Can we get the value from the harmonyvm.properties file?
Thanks,
Mikhail
2006/11/17, Tim Ellison [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
I think that it's totally unreasonable to have no upper bound on stack
size. A Java virtual machine should never be able to hose a machine by
16 Nov 2006 17:15:14 +0600, Egor Pasko [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On the 0x223 day of Apache Harmony Alexey Varlamov wrote:
2006/11/16, Tim Ellison [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Pavel Ozhdikhin wrote:
We have to evolving systems - classlib and DRLVM. To check commits to
classlib we need a stable DRLVM
Is this lib VM-specific?
Are we going to have one more VM-specific lib in the common dir?
Thanks,
Mikhail
2006/11/16, Tim Ellison [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Oliver Deakin (JIRA) wrote:
[classlib][luni] Add creation of stub jvm.dll to luni module
2006/11/16, Tim Ellison [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Mikhail Loenko wrote:
Is this lib VM-specific?
No, er, yes, er, ... let me try to explain.
In the jre/bin/vm sub directories we have harmonyvm.dll's (which are
VM-specific), but we use the name and function export convention to code
against any
,
Mikhail
2006/11/16, Geir Magnusson Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Mikhail Loenko wrote:
why not?
Because the full-stack testing is appropriate for CI systems that are
running full-time to catch bugs. That's what our build-test
infrastructure is all about.
Asking DRLVM developers (and conversely, classlib
15.11.06, Vladimir Ivanov[EMAIL PROTECTED] написал(а):
Hello everyone,
I started cruise control (stored in the buildtest module with patch from
issue 995) on the Windows XP and SUSE Linux boxes.
Both machines are identical (1 CPU - P4*3GHz, 1GB RAM, 120Gb HDD).
On each platform cruise control
Seems like Harmony disappeared from the incubator page
but hasn't yet appeared on the apache.org page
2006/11/16, Geir Magnusson Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
We now have a site
http://harmony.apache.org/
and there's a redirect from
http://incubator.apache.org/harmony/
to there.
Tomorrow
+1
2006/11/16, Geir Magnusson Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Does anyone care? This way, we can be freer about who and what goes in
there.
Since we don't ship the testing frameworks with anything, this is
completely consistent with our IP policies and goals.
geir
for the following (and not limited to this):
* Alexey Varlamov and Elena for driving the whole process
* Anton and Vladimir Ivanov for automating test runs
* Geir and Gregory for checking and committing related DRLVM patches
* Paulex, Tim, Nathan, Stepan and Mikhail Loenko for checking
I guess that Sun has implemented some behavior and some exception
could be thrown by that implementation. Then they wrapped that exception
by SerialException and documented in the spec ;)
You might want to implement it without exception throwing and if we find an
inconsistency later -- fix it
I've run swing and awt tests with fork mode once a dozen times
on Windows and Linux. All tests passed.
So to speed up precommit testing I'd like to change fork mode in
swign and awt to ${hy.test.forkmode} like it's done in other modules.
Objections?
Thanks,
Mikhail
done in 474664
2006/11/14, Alexei Fedotov [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
+1 to use a uniform property for all modules
On 11/13/06, Mikhail Loenko [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've run swing and awt tests with fork mode once a dozen times
on Windows and Linux. All tests passed.
So to speed up precommit
2006/11/10, Andrew Zhang [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hi folks,
I noticed that package javax.sql.rowset.serial is missing in Harmony.
Has anybody already been working on it? If no one holds implemented code in
his hand, I'd like to start on this package.
cool!
Any suggestions/concerns/patches :-)
2006/11/9, Andrew Zhang [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On 11/9/06, Boris Kuznetsov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'll file a JIRA with patch shortly.
HARMONY-2117
Hi Boris, I didn't see any test cases in the patch?
I don;t see them there also ;)
On 11/9/06, Boris Kuznetsov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
2006/11/9, Geir Magnusson Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Fedotov, Alexei A wrote:
Alexey Petrenko wrote,
The only release I can imagine is Harmony Java5SE 100% compatible.
To be Java5SE 100% compatible we need TCK first.
+1
Yes - and I still think that talk of a release is a bit premature right
Hi Daniel
I've tried the patch you suggested. It causes failure of
org.apache.harmony.tests.java.math.BigDecimalArithmeticTest
Could you please take a look?
Thanks,
Mikhail
2006/11/8, Daniel Fridlender [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hi,
In http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HARMONY-2091 there is an
In general I agrre with what Oleg says. Some comment are below
2006/11/8, Oleg Oleinik [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
no regression policy should be relevant to a number of *small* tests
that are easy to run and are running fast, to make them good as pre-commit
criteria.
