On 11/23/05, Graeme Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 'make' also simplifies the bootstrapping issue. When you are doing the
> initial port of the VM to a new platform, and you don't have java
> running yet, having your build instructions encoded in Ant is problematic.
>
Well, good point. Howe
Matt Benson wrote:
--- Ashish Ranjan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
that is the most convincing argument till now. :-)
+1 from an Ant PMC member. That logic is irrefutable.
:)
-Matt
What about cross-compilation/cross-building ? If harmony is to be
successful in its goal of wid
--- Ashish Ranjan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> that is the most convincing argument till now. :-)
+1 from an Ant PMC member. That logic is irrefutable.
:)
-Matt
> bye :-)
> Ashish Ranjan
> India
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> On 11/23/05, Graeme Johnson
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > Tim E
that is the most convincing argument till now. :-)
bye :-)
Ashish Ranjan
India
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 11/23/05, Graeme Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Tim Ellison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 11/21/2005 07:17:16 AM:
>
> > Andrey Chernyshev wrote:
> > > On 11/15/05, Tim Ellison <[EMAIL PROTE
Tim Ellison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 11/21/2005 07:17:16 AM:
> Andrey Chernyshev wrote:
> > On 11/15/05, Tim Ellison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >>In the end we decided to go with a 'conventional' native code tool set
> >>for the native source, and 'conventional' Java code tools for the
On Mon, Nov 21, 2005 at 12:17:16PM +, Tim Ellison wrote:
> There is a distinction to be drawn between the portability of the
> 'product' (i.e. the VM, class libaries, tools, etc.) that we are
> building, and the portability of the toolsuite that is used to build it.
Hmm.
> I'm not convinced
Andrey Chernyshev wrote:
> On 11/15/05, Tim Ellison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>>In the end we decided to go with a 'conventional' native code tool set
>>for the native source, and 'conventional' Java code tools for the Java
>>source. People just felt more comfortable with that.
>>
>>Do you thi
On 11/15/05, Tim Ellison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> In the end we decided to go with a 'conventional' native code tool set
> for the native source, and 'conventional' Java code tools for the Java
> source. People just felt more comfortable with that.
>
> Do you think we are missing out on someth
Andrey Chernyshev wrote:
> Hello,
>
> First of all, good job with this class libraries contribution!
Thanks Andrey (on behalf of a wide group of people who worked hard to
make it happen).
> Sorry for being late, but I have one question related to build. I
> noticed that make is used to build nat
Hello,
First of all, good job with this class libraries contribution!
Sorry for being late, but I have one question related to build. I
noticed that make is used to build native sources. Did you try using
ant cpptask? If yes, what kind of issues did you face that influenced
the choice in favor of
On Nov 12, 2005, at 10:24 AM, Mark Wielaard wrote:
Hi Tim,
On Wed, 2005-11-09 at 16:56 +, Tim Ellison wrote:
I agree that getting a resolution to the community/licensing
differences
would be fantastic. I don't see that happening quickly, and I don't
want to see the success or failure
Hi Tim,
On Sun, 2005-11-13 at 23:32 +, Tim Ellison wrote:
> Mark Wielaard wrote:
> > I believe people are really reluctant to hack on the [new] code
> > while there is a legal limbo whether it can be included into the
> > other code bases out there
>
> I hope that I've misunderstood your comm
Mark Wielaard wrote:
> On Wed, 2005-11-09 at 16:56 +, Tim Ellison wrote:
>
>>I agree that getting a resolution to the community/licensing differences
>>would be fantastic. I don't see that happening quickly, and I don't
>>want to see the success or failure of a development project gated upon
>
Hi Geir,
On Wed, 2005-11-09 at 11:27 -0500, Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
> On Nov 9, 2005, at 10:37 AM, Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
> > On Nov 9, 2005, at 6:17 AM, Mark Wielaard wrote:
> >>
> >> Would IBM be willing to assign this code to the FSF for inclusion
> >> in GNU Classpath or contribute it u
Hi Tim,
On Wed, 2005-11-09 at 16:56 +, Tim Ellison wrote:
> Mark Wielaard wrote:
> > Right! I have been thinking on how to move forward with this. And I am
> > excited to see some core class library code since that is where my
> > expertise is. Obviously we should be able to extend this easily
@incubator.apache.org
cc
Subject
Re: Code contribution to harmony
Hi Jean-Frederic,
It sounds like you do not have a compatible VM to run with (i.e. a VM that
implements the proposed interface to the class libraries). As mentioned by
Tim the other day you can obtain one from the IBM developerWorks site
ot found (required by
/home/jfclere/harmony/Harmony/deploy/jre/bin/default/libj9thr23.so))
+++
George
Jean-frederic Clere <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
09/11/2005 22:56
Please respond to
harmony-dev@incubator.apache.org
To
harmony-dev@incubator.apache.org
cc
Subject
Re: Code contribut
.
