s has been).
- Alfred
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dagok
Sent: Sunday, June 19, 2005 1:09 AM
To: hlds_linux@list.valvesoftware.com
Subject: Re: [hlds_linux] VAC2 actually detecting & banning?
Vulgarisms? When was I vulgar? The wo
consider that flaming or take offense to my
tone...I quite frankly don't care.
Dagok
- Original Message -
From: "Ondřej Hošek" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Sunday, June 19, 2005 1:40 AM
Subject: Re: [hlds_linux] VAC2 actually detecting & banning?
You, fortuna
why would they out of nowhere give some random cvar 'cheat' status for
no reason? Right, they wouldn't. They'd have a reason to do so. As
curious as any of us are, there's really no reason they absolutely
must explain every little decision they make.
On 6/19/05, Ondřej Hošek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wr
e of CSS, probably due to
> some
> sort of abuse that cheaters/hackers discovered.
>
> Maybe Alfred will answer your question and maybe he won't, and quite
> frankly
> "He" doesn't have to just because you say so.
>
> Dagok
>
>
> - Origi
--- Original Message -
From: "Ondřej Hošek" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Sunday, June 19, 2005 12:49 AM
Subject: Re: [hlds_linux] VAC2 actually detecting & banning?
Okay.
I have looked through the message history of this mailing list.
Now, I would like to ask a quest
Okay.
I have looked through the message history of this mailing list.
Now, I would like to ask a question. Anybody who starts flaming me will
be classified as a lesser life form (and I will casually reply with an
FU), since I don't need your "you are an idiot/cheater scum/...", I
would like to ha
u you wouldn't keep coming and posting in response
to people that you think are flaming you.
Dagok
- Original Message -
From: "Vapor" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Sunday, June 19, 2005 12:07 AM
Subject: Re: [hlds_linux] VAC2 actually detecting & banning?
Look
Look folks, thanks for the support but this bickering is pointless. I care not
about this lists opinion of me and never will, you don't know me and making
uninformed baseless assumptions regarding my motives only serves in
aggravating yourself and others, it certainly isn't bothering me. I urge all
, 2005 3:27 PM
Subject: Re: [hlds_linux] VAC2 actually detecting & banning?
Dagok wrote:
Admins that abuse their own server to cheat while claiming to provide a
cheat free server are scum...plain and simple.
Dagok
He ran an app that increases the client's FPS by disabling a high
qualit
Thanks for finding the time to clarify. Apologies for starting the flaming
war, that was not my intention.
Firstly by way of update, as of this morning that steam account's VAC status
has returned to "In good standing". I'm assuming this is temporary and that it
was the imposing/notification of al
as long as VAC2 is still in beta.
>
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Alfred
> Reynolds
> Sent: 18 June 2005 20:12
> To: hlds_linux@list.valvesoftware.com
> Subject: RE: [hlds_linux] VAC2 actually detecting & banning?
&g
steam
update as long as VAC2 is still in beta.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Alfred
Reynolds
Sent: 18 June 2005 20:12
To: hlds_linux@list.valvesoftware.com
Subject: RE: [hlds_linux] VAC2 actually detecting & banning?
Wow, with all this
Yes, HL1 servers can be running both VAC1 and VAC2 at the same time.
- Alfred
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Cream
Sent: Saturday, June 18, 2005 2:21 PM
To: hlds_linux@list.valvesoftware.com
Subject: Re: [hlds_linux] VAC2 actually
valve says it's a cheat, so eat it.
On 6/18/05, m0gely <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> He ran an app that increases the client's FPS by disabling a high
> quality sky. What is the matter with you people? So he's scum for
> that? That's a cheat? You answer questions that were never asked. He
> on
Dagok wrote:
Admins that abuse their own server to cheat while claiming to provide a
cheat free server are scum...plain and simple.
Dagok
He ran an app that increases the client's FPS by disabling a high
quality sky. What is the matter with you people? So he's scum for
that? That's a chea
On Sat, 18 Jun 2005 15:18:54 -0500, Alfred Reynolds
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
The shield icon comes up for either VAC1 OR VAC2, your CS server must
still be running VAC1.
- Alfred
Hmm, strange because I didn't see it come up for any of the VAC1 servers.
