[hugin-ptx] Re: GSoC2009_layout with XYZ for Windows - please test

almost a scaling factor, and there is nothing really controlling that the two groups end up on the same scale. Cheers O 2009/10/18 James Legg > > On Sat, 2009-10-17 at 20:23 +0200, Oskar Sander wrote: > > I have now tested with a bit bigger project, and get a very strange > &

[hugin-ptx] Re: GSoC2009_layout with XYZ for Windows - please test

I have now tested with a bit bigger project, and get a very strange result, I need some help to see If I am doing something wrong, or it's a bug. Iseems like there are "phantom" CP's in optimization that stuffs up the result. These are visible in the layout-view but not in the CP-list. (reported

[hugin-ptx] Re: Next GUI - take 2

Sounds like great ideas Yuv. V * Maximize effective image area within these windows regardless of full screen or not is used(My intepretation of maximize footprint) * Hey, these functions could even all coexist open as parallel V-window instances! W * Concentrate & condense controls and informati

[hugin-ptx] Re: Te0 and Te1 parameters in libpano13

Hi Pablo, in my quest to visualize the model I go on with a couple of questions if you don't mind. In the XYZ model an example w 3 cameras can look like in *illustration1 * attached. It is a 2D illustration, disregarding the Y dimension for the moment. * 3 cameras with different Z & X, and diff

[hugin-ptx] Re: GSoC2009_layout with XYZ for Windows - please test

That's a known bug (see previously in the thread). A workaround is to build your project in Ad's version first, then copy the new binaries. 2009/10/12 Zoran Zorkic > Crashes for me while adding photos (Nikon D90 jpegs) on Xp 32bit and > Vista 64bit. > I just copied your files over the last Ad b

[hugin-ptx] Re: GSoC2009_layout with XYZ for Windows - please test

PrincipalPoint or Nadir? http://www.r-s-c-c.org/rscc/v1m6images/pitch.jpg Cheers 2009/10/10 Pablo d'Angelo > > Oskar Sander schrieb: > > Pablo, when you said that you are working on this, did you refer to > > the "optimization strategy" above, or the ima

[hugin-ptx] Re: (Probably very basic) help needed for build process on WinXP: missing files?

I'd like to set up a Windows hugin development environment, but the terrifying length of this thread is somewhat deterrent. Do you recon your moving target is closing in? /O 2009/10/11 J. Schneider > > > First something you mentioned at the end of your mail: > > I am starting to lose track of

[hugin-ptx] Re: GSoC2009_layout with XYZ for Windows - please test

So what I was getting at is that could it be that most of the problems of the layout branch like: windows-image-read-crash, EXIF-bug, cropfactor-FOV-bug, are actually code-baseline issues for that track that would be mostly overcome after a merge into a more mature code-track. While the really ne

[hugin-ptx] Re: GSoC2009_layout with XYZ for Windows - please test

Pablo, when you said that you are working on this, did you refer to the "optimization strategy" above, or the image-load-bug? What is new in the layout-model so that the EXIF/image parameter has broken? My understanding that stack I'd is the only new parameter(althogh meaning of others ha chnge

[hugin-ptx] Re: GSoC2009_layout with XYZ for Windows - please test

annoying, one workaround seems to be to: add one image, save, exit, open project, add one image, exite, etc 2009/10/7 allard > > I experience the same problem as Oskar. > Running binaries straight from the unzipped package. Load one image, > all still fine. Load one more image, immediate crash.

[hugin-ptx] Re: Testing of SoC 2009 layout track

I've added another one: 287171. Cheers /O --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "hugin and other free panoramic software" group. A list of frequently asked questions is available at: http://wiki.panotools.

[hugin-ptx] CP generator - Any that can output detected features graphically?

