Re: [hugin-ptx] 360 pano, auto expose?

Autoexposure works fine with a little bit of care. It's how I take all of my panorama. Shoot raw. Take brackets if the intra-frame contrast is too high to capture in a single exposure. Develop the raw files, cranking highlight recovery to max if needed, plus shadow boost. Assemble 16 bit tiffs

Re: [hugin-ptx] Re: Adjusting the yaw, pitch and roll of two equirectangular panorama in one view

The main issue is the deliberate parallax for stereoscopic imaging. You will only be able to get good alignment if your control points are on objects as far away from the camera position. In principle, you will only need 2 pairs of control points to align 2 panoramas with y, p, r adjustment.

Re: [hugin-ptx] Re: Adjusting the yaw, pitch and roll of two equirectangular panorama in one view

What you can do is custom optimise and choose what parameters you want to keep fixed on the optimise tab that comes up. Make sure the parameters for the 1st panorama are fixed (unticked) and that the lens parameters are also unticked. Then just optimise the y, p, r parameters of the 2nd image.

Re: [hugin-ptx] Re: Adjusting the yaw, pitch and roll of two equirectangular panorama in one view

Here's the Hugin project file. I've tried to align it as best as I can but you have some noticeable parallax which prevents the two panoramas lining up perfectly. On Tuesday, 22 November 2022 at 20:49:30 UTC DerekS wrote: > Sure. Here are two examples. > > I would be looking for an easy

Re: [hugin-ptx] Re: Adjusting the yaw, pitch and roll of two equirectangular panorama in one view

Can you share your 2 images? They can jpgs if that makes it easier to transfer. It should be quite straightforward to align them On Thursday, 17 November 2022 at 17:28:13 UTC DerekS wrote: > Hi Bruno > > Indeed the lens type for both input image is being read by Hugin > as equirectangular, and

[hugin-ptx] Re: Adjusting the yaw, pitch and roll of two equirectangular panorama in one view

Have you tried adding control points between the 2 images and then optimising the yaw, pitch, roll of just one of them? On Wednesday, 16 November 2022 at 17:01:27 UTC DerekS wrote: > Hi, > > I often use Hugin to correct the pitch and roll of an equirectangular > panorama taken with a 360

Re: [hugin-ptx] Pano curves upward despite level images

Can you send me the link to the photos? Did you use a panohead? Parallax can cause problems. On Friday, 19 August 2022 at 00:00:33 UTC+1 lphil...@gmail.com wrote: > No problem sharing -- I sent a Google Drive link to you via email just > moments ago. > > Thanks. > > On Thursday, August 18,

Re: [hugin-ptx] Re: Hugin++ direct reading of ARW (raw) files

A7m3 does uncompressed 14 bit raw files https://helpguide.sony.net/ilc/1720/v1/en/contents/TP0001661967.html https://www.sony.co.uk/electronics/support/articles/00229990. The A7m3 sensor has a 14 bit ADC (IMX410 https://www.sony-semicon.com/files/62/pdf/p-13_IMX410CQK_Flyer.pdf

[hugin-ptx] Hugin example files for Nadir insertion, Shadow Patching, and Exposure Fusion

I've released an example set of files and blog post http://www.dkloi.co.uk/?p=1570 covering some techniques that may be of interest to other Hugin users. It presupposes knowledge of how to take and assemble panoramas in Hugin but covers how to take a high contrast scene (dim church with bright

[hugin-ptx] Re: settings for photomosaics using iPhone 13 (mini)?

If you can find a scene with objects far away to place control points, you could use a normal head with a planning base to take the 360 cylindrical photo, this should reduce the effect of parallel on the stitch and optimisation. It looked as if you had a few bad control points leading to

[hugin-ptx] Re: settings for photomosaics using iPhone 13 (mini)?

Might be better to use a panohead to take a 360 cylindrical pano with lots of overlap, create many spread out control points, optimise, and then save the lens parameters. This will give an accurate horizontal field of view, (equivalent) focal length, and the distortion values. When you say,

[hugin-ptx] Re: Adding zenith shot

I have shot using an APS-C camera and 17mm (on a 17-50mm zoom) using a panohead and the pattern I used was (shot in portrait orientation) 10 shots at 0 deg pitch, 10 shots at +/-45 deg pitch, + Zenith and Nadir shots. I could have reduced it to 8 shots at +/-45 deg I think but it was easier to

