No sorry i forgot to mention
i am running 3.1.1.0 with cstrike, hlguard, adminmod and statsme. AFAIK
3.1.1.0 doesnt have these anti 'dos' settings.
The server has a 100 mbit internet connection to the internet and is
ofcourse colocated.
- Original Message -
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sounds like you are running 3.1.1.1 with it's anti DDOS settings that cause
HLSW to not see it sometimes. Am I correct?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Erik van
den Berg
Sent: Tuesday, July 15, 2003 1:19 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [
I have done everything in the world I can think of but My dual Xeon but
still spikes to ungodly cpu usage even with no one in the server. The
specifications of the box is Dual 2.8Ghz Xeon with a 1GB DDR Ram, 36GB scsi
drive, and a single nic Running RH9. Currently I have 6 servers running on
the se
Last week i installed another server, running redhat 9.0 with a SMP kernel.
the hardware is a P4 2.4 gigahertz with a 800 mhz FBUS and hyperthreading.
To take advantage of this, linux simulates 2 processors. My problem is this
runs-pauses-runs-pauses thing because i can play on the server, however
I figured I should share some of this with you, since it's downright
amazing:
I recently upgraded the OS on one of our CS servers from FreeBSD
5.0-RELEASE to 5.1-RELEASE to take advantage of the new SMP features,
and the new scheduler. The server is a Dell Poweredge 1600 series with
dual 2.8 Xeo
CAL - Jerry I beleive has it posted in the forums and the plans were to
release prior to this upcoming preseason which begins August 15th. Check the
main forums on caleague.com, you'll find it.
Joshua
-Original Message-
From: Tony Di Schino [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, July 15
--- "Kevin J. Anderson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I am using cal's server side anticheat, which is more or less cal's
> calclient.cfg anticheat incorporated into a special amxmod plugin to
> force
> it onto all clients. It works quite well in fact. I have it set to
> start
> demos, record t
->-Original Message-
->From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
->[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Tony Di
->Schino
->Sent: Tuesday, July 15, 2003 12:56 PM
->To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
->Subject: RE: [hlds_linux] Female Counter-Strike Model
->
->
->--- "Kevin J. Anderson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
->>
->>
--- "Kevin J. Anderson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> ohhh, nice! I should make that standard for my lan tourneys...
> *goes
> off to edit the calserver.cfg*
>
> ; P
> kev
it's a cl_, so doesn't that mean it is client-side setting? Would
setting this in a server.cfg affect all clients? Or is
Very Nice, so close yet so far :P
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of James
Couzens
Sent: Tuesday, July 15, 2003 8:12 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [hlds_linux] Kernel 2.6.0 is forth coming...
Everyone,
This was announced on freshmeat yes
SH> Perhaps it's a new feature? :D
SH> I mean, when did you last try fireing an automatic rifle IRL while
SH> moving sideways at high speed and expect to hit anywhere near what your
SH> where aiming?
Funny, indeed.
Since that complaints come from well known "pro gaming clans", I/we
have to take
->-Original Message-
->From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
->[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Stefan
->Huszics
->Sent: Tuesday, July 15, 2003 11:35 AM
->To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
->Subject: Re: [hlds_linux] Female Counter-Strike Model
->
->
->Kevin J. Anderson wrote:
->
->>what does cl_minmodels 1 do?
->-Original Message-
->From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
->[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Stefan
->Huszics
->Sent: Tuesday, July 15, 2003 11:33 AM
->To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
->Subject: Re: [hlds_linux] [OT] FYI Gentoo users
->
->
->Kevin J. Anderson wrote:
->
->>My point was, that there werent se
Kevin J. Anderson wrote:
what does cl_minmodels 1 do? I tried it, didnt notice any difference...
All T's are 1 model and all CT is another which makes it easier/faster
to determine friend/foe.
--
/Stefan
Software never has bugs. It just develops random features. =)
Kevin J. Anderson wrote:
My point was, that there werent server ebuilds before now were there?
Yes, there was Gentoo ebuilds before for HLDS CS etc, but as I said they
where pretty useless.
That's why I was interested in experiences by anyone that has tried
these new ones :)
--
/Stefan
Software n
->-Original Message-
->From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
->[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Stefan
->Huszics
->Sent: Tuesday, July 15, 2003 11:25 AM
->To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
->Subject: Re: [hlds_linux] [OT] FYI Gentoo users
->
->
->Kevin J. Anderson wrote:
->
->>->>For all you gentoo users I just
->-Original Message-
->From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
->[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Stefan
->Huszics
->Sent: Tuesday, July 15, 2003 10:24 AM
->To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
->Subject: Re: [hlds_linux] Female Counter-Strike Model
->
->
->Daniel Stroven wrote:
->
->>Hell I would settle for any new
Kevin J. Anderson wrote:
->>For all you gentoo users I just noticed these new ebuilds:
you talking about freebsd or something?
No, Gentoo Linux as can be seen in the mail as well as topic :)
However the "packagemanagment" of Gentoo (and it's recent fork) is very
bsd-like
--
/Stefan
Software nev
->-Original Message-
->From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
->[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Stefan
->Huszics
->Sent: Tuesday, July 15, 2003 10:39 AM
->To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
->Subject: Re: [hlds_linux] [OT] FYI Gentoo users
->
->
->Leson wrote:
->
->>For all you gentoo users I just noticed these
Leson wrote:
For all you gentoo users I just noticed these new ebuilds:
Just out of interest, are these updated to latest and install made a bit
more intelligent then it use to be?
The reson I ask is becuse last time I tried out the HLDS stuff it was
old version without latest patches that autoi
20 matches
Mail list logo