Can any of the CP generators output an intermediate result preferably as detected features plotted on the source images? /O --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "hugin and other free panoramic software" gr

[hugin-ptx] Re: I just committed the following:

> > Yuval Levy wrote: > > Jim Watters wrote: > > > >> We wont need to define a new annotation to identify control points > >> belonging to a particular plane if we assume all control points of an > >> image that is using Ti or Tr are of the same plane. > >> > > this is exactly the assumption I want

[hugin-ptx] Testing of SoC 2009 layout track

Hi, I though I might test this one trough a bit more. (note one bug report in the tracker so far) a couple of Q. * Who are active developers in this track? * I'm not so sure what functionality there is in the layout model, is this the best description? [1] [1] http://wiki.panotools.org/SoC_2

[hugin-ptx] Re: GSoC2009_layout with XYZ for Windows - please test

When adding the second image to a new project, Hugin dies with a "Tell Microsoft about the problem". Application log "Faulting application hugin.exe, version 0.0.0.0, faulting module hugin.exe, version 0.0.0.0, fault address 0x004bc5ef." Are there any ways to get more useful dumps or debug traces

[hugin-ptx] Re: GSoC2009_layout with XYZ for Windows - please test

Now were getting somewhere. This with video framegrabs (not HD). The deck-plane represents projection plane and all CPs are on it. In this real-life application the subject will always be more or less 3D. I expect the plane-assumption will cause stitch glitches and labile optimization because of i

[hugin-ptx] Re: I just committed the following:

Your right with 3D and that control areas are needed instead of control points. Maybe PTstereo is something to learn from. http://wiki.panotools.org/PTStereo 2009/9/30 Yuval Levy > > Jim Watters wrote: > > Is the fact that the plane must be straight a current limitation? In > > the future wi

[hugin-ptx] Re: GSoC2009_layout with XYZ for Windows - please test

2009/9/29 Yuval Levy > I hope the (larger than expected) effort was worth it and it will result > in usage/bug reports. > I'm sure it will > > have fun > > I'm sure I will Some preliminary notes. * It works fine so far to just drop-into the directories of Ad's latest install. * I can get m

[hugin-ptx] Re: tilt functions

2009/9/26 Brent > > > I also experimented with varying d,e (it seems that letting them vary > per-image doesn't help anything which is consistent with Pablo's > explanation), and jointly optimizing with some of the lens parameters > (a,b,c). In the latter case, the optimization usually fell ap

[hugin-ptx] Re: dirent.h

> In a few hours I'm leaving again and won't have access to my windows box > for two days. I'm trying to get something out with the gsoc layout > branch so that people can test it (and file bug reports). > > Yuv > > Goodonya! Stop mailing and get back to building! ;-) /O --~--~-~--~~

[hugin-ptx] Re: dirent.h

> > For now, the workaround for those wanting to compile and use the PT > tools in Windows is to build them using MinGW. > > Yuv > > So was it this way you built it for windows in the end? Like in this: http://wiki.panotools.org/Build_pano12_from_sourcecode Cheers /O --~--~-~--~~

[hugin-ptx] APC global search of feature matches between images?

I get inconsistent result with APC depending on how many images i include (30 or 100 in my experiment) in the hugin project before starting CP search. There is also difference in the result if I reorder images. This makes me wonder how APC searches for matches between images (once individual ima

[hugin-ptx] Re: Control point generation in difficult conditions - some success

> > My idea is to run CP finding on preprocessed images, and then substitute > these for the originals before the stich step. > > I'd like to understand the APC inner working better though, maybe there are > potential improvements. I've been peeking a bit in the code of APC and the > LoweFeature de

[hugin-ptx] Re: Control point generation in difficult conditions - some success

I made a workaround with some sucess that I have yet to try on a bigger scale than on two pictures. Have a look at this project [1]. I pre processed the photos using Adbe lightroom. I made quite radical adjustments: Sharpening 91 at radius 1.0 Exposure +0.4 EV Contrast +100 Doing this

[hugin-ptx] To build the tilt version using MSVC2008EE...

I'd like to try this out! I'd like build on windows using MSVC2008EE. Is the most current instruction to do this to use only this portion of the SDK-build: http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_SDK_%28MSVC_2008%29#Panorama_Tools preceded by the installation of these three in order: 1. MSVC2008EE 2.