[hugin-ptx] Re: Adding zenith shot

You can manually place the zenith shot. In Expert Mode, under Geometric Optimisation choose Custom Parameters. This will bring enable the Optimizer tab. You can then manually enter the desired yaw, pitch, and roll parameters of the zenith shot. >From your example, I'm not sure your lens is

Re: [hugin-ptx] Vertical panorama exposure issue

If provide the raw files, maybe we could give it a shot. Are you able to show what you are getting? In high contrast situations, I will use exposure blending with enfuse and this gives quite natural looking results. On Friday, 11 February 2022 at 14:32:22 UTC johnfi...@gmail.com wrote: > I

Re: [hugin-ptx] Re: how should I make a indoor 360° panorama

the Ripon Cathedral Library? I wasn't expecting to find the EV correction > on > what I had stamped as beginners interface. I may need to look more closely > what I can change the as well. > > Am Montag, 3. Januar 2022, 19:14:59 CET schrieb 'dkloi' via hugin and > o

Re: [hugin-ptx] Nona is producing strange colors

Might be useful if you could make available (e.g. dropbox or similar) an example set of images and a PTO file. The white balances of the two files seem to be quite different. Could be something to do with colour profiles or some settings within Hugin but I don't really know. On Monday, 3

Re: [hugin-ptx] Re: how should I make a indoor 360° panorama

t; translate > that into how to do this for real like above. > And of course: looking at how others are doing things is a great way to > learn > imho. > > Am Montag, 20. Dezember 2021, 17:41:53 CET schrieb 'dkloi' via hugin and > other > free panoramic software: > > Y

Re: [hugin-ptx] Re: how should I make a indoor 360° panorama

t; > If anyone knows articles/tutorials about 360° and/or indoor panos please > share. I find it really hard to find something that covers more than the > basics > and is not outdated (or at least old and thus unclear to me if still > valid). > > Am Sonntag, 19. Dezember 20

[hugin-ptx] Re: how should I make a indoor 360° panorama

>From the Hugin manual at https://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_Stitcher_tab "If *Exposure fused from any arrangement* is enabled then hugin will seam blend images with similar exposure with enblend and than it will exposure fuse

Re: [hugin-ptx] How to level a sea horizon?

Have you tried putting horizontal control point pairs on different images? Example http://www.dkloi.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2021/11/SeaHorizon.png On Tuesday, 24 August 2021 at 08:37:57 UTC+1 GnomeNomad wrote: > Gunther - > > Thanks for the reminders. I added horizontal lines, tried

[hugin-ptx] Re: Question about some enblend command line options

You should only have one option for the blending colour space. Maybe enblend ignores the previous options? I use "--blend-colorspace=identity" as I have experienced artefacts with the default settings. Seems to blend fine, the colour differences between frames are usually minor so using

[hugin-ptx] Re: panorama upside down: where is the Num. Trans. button

The numerical transform button in on the "Panorama preview" window, 4th button from left (Centre, Fit, Straighten, Num. Transf.) On the "Fast Panorama preview" window, there is no button but there are Yaw, Pitch, and Roll adjustments you can apply on the Move/Drag tab. On Monday, 9 August 2021

Re: [hugin-ptx] Re: focus stacking tool with Hugin

9 schreef 'dkloi' via hugin and other free > panoramic software : > >> Hi Michel, >> >> You may want to look at >> https://patdavid.net/2013/01/focus-stacking-macro-photos-enfuse/ Enfuse >> is normally used for exposure blending >> https://patdavid.

[hugin-ptx] Re: focus stacking tool with Hugin

Hi Michel, You may want to look at https://patdavid.net/2013/01/focus-stacking-macro-photos-enfuse/ Enfuse is normally used for exposure blending https://patdavid.net/2013/07/automatic-exposure-blending-with-enfuse/ but can do exposure stacking as well. There is a standalone enfuse/enblend

Re: [hugin-ptx] Aligning 2nd Image Control Points to Match 1st Image

d then move to STITCHER tab, PROJECTION (Rectilinear)? > Remapped Images select all three boxes and then hit STITCH? > > When I do that, it tells me it could not output as no images are selected. > > Thanks. > > > On Sat, 17 Apr 2021 at 22:41, 'dkloi' via hugin and other free

Re: [hugin-ptx] Aligning 2nd Image Control Points to Match 1st Image

Here's my attempt. I manually tried to match points on the building but because there has been a lot of renovation to the frontage, as well as large tree in the way obscuring key bits of the building, I don't expect the match to be great. Daniel On Saturday, 17 April 2021 at 12:20:39 UTC+1

Re: [hugin-ptx] Correction of heavy noise?

