On May 14, 2005, at 7:39 PM, Davanum Srinivas wrote:
Leo
We can use the con call next week as the forum.
Yes please - we have an ongoing conversation with the FSF on
licensing issues, and we can just add this to the list.
Folks,
Just to summarize *Ideally* what we would like, here's a list:
- We
On May 14, 2005, at 9:35 PM, Sven de Marothy wrote:
- Harmonization of developer-demands. Classpath requires clean-room
status
(i.e. hasn't seen Sun's code) and FSF assignment (with rights
granted back).
Harmony will require some form of clean-roomness and an Apache
licensing agreement.
Seems
On 5/15/05, Mark Brooks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >To be clear, so as no-one feels they've been misled in the future, this
> is
> >not what we'd like in the best of all possible worlds. In that world,
> >classpath would be relicensed under the AL, or a compatible licence.
> >
> >What's liste
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That's a bit knee jerk. Far more value could be found from working
together. We have more in common than not. If we learn to compromise
and work together, the gains will be tremendous. Seperately we're all a
bunch of qubbling groups who produce pieces of Java that ar
On Sun, 2005-05-15 at 12:59 -0400, Mark Brooks wrote:
> Respectfully, perhaps the mistake is not going ahead and developing a class
> library specifically for this project.
>
> I realize that is a lot of work, but perhaps it would be better to do that
> work than to use code from another project
That's a bit knee jerk. Far more value could be found from working
together. We have more in common than not. If we learn to compromise
and work together, the gains will be tremendous. Seperately we're all a
bunch of qubbling groups who produce pieces of Java that are interesting
and maybe
To be clear, so as no-one feels they've been misled in the future, this is
not what we'd like in the best of all possible worlds. In that world,
classpath would be relicensed under the AL, or a compatible licence.
What's listed above is a position we can live with.
Cheers,
Ben.
Respectfully, per
> On 5/14/05, Leo Simons <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> (Harmony people: replies only on the classpath mailing list please, this has
>> in reality only little to do with harmony.)
I really hate crossposts. Oh well.
On 15-05-2005 01:39, "Davanum Srinivas" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> We can use the
Davanum Srinivas wrote:
Leo
We can use the con call next week as the forum.
Folks,
Just to summarize *Ideally* what we would like, here's a list:
- We don't want to modify any classpath code. If we need changes, we
can work with classpath folks.
- We don't want to add classpath sources to our tre
Sven,
yep...am hoping Harmony folks would help with classpath too under
classpath terms and conditions of course.
-- dims
On 5/14/05, Sven de Marothy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Given andy's post here, I should re-phrase my own wording:
>
> On Sun, 2005-05-15 at 03:35 +0200, Sven de Marothy wr
Given andy's post here, I should re-phrase my own wording:
On Sun, 2005-05-15 at 03:35 +0200, Sven de Marothy wrote:
> Davanum Srinivas wrote:
> > - We don't want to modify any classpath code. If we need changes, we
> > can work with classpath folks.
> > - We don't want to add classpath sources to
Hi,
As a Classpath hacker (but by no means an important one)
here are my comments:
Davanum Srinivas wrote:
> - We don't want to modify any classpath code. If we need changes, we
> can work with classpath folks.
> - We don't want to add classpath sources to our tree. this will avoid
> local change
I agree with what you mean but don't like your wording. I may
personally love to help fix the occassional nit in classpath if its in
the way of harmony and will very cooperatively contribute it to
classpath. If I don't feel qualified to do it or thing others may be
better suited I'll kindly s
Leo
We can use the con call next week as the forum.
Folks,
Just to summarize *Ideally* what we would like, here's a list:
- We don't want to modify any classpath code. If we need changes, we
can work with classpath folks.
- We don't want to add classpath sources to our tree. this will avoid
loca
Hi classpath developers!
(Harmony people: replies only on the classpath mailing list please, this has
in reality only little to do with harmony.)
"Oh no, not all that licensing crap again!"
As part of the ongoing investigation whether the new Apache Harmony project
can legally use GNU Classpath
15 matches
Mail list logo