Granted it's been a few days since I
Alfred Reynolds wrote:
The shield icon comes up for either VAC1 OR VAC2, your CS server must
still be running VAC1.
isnt the server required to be running in secure mode (VAC1) AND with
-vacbeta to enable VAC2?
if so, could servers be running both VAC1 and VAC2 atm?
_
: [hlds_linux] VAC2 actually detecting & banning?
On Sat, 18 Jun 2005 14:06:32 -0500, Alfred Reynolds
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Once VAC2 goes out of beta there will be a server update that will
> make your OP4 servers have the little shield .
>
I was running a CS server for a
ouski" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Saturday, June 18, 2005 8:13 AM
Subject: Re: [hlds_linux] VAC2 actually detecting & banning?
On 6/18/05, Eric (Deacon) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
In a bold display of creativity, Dagok wrote:
> Then cry on a forum that someone cares a
On Sat, 18 Jun 2005 14:06:32 -0500, Alfred Reynolds
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Once VAC2 goes out of beta there will be a server update that will make
your OP4 servers have the little shield .
I was running a CS server for a week or so with the -vacbeta line, I
pulled the -vacbeta line out of
to actively support them - do you have any
> information on future support of OP4 servers?
>
>
>
> - Original Message -----
> From: "Alfred Reynolds" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To:
> Sent: Saturday, June 18, 2005 10:11 AM
> Subject: RE: [hlds_linux] VAC2 actuall
em - do you have any
> information on future support of OP4 servers?
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -
> From: "Alfred Reynolds" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To:
> Sent: Saturday, June 18, 2005 10:11 AM
> Subject: RE: [hlds_linux] VAC2 actually detecting & ba
Subject: Re: [hlds_linux] VAC2 actually detecting & banning?
There aren't many real questions right now, we are too busy insulting
each other :-)
OK, I'll ask a real question. If I STATUS my OP4 server, I see:
11:51:57 hostname: Ooks Steaming Pile of 1001 Crap Maps
version
IL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Saturday, June 18, 2005 10:11 AM
Subject: RE: [hlds_linux] VAC2 actually detecting & banning?
> Wow, with all this flaming I have a hard time finding the real questions
> :)
>
> VAC2 should not be enforcing bans at this time, it looks like a greml
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of m0gely
Sent: Saturday, June 18, 2005 10:26 AM
To: hlds_linux@list.valvesoftware.com
Subject: Re: [hlds_linux] VAC2 actually detecting & banning?
Eric (Deacon) wrote:
> What the hell is wrong with you jackas
I know you
I know all about you
You see things that other people dont see that makes you nervous
If your hands would stop shaking
You'd wipe the cold sweat off your brow
Its hard for you to think
But you dont need to very much
because the voices in your head usually tell you what to do
you consider
Eric (Deacon) wrote:
What the hell is wrong with you jackasses?
I was wondering the same thing. He just asked a simple question and
gets all this crap back.
--
- m0gely
http://quake2.telestream.com/
Q2 | Q3A | Counter-strike
___
To unsubscribe, ed
I don't think it helps ANYTHING when some punk replies to every flame
in a thread with another flame, doubling the stupidity and just asking
for more... and I agree with a previous comment in the thread about
swearing. Why do it here? And furthermore if these flames of flames
aren't just a tool t
PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Michael McKoy
Sent: Saturday, June 18, 2005 10:11 AM
To: hlds_linux@list.valvesoftware.com
Subject: Re: [hlds_linux] VAC2 actually detecting & banning?
Wow. Just wow. This list has become completely and utterly useless. When did
all the childre
Wow. Just wow. This list has become completely and utterly useless. When did
all the children join?
Its a simple question. He didn't ask to get unbanned, he freely admitted
what he was doing, he doesn't care.
"Is VAC2 actively banning or not?"
___
To
it ain't my fault no one likes you, Eric.
On 6/18/05, Eric (Deacon) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Yes, he did. It's a common mistake to make and a pretty poor basis for
> a response. But since you're all about the correct spellings of
> homonyms, why not send us a URL of the pic you took with WWW
get ready to be reamed by the rulers of the list who don't see it your
way! maybe they'll tell you to grow up as well LOL
EqualHate wrote:
***wipes tears of laughter from eyes and replies***
o was the server running a third party anti-cheat on your server?
if no, go to next, irrelevant beca
wow big bad guy has spoken
Eric (Deacon) wrote:
In a bold display of creativity, Roc wrote:
What on are is your problem? Why do you need confirmation?
