
I have no objections here, just thinking about Harmony-hosted Harmony
web site - it can become really good self explanatory reliability
test. Not today, I agree. But may be some day.
With Regards,
2006/8/1, Anton Luht [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hello Alexei,
I believe that there are more
On Tuesday 01 August 2006 01:53 Alex Blewitt wrote:
On 31/07/06, Salikh Zakirov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Alex Blewitt wrote:
Don't get me wrong; being able to specify minimum/maximum is a
reasonable idea for optimising a VM if you know what to put; but by
default, there shouldn't be
Our project is now in a good shape and we started encouraging people
to try real applications on top of Harmony. One of the important parts
of the feedback will be general impression of stability, reliability
and performance of the HDK. We are doing pretty good in fixing bugs
and developing new
Hi,
I have been reviewing the DRLVM JIRA issues, and came across
HARMONY-699 [DRLVM] modification to eclipse plugin should be applied to plugin
itself
So I took the hyplugin.patch from DRLVM distribution and applied the changes
to plugin source tree, taking into account, that DRLVM executable
I've attached a fix for this issue.
SY, Alexey
2006/7/21, Victor A Martynov [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hello Geir,
I created new JIRA:
HARMONY-946
on this issue.
=
Warm Regards,
Victor Martynov,
Intel Middleware Product Division
On 7/20/06, Geir Magnusson Jr [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We
On 8/1/06, Gregory Shimansky [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There is a method Runtime.freeMemory() which returns the memory available in
the heap. I wonder what it should return when there is no limit.
Some applications may rely on the value which this method returns. Just
returning Long.MAX_VALUE
Geir, all,
I have thought that I could contribute by brushing up and expanding some
of the pages on the Harmony website. My first attempt has been to edit
the FAQ section, see JIRA issue 1032 [1].
Another thing I could do is to add content to the DRLVM page (a newly
added page with no content
On Tue, Aug 01, 2006 at 10:39:03PM +0800, Xiao-Feng Li wrote:
On 8/1/06, Gregory Shimansky [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There is a method Runtime.freeMemory() which returns the memory available
in
the heap. I wonder what it should return when there is no limit.
Some applications may rely on
How did Kaffe deal with SoftReferences? Did they ever go away when you
did not have a memory limit?
Dalibor Topic wrote:
On Tue, Aug 01, 2006 at 10:39:03PM +0800, Xiao-Feng Li wrote:
On 8/1/06, Gregory Shimansky [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There is a method Runtime.freeMemory() which
Vladimir,
I've found some more Java benchmarks in bookmarks, maybe some of them
will be interesting sor someone.
- Richards and deltaBlue [1] - first simulates the task dispatcher in
the kernel of an operating system, second is constraint solver
benchmark in the Java programming language.
-
All,
I added a bunch of missing regression tests. The only ones missing at
this point are the atomic operations. The regression tests are
currently in the process of being donated. Thus I can't simply post
these tests to Harmony JIRA :(
In any case below are the current tests that fail when
On Tuesday 01 August 2006 18:07, will pugh wrote:
How did Kaffe deal with SoftReferences? Did they ever go away when you
did not have a memory limit?
Why are we discussing Kaffe in the past tense?
--
Chris Gray/k/ Embedded Java Solutions BE0503765045
Embedded Mobile Java, OSGi
-Original Message-
From: Chris Gray [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, August 01, 2006 3:16 PM
To: harmony-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: [rant] Memory options in VM -- why is the
default not 'unlimited'
On Tuesday 01 August 2006 18:07, will pugh wrote:
How did
Yes. I apologize. I stated it in the past because the issue was
resolved in the past. More precise english probably would have been either:
How did Kaffe decide to deal with SoftReferences?
or
How does Kaffe deal with SoftReferences?
Although, still interested in the answer to either of
Vladimir Strigun wrote:
Our project is now in a good shape and we started encouraging people
to try real applications on top of Harmony. One of the important parts
of the feedback will be general impression of stability, reliability
and performance of the HDK. We are doing pretty good in
HARMONY-948 has a serialized dtd file called transitional401.bdtd.
When I try to read it by calling DTD.read(DataInputStream) I get a
java.io.EOFException. But, on the other hand, when I create a binary
DTD by calling DTDUtilities.create(String) I can get it with succeed.
How can I read
On 8/1/06, Gregory Shimansky [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tuesday 01 August 2006 09:47 Leo Li wrote:
I agree with this approach. Do you know which API functions and events
you will need for such agent?
Hi, we will need VM Initialization Event to run premain functions and
Class File Load
Alexei Zakharov wrote:
Hi Richard,
Not sure if we really want to involve another migration: TestNG javadoc
- TestNG annotation. Any comments?
Well, IMHO this depends on time constraints - when do we plan to have
the support for anotations? If the answer is about a couple of weeks -
no
Ivanov, Alexey A wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Igor Stolyarov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, July 28, 2006 1:04 PM
To: harmony-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: AWT 2D PERFORMANCE ISSUE
I think using WeakReference and ReferenceQueue can't help because
according
Thank you for all your attention on this:), because seems no one
objects, I'm going to assign HARMONY-982 to myself, and start to extend
the portlib.