Actually, I'm thinking about the
What is passed to java.lang.Float.parseFloat(Float.java:335) ?
2006/11/9, Anton Rusanov [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I've managed to get the stacktrace of the exception which prevents
Cocoon from starting on DRLVM. Here it is.
Uncaught exception in main:
java.lang.reflect.InvocationTargetException
Cool! I agree
2006/11/2, Tony Wu [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hi all,
I noticed that some tests of java.net were excluded due to external
server dependency. Now we have a jetty in /depends/jars, is it time to
clean up these testcases to use jetty and make them run-able? I
volunteer to do it if so.
--
Hi Alexey
One more suggestion:
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-harmony-dev/200604.mbox/[EMAIL
PROTECTED]
Thanks,
Mikhail
2006/11/2, Alexey Petrenko [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Missed this.
Thanks, Tim.
SY, Alexey
2006/11/2, Tim Ellison [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
This file needs an ASF
I've added Jigsaw to the list of being enabled apps [1]
Thanks,
Mikhail
[1] http://wiki.apache.org/harmony/Application_Status
Hi Nadya
I'll be happy to apply the patch ;)
Thanks,
Mikhail
2006/11/2, Morozova, Nadezhda [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Thanks all who helped with the what can we do now page - the new page is
shorter but none the less useful.
My suggestion is to add more links to the page. It now only links to the
2006/10/29, Nathan Beyer [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I found this bit of code in the java.rmi.activation.ActivationGroup. I
snipped the calls to the RMI logger, for a bit more clarity.
protected void activeObject(ActivationID id, MarshalledObject mobj)
throws ActivationException,
does it make sense to put it on the site?
Thanks,
Mikhail
2006/10/25, Stepan Mishura [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On 10/16/06, Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
We're a volunteer project, so supported is based on interest in
community. Lets be clear by writing down a set of platforms that we as
a community
yes, I mean the current definitions
Then we could discuss the lists
Thanks,
Mikhail
2006/10/25, Stepan Mishura [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On 10/25/06, Mikhail Loenko wrote:
does it make sense to put it on the site?
To put what? The definition of supported platform or/and the list of
supported
2006/10/25, Geir Magnusson Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Stepan Mishura wrote:
On 10/16/06, *Geir Magnusson Jr.* wrote:
We're a volunteer project, so supported is based on interest in
community. Lets be clear by writing down a set of platforms that we as
a community commit to
+1 for separation
Thanks,
Mikhail
2006/10/25, Ilya Neverov [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hi All,
I support the idea to have separate JIRA-s for different components.
For tracking such changes spreaded over codebase the JIRA's subtask
feature is very usefull - pls see [1,2]
Thanks
-Ilya
[1]
2006/10/20, Geir Magnusson Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
For those that haven't been following along
Graduating from the Incubator is a dynamic process, as there's no
really hard and fast rules to satisfy. On one hand, this is a good
thing, because determining the health and prospect of future
I've just built fine. Will try on a fresh WS. Have you tried 'ant clean'?
19.10.06, Volynets, Vera[EMAIL PROTECTED] написал(а):
Hi,
I've tried to build classlib today.
it failed with following message:
-compile:
[javac] Since compiler setting isn't classic or modern,ignoring fork setting.
But what is the difference between supported and in-progress then?
2006/10/20, Geir Magnusson Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Mikhail Loenko wrote:
Good! :)
Now it's more or less clear about the categories that we have and I suggest
that we discuss policies around the categories.
Probably we
that we certify as being compatible, but don't make any
support promises
geir
On 10/18/06, Mikhail Loenko [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
2006/10/17, Geir Magnusson Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Mikhail Loenko wrote:
2006/10/17, Geir Magnusson Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Mikhail Fursov wrote:
I
) product or supported
3) incubation
On 10/18/06, Mikhail Loenko [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well, I think there are at least three categories of platforms:
1) Platforms that we don't care about
2) Platforms that we think work and we want them working
3) Platforms that we want working
2006/10/17, Alexander Kleymenov [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hello Gerald!
It is glad to hear that You are trying to use Harmony's JSSE provider!
I'd like to inquire if there is any intention in the future to support any
of the TLS AES type cipher suites?
Now only the base Cipher Suites (described by
There is javax.activity package that has 3 exception classes and nothing else.
I doubt we need a dedicated module for them.
I think they should go to RMI module.