[hugin-ptx] Re: svn 4450 hugin installer for Windows Vista

Bingo! It seems to do the trick. Ad, If you are building a new installer with RC1, please add another default setting for autopano-sift-c. Then it will run "out of the box" Cheers 2009/9/23 Bruno Postle > > It is almost certainly this bug: > > autopano-sift-c --projection parameter no longe

[hugin-ptx] Re: [PanoTools-devel] tilt functions

2009/9/24 Pablo d'Angelo > > The XYZ mode I recently implemented actually does its rotation in an own > sphere: > It rotates image B in its own sphere and then translates (X,Y) and > scales (Z) the input image (still on the sphere!), which is then > projected onto the panorama plane (when using r

[hugin-ptx] Re: Aerial Photography Stitching (using new mosaic mode)

Thanks, I see. So the method was to take one shot as straight down as possible and then to take consecutive shots panning out towards the horizon perpendicular to the flightpath, and then repeat that procedure from the downward view, right? I think the result looks really nice Pablo! It would be

[hugin-ptx] Re: svn 4450 hugin installer for Windows Vista

No worries, I rather use the RC version of hugin, so it is the matter of finding a decent autopano-sift-c.exe to run with it. How do would you like me to report on this problem (is it known?) i only find 3 open bug reports in the tracker when searching on autopano-sift-c. What traces would be of i

[hugin-ptx] Re: Aerial Photography Stitching (using new mosaic mode)

Please excuse my noise Pablo. I just have to ask to clarify in my mind the geometry. Have I understood correctly that: * The parameters Tx,Ty,Tz (soon X,Y,Z) are now camera shift (Not attitude aka "tilt") * The y,p,r parameters are now changed from the "old" model so they apply to the camera ce

[hugin-ptx] Re: svn 4450 hugin installer for Windows Vista

Enfuse Droplets Create additional entries in Program Files menu 2009/9/22 Oskar Sander > > I don't get this install to work properly. (I used hugin uninstall for > previous installation first) > > --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this

[hugin-ptx] Re: svn 4450 hugin installer for Windows Vista

I don't get this install to work properly. (I used hugin uninstall for previous installation first) It doesn't find any control point matches for me with (default installation options), although it reports features found. This seems to happen on all projects. after a few tries with different se

[hugin-ptx] Re: Aerial Photography Stitching

Hi Matt, If you experiment on this further, it would be really sweet if you did a tutorial writeup here even if it doesn't work out perfect right now. > 0. Get and compile the current trunk of libpano13 > If you so happens to build panotools on windows, pls drop me a mail. (and I'll give this a

[hugin-ptx] Re: Hugin&PT application & examples: Underwater photo-mosaic

> took some time to load, but here it was. What is the original resolution > of the mosaic? in the PDF viewer I zoomed at 400%... > I belive this one was taken with a Nikon D300, but there has also been experiments with framegrabbs from a HD video camera. The swim-by can be easier with a videocam

[hugin-ptx] Re: Tilt transformation...

Dmg, If I am running an optimization using Autooptimize using the new Tilt parameters in the new panotools version, what is the parameter syntax in the pto-file? Cheers /O 2009/9/11 Oskar Sander > > > 2009/9/10 dmg > >> >> to be honest, I am not sure how much they wil

[hugin-ptx] Re: Hugin&PT application & examples: Underwater photo-mosaic

1 MB) http://web.mit.edu/mindell/www/Publications/ENALIA_2002a_3325.pdf 2009/9/18 Oskar Sander > *The UW- photomosaic* > > ftp://ftp.whoi.edu/pub/users/hanu/web_pdf/singh2004joe.pdf > > -- /O --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this mes

[hugin-ptx] Hugin&PT application & examples: Underwater photo-mosaic

*The UW- photomosaic* Someone here recently asked for more usage reports, so I thought I post a bit more what I try to use(misuse) Hugin for. I'm an active scuba diver and amateur marine archeologist. The conditions for these activities here in the Baltic sea are quite good for these activities,

[hugin-ptx] Re: efoto

Anyone here know of any activity with this project though? I was eying this a few months ago, but activity seems to have ceased on this site since a while unfortunately. WWWfossile? /O 2009/9/16 michael crane > > the link works now. what happened there I do not know. > mick > > 2009/9/16 Ste

[hugin-ptx] Re: well, I didn't know that

But of course. I guess someone with an interest in Norse religion named these applications. I suspect Nona being named after "Norna" (Swedish pl. Nornorna) who were the three godess of fate (past, present and future) /O (Viking) 2009/9/16 J. Schneider > > michael crane schrieb: > > http://mu

[hugin-ptx] Usage: De-fisheye with panotools (or via hugin)

De-fisheye conversion of a single image should be possible to do using PT, right? If there is a writeup on this is somewhere and could I please ask for a pointer to it in that case? Cheers /O --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscri

[hugin-ptx] Re: Tilt transformation...

