Vladimir,
I've applied both patches, but `segfault` is reproducible nevertheless.
gdb says that:
(gdb) run Hello
Starting program:
/export/lab_drlbuild/test_tmp/20060719/trunk/build/lnx_ia32_gcc_debug/deploy/jre/bin/ij
Hello
[Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled]
[New Thread 1083593376
Apparently segfault disappears if one replaces the hyzlib library
(which is compiled from re-distributed zlib at
modules\archive\src\main\native\zlib_dist) with the natural libz
which comes with the Linux installation (I'm using GCC 3.3.4 as well).
It seems there is still a conflict between drlvm
Probably I've understood the reason of the segmentation fault on Linux
platform.
I almost sure it is related with the build system. An argument why I think
so is the following.
The basic_istringstream() class from the /usr/include/g++/sstream include
should be used
to construct the
Ignore please my previous e-mail. I was slightly mistaken :-(.
Thanks,
Vladimir.
On 7/18/06, Vladimir Gorr [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Probably I've understood the reason of the segmentation fault on Linux
platform.
I almost sure it is related with the build system. An argument why I think
so
The reason of the 'seg fault' issue is clear for me now.
I see this issue occurs when I used the gcc of 3.4.2 version.
All works fine for the *gcc (GCC) 3.3.3 (SuSE Linux).*
Could anybody else confirm or deny this?
Thanks in advance,
Vladimir.
On 7/18/06, Vladimir Gorr [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Vladimir and all,
I've compiled with gcc 3.3.4 and received `seg faults` since July,08
till now. I'm not applying any patches, and take just *pure* drlvm
from SVN.
DRLVM build for July,05 is fine, then the build was broken (on linux).
Maybe we should look through the commits since July,05 till
Nataly,
I believe you need to accept both patches mentioned by Silikh in the initial
e-mail of this thread,
namely, H-898 H-853. Could you please check if the 'seg fault' issue
disappears for gcc 3.3.4
as well?
Thanks,
Vladimir.
On 7/18/06, Nataly Naumova [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Vladimir
Hi,
Can anyone share their experience on running DRLVM built from SVN?
On my workstations, it requires several fixes in order to run properly:
HARMONY-898 'workaround to get correct hythr.dll' (both for Linux and Windows)
HARMONY-853 'DRLVM+classlib segfaults in hyzlib' (on Linux)
Without
On 7/17/06, Salikh Zakirov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Can anyone share their experience on running DRLVM built from SVN?
Removing classlib from drlvm build is a big improvement. At this
point, I develop only on windows. No recent experience with the Linux
build. ant seems to have
Geir Magnusson Jr wrote:
Without HARMONY-898, DRLVM segfaults after reading NULL from TLS.
Without HARMONY-853, DRLVM segfaults in libhyzlib.so on Linux.
Odd - I don't think I have those problems, since the tests that do run
pass on my box. Adding a test to show this would be good.
The
Salikh Zakirov wrote:
Geir Magnusson Jr wrote:
I'd like to see us figure out the hythr problem, since 898 is a hack to
just work around what seems to be an important issue. can we grind this
one out?
A couple of words in defense of HARMONY-898.
The classlib doesn't depend on a
On 7/17/06, Salikh Zakirov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Can anyone share their experience on running DRLVM built from SVN?
On my workstations, it requires several fixes in order to run properly:
HARMONY-898 'workaround to get correct hythr.dll' (both for Linux and
Windows)
HARMONY-853
12 matches
Mail list logo