If no objections, I'll implement them there.
This red line in Japi reports makes me unhappy.
Thanks,
Mikhail
2006/10/17, Geir Magnusson Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Mikhail Fursov wrote:
On 10/16/06, Geir Magnusson Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Great! Write that down with your votes. (Note, I was just kicking this
off, not being comprehensive...)
OK, I'll try to add more restrictions to the list.
2006/10/17, Geir Magnusson Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Mikhail Loenko wrote:
2006/10/17, Geir Magnusson Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Mikhail Fursov wrote:
I think if we decide to support a platform then we define a set of tests
that
must pass on that platform after each commit and we do roll back
2006/10/16, Tim Ellison [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Mikhail Loenko wrote:
When we bring new platforms how will we make sure that a patch for some
rare platform would not break another one?
Beyond sniffing the patch to ensure it looks reasonable, the best a
committer can do is to test
2006/10/16, Geir Magnusson Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Mikhail Loenko wrote:
2006/10/16, Tim Ellison [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Mikhail Loenko wrote:
When we bring new platforms how will we make sure that a patch for some
rare platform would not break another one?
Beyond sniffing the patch
2006/10/16, Tim Ellison [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
Mikhail Loenko wrote:
2006/10/16, Tim Ellison [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Mikhail Loenko wrote:
When we bring new platforms how will we make sure that a patch for
some
rare platform would not break another one?
Beyond sniffing
2006/10/16, Mikhail Fursov [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On 10/16/06, Mikhail Loenko [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Isn't it time to define the official set of supported platforms? ;)
After reading the neighbour threads about hardware available for commiters
and precommit criteria I think that we have
Once it's more or less ready let's point to that page from TODO on our website
Thanks,
Mikhail
2006/10/17, Gregory Shimansky [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hello
You know that drlvm was donated by Intel and there was some period of time
while drlvm was developed internally. We had an internal bugzilla
congratulations!!!
2006/10/17, Geir Magnusson Jr [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Please join the Apache Harmony PPMC in welcoming the project's newest
committers, in alphabetical order :
Oliver Deakin
Richard Liang
Alexey Petrenko
Gregory Shimansky
Alexey Varlamov
Alexei Zakharov
These six individuals
2006/10/14, Tim Ellison [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Just to add my 2p -- I also agree with doing the work in the trunk. Of
course the minimum cost of working there is that you do no harm to the
other platforms. That is the zeroth level of integration.
The first level of integration would then be to
Cool!
Do you mean that it can now validate a signature in BouncyCastle jar file?
Thanks,
Mikhail
2006/10/13, Yuri Kropachev [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hello,
With reference to my e-mail dated 2006-06-29 (below) and
JIRA ## 742, 837, 872, 908, 1159, 1396, 1837,
I inform you that the provider's code
2006/10/12, Mikhail Loenko (JIRA) [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HARMONY-1837?page=all ]
Mikhail Loenko resolved HARMONY-1837.
-
Resolution: Fixed
applied in 463279 with the following changes:
moved a package-access class
2006/10/11, Elena Semukhina [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hello all,
I think that the goal of running classlib unit tests on DRLVM with 100% pass
rate could be worth to achieve.
+1
and we will have better pre-commit tests for VM
Actually today we have 99% (without
awt/swing) but still have about 30
Hi Alexei
I'm sorry I comlpetely don't understand your comment (as well as a
number of similar comments in other JIRAs)
Thanks,
Mikhail
2006/10/7, Alexei Fedotov (JIRA) [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HARMONY-1670?page=comments#action_12440591
]
Alexei Fedotov
with different subject,
so that other people could notice that discussion and participate
Thanks,
Mikhail
With best regards,
Alexei Fedotov,
Intel Middleware Products Division
-Original Message-
From: Mikhail Loenko [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, October 11, 2006 2:37 PM
To: harmony
.
With best regards,
Alexei Fedotov,
Intel Middleware Products Division
-Original Message-
From: Mikhail Loenko [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, October 11, 2006 5:57 PM
To: harmony-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: [jira] Commented: (HARMONY-1670) [classlib][luni] invalid
testcase
Please wait.
what are you going to do with linux?
Thanks,
Mikhail
2006/10/10, Mark Hindess [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On 9 October 2006 at 16:02, Tim Ellison [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Works for me too now ...
Unless anyone objects I suggest that we make the 'with.awt.swing'
default behavior (and
Hi Pavel,
I'm sorry I did not catch how for example Nathan's commits will be checked
on the configurations he does not have?