It's caused by enblend/enfuse. I've tried to figure out what conditions causes it but never really found anything definitive. I just use the previously suggested setting, "--blend-colorspace=IDENTITY" (used to use "--no-ciecam" before they changed the options) to prevent it happening. On

Re: [hugin-ptx] Re: New to Huglin looking for some help.

e how they will work on my stuff. >> >> Cheers >> Nor >> >> >> On 12/3/2020 6:56 AM, 'dkloi' via hugin and other free panoramic software >> wrote: >> >> Stitch looks good. You can see in the stitch tab that the FOV is now a >> more reaso

Re: [hugin-ptx] Re: New to Huglin looking for some help.

itcher tab that I finally used. > > Not really being familiar with this program I was just poking and hoping > that something would work. ONce I have it all figured out I'll put > together a work flow. > > Thanks for the reply. > Cheers > Nor > > > > > On 12/2/

[hugin-ptx] Re: New to Huglin looking for some help.

Welcome to the group. It would help if you could provide the images. You should be able to stitch astronomical images together. I note on the log file: Number of active images: 3 Output exposure value: 0.0 Canvas size: 6040x7940 ROI: (0, 0) - (6040, 7940) FOV: 360x473 Projection:

Re: [hugin-ptx] Re: Newbie question/problem

Sometimes it's good to see how the sausage is made :-). I agree that the assistant would be able to do the same thing more or less on this simple stitch and would be the practical method in many cases. For newbies wanting to stop being newbies, seeing what goes under the hood can be

Re: [hugin-ptx] Re: Newbie question/problem

rus-free. > www.avast.com > <https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email_source=link_campaign=sig-email_content=webmail_term=link> > > <#CAHiEbuVcQE-LXuDm4L5XHVa=XaxkH3pmTc+Opan5nSGfyQK2eA@mail.gmail.com_m_4046455741725645594_DAB4FAD8-2DD7-40BB-A1B8-4E2AA1F9FDF2> > >

[hugin-ptx] Re: Newbie question/problem

It seems to stitch fine. I ran the CPfind on adjacent pairs of images, optimised positions, field of view, barrel, and everything without translation. Found a few outlying CPs, corrected them, optimised again. Then did exposure optimisation (without EMoR), exposure, balance, and vignetting. I

Re: [hugin-ptx] help needed with producing HDR panorama

Looks like there are some problems with the seam generation in Enblend that can lead to some of the problems you are seeing. Try turning off seam optimisation to see if that helps ( http://enblend.sourceforge.net/enblend.doc/enblend_4.2.xhtml/enblend.html#sec%3Amask-generation-options). To

Re: [hugin-ptx] Problems with stitching a GigaPano ...

In a preview window, only selected images get stitched into the final pano. On Wednesday, 29 November 2017 09:13:53 UTC, GnomeNomad wrote: > > > > On November 28, 2017 10:41:18 PM HST, Terry Duell > wrote: > >On Wed, 29 Nov 2017 17:03:49 +1100, Emad ud din Bhatt >

Re: [hugin-ptx] Problems with stitching a GigaPano ...

Try specifying nft as the seam generator instead of graph cut in the enblend options. I ran into problems where the default seam generation method was coming up with really bizarre seams, hence leading to weird results in the final stitch. On Friday, 3 November 2017 07:39:06 UTC,

[hugin-ptx] Re: Question about layer order and shooting the sky

On Sunday, 22 October 2017 08:51:10 UTC+1, Jesse Kennedy wrote: > > Hello Hugin users, > > I've been using the software for a couple months, and I really like it. > Thanks to the developers for creating an awesome project that's still > relevant many years later. I have a question about how you

[hugin-ptx] Re: hugin produces bad picture

Here's a downscaled version of the 24202 pixel wide stitch. Hugin 2017.0.0.eac5e8cc546e on Windows 10 Ent 64 bit. Don't see any problems. CPFind, added some VCPs,

[hugin-ptx] Re: align_image_stack with any exposure but move/drag

I had a look at the files you uploaded. Here's a PTO that has them all aligned. I added the images into a fresh Hugin project. Did not assign stacks. I ran Hugin's CPFind on each exposure set (same position, different exposures). I then ran CPFind on the middle exposures. Optimized position,

[hugin-ptx] Re: Link/Unlink Images and Parameters?

It is documented in both Hugin help and panotools. Just search for "unlink" and you'll get hits on the relevant sections. Basically it's to determine whether certain parameters get modified the same way when optimising for a group of images either with the same lens or in the same stack. E.g.

[hugin-ptx] Re: Enfuse 4.1.1 CIECAM bug?

