Re: [hlds_linux] OT: Routing securely

2002-08-13 Thread Kevin J. Anderson
S multi-map) 209.41.98.2:27015 (DoD) >209.41.98.2:27017 (CS militia/dust2)Dallas, TX > > >> -Original Message- >> From: Florian Zschocke [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >> Sent: Tuesday, August 13, 2002 4:25 AM >> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >

Re: [hlds_linux] OT: Routing securely

2002-08-13 Thread Dimitris Zilaskos
> > Now I've switched to a new ISP, and they have just assigned me 7 statics, > but they are all part of a .192 subnet. I don't want to go back to having > all my machines plugged into a hub directly accessable to the internet. How > can I use my 2 NIC machine as a router/firewall with this new se

RE: [hlds_linux] OT: Routing securely

2002-08-13 Thread Stan
t2)Dallas, TX > -Original Message- > From: Florian Zschocke [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Tuesday, August 13, 2002 4:25 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [hlds_linux] OT: Routing securely > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > >

Re: [hlds_linux] OT: Routing securely

2002-08-13 Thread Florian Zschocke
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > I think Florian is direct to list. I don't think he uses Ken's newsgroup > server. Correct. > In essence, you bind all of your public IPs that the ISP has given you to > your public NIC. Thus, it will accept any traffic thrown at it from the > world. You then crea

RE: [hlds_linux] OT: Routing securely

2002-08-13 Thread Stan
ron [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Tuesday, August 13, 2002 3:59 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [hlds_linux] OT: Routing securely > > > Hrm - Florians msg didn't show up in my mail - newsgroup only? > > Originally I had my linux box doing my routing/firewa

Re: [hlds_linux] OT: Routing securely

2002-08-13 Thread Florian Zschocke
Khyron wrote: > > Hrm - Florians msg didn't show up in my mail - newsgroup only? Nope. > The new ISP is doing it the old way, they don't issue subnets, just random > single statics. My set includes x.194, 195, 196, 197, 208, 209. x.193 is > their gateway. Subnet mask is .192 Aaah, I see, so it'

RE: [hlds_linux] OT: Routing securely

2002-08-13 Thread Stan
Damnit, I miskeyed. I'll have what I intended to send up here in a minute Stan > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Tuesday, August 13, 2002 4:10 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: [hlds_linux] OT: Routing se

RE: [hlds_linux] OT: Routing securely

2002-08-13 Thread Stan
eate 1-to-1 NAT mappings from the public IPs to the private IPs of your game servers: 207.151.100.194 207.151.100.194 207.151.100.194 207.151.100.194 > -Original Message- > From: Khyron [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Tuesday, August 13, 2002 3:59 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECT

Re: [hlds_linux] OT: Routing securely

2002-08-13 Thread Khyron
ll. Works, but insecure as hell. Regards, Khyron - Original Message - From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, August 13, 2002 2:01 AM Subject: RE: [hlds_linux] OT: Routing securely > IIRC Florian, he didn't want to have to re-compile his kern

RE: [hlds_linux] OT: Routing securely

2002-08-13 Thread Stan
:27015 (DoD) 209.41.98.2:27017 (CS militia/dust2)Dallas, TX > -Original Message- > From: Florian Zschocke [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Tuesday, August 13, 2002 2:23 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [hlds_linux] OT: Routing securely > > > Khyron wr

Re: [hlds_linux] OT: Routing securely

2002-08-13 Thread Florian Zschocke
Khyron wrote: > > Yah I could NAT with a 10.x or whatever, but avoiding NAT is the reason I > paid extra for the statics. I've been looking at Arp Proxy, but any of those > that I found on the net assumes you have a full subnet, as opposed to my > situation (several statics that are not all in seq

Re: [hlds_linux] OT: Routing securely

2002-08-12 Thread James Gurney
m0gely wrote: > he just said he has 7 static ip's?! What the heck would he wanna use > NAT for? NAT != ip_masq, although this is a common misconception. ip_masq allows you to share 1 IP with multiple machines. With NAT, you simply set up your gateway/firewall box with all your IPs and then trans

Re: [hlds_linux] OT: Routing securely

2002-08-12 Thread m0gely
Leif Sawyer wrote: > Well, not an easy task. You can't route the packets. > > What you _can_ do, is use NAT, network address translation. > > NAT in combination with IP filtering will keep your boxes > from being completely on the internet, but still allow outside > users to connect. > > There ar

RE: [hlds_linux] OT: Routing securely

2002-08-12 Thread Leif Sawyer
doing this, check the FAQ. *I don't do this for game servers. > -Original Message- > From: Khyron [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Monday, August 12, 2002 12:33 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [hlds_linux] OT: Routing securely > > > Hi, > > Kinda

[hlds_linux] OT: Routing securely

2002-08-12 Thread Khyron
Hi, Kinda OT, but I figure server admins would be the most likely to have dealt with it before - but here's my dilema (and my cstrike server is why I'm doing it)...: Originally had DSL with an 8 IP subnet - basically just plugged the dsl modem into a hub, and the other 4 comps into the hub and e