--- Game Servers [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
--
[ Picked text/plain from multipart/alternative ]
How do I report a wonid to vac so that they can permanently ban it?
The wonid is 660394. He hacked our server and is banning everyone,
kicking, and
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I seem to recall, once upon a time, that there can sometimes be a delay
between when a CD-KEY is active and then shown inactive on WON. Leading,
sometimes to false CD-KEY IN USE errors...
But is it likely that the users IP would have changed before the wonid
database
On Wednesday, July 23, 2003 11:36 AM [GMT+1200=NZT],
Britt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You can easily sniff network traffic if you have the target IP and
resolve their MAC Address with certain progs out there - however
since this is all UDP - not much you can do - if it used TCP - you
could add
--- Game Servers [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
How do u keep an rcon secure if it's not encrypted? I have fixed
this
rcon_password
rcon by nature is a vulnerability. use admin_mod or amx.
gg if u have nothing constructive to say, please refrain from
posting.
right back atcha, pally.
Wow I was about to thank you for your help. Until u flamed me. It was
a legit question since I didn't want to send an email directly without
going through a chain of commands type thing. Apparently you are the
ignorant one. This list is for help not start flame wars. I have found
this list to
Stefan Huszics wrote:
I seem to recall, once upon a time, that there can sometimes be a delay
between when a CD-KEY is active and then shown inactive on WON. Leading,
sometimes to false CD-KEY IN USE errors...
But is it likely that the users IP would have changed before the wonid
database manages
Game Servers wrote:
I understand that what he was telling me was common sense. I already
did everything that he told me and what you told me before I even
posted. So please don't say I didn't do anything.
Dude, if you want to keep being a jackass, go for it. But you're just
feeding the flames
Game Servers wrote:
How do u keep an rcon secure if it's not encrypted?
By not using the rcon EVER.
Instead install eg Adminmod or AMXmod and the rcon will not be sent over
the internet.
This of cource assumes that when you say he said he hacked our server
you are talikng about the
Computer crime laws have become stiff in the USA - just by intruding into
that machine either directly or indirectly is a felony in the US - so
something would be done about it - we've done it several times.
Britt
- Original Message -
From: Simon Garner [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL
Eric (Deacon) wrote:
Exactly, Stefan. If the CD-KEY IN USE error message comes up, it's
because Valve's received the communication, looked it up, and given it
the thumbs-down. If it's coming from the same IP, then don't worry
about it. If it's coming from different IP's, reject that CD-Key for
According to the great words of Simon Garner:
I can't really see them caring too much about
some kid stealing the rcon password for some other kid's l33t cs
server...
Depends on what was hacked and what other stuff is in the server farm.
Maybe an e-commerce website? Cusomer information?
On Wednesday, July 23, 2003 1:27 PM [GMT+1200=NZT],
James Clark [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
When it has become an issue it doesn't matter who it is, the owner or
the owners mate... both will be made to pay (and learn). In much the
same way as all of those brothers out there got caught with
Tony Di Schino wrote:
Unfortunately, I doubt that will even happen with the deployment of
IPV6
I dunno about that...
http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=03/07/22/1413248mode=flattid=126tid=95
The 'Impending IP crisis' is over stated.
Less than half the 4 1/2 billion hosts ipv4 provides are
And what if some punk with a keygen gets lucky and generates your key,
then goes and plays CS - then you go to play and it says the key is in
use and you get banned?
As far as I know you'd have to be VERY lucky to do this with WON.
Yes I do know what it is like for this to happen - I bought
On Wednesday, July 23, 2003 2:02 PM [GMT+1200=NZT],
James Clark [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I also think people are getting confused between two things
1 - multiple people using same key.
2 - the 'key is in use' issue some people suffer when it isn't
actually in use.
This thread is about
Simon Garner wrote:
Plastic wrappered aren't they? I can't remember - been a while since
I bought my copy.
They should be, but not always.
-Simon
Not to mention, those plastic wrapper machines most companies have...
___
To unsubscribe, edit your
Eric (Deacon) wrote:
Dude, if you want to keep being a jackass, go for it. But you're just
feeding the flames of your own fire that you started.
lol, hypocrite.
___
To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit:
James Clark wrote:
I don't think cd key in use problems should be lumped together with
cheating - they're a different issue.
Why not? The worst cheaters are also CD-Key stealers/traders.
...and some of the best players, occasionaly get CD Key in use.
But ban them anyway, because they could
Jeremy Brooking wrote:
Eric (Deacon) wrote:
Jeremy Brooking wrote:
Eric (Deacon) wrote:
Yes, you've figured me out :roll:
Do you have anything intelligent to say? Praise or criticizm of the
idea, or are you just a jackass?
Oh of course eric, you are the only person has puts positive input into
Simon Garner wrote:
This might help fix the timeout/reconnect issue. But it still doesn't
help you to determine which player is the legitimate owner of the key
and which is not. That is the crux of the problem. You cannot ban a
player just for using the same key as another player.
-Simon
Its clear text for sure in UDP - but in TCP its formed in a set packet -
which can be disassembled and viewed. You can give me any IP Address and I
can sniff/watch the traffic from that IP. SSL encrypts the entire TCP
packet - I'm speaking the % garbling it to make it harder to understand what
Jeremy Brooking wrote:
Simon Garner wrote:
This might help fix the timeout/reconnect issue. But it still doesn't
help you to determine which player is the legitimate owner of the key
and which is not. That is the crux of the problem. You cannot ban a
player just for using the same key as another
On Wednesday, July 23, 2003 5:08 PM [GMT+1200=NZT],
Britt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You can give me any IP Address and I can sniff/watch the traffic
from that IP.
Uh? no. Dream on.
-Simon
___
To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the
Quoting Britt [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
You can give me any IP Address and I
can sniff/watch the traffic from that IP.
210.56.34.71
Yes the address is up.
Yes the address is routable.
Yes I know you cant ping it.
Yes this box does traffic, adverages 2mb/s
No it does not run a CS server.
So show
You can give me any IP Address and I
can sniff/watch the traffic from that IP.
Granted you are on the same subnet...You can't just get anyone else's
traffic? If you can, please explain...
On Wed, 2003-07-23 at 00:08, Britt wrote:
Its clear text for sure in UDP - but in TCP its formed in a set
-Original Message-
From: Simon Garner [EMAIL PROTECTED]
You cannot ban a player just for using the same key
as another player.
Sure I can.
Key-sharing? No, I don't believe it. Multiple keys are used for one
thing: cheating. Anyone I see flip flop between keys, I'll ban them
on
26 matches
Mail list logo