Is it so you can then remove the rest of the cheats on your PC?
The confirmation is you being banned Mr. Green thumb!
What the hell is wr
grow up and get used to me not responding to what you wanna hear... not
going anywhere LOL
kama wrote:
Chill down... He just wanted a statement what the beta are doing for
checks. Nothing else. In the announcement from Valve (Alfred) they stated
that they needed information on disconnects. The
***wipes tears of laughter from eyes and replies***
o was the server running a third party anti-cheat on your server?
if no, go to next, irrelevant because Steam informed you of the ban.
o Was server running vacbeta?
your post says yes, go to next
o are you running a cheat?
your post says y
Vapor wrote:
> What on earth are you talking about? I'm asking for confirmation of
> VAC2's
> working status, I already know that steamid is banned and why.
Guys, he's got a legitimate bloody question. Alfred had said just a
couple days ago when requesting that we all join the vacbeta that it
will
Eric (Deacon) wrote:
In a bold display of creativity, Dagok wrote:
Then cry on a forum that someone cares about you being banned.
Who's crying? This is the kind of stupid shit that makes me wonder what
the fuck is going on in the server community these days. What the hell
is wrong with yo
Guys,
Can you not express yourself without the use of repeated foul language?
This isn't the tone I expect to see on a mailing list!
Regards, aXeR
- Original Message -
From: "Eric (Deacon)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Saturday, June 18, 2005 4:02 PM
Subject:
On 6/18/05, Eric (Deacon) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> In a bold display of creativity, Dagok wrote:
> > Then cry on a forum that someone cares about you being banned.
>
> Who's crying? This is the kind of stupid shit that makes me wonder what
> the fuck is going on in the server community these d
In a bold display of creativity, Clayton Macleod wrote:
mute? I think you meant to say moot.
Yes, he did. It's a common mistake to make and a pretty poor basis for
a response. But since you're all about the correct spellings of
homonyms, why not send us a URL of the pic you took with WWW.ANSW
In a bold display of creativity, Andrew Armstrong wrote:
Dont run cheats? Thats a fix!
What fix? Nobody asked for a "fix" which makes your reply sound really
really stupid. And childish. And many other such things.
--
Eric (the Deacon remix)
___
In a bold display of creativity, Roc wrote:
What on are is your problem? Why do you need confirmation?
Is it so you can then remove the rest of the cheats on your PC?
The confirmation is you being banned Mr. Green thumb!
What the hell is wrong with you jackasses? The dude fired off a quick
e
In a bold display of creativity, Dagok wrote:
Then cry on a forum that someone cares about you being banned.
Who's crying? This is the kind of stupid shit that makes me wonder what
the fuck is going on in the server community these days. What the hell
is wrong with you?
--
Eric (the Deacon r
Chill down... He just wanted a statement what the beta are doing for
checks. Nothing else. In the announcement from Valve (Alfred) they stated
that they needed information on disconnects. There where no information
about the cheat detection. I thinks his question is fair.
Some of the hacks that
What on are is your problem? Why do you need confirmation?
Is it so you can then remove the rest of the cheats on your PC?
The confirmation is you being banned Mr. Green thumb!
Maybe, you should find the time away from gardening to read what Alfred
had said then you would know already that you
On Sat, 18 Jun 2005 05:45:53 -0400, Roc wrote
> Alfred gave the warning to stop all cheats dude, you've been busted
> so just give it up and stop looking for reasons other than the one
> you forgot to pay attention to!
>
> Stop whining and looking for reasons other than the obvious!
>
> There is no
ok
Sent: 18 June 2005 10:30
To: hlds_linux@list.valvesoftware.com
Subject: Re: [hlds_linux] VAC2 actually detecting & banning?
What more important issues? Looks like VAC2 worked well to me.
People don't care that you got caught for cheatingget it?
Dagok
- Original Message -
From
_linux@list.valvesoftware.com
Subject: Re: [hlds_linux] VAC2 actually detecting & banning?
