7 new msgs in hlds_linux.
All from Britt. All pretty much worthless. We have a new Deacon.
Hey, fuck you :P
--
Eric (the Deacon remix)
___
To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit:
Rick Thompson wrote:
--
One of the issues tho is that the commercial version can not connect to
3.1.1.0 servers. So we miss out on a lot of players. So then we want those
players so we go with 3.1.1.1 and get high CPU usage. Kinda puts us between
a rock and a hard spot without the knife to cut
Obviously you have not tested the retail version then.
Brad
- Original Message -
From: Rick Thompson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, June 02, 2003 4:49 AM
Subject: RE: [hlds_linux] HLDS 3111c
--
One of the issues tho is that the commercial version can not
Who are you saying is wrong? The retail version can not connect to a 3.1.1.0
server. Valve changed some stuff with the client side. This is why when you
download 1.0 from them they include the new 3.1.1.1 server.
Brad
- Original Message -
From: Britt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL
Doing what you say below and it still doesn't work?
Michael Ressen,
Michigan Burbs Network Administrator
www.michiganburbs.com
From: Darren Mansell [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [hlds_linux] nat issues
Date: Mon, 2
On Mon, 2 Jun 2003, [iso-8859-1] Jonas Andrén wrote:
just a q while you at valve ar compiling for different 486/686/AMD couldnt
you do a native FreeBSD port too? :) im not a programmer so it might be
harder than i think.. but i would be really happy if that could be done.
And if you would
LOL!!!
admin_unllama Britt
There. Now maybe you'll make some sense when you talk.
Michael Ressen,
Michigan Burbs Network Administrator
www.michiganburbs.com
From: Britt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [hlds_linux] HLDS 3111c
Date:
On Mon, 2003-06-02 at 14:49, Michael Ressen wrote:
WHAT? Are you on glue? Explain to me how micro$oft, let alone,
windoze has ANYTHING to do with this??? Did they just buy Valve? Or
did they covertly purchase (or steal) RFC-768 recently without my
knowledge (or bid)? So how (I cant
--
Message: 11
From: Kerry Dorsey [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Mon, 2 Jun 2003 07:59:42 -0500
Subject: [hlds_linux] Re: HLDS 3111c
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Some mods don't have the choices allotted to CS. DoD, for example, has no
choice but to run x.1.1.1, otherwise, we'd
wow.
- Original Message -
From: Jeremy Brooking [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, June 02, 2003 6:14 PM
Subject: Re: [hlds_linux] HLDS 3111c
On Mon, 2003-06-02 at 14:49, Michael Ressen wrote:
WHAT? Are you on glue? Explain to me how micro$oft, let alone,
Indeed look @ mohaa it uses 1/2 the cpu of any hlds mod
1% per play on a P4 2.5Ghz I really don't understand why
the CPU load for hlds servers has to go up when it should
be coming down. As you say DOD is pricing itself out the
market like ns which is a real shame.
Steve / K
- Original
really hate when people bitch on the list. it's REALLY unproductive. so...
i just want some on valve to explain why this major problem with x.1.1.1.
just an answer on the list. and if it's a bug or not. really hope you guys
will do somethin' about it.
just 2 (20 slots) servers on a 2100+
That has to be the saddest thing I've read in a long time. I hate to say
this but I guess you're right. With the pig that's x.1.1.1 low end servers
are going out the door. Still, it doesn't quite justify *why* the new server
is such a pig. I understood the requirement jump when they added in the
Actually, I agree with you, but in a different way. Game companies
generally hate anything that isn't windows. For example, when was the
last time you saw a port of a game for MacOS?Same thing with all
these server ports for Linux. Where's native *nix support? What if I
wanna put up
--Original Message-
-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
-SavannahLion
-Sent: Monday, June 02, 2003 7:35 PM
-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Subject: [hlds_linux] Re: HLDS 3111c
-
-
-That has to be the saddest thing I've read in a long time. I hate to say
-this but I
I am well familiar with 1855. You are right, I did go off on him, and
poorly formatted it, and it was rude to the rest on the listserv, to
whom I apologize.
About the UDP handlers, what I was referring to was Britt's assertation
that if microsoft changed their handling of UDP, we would have an
16 matches
Mail list logo
