the Maybe monad, then it becomes
hard to use if SomeFunction might raise an error.
Am I missing something?
Doug Ransom
Systems Engineer
Power Measurement Ltd.
http://www.pml.com
250-652-7100 office
250-652-0411 fax
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED
; From: Johan Jeuring [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, December 28, 2000 6:06 AM
> To: Doug Ransom
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Learning Haskell and FP
>
>
> >Is there a good textbook on Functional Programming which
> starts from a base
> >po
That would only work if the haskell mailing list was either delete or
mirrored onto a newsgroup. I would prefer a newsgroup myself for bandwidth
reasons.
> -Original Message-
> From: i r thomas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, December 28, 2000 12:53 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTE
ng" but more advanced in
terms of introducing necessary topics like Category theory, catamorphisms,
monads, etc? I would find such a book very useful, especially if it
concentrated on lazy functional programming.
Doug Ransom
Systems Engineer
Power Measurement Ltd.
http://www.pml.com
250-652-71
I think it is important that a good haskell XML library be included as part
of the haskell runtime library given XML's relevance.
> -Original Message-
> From: Malcolm Wallace [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, November 16, 2000 8:42 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: ANNO
I would think the tool of choice would be XSLT, not Haskell. The saxon xslt
translator is pretty good for command line translation. The microsoft XSLT
latest Beta xslt is good too.
What xml parser are you using XML in haskell? I am familliar with this
stuff: http://www.cs.york.ac.uk/fp/HaXml.
Are there formal semantics for either C# or common runtime?
> -Original Message-
> From: Matthias Kilian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, September 11, 2000 8:32 AM
> To: Andrew Kennedy
> Cc: Erik Meijer; Ketil Malde; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED];
> Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowal
Unfortunately there are only 3 idioms cataloged.
Maybe someone could get a thesis or textbook out of this.
Here is a link to a description of such a book for OO:
http://www.chapters.ca/books/details/default.asp?ISBN=0201633612&mscssid=L5D
5PBN270S92G3S00AKHCJKTTGEF1C7&WSID=1009F699A2218A0411D
I have worked through "Haskell: The craft of functional programming".
Learning the language is one thing, applying FP is another. The next thing
I would like to study would be a catalog of patterns for lazy functional
programming. In the Object-oriented world, there are some catalogs of
useful p
I do
believe FP is current 90 degrees out of phase with OO. I think the isue
with tuples, lists, conses, etc. it the big problem. I currently see no
way for someone to write a clever matrix library in Haskell and have it
seamlessly integrate into the NGWS framework (the new object type and
at the end of the development cycle
trying to find a memory leak.
Doug Ransom
> --Ben
> --
> Benjamin L. Russell
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> "Furuike ya! Kawazu tobikomu mizu no oto." --Matsuo Basho
>
I think most C++ programmers realize C++ for what it is, a poorly designed
portable object oriented assembler language. Most C++ programmers use C++
because they program for windows and COM, and the only other real choices of
development environments are VB and Delphi (which I do not know anything
Interesting results might be generated if Microsoft were to provide the
entire C# team and the team designing the virtual machine 2 weeks to learn
Haskell and play with it.
-Original Message-
From: Tyson Dowd [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, August 09, 2000 9:26 PM
To: Bren
Back to the language wars then.
It does seem like integration of Haskell and the NGWS is a graunch, largely
because Haskell is not OO.
Is there anything preventing Haskell from becoming OO and seamlessly fitting
into the NGWS? Or from designing a functional language that would be a good
fit into
It is not what language that you want on your phone that matters -- you
didn't write the software. What matters is any development team can pick
the language they prefer to use and make their software portable to your
phone or your PC.
-Original Message-
From: Nigel Perry [mailto:[
The PDC slides and white papers should be available if you dig through this
site:
http://commnet.pdc.mscorpevents.com/default.asp
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, August 02, 2000 9:43 AM
To: Fergus Henderson
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sub
Does anyone know where there is some information on Haskell integration with
the Microsoft NGWS runtime, which provides
cross language integration and a common system for memory managment, library
functions etc.
I am curious to see if the haskell integration is a good fit or a graunch
(square pe
Does anyone know where there is some information on Haskell integration with
the Microsoft NGWS runtime, which provides
cross language integration and a common system for memory managment, library
functions etc.
I am curious to see if the haskell integration is a good fit or a graunch
(square pe
I am curious. How much faster do you think GHC would run if it were written
in C? Or how much slower would a C++ compiler be if it were written in
Haskell instead of C++?
It seems to me that a compiler would be an ideal candidate for writing in a
functional language. The number of times C++ co
19 matches
Mail list logo
