Hello,
Seems like nobody is using this test results storage - the problem may
be that it has very few features. I'm going to implement something I
think will be useful - please make comments if you have any.
Features are:
- autorization - authorized users can modify tests results, for
example, l
Nice saga, quite inspiring:
http://inside-swt.blogspot.com/2006/07/how-does-anything-work.html
We believe in our future, let it be Harmony! ;)
-
Terms of use : http://incubator.apache.org/harmony/mailing.html
To unsubscribe, e-ma
Seems like a new patch is a better way.
If apply it as is then some tests fail some hang up...
Thanks,
Mikhail
2006/8/31, Geir Magnusson Jr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Well, that's 3 days :)
+1 from geir, alexey, vladimir, Ilya, the other alexey, sergey, mark,
oleg, paulex, mikhail, kenny,
no oth
Hi Geir,
It seems not all of us are able to see my attachments :-(
I've created new jira HARMONY-1390 with attachments.
Thanks
Evgueni.
On 9/6/06, Evgueni Brevnov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
HI All,
Good news! I have a patch to run DRLVM with the classlib's launcher
(I've checked Hello and Ecl
A question for Jitrino.JET developers. How hard would it be to modify the
existing Jitrino.JET code so that the "new" opcode calls MMTk alloc()?
Thanks
--
Weldon Washburn
Intel Middleware Products Division
Using MMTk's GenMS collector, I was able to cause an object to be promoted
to mature generation. Then write the ref ptr of nursery object "X" in a
slot of the mature object. This caused the write barrier to add the mature
object to the remembered set. Then a bunch of throw away objects were
al
On 9/4/06, Ivan Volosyuk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Weldon,
what is the "user-mode"?
Thanks for asking. Basically I call MMTk's object alloc() routine from java
application code instead of from DRLVM JIT runtime helper. I use vmmagic to
patch up stuff. The trick is to hide the objects all
Hi, Mikhail:
Ok, I will put my diffs to the JIRA later. And I have solved the issue I
asked two days ago.
I want to know how to use the option -Xdumpfile, It needs liblwdis.sosupporting.
If it need to be written by ourselves, I will finish it. If not, could you
please tell me where can I
get it
Mikhail Loenko wrote:
Alexey
I think putting some third-party code into JIRA and downloading it on
the fly
when build means that we redistribute that third-party code.
We intenationally do it for yoko.jar, because we've discussed here that
we host
it.
My question is: did we discussed her
Morozova, Nadezhda wrote:
Best regards,
Nadya Morozova
Folks,
I have just submitted a patch that fixing the conflict in styles on the
website [1]. When doing this, I noticed another issue with the docs
deployed:
There are no images! The image files used in individual documents are
st
HI All,
Good news! I have a patch to run DRLVM with the classlib's launcher
(I've checked Hello and Eclipse applications on Windows only).
Actually, there are two patches. The first one is for classlib which
changes vm default directory to drlvm. The second one is for build
system and VM itself.
Wow, How many examples do you have? ;-)
As ChoiceFormat is a "format engine", it's impossible to list all the
exceptional cases.
IMHO, maybe we could 1) *guess* the rules behind RI's strange behavior
by adding more test cases. 2) try our best to implement the rules of
RI. 3) And then, leave this
Alexey
I think putting some third-party code into JIRA and downloading it on the fly
when build means that we redistribute that third-party code.
We intenationally do it for yoko.jar, because we've discussed here that we host
it.
My question is: did we discussed here that we redistribute 3rd-pa
Best regards,
Nadya Morozova
Folks,
I have just submitted a patch that fixing the conflict in styles on the
website [1]. When doing this, I noticed another issue with the docs
deployed:
There are no images! The image files used in individual documents are
stored in the SVN repository at t
Hi Qiong,
What do you think about putting your diffs to the JIRA? Doing this way we
can write and test the code together?
Apache gurus,
is JIRA the standard tool to simulate SVN branching for developers that are
not commiters?
Should we gain some success in a feature implementation before we get
+1 from me.
Another (better) approach would be to write a REMSET sanity checker.
When enabled by a command-line switch it would inject an extra phase
into the GC phase list (like the existing sanity checker does), and
before a nursery collection it would:
- do a full-heap trace, using private s
+1 for cleanup, I could even assist you.
Please also consider possible dependency on issue #1363.
--
Regards,
Alexey
2006/9/5, Pavel Pervov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
It's been long time this discussion stopped.
This may mean three things:
- first, everyone agrees this should be done and I'm ok to pr
The coverage information was updated on the wiki to current state.
thanks, Vladimir
One more example of strange RI behaviour
-
import java.text.*;
public class Test {
static void test(String pattern) {
System.err.print("[" + pattern + "] ");
try {
System.err.println(new ChoiceFormat(pattern).to
It's been long time this discussion stopped.
This may mean three things:
- first, everyone agrees this should be done and I'm ok to provide
consecutive patches;
- second, noone clearly understand the purpose of what is suggested to do;
if this is the case, do not hesitate to ask (again?);
- third,
On 9/5/06, Denis Kishenko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
People what do you think about HARMONY-1110?