What more important issues? Looks like VAC2 worked well to me.
People don't care that you got caught for cheatingget it?
Dagok
- Original Message -
From: "Vapor" <[EMAIL PRO
Alfred gave the warning to stop all cheats dude, you've been busted so
just give it up and stop looking for reasons other than the one you
forgot to pay attention to!
Stop whining and looking for reasons other than the obvious!
There is nothing more to discuss, you've been caught cheating, you w
Alfred gave the warning to stop all cheats dude, you've been busted so
just give it up and stop looking for reasons other than the one you
forgot to pay attention to!
Stop whining and looking for reasons other than the obvious!
Vapor wrote:
Guys, I care little about the bloody ban, and know ex
Alfred gave the warning to stop all cheats dude, you've been busted so
just give it up and stop looking for reasons other than the one you
forgot to pay attention to!
Stop whining and looking for reasons other than the obvious!
Vapor wrote:
I only play on my own CS:S servers which are running
What more important issues? Looks like VAC2 worked well to me.
People don't care that you got caught for cheatingget it?
Dagok
- Original Message -
From: "Vapor" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Saturday, June 18, 2005 1:34 AM
Subject: Re: [hlds_linux] VA
> Rightclick Steam in the tray>Settings
>
> Whats 'VAC Status' say?
"Banned from some secure servers because of a cheating infraction".
Now here's the interesting part, "Click for details" > up pops a window
informing me my ban affects the following games:
Counter-Strike: Source
Half-Life 2: Dea
mute? I think you meant to say moot.
On 6/18/05, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> home connections and ultimately poisoning the game itself. If all servers
> were run on quality machines with quality bandwidth it would make all of
> this talk of "tweaking" the server settings mute an
]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Vapor
Sent: Saturday, June 18, 2005 3:59 AM
To: hlds_linux@list.valvesoftware.com
Subject: Re: [hlds_linux] VAC2 actually detecting & banning?
> I only play on my own CS:S servers which are running -vacbeta. CS:S
> is the only steam game I have r
"testing
purposes" then you should have set the server to sv_cheats 1 and turned off
VAC2 beta.
Dagok
- Original Message -
From: "Vapor" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Saturday, June 18, 2005 1:03 AM
Subject: Re: [hlds_linux] VAC2 actually detecting & banning
Rightclick Steam in the tray>Settings
Whats 'VAC Status' say?
- Original Message -
From: "Vapor" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Saturday, June 18, 2005 6:03 PM
Subject: Re: [hlds_linux] VAC2 actually detecting & banning?
> Guys, I care little ab
Cool. Another Steam ID for my banlist :)
r_3dsky 0 makes baby Jesus cry.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Vapor
Sent: Saturday, June 18, 2005 12:59 AM
To: hlds_linux@list.valvesoftware.com
Subject: Re: [hlds_linux] VAC2 actually detecting
Guys, I care little about the bloody ban, and know exactly what the program I
was using does, and have my reasons (rather than assumed stupidity) for using
it. Move along please... flame someone who cares...
I'm more interested in the fact VAC2 may well be actually operational.
Brett
___
> I only play on my own CS:S servers which are running -vacbeta. CS:S
> is the only steam game I have run in over 6 months. I do regularly
> run a program which holds r_3dsky at 0 for testing purposes (which I
> can send you on request), which I understand is most likely
> classified as a cheat. Ot
Dont run cheats? Thats a fix!
If you wanted to have r_3dsky set to 0 on your server, set sv_cheats 1 on
the server, then you can use the 3dsky variable.
- Original Message -
From: "Vapor" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Saturday, June 18, 2005 5:35 PM
Subject: [hlds_linux] VAC2 actually de
please refer to this thread at the Steam forums:
http://forums.steampowered.com/forums/showthread.php?threadid=282892
Anything and I mean ANYTHING that modifies steam or game executables will
probably result in a ban.
the "fix" that you are referring to for 3dsky patches the game executable
and
heh, doofus
On 6/18/05, Vapor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Alfred, I was still under the impression VAC2 was still in infrastructure test
> phase? However, on restarting my local steam client this morning I was
> informed via dialog of my new found VAC ban from CS:S and HL2DM.
>
> I only play on m
63 matches
Mail list logo
