Yes, Jetty is a good option :-)
Richard Liang
China Software Development Lab, IBM
Geir Magnusson Jr wrote:
Stepan Mishura wrote:
Tim, George, I'd like to resume this topic
Thanks for posting to the dev list :)
There is no way to force a server to send you a chunked response using
On 3/3/06, Geir Magnusson Jr [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...snip...
I believe this approach may be applied for most of cases and allow us to
eliminate dependency on an external server.
And give us tight control to be able to mimic misbehavior on the server
side to be sure that the library behaves
Tim, George, I'd like to resume this topic
There is no way to force a server to send you a chunked response using
regular HTTP headers, so in this case the server and client have an
understanding that when the client asks for a particular resource the
server will send it back in chunks.
I've
Stepan Mishura wrote:
Tim, George, I'd like to resume this topic
Thanks for posting to the dev list :)
There is no way to force a server to send you a chunked response using
regular HTTP headers, so in this case the server and client have an
understanding that when the client asks for a
Geir Magnusson Jr wrote:
George Harley wrote:
Geir Magnusson Jr wrote:
George Harley wrote:
What is the problem with using httpd to test Harmony ?
It's a rather large external dependency. Reminds me of the time we
got the TCK for JavaMail (a story in itself) and the only practical
I agree -- thanks for the patch Stepan.
Regards,
Tim
Stepan Mishura wrote:
Tim,
..snip..
I agree that the tests in HARMONY-71 only need something to accept their
connection, but I was simply pointing out that there will be a local
server we can use if that contribution is accepted into
George Harley wrote:
Geir Magnusson Jr wrote:
George Harley wrote:
What is the problem with using httpd to test Harmony ?
It's a rather large external dependency. Reminds me of the time we
got the TCK for JavaMail (a story in itself) and the only practical
way to use it was to get
Mark Hindess wrote:
But this doesn't mean George is wrong! Because *if* there was a
publically accessible Internet server that already had Apache httpd,
twoftpd (my favourite ftp server this week), Dante socks, etc, then
the scenario I like to optimise becomes possible.
And doesn't work
Tim Ellison wrote:
I'd echo those sentiments.
Geir: how close are you to putting HARMONY-57 to the vote?
I think I have everything, but fear the JIRA! Fear the JIRA! :)
Regards,
Tim
George Harley wrote:
Just want to emphasise something that has possibly got lost in this
thread. To
Stepan Mishura wrote:
I feel that I need to study more details about net testing. Also to
made discussion more concrete and constructive I'll to try to provide
'a proof of concept'. I believe that this won't be a wasted effort
and it won't take too much time. I'm going to select a number of
This sounds like the discussion we had a while ago along the lines of
'what is a reasonable environment we should expect developers/testers to
set-up locally, and what should be stubbed in the test suite itself.'
i.e. which of the following are reasonable items to put in the readme?
go and set-up
Mark Hindess wrote:
I think it might help this disagreement if we step back and decide
what scenarios for running tests we are trying to optimise.
Personally, whenever I write tests I'm doing it to optimise the
scenario where a new users comes to the project and does:
1$ svn co ...
Hi Richard,
Yes, I'm always for simplifying testing routine. And creating a detail guide
for configuring some testing server is a possible way to do it. However I'd
prefer to try to develop a simple local test server that is easy to
configure. I believe that it will cover most of cases.
And I
Stepan Mishura wrote:
On 2/21/06, Tim Ellison [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Stepan Mishura wrote:
I glanced through a local server code from HARMONY-57 contribution
without
looking into implementation details and ... this made me think. I catch
hold
of the following:
1) The server contains
So, does this summarize to :
1) We need a new server or we should enahnce the current one?
2) We need instructions on how to do this.
?
(I hope we don't need httpd to test Harmony...)
Stepan Mishura wrote:
Hi Richard,
Yes, I'm always for simplifying testing routine. And creating a detail
Geir Magnusson Jr wrote:
So, does this summarize to :
1) We need a new server or we should enahnce the current one?
2) We need instructions on how to do this.
?
(I hope we don't need httpd to test Harmony...)
Could you remind me what the current one is ?
What is the problem with using
George Harley wrote:
Geir Magnusson Jr wrote:
George Harley wrote:
Geir Magnusson Jr wrote:
So, does this summarize to :
1) We need a new server or we should enahnce the current one?
2) We need instructions on how to do this.
?
(I hope we don't need httpd to test Harmony...)
Tim Ellison wrote:
George Harley wrote:
Geir Magnusson Jr wrote:
George Harley wrote:
Geir Magnusson Jr wrote:
So, does this summarize to :
1) We need a new server or we should enahnce the current one?
2) We need instructions on how to do this.
?
(I hope we don't
I feel that I need to study more details about net testing. Also to made
discussion more concrete and constructive I'll to try to provide 'a proof of
concept'. I believe that this won't be a wasted effort and it won't take
too much time. I'm going to select a number of 'common testing scenarios',
I think it might help this disagreement if we step back and decide
what scenarios for running tests we are trying to optimise.
Personally, whenever I write tests I'm doing it to optimise the
scenario where a new users comes to the project and does:
1$ svn co ... classlib # or wget/tar if you
Stepan Mishura wrote:
I glanced through a local server code from HARMONY-57 contribution without
looking into implementation details and ... this made me think. I catch hold
of the following:
1) The server contains some testing code that looks not good for me
Care to explain?
2) It is not
Dears,
Agree that server (maybe not local) is required for some sophisticated
test cases. To make thing simply, we may provide more detail guide
(step-by-step) on how to setup/configure a typical testing server. Or
shall we setup a test server and allow user to share our testing server?
Richard Liang wrote:
Dears,
Agree that server (maybe not local) is required for some sophisticated
test cases. To make thing simply, we may provide more detail guide
(step-by-step) on how to setup/configure a typical testing server. Or
shall we setup a test server and allow user to share
On 2/21/06, Tim Ellison [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Stepan Mishura wrote:
I glanced through a local server code from HARMONY-57 contribution
without
looking into implementation details and ... this made me think. I catch
hold
of the following:
1) The server contains some testing code that
24 matches
Mail list logo