Problem is we have to reproduce behavior of ChoiceFormat pattern parser without
specification. There is only one example in Java doc which doesn't
allow understand when RI assumes that pattern is in
On 9/5/06, Paulex Yang wrote:
Stepan Mishura wrote:
> Paulex, thanks for your patience and answers.
>
> Yes, Sun's JRE sets root logger's level according to
> 'lib/logging.properties'. Also specifying the level for root logger in
> j.u.l.config.file doesn't help. (I assumed before that a JRE res
Stepan Mishura wrote:
Paulex, thanks for your patience and answers.
Yes, Sun's JRE sets root logger's level according to
'lib/logging.properties'. Also specifying the level for root logger in
j.u.l.config.file doesn't help. (I assumed before that a JRE respects my
"lovely" custom LogManager sett
On 9/5/06, Paulex Yang wrote:
Stepan Mishura wrote:
> On 9/4/06, *Paulex Yang* wrote:
>
> Stepan Mishura wrote:
> > On 9/1/06, Paulex Yang wrote:
> >>
> >> Stepan Mishura wrote:
> >> > Hi Andrew,
> >> >
> >> > I've just looked into static initialization block and then
Ooops...I've seen your comments that you've already removed these changes in
jira a bit later.
I'll take a look at the applied patch results today.
Regards,
Ilya.
On 9/5/06, Ilya Okomin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Yep, you are right, we can left such messages without
internationalization. I m
Yep, you are right, we can left such messages without internationalization.
I made this automatically.
Thanks for pointing this Mikhail, I'll update the patch.
Regards, Ilya.
On 9/5/06, Mikhail Loenko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Ilya
Does it make sense?
-throw new Error("not yet
BC provider throws the same exceptions as SUN provider
(at least for standard digest alg. names: SHA, MD2, MD5, SHA-256,
SHA-384, SHA-512).
But what about other third party providers?
On 9/5/06, Mikhail Loenko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
IMHO we should look from the perspective of migrating the a
People what do you think about HARMONY-1110?
Problem is we have to reproduce behavior of ChoiceFormat pattern parser without
specification. There is only one example in Java doc which doesn't
allow understand when RI assumes that pattern is incorrect.
Thanks
--
Denis M. Kishenko
Intel Middlewar
let's talk about it on a different thread
2006/9/5, Denis Kishenko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
By the way, people what do you think about HARMONY-1110?
Problem is we have to reproduce behavior of pattern parser without
specification. There is only one example in Java doc which doesn't
allow understand
Ilya
Does it make sense?
-throw new Error("not yet implemented");
+// sound.00=not yet implemented
+throw new Error(Messages.getString("sound.00")); //$NON-NLS-1$
Thanks,
Mikhail
2006/9/4, Ilya Okomin (JIRA) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
[ http://issues.apache.o
By the way, people what do you think about HARMONY-1110?
Problem is we have to reproduce behavior of pattern parser without
specification. There is only one example in Java doc which doesn't
allow understand when pattern is incorrect.
2006/9/5, Denis Kishenko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Boris thank yo
Stepan Mishura wrote:
On 9/1/06, Paulex Yang wrote:
Stepan Mishura wrote:
> Andrew, thanks for the test. But working test doesn't mean that there
> is no
> bug :-)
>
> AFAIK in our case an operation on file (if file is not exist - create
> file)
> should be atomic. And it looks like Harmony im
Weldon Washburn wrote:
On 7/18/06, Volynets, Vera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
I didn't find any bugs in gc_v4 at the moment,
Vera, its good to know the verifier found zero bugs in GCV4!
but this feature is really very useful especially if
you modify gc_v4 or design a new gc. Of course, it
On 9/5/06, Vladimir Ivanov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 9/5/06, Andrew Zhang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
...
> > > How to define platform? Get platform information in test code?
> >
> >
> > Yes. It is just one line of code. For example, from Support_Exec.java
> > class:
> > boolean onUnix = Fil
IMHO we should look from the perspective of migrating the apps.
So let's try to make behavior of "Harmony + BC provider" close
to "Sun + Sun's provider"
If without the checks the combination Harmony+BC works similar to
Sun+Sun's provider, then let's remove the checks. Otherwise let's
keep it to
On 9/5/06, Andrew Zhang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
...
> > How to define platform? Get platform information in test code?
>
>
> Yes. It is just one line of code. For example, from Support_Exec.java
> class:
> boolean onUnix = File.separatorChar == '/';
Yes, it does work sometimes, but ...
Ho
Boris thank you for your question. I asked myself the same question
and choose the same answer as you. Unfortunately as people wrote above
we were wrong and they are reasonable.
I have already written patch for HARMONY-1120 to follow RI behavior.
2006/9/5, Stepan Mishura <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
On
On 9/5/06, Paulex Yang wrote:
Stepan Mishura wrote:
> On 9/4/06, *Paulex Yang* wrote:
>
> Stepan Mishura wrote:
> > On 9/1/06, Paulex Yang wrote:
> >>
> >> Stepan Mishura wrote:
> >> > Hi Andrew,
> >> >
> >> > I've just looked into static initialization block and then
38 matches
Mail list logo
