On 11/23/05, Graeme Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
'make' also simplifies the bootstrapping issue. When you are doing the
initial port of the VM to a new platform, and you don't have java
running yet, having your build instructions encoded in Ant is problematic.
Well, good point. However,
Tim Ellison [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 11/21/2005 07:17:16 AM:
Andrey Chernyshev wrote:
On 11/15/05, Tim Ellison [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In the end we decided to go with a 'conventional' native code tool set
for the native source, and 'conventional' Java code tools for the Java
source.
that is the most convincing argument till now. :-)
bye :-)
Ashish Ranjan
India
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 11/23/05, Graeme Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Tim Ellison [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 11/21/2005 07:17:16 AM:
Andrey Chernyshev wrote:
On 11/15/05, Tim Ellison [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Matt Benson wrote:
--- Ashish Ranjan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
that is the most convincing argument till now. :-)
+1 from an Ant PMC member. That logic is irrefutable.
:)
-Matt
What about cross-compilation/cross-building ? If harmony is to be
successful in its goal of wide
On 11/15/05, Tim Ellison [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In the end we decided to go with a 'conventional' native code tool set
for the native source, and 'conventional' Java code tools for the Java
source. People just felt more comfortable with that.
Do you think we are missing out on something
Andrey Chernyshev wrote:
On 11/15/05, Tim Ellison [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In the end we decided to go with a 'conventional' native code tool set
for the native source, and 'conventional' Java code tools for the Java
source. People just felt more comfortable with that.
Do you think we are
On Mon, Nov 21, 2005 at 12:17:16PM +, Tim Ellison wrote:
There is a distinction to be drawn between the portability of the
'product' (i.e. the VM, class libaries, tools, etc.) that we are
building, and the portability of the toolsuite that is used to build it.
Hmm.
I'm not convinced of
of make?
Andrey Chernyshev
Intel Managed Runtime Division
On Nov 8, 2005, at 5:49 AM, Tim Ellison wrote:
I'm delighted to be able to make a code contribution to the Harmony
project on behalf of IBM. The code comprises a concrete implementation
of the interface between virtual machine
Andrey Chernyshev wrote:
Hello,
First of all, good job with this class libraries contribution!
Thanks Andrey (on behalf of a wide group of people who worked hard to
make it happen).
Sorry for being late, but I have one question related to build. I
noticed that make is used to build native
Hi Tim,
On Wed, 2005-11-09 at 16:56 +, Tim Ellison wrote:
Mark Wielaard wrote:
Right! I have been thinking on how to move forward with this. And I am
excited to see some core class library code since that is where my
expertise is. Obviously we should be able to extend this easily with
Hi Geir,
On Wed, 2005-11-09 at 11:27 -0500, Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
On Nov 9, 2005, at 10:37 AM, Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
On Nov 9, 2005, at 6:17 AM, Mark Wielaard wrote:
Would IBM be willing to assign this code to the FSF for inclusion
in GNU Classpath or contribute it under a
(required by
/home/jfclere/harmony/Harmony/deploy/jre/bin/default/libj9thr23.so))
+++
George
Jean-frederic Clere [EMAIL PROTECTED]
09/11/2005 22:56
Please respond to
harmony-dev@incubator.apache.org
To
harmony-dev@incubator.apache.org
cc
Subject
Re: Code contribution to harmony
@incubator.apache.org
cc
Subject
Re: Code contribution to harmony
Hi Jean-Frederic,
It sounds like you do not have a compatible VM to run with (i.e. a VM that
implements the proposed interface to the class libraries). As mentioned by
Tim the other day you can obtain one from the IBM developerWorks site
Hi,
On Tue, 2005-11-08 at 16:13 +, Stefano Mazzocchi wrote:
Tim Ellison wrote:
I'm delighted to be able to make a code contribution to the Harmony
project on behalf of IBM.
Let's the harmonization process begin :-)
Right! I have been thinking on how to move forward
On Nov 9, 2005, at 6:17 AM, Mark Wielaard wrote:
Hi,
On Tue, 2005-11-08 at 16:13 +, Stefano Mazzocchi wrote:
Tim Ellison wrote:
I'm delighted to be able to make a code contribution to the Harmony
project on behalf of IBM.