Thanks,
Mikhail
2006/10/9, Pavel Ozhdikhin [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On 10/9/06, Tim Ellison [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Rana Dasgupta wrote:
We need to check both release and
I couldn't reproduce that - worked fine before I committed
Now trying on a fresh ws
2006/10/9, Alexey Petrenko [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Yes, this happens because HARMONY-1729 was not integrated yet.
HARMONY-1729 consists of build files diff and connetced to HARMONY-1609.
SY, Alexey
2006/10/9,
2006/10/10, Tim Ellison [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Works for me too now ...
Unless anyone objects I suggest that we make the 'with.awt.swing'
default behavior (and we'll see the failure if it happens again).
Are you going to make it on Windows or both?
I thought that linux dependencies are not
What is the status of our discussions about new test suite layout?
Long ago we decided not to move existing tests until we finish with
that discussion but the discussion seems to be either dead or in coma
Does it make sense to continue putting the tests in order (according to the old
model) and
+1
2006/10/3, Geir Magnusson Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
BCC and ACQs in place.
[ ] +1 Yes, accept the contribution
[ ] -1 No, don't. reason :
As usual, 3 days or until all committers vote, or there is an
objection/request for continuance
2006/10/4, Mark Hindess [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On 4 October 2006 at 15:41, Tim Ellison [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Excuse the change in subject line...
No problem. I was just cursing myself for having forgotten to change
it.
Mark Hindess wrote:
With this change, the awt dependencies should now
2006/10/4, Geir Magnusson Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Mark Hindess wrote:
On 4 October 2006 at 15:41, Tim Ellison [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Excuse the change in subject line...
No problem. I was just cursing myself for having forgotten to change
it.
Mark Hindess wrote:
With this change, the
on this? Or should I proceed with a patch for the both issues?
Yes, please. When you submit a patch people will have a chance
to review and comment
Thanks,
Mikhail
Thanks,
Oleg
On 10/4/06, Mikhail Loenko [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
2006/10/4, Mark Hindess [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On 4 October 2006
, but I figure no one is
going to assume that we are formally distributing them if they are in a
personal directory.
Interesting statement. IANAL, but I'd assume we are
Thanks,
Mikhail
geir
SY, Alexey
2006/10/3, Geir Magnusson Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Mikhail Loenko wrote:
For the short
+1
2006/9/28, Geir Magnusson Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
BCC and ACQs are in.
What say ye? Would it be nice to debug using eclipse debugger in DRLVM?
[ ] + 1 accept this contribution into the project
[ ] -1 don't accept (please give reason)
Vote runs usual 3 days unless protest or early
Shouldn't we stop commits until the build is fixed?
Thanks,
Mikhail
2006/9/15, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Author: hindessm
Date: Fri Sep 15 01:44:20 2006
New Revision: 446549
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revrev=446549
Log:
Applying patch from [#HARMONY-1460]
CipherTest failure is caused by one of Set eol-style = native ... commits
Looking...
Thanks,
Mikhail
2006/9/15, Mark Hindess [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Two on windows:
Operation produced incorrect results
junit.framework.AssertionFailedError: Operation produced incorrect results at
Etienne asked not to close the issue, see previous comments in the JIRA.
Etienne, could you please comment?
Thanks,
Mikhail
2006/9/15, Alexey Petrenko (JIRA) [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HARMONY-290?page=comments#action_12434935 ]
Alexey Petrenko commented on
2006/9/15, Mikhail Loenko [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
CipherTest failure is caused by one of Set eol-style = native ... commits
The cause is corrupted resource file
r446485
incubator/harmony/enhanced/classlib/trunk/modules/crypto/src/test/resources/hyts_des-ede3-cbc.test1.plaintext
(contents, props
in ~/.subversion/config.txt?
geir
Mikhail Loenko wrote:
2006/9/15, Mikhail Loenko [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
CipherTest failure is caused by one of Set eol-style = native ...
commits
The cause is corrupted resource file
r446485
incubator/harmony/enhanced/classlib/trunk/modules/crypto/src/test/resources
I'm going to integrate H-1370 that throws exception with some text
but don't know where to put the message.
There is messages.properties in internal package that is empty but consistent
with other modules and there is ExternalMessages.properties that is populated
I'll put it to the old
Hi Rana
2006/9/14, Rana Dasgupta [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
SNIP
One way to write the test would be to loop N times on a scenario that
kicks in the optimization say, array bounds check elimination and then loop
N times a very similar scenario but such that the bounds check does not get
eliminated.
