I and many others from the forum have received the "compression
failure" when doing a fresh install of CS:S DS on a linux box and
downloading the cs_office.bsp file. Deleting and retrying the install
comes up with the same error message. What is the problem and when can
it be fixed? Is it a corrupt
oops.. beer & scotch taking effect
Corrected urls follow...
What you and PB can see by specing me in CSS:
http://www.theradianteye.com/dual6800_sli_what_u_see.jpg
What I see at the same time with the SLI load balancing monitor turned on:
http://www.theradianteye.com/dual6800_sli_what_i_see.jpg
Alfred can chime in and correct all of us on this one.
Hey Alfred, is SRCDS beta testing satisfactorilly with 18,000+ "beta
servers" online with 40,000+ people playing the "steaming pile" game?
Careful now Ray. You are encroaching on my tard-ass territory with
statements like that.
VAC2 would be ni
Quote: the CPU utilization is not increasing at the rate you and your
co-haters described. Endquote.
Well slick I don't run the shit. SRCDS is a BS beta test platform for the
coders in Valve and I'm not part of it. I've stated before and I'll state it
again for the slow ones in the group. CSS is a
so no reasonable and professional participation from [EMAIL PROTECTED]
either?
I've been around here and have been participating longer than you know ray.
And doing so under multiple email addresses.
So stop the flame fest and test the issue and see if your empty CSS
servers are pulling more than b
Don't try to rectify the fact that were you BSing when you were
talking about running multiple fully-loaded CS:S servers. An empty
server should not be putting so much stress on a system but 8
single-threaded empty servers is going to added a significant amount
of utilization on a system.
Look hotshot, you're trying to clean up your mess and that's fine. But don't
bring your high-and-mighty tighty-whities into this list running your face.
I know m0gely's been around a while and I've been here since about 2000. He
plainly stated the same thing I'm going to do. You gave the distinct
i
look m0gely, keep your flamefest in your pants. Don't keep fanning the
flames like a tard.
before the update the idle server CPU utilization was nothing compared
to what it is now.
so stop with the flames and see if your system exhibits the same
behavior because if it does then Alfred needs to know
wArgOd wrote:
All flames aside, I don't think the host will go for 200+ players in
it's current configuration.
That's what we've been saying. Now if you have a quad Xeon or Opteron,
then I could least say it *sounds* reasonable.
I don't recall actually stating that it could go that high either.
Qu
There are Dual Pentium 4 1GHz systems?
In any case wargod, I doubt anybody here would advocate that running
3-5 HLDS processes on a DUAL CPU system would be a problem so long as
you kept the player numbers per server at 18 or less.
Moreover, if you were as clever as you make out, you would know b
I started it and a lot of folks have significant interest and wisdom on
the topic so it might as well have it's own thread.
Observations made yesterday (by folks on this list) of my "16 game
server host" indicated the CPU utilization will tend follow the
aggregate player count across the servers. E
Kevin Cantrell wrote:
My expectations are to run 1 main 24 man Clan source
server that is perfect in everyway.
and run two 24/7 (custom map) 18 man servers(with 4
reserve slots. < I redirect a full server using
mani-mod to my Main source server.
so a total of 3 servers with 52 players max.
OMG I
Disregard this thread - logging works fine for rcon. Sorry for the
squandered bandwidth.
Phraze.
___
To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please
visit:
http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
--
[ Picked text/plain from multipart/alternative ]
I have logging turned on. If I issue a command from my rcon client (for
e.g. say "hello world") - the command is processed but no log record is
generated. If I issue the same command from the local
Couldn't help myself, stupid replies get stupid answers ;)
From: "Alfred Reynolds" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: hlds@list.valvesoftware.com
To:
Subject: RE: [hlds] Switching from Linux to Windows
Date: Wed, 2 Mar 2005 12:43:02 -0800
That language is not appropriate on this list.
- Alfred
-Or
Kevin Cantrell wrote:
Wargod, I will try the things you mentioned.
but keep in mind I am not running a dual Zeon box,
I have Dual P4 1ghz.
Pentium IV's started out at 1.3GHz and are not dual proc compatible. If
you're running dual 1GHz Intel then they are PIII's. The only SMP
compatible Pentium I
Wow, tough Wednesday eh guys?
Please take all these flaming posts off-list somewhere. Let's all show some
maturity and keep the list focused on server-related issues.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, March
Look kid. Show a screen. Second, I run all of 4 CS servers so you have no
basis to even comment on what I do or do not run on the machines since you
have zero idea what you're talking about. So let me understand this
statement you made"I only cuzz at Ray because he holds a grudge against
me and
That language is not appropriate on this list.
- Alfred
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Philipp G.
Sent: Wednesday, March 02, 2005 12:21 PM
To: hlds@list.valvesoftware.com
Subject: Re: [hlds] Switching from Linux to Windows
Why don't you
Why don't you go play hide and go fuck yourself.
