Solution Found - Confirmed:
FreeBSD 5.4 p1 - the htt patch is a mess, and with analysis by my devs
they have determined it as the cause of every problem, one of them
will be creating a reverse p1 patch, to apply every time after a full
cvsup, I expect this problem will remain existant in 6.0 and i
ZA and Symantec's products add hooks to low-level operating system
functions that cause everything from web browsing to game playing to
slow down. Members of my family have used both and form experience ZA
seemed to work but at a huge cost to network performance, and Symantec
just plain broke EVER
ZoneAlarm is notorious for blocking stuff it should not - even when it isn't
running. Anytime I trouble shoot a connectivity problem, one of the first
things I do is make sure they are not running ZoneAlarm or any form of
Symantec security, as both of them are known to block things that should not
Here is a link from the guy in the Steam support forums showing the
error message if it helps:
http://img194.echo.cx/img194/6278/errormessage6mj.png
-sb
On 6/19/05, GiZm0r <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> they normaly can play but sometimes this message came and they are
> kicked off the server
>
>
>
I have confirmed the following:
FreeBSD 5.4 - modded linux_socket.c and non modded on an Asus board
(with or without HT Fails)
The Same configuration, with an Intel Board, HT on, also fails,
however with HT off, it works flawlessly, somehow HT is affecting all
of this, and its board specific too.
or install the linux gdb... then it looks in /compat first...
/Bjorn
On Sun, 19 Jun 2005, Steven Hartland wrote:
> That wont work as it requires additional kernel dependencies.
>
> tbh I've only ever had issues with the update tool when I'd had
> a bad install. Deleting the entire dir has alway
Using any cheat program can result in a ban, no matter the subset of its
functionality you actually use. If you want to alter cvar values then set
"sv_cheats 1" for the period you want it altered. Using cheats at any time is a
violation of the Steam Subscriber Agreement (and always has been).
-
they normaly can play but sometimes this message came and they are
kicked off the server
- Original Message -
From: Stan Bubrouski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Sonntag, 19.06.2005 22:11
Subject: [hlds_linux] VAC2 -> No Steam Logon
> Some people have been reporting this on the Steam For
VAC1 bans will be brought forward into VAC2 when it goes live (no free
passes here!).
- Alfred
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Andrew
Armstrong
Sent: Saturday, June 18, 2005 8:48 PM
To: hlds_linux@list.valvesoftware.com
Subject: [hlds_linu
I've released a new HL2DM map and I've had several people ask if it runs ok
on a linux server, there are apparently some linux related bsp issues.
I would appreciate it if someone could put it up for a few and and let me
know if they see any problems.
Webpage with pictures and detailed descripti
Some people have been reporting this on the Steam Forums, but thus far
I have no reasolution posted on any of those threads, mostly
suggestions of making sure ports are open. Are any of them using
firewall software or routers? One of the threads in the forum was by
a guy using ZoneAlarm but he ma
HI
Some Players on my server get kicked from vac2 on mein CS:S server
with this message (No Steam Logon)
And after this, he gets the message:
"connection to the steam VAC servers could not be made. For
truobleshooting network isssues, please click the link below"
when he try to connect
Anyone kno
Are you sure about this? If so that's great and thanks for the help!
-Some Llama
--__--__--
Date: Sun, 19 Jun 2005 00:54:42 -0400
From: Sebastian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: hlds_linux@list.valvesoftware.com
Subject: Re: [hlds_linux] How to enable VAC2 on a server
Reply-To: hlds_linux@list.valveso
I'll get that in a bit, not in access of the box, however is there
anything else that may be causing this, because on a single box, when
I had it formatted as said previously, the only thing that changed was
the OS was reinstalled, and it started giving me this error, it was
flawless on the same ve
Alfred please be more precise
How do I know my CS1.6 server is using VAC2 and not VAC1 ??
My server provider made a script so we can add or not -vacbeta to the
commandline, I added it, but there is absolutely no difference. If I set
secure "0" in liblist.gam... well if I understood well all you'
That wont work as it requires additional kernel dependencies.
tbh I've only ever had issues with the update tool when I'd had
a bad install. Deleting the entire dir has always fixed it.
Out of interest what's the backtrace. N.B. to get a full backtrace
you will need to symlink the required libs
Hardware:
2* Xeon 2.8 ghz 2gb ram. 72 gb scsi drives
Unlimited bandwith. (100 mbit)
Servers:
3 * cs 1.6 ffa servers: 16 players metamod 1.17.4p21 ,hlguard and amvmodx
1.01
1 * cs 1.6 cw server : 12 players metamod 1.17.4p21 ,hlguard
1 * Source cstrike: 16 players tickrate 66 no addons.
apach
Alfred wrote somewhere, that i will be enabled by default on source servers.
To disable you should add -insecure to your commandline
Drone
-Oprindelig meddelelse-
Fra: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] På vegne af devin812
Sendt: 19. juni 2005 06:42
Til: hlds_linux@list.valveso
Aggressive and unfriendly yes, absolutely. Why would I be kind to an
admitted cheater?
I despise cheaters. They ruin multiplayer games, period.
And I find an admin that sets sv_cheats 0, turns on vac or vacbeta, and uses
a known cheat to bypass it, despicable.
If he or anyone else wants to cons
why would they out of nowhere give some random cvar 'cheat' status for
no reason? Right, they wouldn't. They'd have a reason to do so. As
curious as any of us are, there's really no reason they absolutely
must explain every little decision they make.
On 6/19/05, Ondřej Hošek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wr
You, fortunately, weren't vulgar, you were only a bit aggressive. You
were defending your opinion, and I don't find that inherently bad, but
you still seemed to have an unfriendly undertone.
"Their game, their code, their choice".
This is true, but that doesn't mean I can't ask why they have done
Vulgarisms? When was I vulgar? The worst I said was "scum"...oh heavens
no, I said scum, I used a horrible word!!!
Like seriously, grow up and get over it. I presented my opinion of his
abuse of a cheat on his own "cheat protected server".
Don't like it? Too bad. That's what happens when you
Okay.
I have looked through the message history of this mailing list.
Now, I would like to ask a question. Anybody who starts flaming me will
be classified as a lesser life form (and I will casually reply with an
FU), since I don't need your "you are an idiot/cheater scum/...", I
would like to ha
I would hardly call my posts flaming. You must have extremely thin skin if
you do think this has been some sort of attack on you.
You made it quite clear what you do (regardless of intentions) and I feel
sorry for the people on your server(s) that are unaware.
If it wasn't bothering you you wou
Look folks, thanks for the support but this bickering is pointless. I care not
about this lists opinion of me and never will, you don't know me and making
uninformed baseless assumptions regarding my motives only serves in
aggravating yourself and others, it certainly isn't bothering me. I urge all
25 matches
Mail list logo
