been implemented by ITC in
their in place operations in BigInteger.
Thanks,
Elena
-Original Message-
From: Vladimir Gorr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, April 23, 2006 7:28 PM
To: harmony-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: ITC's java.math package contribution
If we
Chris Gray wrote:
On Sunday 23 April 2006 02:07, Daniel Fridlender wrote:
I also agree with [Vladimir] that it would be really nice to have a
representative collection of realistic applications of the
functionality of java.math. RSA key generation is definitely one of
them. We should find
On Sunday 23 April 2006 02:07, Daniel Fridlender wrote:
I also agree with [Vladimir] that it would be really nice to have a
representative collection of realistic applications of the
functionality of java.math. RSA key generation is definitely one of
them. We should find more. That would
Message-
From: Daniel Fridlender [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, April 21, 2006 2:52 AM
To: harmony-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: ITC's java.math package contribution
Dear all,
on behalf of ITC I have updated our contribution
-Original Message-
From: Daniel Fridlender [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, April 21, 2006 2:52 AM
To: harmony-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: ITC's java.math package contribution
Dear all,
on behalf of ITC I have
Hi Geir,
The 1.5 spec includes an Enum which is used in BigDecimal.
But we surely can compile to 1.4 bytecode the part of the
implementation that corresponds to the 1.4 API.
Regards,
Daniel Fridlender
On 4/21/06, Geir Magnusson Jr [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Daniel Fridlender wrote:
Dear
-Original Message-
From: Daniel Fridlender [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, April 21, 2006 2:52 AM
To: harmony-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: ITC's java.math package contribution
Dear all,
on behalf of ITC I have updated our contribution of the package
Hi Stefano,
I would be really surprised if a change in the VM has a significative
impact on the relative performance of the two implementations. The
difference in performance is due to the internal representation and to
the implemented algorithms. But sure, it would be interesting to
compare
: ITC's java.math package contribution
Dear all,
on behalf of ITC I have updated our contribution of the package
java.math including some recent optimizations (HARMONY-199). I think
it would be interesting to compare our implementation with the one
donated by Intel
: ITC's java.math package contribution
Dear all,
on behalf of ITC I have updated our contribution of the package
java.math including some recent optimizations (HARMONY-199). I think
it would be interesting to compare our implementation with the one
donated by Intel (HARMONY-39). In order
Daniel Fridlender wrote:
Dear all,
on behalf of ITC I have updated our contribution of the package
java.math including some recent optimizations (HARMONY-199). I think
it would be interesting to compare our implementation with the one
donated by Intel (HARMONY-39). In order to do that, it
PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, April 21, 2006 2:52 AM
To: harmony-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: ITC's java.math package contribution
Dear all,
on behalf of ITC I have updated our contribution of the package
java.math including some recent optimizations (HARMONY-199). I think
Hi Vladimir,
Yes, I can make our results public of course. We have tested both
implementations for RSA key generation, which is a mix of random prime
generation and modular arithmetic (such as multiplicative inverse
calculation).
The testing platform was:
CPU: Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 2.26GHz
Message-
From: Daniel Fridlender [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, April 21, 2006 2:52 AM
To: harmony-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: ITC's java.math package contribution
Dear all,
on behalf of ITC I have updated our contribution of the package
java.math including some
Daniel Fridlender wrote:
Hi Vladimir,
Yes, I can make our results public of course. We have tested both
implementations for RSA key generation, which is a mix of random prime
generation and modular arithmetic (such as multiplicative inverse
calculation).
The testing platform was:
CPU:
Fridlender [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, April 21, 2006 2:52 AM
To: harmony-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: ITC's java.math package contribution
Dear all,
on behalf of ITC I have updated our contribution of the package
java.math including some recent optimizations
Dear all,
on behalf of ITC I have updated our contribution of the package
java.math including some recent optimizations (HARMONY-199). I think
it would be interesting to compare our implementation with the one
donated by Intel (HARMONY-39). In order to do that, it would be nice
to have a
Hi Daniel,
indeed it makes sense to compare the performance both implementations of
java.math package
using the real applications. If you have any results could you plase to make
them public?
I want to look at them. Besides I'd pefer to slightly correct you about the
SVN repository already
18 matches
Mail list logo