Let's the harmonization process begin :-)
Right! I have been
On Nov 9, 2005, at 10:37 AM, Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
On Nov 9, 2005, at 6:17 AM, Mark Wielaard wrote:
Hi,
On Tue, 2005-11-08 at 16:13 +, Stefano Mazzocchi wrote:
Tim Ellison wrote:
I'm delighted to be able to make a code contribution to the Harmony
project on behalf of IBM
On Nov 9, 2005, at 10:37 AM, Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
On Nov 9, 2005, at 6:17 AM, Mark Wielaard wrote:
Would IBM be willing to assign this code to the FSF for inclusion
in GNU
Classpath or contribute it under a GPL-compatible license like MIT/X,
W3C, etc. so that it can be mixed and
Mark Wielaard wrote:
Hi,
On Tue, 2005-11-08 at 16:13 +, Stefano Mazzocchi wrote:
Tim Ellison wrote:
I'm delighted to be able to make a code contribution to the Harmony
project on behalf of IBM.
Let's the harmonization process begin :-)
Right! I have been thinking on how to move
@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Code contribution to harmony
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I'm delighted to be able to make a code contribution to the Harmony
project on behalf of IBM. The code comprises a concrete implementation
of the interface between virtual machine and class library that we
Note when doing ant I get the following:
+++
cc -fpic -DLINUX -D_REENTRANT -O1 -march=pentium3
-DIPv6_FUNCTION_SUPPORT -DHYX86 -DHYPORT_LIBRARY_DEFINE
-I../include -c -o hyvmem.o hyvmem.c
hyvmem.c: In function `hyvmem_reserve_memory':
hyvmem.c:311: `SHM_HUGETLB' undeclared (first use in
Jean-frederic Clere wrote:
Note when doing ant I get the following:
+++
cc -fpic -DLINUX -D_REENTRANT -O1 -march=pentium3
-DIPv6_FUNCTION_SUPPORT -DHYX86 -DHYPORT_LIBRARY_DEFINE
-I../include -c -o hyvmem.o hyvmem.c
hyvmem.c: In function `hyvmem_reserve_memory':
hyvmem.c:311:
Tim Ellison wrote:
Jean-frederic Clere wrote:
Note when doing ant I get the following:
+++
cc -fpic -DLINUX -D_REENTRANT -O1 -march=pentium3
-DIPv6_FUNCTION_SUPPORT -DHYX86 -DHYPORT_LIBRARY_DEFINE
-I../include -c -o hyvmem.o hyvmem.c
hyvmem.c: In function `hyvmem_reserve_memory':
,
George
Jean-frederic Clere [EMAIL PROTECTED]
09/11/2005 22:56
Please respond to
harmony-dev@incubator.apache.org
To
harmony-dev@incubator.apache.org
cc
Subject
Re: Code contribution to harmony
Tim Ellison wrote:
Jean-frederic Clere wrote:
Note when doing ant I get the following
.
Best regards,
George
George Harley1/UK/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
09/11/2005 23:54
Please respond to
harmony-dev@incubator.apache.org
To
harmony-dev@incubator.apache.org
cc
Subject
Re: Code contribution to harmony
Hi Jean-Frederic,
It sounds like you do not have a compatible VM to run
, 2005, at 5:49 AM, Tim Ellison wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I'm delighted to be able to make a code contribution to the Harmony
project on behalf of IBM. The code comprises a concrete
implementation
of the interface between virtual machine and class library that we
Tim Ellison wrote:
I'll post the URL for the VM download (as soon as I know it) as a
follow-up to this mail -- it could take a couple of days to organize.
Hey, the DeveloperWorks download is available now:
http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/java/jdk/harmony
Any questions just shout.
AWESOME!! thanks guys.
-- dims
On 11/8/05, Tim Ellison [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Tim Ellison wrote:
I'll post the URL for the VM download (as soon as I know it) as a
follow-up to this mail -- it could take a couple of days to organize.
Hey, the DeveloperWorks download is available now:
27 matches
Mail list logo