Issue Type: Improvement
Components: Classlib
Reporter: Alexander Kleymenov
Assigned To: Mikhail Loenko
Attachments: https-over-proxy-patch.txt, https.patch,
https.patch2.txt, https.proxy.patch.txt, https.txt, key_store.bks, key_store.bks
Provided patch
It's not clear why it should be non-bug diff?
Shouldn't it be fixed to follow RI?
Thanks,
Mikhail
2006/9/14, Andrew Zhang [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Would any commiter like to confirm and close this non-bug differences from
RI jira? Thanks!
On 9/13/06, Andrew Zhang [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From:
2006/9/14, Alexei Zakharov (JIRA) [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HARMONY-953?page=comments#action_12434627 ]
Alexei Zakharov commented on HARMONY-953:
-
IMO it should be moved to DRLVM component.
+1
Thanks,
Mikhail
);
java.net.MalformedURLException: unknown protocol: ss
5. new URL(ss, 0, -1, null);
java.lang.NullPointerException
Yes, we should follow RI for exception thrown sequence if possible. But for
thise case, would anyone suggest how to throw exception to follow RI?
On 9/14/06, Mikhail Loenko [EMAIL
like this and not stick to IR-level testing.
Sometimes, a performance issue is more sophisticated and we need an
IR-oriented test.
I would vote for having *both* kinds of tests in JIT regression testbase.
P.S.: Are we out of ideas and it's time to implement something?
On 9/14/06, Mikhail Loenko
There are two options supported by Support_Exec: IBM and Sun
I'd like to apply this change (remove IBM branch and leave the Sun branch for
all VMs):
Index: C:/WS/Experiments/support/src/test/java/tests/support/Support_Exec.java
options.
Thanks
Mikhail
(And we'd certainly want to always be able to choose J9 or whatever else
shows up too...)
geir
Oliver Deakin wrote:
Does this mean we could no longer use the IBM VME to run the tests?
Regards,
Oliver
Mikhail Loenko wrote:
There are two options supported
No
sorry for unclear wording, the tests passed on IBM VME
2006/9/14, Oliver Deakin [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Does this mean we could no longer use the IBM VME to run the tests?
Regards,
Oliver
Mikhail Loenko wrote:
There are two options supported by Support_Exec: IBM and Sun
I'd like to apply
I've committed the changes to exclude list. Now the tests should pass
on both linux and windows
Thanks,
Mikhail
2006/9/13, Geir Magnusson Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
And? :)
How did it turn out?
geir
Mikhail Loenko wrote:
I've not tried.
Right after I've send the previous mail all swing
Project: Harmony
Issue Type: Improvement
Components: Classlib
Reporter: Alexander Kleymenov
Assigned To: Mikhail Loenko
Attachments: https-over-proxy-patch.txt, https.patch,
https.proxy.patch.txt, https.txt, key_store.bks, key_store.bks
I see this on both linux and windows. anybody else seeing it?
Class org.apache.harmony.luni.tests.java.lang.MathTest
test_hypot_DD Failure Should return NaN expected:NaN but was:NaN
junit.framework.AssertionFailedError: Should return NaN expected:NaN
but was:NaN at
it works! thanks, Paulex
2006/9/12, Paulex Yang [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Seems caused by r442438, I have recovered part of the update to make the
test pass at revision r442527, please verify.
Mikhail Loenko wrote:
I see this on both linux and windows. anybody else seeing it?
Class
: Improvement
Components: Classlib
Environment: ws2003
Reporter: Alexei Zakharov
Assigned To: Mikhail Loenko
Attachments: CustomizedPDTest4.patch
The attached patch contains implementation of persistence delegate for all
dynamic proxy objects
I'm trying to exclude all the swing tests that fail on linux.
But every time I run, exclude failuing tests and rerun, new tests fail
or hang up.
And it looks endless.
any receipt?
Thanks,
Mikhail
-
Terms of use :
, Mikhail Loenko wrote:
I'm trying to exclude all the swing tests that fail on linux.
But every time I run, exclude failuing tests and rerun, new tests fail
or hang up.
And it looks endless.
any receipt?
Thanks,
Mikhail
--
Terms of use
/12/06, Mikhail Loenko wrote:
I'm trying to exclude all the swing tests that fail on linux.
But every time I run, exclude failuing tests and rerun, new tests fail
or hang up.
And it looks endless.
any receipt?
Thanks,
Mikhail
Hi Denis,
thanks for you patch!
could you please add some comments, why you think this change is necessary?