Best regards,
George
George Harley1/UK/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
09/11/2005 23:54
Please respond to
harmony-dev@incubator.apache.org
To
harmony-dev@incubator.apache.org
cc
Subject
Re: Code contribution to harmony
Hi Jean-Frederic,
It sounds like you do not have a compatible VM to run
,
George
Jean-frederic Clere <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
09/11/2005 22:56
Please respond to
harmony-dev@incubator.apache.org
To
harmony-dev@incubator.apache.org
cc
Subject
Re: Code contribution to harmony
Tim Ellison wrote:
>Jean-frederic Clere wrote:
>
>
>>Note whe
Tim Ellison wrote:
Jean-frederic Clere wrote:
Note when doing ant I get the following:
+++
cc -fpic -DLINUX -D_REENTRANT -O1 -march=pentium3
-DIPv6_FUNCTION_SUPPORT -DHYX86 -DHYPORT_LIBRARY_DEFINE
-I../include -c -o hyvmem.o hyvmem.c
hyvmem.c: In function `hyvmem_reserve_memory':
hyvme
Jean-frederic Clere wrote:
> Note when doing ant I get the following:
> +++
> cc -fpic -DLINUX -D_REENTRANT -O1 -march=pentium3
> -DIPv6_FUNCTION_SUPPORT -DHYX86 -DHYPORT_LIBRARY_DEFINE
> -I../include -c -o hyvmem.o hyvmem.c
> hyvmem.c: In function `hyvmem_reserve_memory':
> hyvmem.c:311: `SH
Note when doing ant I get the following:
+++
cc -fpic -DLINUX -D_REENTRANT -O1 -march=pentium3
-DIPv6_FUNCTION_SUPPORT -DHYX86 -DHYPORT_LIBRARY_DEFINE
-I../include -c -o hyvmem.o hyvmem.c
hyvmem.c: In function `hyvmem_reserve_memory':
hyvmem.c:311: `SHM_HUGETLB' undeclared (first use in t
: Code contribution to harmony
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I'm delighted to be able to make a code contribution to the Harmony
project on behalf of IBM. The code comprises a concrete implementation
of the interface between virtual machine and class library that we have
been discussi
Mark Wielaard wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, 2005-11-08 at 16:13 +, Stefano Mazzocchi wrote:
>
>>Tim Ellison wrote:
>>
>>>I'm delighted to be able to make a code contribution to the Harmony
>>>project on behalf of IBM.
>>
>>Let's the harmonization process begin :-)
>
>
> Right! I have been thinki
On Nov 9, 2005, at 10:37 AM, Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
On Nov 9, 2005, at 6:17 AM, Mark Wielaard wrote:
Would IBM be willing to assign this code to the FSF for inclusion
in GNU
Classpath or contribute it under a GPL-compatible license like MIT/X,
W3C, etc. so that it can be mixed and mer
On Nov 9, 2005, at 10:37 AM, Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
On Nov 9, 2005, at 6:17 AM, Mark Wielaard wrote:
Hi,
On Tue, 2005-11-08 at 16:13 +, Stefano Mazzocchi wrote:
Tim Ellison wrote:
I'm delighted to be able to make a code contribution to the Harmony
project on behalf of IBM.
Let's
On Nov 9, 2005, at 6:17 AM, Mark Wielaard wrote:
Hi,
On Tue, 2005-11-08 at 16:13 +, Stefano Mazzocchi wrote:
Tim Ellison wrote:
I'm delighted to be able to make a code contribution to the Harmony
project on behalf of IBM.
Let's the harmonization process begin :-)
Right! I have been
Hi,
On Tue, 2005-11-08 at 16:13 +, Stefano Mazzocchi wrote:
> Tim Ellison wrote:
> >
> > I'm delighted to be able to make a code contribution to the Harmony
> > project on behalf of IBM.
>
> Let's the harmonization process begin :-)
Right! I have been thinking on how to move forward with th
Tim Ellison wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I'm delighted to be able to make a code contribution to the Harmony
project on behalf of IBM.
Right on :-)
Let's the harmonization process begin :-)
--
Stefano.
AWESOME!! thanks guys.
-- dims
On 11/8/05, Tim Ellison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Tim Ellison wrote:
> > I'll post the URL for the VM download (as soon as I know it) as a
> > follow-up to this mail -- it could take a couple of days to organize.
>
> Hey, the DeveloperWorks download is available
Tim Ellison wrote:
> I'll post the URL for the VM download (as soon as I know it) as a
> follow-up to this mail -- it could take a couple of days to organize.
Hey, the DeveloperWorks download is available now:
http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/java/jdk/harmony
Any questions just shout.
Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
> Thanks Tim!
>
> 4) To that end, I can think of a few things we can do to get started :
>
> a) Get our own current crop of VMs working with it - bootVM and jcheVM.
>
And I am hoping a lot to see a combination of both emerge ...
> b) Help to get Kaffe working with t
Thanks Tim!
A few comments, wearing my Apache hat of course (n.b I am an IBM
employee as well).
0) We need to go through the bulk contribution process for this
donation (of course). I have an outstanding to-do on that, which is
to wrap up the bulk contrib rules. I have a proposal that I
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I'm delighted to be able to make a code contribution to the Harmony
project on behalf of IBM. The code comprises a concrete implementation
of the interface between virtual machine and class library that we have
been discussing recently, together with
34 matches
Mail list logo