I found reference to the bug at https://bugs.launchpad.net/enblend/+bug/752283 https://bugs.launchpad.net/enblend/+bug/1576862 https://discuss.pixls.us/t/enfuse-artifacts/4687 On Wednesday, 2 August 2017 19:33:59 UTC+1, mh00h wrote: > > I have this exact same speckles problem in Arch Linux. It

[hugin-ptx] Link/Unlink Images and Parameters?

Maybe I'm missing something but I can't seem to find the link/unlink option in the Context (right click) Menu or the link checkboxes when editing image parameters. For example, I select an image in the Photos tab, one that shares a lens with other images, and right click to bring up the context

[hugin-ptx] Re: align_image_stack with any exposure but move/drag

On Tuesday, 1 August 2017 20:02:48 UTC+1, mh00h wrote: > > Here is my workflow: > > > > > > >> Image align stack each set of exposure. > > Images are big 16-bit

[hugin-ptx] Re: align_image_stack with any exposure but move/drag

I'd import all the images into a single project. Image align stack each set of exposure. Stitch together one image from each exposure stack into a panorama (e.g. the middle exposures). Thus the others in the stack will also be aligned. Then I would export each exposure separately (light, mid,

[hugin-ptx] Re: I have problem with stiching - always get one photo in result

Have you optimized the position of the images? You need to do this after creating control points. On Tuesday, 24 May 2016 14:23:44 UTC+1, Marcin Majkowski wrote: > > Could You help me please?? I've done 69 photos - it is half of the sphere. > I upload photos to Hugin, make contorl points, and

[hugin-ptx] Re: Dark marks on panoramas

Check that your cropping circle is correct. Looks like you are including some of the image beyond the image circle of your lens. What's your shooting setup? On Tuesday, 24 May 2016 08:45:36 UTC+1, Jakob Dalhoff wrote: > > Hi, > > I have been using Hugin for about 7 months and have never had any

[hugin-ptx] Re: Need help / Feedback on my workflow

On Friday, 22 April 2016 00:13:52 UTC+1, Sukima wrote: > > I've tried several times to figure out the focus with the fisheye. Every > time I can't seem to tell the difference between infinity and 0.4 ft! Maybe > I need my eyes checked. > If you camera doesn't have liveview, then you'll can find

[hugin-ptx] Re: night panorama

If you can't place manual control points then it doesn't sound promising. Any chance of uploading the source images? On Saturday, 16 April 2016 16:58:18 UTC+1, Livio Scalmati wrote: > > anybody can help me in creating a panorama using 6 photo, taken by night ? > It's a panoraman with my town and

[hugin-ptx] Re: Problem with Hemisferic Photos

Here's a step by step guide: Open Hugin Set the interface to be expert Add images Set the lens parameters when asked. What lens/camera combination are you using? I'm guessing 8mm and 1.5 crop. Choose circular fisheye. Got to Masks tab. For each image, use the crop tab and drag the edges of the

[hugin-ptx] Re: Problem with Hemisferic Photos

Why are you using the instructions for stitching together scanned documents? I assume you're using a fisheye lens to take upward shots of the forest canopy? You need to stitch them as you would a normal (partial) panorama using the right lens parameters like the lens type (fisheye) and focal

Re: [hugin-ptx] indoor photosphere

Give us more information if you want us to help you. What did you do? Give precise steps, the details matter. On Tuesday, 15 March 2016 18:40:04 UTC, Michael wrote: > > I flipped it yesterday and tried to fuse them to no avail. > > On Tue, Mar 15, 2016 at 1:18 PM, panostar

Re: [hugin-ptx] indoor photosphere

The numbers "3.3-5.9" are the max apertures of the lens at the wide and tele end of the zoom respectively, not the crop factor. On Tuesday, 15 March 2016 00:02:16 UTC, Michael wrote: > > wow, I didn't even think it would be on the lens of a point an click. I > looked and there it is (sort of).

Re: [hugin-ptx] indoor photosphere

Hugin only cares about the actual angle of view of your lens. The angle of view depends on the focal length of the lens (let's just assume we're talking about rectilinear lenses and not fisheyes) and the size of the sensor the image cast by the lens fall upon. Once upon a time, most

Re: [hugin-ptx] indoor photosphere

Can you explain fully what you are doing? What lens are you using? Are you using a panoramic head? What are the steps you are doing in Hugin? Without details, we can't help. >From your log file: First input image Number: 0 Filename: /home/bmike1/Pictures/Work/photospere test/DSC00100.JPG Size: