Sorry I havnt replied sooner Thorbjørn - I have been off list the last
few days
or so, and am still wading through all the mail. I think Marks response
summed up
what I was thinking pretty well but Ill go through and check...
Mark Hindess wrote:
On 5 July 2006 at 13:39,
On 5 July 2006 at 13:39, =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Thorbj=F8rn_Ravn_Andersen?= [EMAIL
PROTECTED] wrote:
Oliver Deakin skrev den 27-06-2006 12:25:
Do you mean the header files in deploy/include? If so, the reason
they are copied there is so that they are in a shared location for
all modules. (In
Oliver Deakin skrev den 27-06-2006 12:25:
Do you mean the header files in deploy/include? If so, the reason they
are copied
there is so that they are in a shared location for all modules. (In
fact it's the same
reason that libs are built into deploy/lib and makefile includes are
copied into
Geir Magnusson Jr skrev den 28-06-2006 10:25:
Next step - dlrvm :)
That's excellent. Did all the tests pass for classlib?
Working on it... Doesn't get much done these days.
Can you document this procedure either on the wiki or send as a patch
for the website?
Yes. I think
Thorbjørn Ravn Andersen wrote:
Geir Magnusson Jr skrev den 28-06-2006 10:25:
Next step - dlrvm :)
That's excellent. Did all the tests pass for classlib?
Working on it... Doesn't get much done these days.
Can you document this procedure either on the wiki or send as a patch
Thorbjørn Ravn Andersen wrote:
Gregory Shimansky skrev den 27-06-2006 14:23:
Cool! Thanks for the pointer. This is something new. The date
published is
June 7 2006 which is pretty recent. It happened after I've written my
email
about MASM not available.
Thank you all for your help. I
Thorbjørn Ravn Andersen wrote:
Mark Hindess skrev den 26-06-2006 21:57:
What would a feasible path be from here?
Looks like one of the variables set in one of those empty included
makefiles should be CC set to cl ?
I forgot to state that I somewhat arbitrarily tried doing exactly
On 27 June 2006 at 16:23, Gregory Shimansky [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Anyway, I hope my NASM port will not be discarded because it may
be used to compile Harmony with free as in speech Cygwin or MinGW
toolchains.
It wont!
A while back I looked at the MinGW toolchain, but gave up since with
Gregory Shimansky skrev den 27-06-2006 14:23:
Cool! Thanks for the pointer. This is something new. The date
published is
June 7 2006 which is pretty recent. It happened after I've written my
email
about MASM not available.
Thank you all for your help. I have now managed to build classlib
On 6/27/06, Gregory Shimansky [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
2006/6/27, Rana Dasgupta [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I also read your interesting experiments on the other linked
thread. Microsoft appears to have a new tool mt.exe to embed these
manifests:
mt.exe -manifest someapp.exe.manifest
I have now tried fiddling with Visual Studio C++ Express (free download
for the time being from Microsoft, which would enable me to participate)
to see if I could build classlib with it under Windows XP, but have
failed so far.
I made some progress however. Nmake initially complains that it
On 26 June 2006 at 21:40, =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Thorbj=F8rn_Ravn_Andersen?= [EMAIL
PROTECTED] wrote:
I have now tried fiddling with Visual Studio C++ Express (free download
for the time being from Microsoft, which would enable me to participate)
to see if I could build classlib with it under
Mark Hindess skrev den 26-06-2006 21:57:
What would a feasible path be from here?
Looks like one of the variables set in one of those "empty" included
makefiles should be CC set to cl ?
I forgot to state that I somewhat arbitrarily tried doing exactly that,
but without any
On 6/26/06, Thorbjørn Ravn Andersen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have now tried fiddling with Visual Studio C++ Express (free download
for the time being from Microsoft, which would enable me to participate)
to see if I could build classlib with it under Windows XP, but have
failed so far.
I
On Tuesday 27 June 2006 00:29 Thorbjørn Ravn Andersen wrote:
Mark Hindess skrev den 26-06-2006 21:57:
What would a feasible path be from here?
Looks like one of the variables set in one of those empty included
makefiles should be CC set to cl ?
I forgot to state that I somewhat
On 6/26/06, Gregory Shimansky [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I used to build classlib successfully on WinXP with completely free
environment, that is MS VS.NET http://vs.net/ 2005 Express, MS Platform
SDK Server 2003 R2
and NASM from Cygwin (there is no free MASM with license which allows OSS
16 matches
Mail list logo
