Would the insight into existing deployments enable you to suggest
the most likely required topologies wherre the benefits of babel would play off
?
Cheers
Toerless
On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 07:28:06AM +0200, Dave Taht wrote:
> Back in February I had distributed a basic poll about what sorts of
Back in February I had distributed a basic poll about what sorts of technologies
were common in the home, and got back about 25 results from ietfers.
http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/homenet/current/msg04724.html
Lest the complexity of those networks be written off as a geekisms, I also
ran t
Dave Taht wrote:
The homenet working group has been laboring for several years now to
find ways to make ipv6 more deployable to home (and presumably small
business) users.
In addition to multiple specification documents some code has been
produced to try and make things easier. At least in the
> Op 20 feb. 2015, om 17:50 heeft Dave Taht het volgende
> geschreven:
>
> The homenet working group has been laboring for several years now to
> find ways to make ipv6 more deployable to home (and presumably small
> business) users.
>
> In addition to multiple specification documents some cod
>
>
> 0) Have you managed to get ipv6 working at all? If so, how? What sort
> of problems did you encounter?
>
Yes. I use DIR-855L at home, PPPoE. The only problem I have so far is my
ISP gives only /64 via PD.
>
> 1) Have you attempted to deploy a routing protocol in your home? Which
> one, and
On 2/20/15 8:50 AM, Dave Taht wrote:
> The homenet working group has been laboring for several years now to
> find ways to make ipv6 more deployable to home (and presumably small
> business) users.
>
> In addition to multiple specification documents some code has been
> produced to try and make th
On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 08:50:10AM -0800, Dave Taht wrote:
> 0) Have you managed to get ipv6 working at all? If so, how? What sort
> of problems did you encounter?
Yes.
How ? Through configuration ? Don't understand the question.
Problems:
a) IPv6 incapable clients:
2 IP printers
1 printer-ad
On 21/02/2015 05:50, Dave Taht wrote:
> So a quick poll:
Goodie, I love polls (not) ;-)
> 0) Have you managed to get ipv6 working at all? If so, how? What sort
> of problems did you encounter?
Yes.
(a) Using SixXs/ayiya. Geek problems (the SixXs geeky registration
interface, and the fact that
0) Have you managed to get ipv6 working at all? If so, how? What sort
of problems did you encounter?
I originally had IPv6 service through a tunnel to SixXS, which was OK once I
got the details sorted.
I'm using a Linksy E4200 with development software from a project at Cisco that
includes IPv
> On Feb 20, 2015, at 11:50 AM, Dave Taht wrote:
>
> The homenet working group has been laboring for several years now to
> find ways to make ipv6 more deployable to home (and presumably small
> business) users.
>
> In addition to multiple specification documents some code has been
> produced t
In message
, Dave Taht writes:
> The homenet working group has been laboring for several years now to
> find ways to make ipv6 more deployable to home (and presumably small
> business) users.
>
> In addition to multiple specification documents some code has been
> produced to try and make things
Am 20. Februar 2015 21:01:50 MEZ, schrieb Ted Lemon :
>I'd be a bit curious to know what people are using for test hardware.
>That's a big issue for me. I have a WNDR3800 as an internal router,
>and a Mac Mini as my edge router, and haven't had time to really try to
>make HNCP and Babel work
I'd be a bit curious to know what people are using for test hardware. That's
a big issue for me. I have a WNDR3800 as an internal router, and a Mac Mini
as my edge router, and haven't had time to really try to make HNCP and Babel
work with them. Making IPv6 prefix delegation work on a stoc
>So a quick poll:
>
>0) Have you managed to get ipv6 working at all? If so, how? What sort
>of problems did you
Yes. Most foss router software sucked with v6. Tried to fix some things. Still
not 100% convinced.
>
>1) Have you attempted to deploy a routing protocol in your home? Which
>one, and
Hi,
On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 08:50:10AM -0800, Dave Taht wrote:
> So a quick poll:
>
> 0) Have you managed to get ipv6 working at all? If so, how? What sort
> of problems did you encounter?
Yes, PPPoE/L2TP session to myself as ISP on the other end (so I cheated).
> 1) Have you attempted to deplo
On 02/20/2015 08:50 AM, Dave Taht wrote:
The homenet working group has been laboring for several years now to
find ways to make ipv6 more deployable to home (and presumably small
business) users.
In addition to multiple specification documents some code has been
produced to try and make things e
On 20.2.2015, at 18.50, Dave Taht wrote:
> The homenet working group has been laboring for several years now to
> find ways to make ipv6 more deployable to home (and presumably small
> business) users.
>
> In addition to multiple specification documents some code has been
> produced to try and ma
On Fri, 20 Feb 2015, Dave Taht wrote:
1) Have you attempted to deploy a routing protocol in your home? Which
one, and why?
Home, HE tunnel.
2) Have you attempted to get hnetd's prefix distribution system
working? (it supports linux mainline and openwrt presently)
Yes, I had this working, b
On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 11:50 AM, Dave Taht wrote:
> The homenet working group has been laboring for several years now to
> find ways to make ipv6 more deployable to home (and presumably small
> business) users.
>
> In addition to multiple specification documents some code has been
> produced to
The homenet working group has been laboring for several years now to
find ways to make ipv6 more deployable to home (and presumably small
business) users.
In addition to multiple specification documents some code has been
produced to try and make things easier. At least in the USA, comcast
has rol
20 matches
Mail list logo