From: wArgOd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: hlds@list.valvesoftware.com
To: hlds@list.valvesoftware.com
Subject: Re: [hlds] Switching from Linux to Windows
Date: Wed, 02 Mar 2005 12:06:19 -0500
m0gely wrote:
P.S. Don't cuss at me. I only disagree.
-
we're all fools when it comes down to it, especially you, Mr. Robinett.
From: "Shane Robinett" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: hlds@list.valvesoftware.com
To:
Subject: RE: [hlds] Switching from Linux to Windows
Date: Wed, 2 Mar 2005 11:36:53 -0500
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
--
[ Pi
Unfortunately no. The only things you can do at the moment is 1) place
fps_max 999 at the top of your server.cfg file (ya don't need to run
clock.avi or any other directx app to kickstart your srcds server to run at
512fps at startup) and 2) setup some type of auto-restart of all of your
instances
Thats why I think warg0ds got the wrong end of the stick, the original
question was for a single 2800+ xp, nothing to do with duals, and no
one has said you can only run 3 or 4 servers on a dual cpu machine.
___
To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences
One of my boxes is a dual 1gh PIII, and with a TFC full at 20 cpu usage on
one processor is around 50%, FLF full at 16 that processor is around 50-60%.
That's running with increased FPS, if I let them run at the default cpu
usage is about 1/4 of that.
- Original Message -
From: "Kevin Cantr
Hopefully I am replying to this correctly.
Wargod, I will try the things you mentioned.
but keep in mind I am not running a dual Zeon box,
I have Dual P4 1ghz.
My expectations are to run 1 main 24 man Clan source
server that is perfect in everyway.
and run two 24/7 (custom map) 18 man servers(wi
Has anyone heard anything more on the FPS drop that is experienced by *some*
(I don't know if its everyone) users and the bump in FPS seen when executing
a DirectX app?
Regards,
Bud Ingram
___
To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the lis
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
--
[ Picked text/plain from multipart/alternative ]
Hi,
thx for all replies. When i read the last messages, i mean
i could run 4x16 full Slots with Windows 2003 Web Edition on a Athlon XP
2800+/1GB-DDRAM.
thx
- Original Message -
From: ran
m0gely wrote:
P.S. Don't cuss at me. I only disagree.
--
- m0gely
http://quake2.telestream.com/
Q2 | Q3A | Counter-strike
I only cuss at Ray because he holds a grudge against me and my bro's.
;-)
If and when I get a full load while I am watching I will take a screenie.
Fact is, servers are seldom
Kevin, assuming you are running in console mode, what is the "fps rate"
on your server when it is running?
If it reads around 65 then your simulation rate is low which is the
cause of the latency. make sure you use one of the methods mentioned
here to "unlock the fps". such as running clock.avi in
I bet if he ran Gentoo, he could handle those 358 players :P
/me puts on flame-repellant suit
___
To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please
visit:
http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
--
[ Picked text/plain from multipart/alternative ]
Why bother replying Ray? I know he's a fool. You know he's a fool.
Majority of the hlds list knows he's a fool. You just can't convince a
fool he's a fool.
-
Shane
http://www.Phxx.net
http://www.W0
wArgOd wrote:
what you don't see is how i am not dead in the water when i have 200+
players.
I think this and any box would crack and creak under this sort of load
should many of the servers get to capacity. Tweaking services &
settings, etc. is fine but it doesn't automatically offer you 4 fold t
K. Mike Bradley wrote:
> I don't see how a server with 200 players could possibly work in the
real
world considering the average persons home PC.
Please trim your posts. He meant 200 slots across several servers.
Which I would like to see proof of still.
--
- m0gely
http://quake2.telestream.com/
Ya know I got to step in here and mention a fact.
As the number of players go up on a server so does the number of packets to
each client.
Remember each client gets data on any other client.
So to host a 200 player server, the clients would need serious CPU and maybe
a little more ram and a whol
sorry if this is a double post, it's my first time
posting, I have been a lurker.
I would like to throw my two cents in this, It just
so happens two days ago I was researching information
in the steam forums and ran across a thread from the
EMF wargod guy, he posted his rates and talked about
run
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
--
[ Picked text/plain from multipart/alternative ]
This is the same wargod that got banned form the steam forums for this same bs.
Hopefully it won't take long to get him removed from here as well.
--
___
T
- Original Message -
From: "wArgOd" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: [hlds] Switching from Linux to Windows
damn ray, all your shit is at theplanet. everybody can save some bucks and
hassle by going directly to theplanet.com can't they.
Well first off the planet rents the whole box to you
I'd like to see the spec's of a computer running 200 HLDS slots!!
lol
On Wed, 2 Mar 2005 08:21:39 +0100, Alexander Kobbevik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> And you are sure this is not your son?
> You better slap him around just in case ;)
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
38 matches
Mail list logo