Paulex Yang wrote:
Sorry I forgot to add the prefix just now.
Paulex Yang wrote:
Hi, all
I raise HARMONY-982
Hi,
If no objection, I shall go on with the plan of instrument :)
Refer to Harmony status page[1], INSTRUMENT is missing, so this
module shall named as instrument. I shall open a wiki-page for its
status like other modules on [2].
For Java codes, API classes/interfaces can be
On 8/2/06, Jimmy, Jing Lv wrote:
Hi,
If no objection, I shall go on with the plan of instrument :)
Refer to Harmony status page[1], INSTRUMENT is missing, so this
module shall named as instrument. I shall open a wiki-page for its
status like other modules on [2].
For Java codes,
On 8/1/06, Richard Liang wrote:
Andrew Zhang wrote:
On 7/31/06, Mikhail Fursov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 7/31/06, Andrew Zhang [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Shall we follow RI or spec? I'd like to suggest follow RI for this
specific
case, because:
1. If we follow spec, it may
It is a lang package, right?
Stepan Mishura wrote:
On 8/2/06, Jimmy, Jing Lv wrote:
Hi,
If no objection, I shall go on with the plan of instrument :)
Refer to Harmony status page[1], INSTRUMENT is missing, so this
module shall named as instrument. I shall open a wiki-page for its
Sorry I didn't reply sooner. Have fun :)
geir
Paulex Yang wrote:
Thank you for all your attention on this:), because seems no one
objects, I'm going to assign HARMONY-982 to myself, and start to extend
the portlib.
Paulex Yang wrote:
Sorry I forgot to add the prefix just now.
Paulex
Thank you Paulex, may be it is that what is needed.
--
Igor V. Stolyarov
Intel Middleware Products Division
Yes, it is. But accoriding to [1] the code should be put into separate
'instrument' module.
So the patch should start with 'modules/'instrument'.
Thanks,
Stepan.
[1]http://wiki.apache.org/harmony/componentization
On 8/2/06, Geir Magnusson Jr wrote:
It is a lang package, right?
Stepan
Vladimir Strigun wrote:
Our project is now in a good shape and we started encouraging people
to try real applications on top of Harmony. One of the important parts
of the feedback will be general impression of stability, reliability
and performance of the HDK. We are doing pretty good in
Never appeal to me using a Wiki as an authority :) It's like finding
something written in chalk on the sidewalk.
However, if you had pointed out
http://incubator.apache.org/harmony/auth_cont_quest.html
I'd have agreed w/o having the opportunity to make fun of the Wiki.
So I agree :)
geir
Stepan Mishura wrote:
Yes, it is. But accoriding to [1] the code should be put into separate
'instrument' module.
So the patch should start with 'modules/'instrument'.
Ah ... you are right, thanks very much Stepan! :)
So I shall put code to
modules/
instrument/
Morozova, Nadezhda wrote:
Geir, all,
I have thought that I could contribute by brushing up and expanding some
of the pages on the Harmony website. My first attempt has been to edit
the FAQ section, see JIRA issue 1032 [1].
Patch applied and committed
Another thing I could do is to
Great. Can you augment this to be applied to a copy of the launcher
code we'll keep in the DRLVM tree? And maybe a simpler buildfile that
isn't a part of the DRLVM build infrastructure? (which we want to get
away from...)
geir
Salikh Zakirov wrote:
Hi,
I have been reviewing the DRLVM JIRA
Why is it needed? Clearly something is wrong w/ the binary snapshot,
which is supposed to be a release build...
geir
Salikh Zakirov wrote:
Aleksey Ignatenko wrote:
Hi, it looks like your friend needs to install Microsoft Platform SDK on
his
PC .
Another solution is to download and
Stepan Mishura wrote:
On 8/2/06, Jimmy, Jing Lv wrote:
Hi,
If no objection, I shall go on with the plan of instrument :)
Refer to Harmony status page[1], INSTRUMENT is missing, so this
module shall named as instrument. I shall open a wiki-page for its
status like other modules on
Anton Luht wrote:
Hello,
I know why this thread is so lazy - it's because everybody dislikes QA
testing :)
OK, now let me add my $0.02 about my vision about reporting of test
results. I believe it's better to do this using HTTP rather than mail
because some people may not have access
Anton Luht wrote:
Hello Alexei,
I believe that there are more installations that can execute CGI than
those that can run servlets. I'm sure that for the first time the test
infrastructure will be deployed to an existing installation but not to
a dedicated server - that's why I decided
Alexei Zakharov wrote:
Anton,
I have no objections here, just thinking about Harmony-hosted Harmony
web site - it can become really good self explanatory reliability
test. Not today, I agree. But may be some day.
Well, I have objections if I understand things correctly.
There is no
Jimmy, Jing Lv wrote:
Stepan Mishura wrote:
On 8/2/06, Jimmy, Jing Lv wrote:
Hi,
If no objection, I shall go on with the plan of instrument :)
Refer to Harmony status page[1], INSTRUMENT is missing, so this
module shall named as instrument. I shall open a wiki-page for its
status
50 matches
Mail list logo