Thanks,
Mikhail
2006/9/12, Denis Kishenko (JIRA) [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HARMONY-1439?page=comments#action_12434133
]
Denis Kishenko commented
Actually on other externals we are not liked to latest.
At least we discuss here each time we move to a newer version
of Junit or BouncyCastle provider
Thanks,
Mikihail
2006/9/12, Alexey Petrenko [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Great! Jars are better then the full snashot of 15Mbytes.
Is that possible to
Alexei Z, do you agree with what Alexey V. suggests?
Thanks,
Mikhail
2006/9/11, Alexey Varlamov (JIRA) [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HARMONY-1408?page=comments#action_12433782
]
Alexey Varlamov commented on HARMONY-1408:
use this instead
http://www.dlldump.com/dllfiles/M/MSVCR71.dll
i've not changed the build as the old link still may recover
Thanks,
Mikhail
2006/9/8, Alexey Petrenko [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
The dlldump.com was down for a few days when 1362 was created. It
became up for a few days then. And now
OK, done
2006/9/8, Nataly Naumova [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Mikhail,
maybe you'll change the link (in make\depends.properties)
nevertheless. The new link is more stable, but the old link gets
broken very often.
--
Nataly Naumova,
Intel Middleware Products Division
On 9/8/06, Mikhail Loenko [EMAIL
Cool!
2006/9/8, George Harley (JIRA) [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Contribution of Java code for package java.lang.management
--
Key: HARMONY-1407
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HARMONY-1407
Hi Miguel
Thanks for your patches! Could you please grant ASF license to them?
Thanks,
Mikhail
2006/9/7, Miguel Montes (JIRA) [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Code for reading and writing binary DTDs using ASN.1 encoding
-
Key:
+1
2006/9/7, Geir Magnusson Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
All is in order and in SVN for Harmony-1225 wrt BCC and ACQ. I think
that this an important patch so we can get better 1.5 support et al.
Please vote to accept or reject this set of patches and fixes into the
Apache Harmony class library :
[
Hi Alex
Thanks for the patches!
Could you please grant ASF license to make their inclusion possible?
Thanks,
Mikhail
2006/9/6, Alex Blewitt (JIRA) [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Update to Pack200 decoding libraries
Key: HARMONY-1386
A list of tests for exclude is OK, or a patch to the old patch :)
Thanks,
Mikhail
2006/9/6, Geir Magnusson Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Mikhail Loenko wrote:
Seems like a new patch is a better way.
If apply it as is then some tests fail some hang up...
What would the new patch be? :)
If new
Is there a reason to have two different options for classes and for tests?
Why not have -Dwith.awt.swing for both?
Thanks,
Mikhail
2006/9/6, Alexey Petrenko (JIRA) [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HARMONY-1392?page=all ]
Alexey Petrenko updated HARMONY-1392:
IMHO we should look from the perspective of migrating the apps.
So let's try to make behavior of Harmony + BC provider close
to Sun + Sun's provider
If without the checks the combination Harmony+BC works similar to
Sun+Sun's provider, then let's remove the checks. Otherwise let's
keep it to
Ilya
Does it make sense?
-throw new Error(not yet implemented);
+// sound.00=not yet implemented
+throw new Error(Messages.getString(sound.00)); //$NON-NLS-1$
Thanks,
Mikhail
2006/9/4, Ilya Okomin (JIRA) [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
[
let's talk about it on a different thread
2006/9/5, Denis Kishenko [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
By the way, people what do you think about HARMONY-1110?
Problem is we have to reproduce behavior of pattern parser without
specification. There is only one example in Java doc which doesn't
allow understand
-party awt code?
Thanks,
Mikhail
2006/9/5, Mikhail Loenko (JIRA) [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HARMONY-1297?page=all ]
Mikhail Loenko reassigned HARMONY-1297:
---
Assignee: Mikhail Loenko
Dependencies for awt native
Seems like a new patch is a better way.
If apply it as is then some tests fail some hang up...
Thanks,
Mikhail
2006/8/31, Geir Magnusson Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Well, that's 3 days :)
+1 from geir, alexey, vladimir, Ilya, the other alexey, sergey, mark,
oleg, paulex, mikhail, kenny,
no
We have recently starting internationalization of existing modules
(thanks to all people involved!)
Now when we submit new patches and apply old ones let's make sure that
we don't break internationalization for the modules that were already
internationalized!
Thanks,
Mikhail
1 - 100 of 543 matches
Mail list logo
