Olivier dixit:
ok, I just tested myself on Windows and it seems that the RI ignores
environment variable changes, so I guess it's fine if we stick with what
we have in Harmony.
Now that I think about it, I remember someone complaining once on a Java
newsgroup that changing the CLASSPATH
Chris Gray wrote:
Olivier dixit:
ok, I just tested myself on Windows and it seems that the RI ignores
environment variable changes, so I guess it's fine if we
stick with what
we have in Harmony.
Now that I think about it, I remember someone complaining
once on a Java newsgroup that
Leo Li wrote:
Hi,
On 8/21/06, Geir Magnusson Jr [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Oliver Deakin wrote:
Leo Li wrote:
Hi, Oli:
It is really a problem that System.getenv fails to behave as
RI on
windows. I will fix it by get env string out by os function such
as getenvironmentvariable and
Hi,
On 8/21/06, Geir Magnusson Jr [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Oliver Deakin wrote:
Leo Li wrote:
Hi, Oli:
It is really a problem that System.getenv fails to behave as RI on
windows. I will fix it by get env string out by os function such
as getenvironmentvariable and getenv. Thank you
Leo Li wrote:
Hi, Oli:
It is really a problem that System.getenv fails to behave as RI on
windows. I will fix it by get env string out by os function such
as getenvironmentvariable and getenv. Thank you for your tips.
Thanks for looking at fixing this Leo :)
Besides, the returned
Oliver Deakin wrote:
Leo Li wrote:
Hi, Oli:
It is really a problem that System.getenv fails to behave as RI on
windows. I will fix it by get env string out by os function such
as getenvironmentvariable and getenv. Thank you for your tips.
Thanks for looking at fixing this Leo :)
Oli
Thanks Leo for volunteering, I've checked in his patch for HARMONY-1155
at revision r431560, i.e., the implementation of Environment class,
would you help to verify if that implementation is OK to use? or it
takes effect automatically at once? Thank you.
Oliver Deakin wrote:
Leo Li
Hi Paulex,
Thanks also to Leo for providing this implementation. I tried a couple
of simple
tests on Windows on the getenv() and getenv(String) methods.
The getenv() method seems to work fine, giving me a list of the
environment properties.
I compared this list to those output by the Sun
Hi, Oli:
It is really a problem that System.getenv fails to behave as RI on
windows. I will fix it by get env string out by os function such
as getenvironmentvariable and getenv. Thank you for your tips.
Besides, the returned environment variables is only defined in
the process of the java
Hi, Oliver:
I am willing to implement the
org.apache.harmony.luni.platform.Environment class with
the two getenv() methods.
Good luck!
On 8/8/06, Geir Magnusson Jr [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Great news.
In the future, could you please prefix the subject line with something
appropriate,
Oliver Deakin wrote:
Hi all,
I'm pleased to announce that a new 5.0 level IBM VME will be made
available soon at:
http://www-128.ibm.com/developerworks/java/jdk/harmony/index.html
The new VME downloads are named Harmony-vme-win.IA32-v4.zip and
Harmony-vme-linux.IA32-v4.tar.gz. I would like
Leo Li wrote:
Hi, Oliver:
I am willing to implement the
org.apache.harmony.luni.platform.Environment class with
the two getenv() methods.
Great, thanks for volunteering Leo!
Good luck!
On 8/8/06, Geir Magnusson Jr [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Great news.
In the future, could you
Eager to hear sounds of testNG :)
Yeah, but we still need working implementation of java.util.concurrent
to run 1.5 version of TestNG..
2006/8/8, Jimmy, Jing Lv [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Oliver Deakin wrote:
Hi all,
I'm pleased to announce that a new 5.0 level IBM VME will be made
available
I have checked fresh classlib + drlvm + harmony-1084 classlib patch.
Smoke tests work fine for me.
--
Ivan
On 8/8/06, Alexei Zakharov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Eager to hear sounds of testNG :)
Yeah, but we still need working implementation of java.util.concurrent
to run 1.5 version of
Thanks! We seem goot to got then... Java 5, here we come :)
-Original Message-
From: Ivan Volosyuk [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, August 08, 2006 07:55 AM Pacific Standard Time
To: harmony-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject:Re: New IBM VME available soon
I
Great -- here goes...
I'll announce in a separate thread when done.
Tim
Ivan Volosyuk wrote:
I have checked fresh classlib + drlvm + harmony-1084 classlib patch.
Smoke tests work fine for me.
--
Ivan
On 8/8/06, Alexei Zakharov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Eager to hear sounds of testNG :)
Thanks for checking that Ivan, great news that the test run worked ok.
I guess we're about ready to move to 5.0 :)
Regards,
Oliver
Ivan Volosyuk wrote:
I have checked fresh classlib + drlvm + harmony-1084 classlib patch.
Smoke tests work fine for me.
--
Ivan
On 8/8/06, Alexei Zakharov [EMAIL
Hi,
I'm pleased to announce that a new 5.0 level IBM VME will be made
available soon at:
Great!
- Change Java build target from jsr14 to 1.5 :)
Does DRLVM supports 1.5 classes now?
The more specific question: does it support 1.5 annotations?
Thanks,
2006/8/7, Alexey Petrenko [EMAIL
Alexey Petrenko wrote:
Does DRLVM supports 1.5 classes now?
AFAIK, DRLVM accepts 1.5 class files now,
but does not support any of the 1.5 APIs or annotations.
-
Terms of use : http://incubator.apache.org/harmony/mailing.html
Great news.
In the future, could you please prefix the subject line with something
appropriate, like [general]? It helps people prioritize and such...
thanks
Oliver Deakin wrote:
Hi all,
I'm pleased to announce that a new 5.0 level IBM VME will be made
available soon at:
20 matches
Mail list logo