2009/9/10 dmg > > to be honest, I am not sure how much they will help for a mosaic. The > model for panos in libpano > is still spherical. But it is a matter of trying. > > scale scales the tilt operations only. It actually scales the view > point from which the photo was originally taken. > > --

[hugin-ptx] Re: Tilt transformation...

Nice work guys! 2009/9/9 D M German > > > Now, the real question for hugin developers: can somebody create a > branch of hugin that supports these new parameters during the > optimization? shearX, shearY, tiltX, tiltY, tiltZ and tiltScale? > > > So trying to mentally picture these parameters in

[hugin-ptx] Re: Installer for SVN 4352 / 2009.2

Preliminary, it installs and works OK (at least not worse than 0.8) with a couple of old projects of mine on my XP. GLpreview shows some crazy triangles and stuff, that are not visible in the standard preview and in final result. This is bug reported already, and no need for further bugreport/trac

[hugin-ptx] Re: how to add another parameter to the optimization?

Cool, are you planning any test-release of that? Cheers /O 2009/9/8 D M German > > > hi Everybody, > > i am trying to finish and integrate the tilt function that Dev > implemented during the summer. > > I have everything working except the optimization. I just can't understand > the optimizer v

[hugin-ptx] Hugin system recommendation for the future?

How does an ideal Hugin system look like (for example Windows) going forward? I suppose huge amounts of memory is still good, but how does other factors rank (i.e. multiple cores, GPU etc)? I'm about to upgrade my home computer anyway and don't want to miss the mark. Cheers /O --~--~-~

[hugin-ptx] Re: Flipping Photos !

Did these controll points stand out looking at the list of control points, or did you identify these in another way? I think control point quality the key to many experienced problems (including mine!) and ways to help the user quickly identify problems and/or the algorithms to weed out bad ones f

[hugin-ptx] Re: Flipping Photos !

I think the assistant tab is causing a bit of the confusion here (at least it did first for me). It runs an optimization on the fly "align" as one of the step (right?). I may be the result after that optimization that is referred to here. A sidetrack question on that, what type of optiomization

[hugin-ptx] Re: Status of branches: I'm lost (Was: What's in a Version Number?)

Nice, I like the description on Development cycle and Release cycle you have added. Where do I look in the wiki to see what the active release branches are, description and status of the branches, who the release managers are and his/her comments? Is it intended to be under the link below or is i

[hugin-ptx] Re: Stitiching 2 images / 2 rows - Problem Rectlinear

How does straighten work? Any clever horizon detection stuff, or just trying to align the images geometrically? Cheers O 2009/8/26 Bruno Postle > > On Tue 25-Aug-2009 at 18:33 +0200, Ralf wrote: > >That works but I was not able to straighten the image. The fast > >previewwindow gets back to "f

[hugin-ptx] Re: Stitcher tab changes?

Nice! Some quick nitpicky opinions: * The words "fusion", "blending" sucks and sould not be used by themselves. We've had discussions on that before.I.e. always use the combinations "seam blending" and "exposure fusion" if needed. (the wizard setences and the Tool labels for example) * The

[hugin-ptx] Re: GSOC curious on status and inclusion plan...

e so I have some time. I know a lot of you have been interested in this > for a long time and don't want to let you down. The wiki hasn't been > updated in a while but I will update as I get closer to completion and > testing. > > -D > > > On Tue, Aug 25, 2009 at

[hugin-ptx] Re: GSOC curious on status and inclusion plan...

2009/8/25 Yuval Levy > work will continue after the official Google sponsorship ended. Nodal > Ninja is once again sponsoring the > integration work. > That is great, Kudos! > > as the students shift from full-time to spare-time it is important to > (a) give them

[hugin-ptx] GSOC curious on status and inclusion plan...

I am a bit curious on how the GSOC2009 projects turned out at the end. I'm not quite sure where on the PanoTools wiki the source of this information is, it seems to be on personal pages in some instances. For example is this the most current/correct one on mosaic mode? : http://wiki.panotools.or

[hugin-ptx] Re: No Hugin 0.8 for Windows?

2009/8/12 allard > As I don't know how to program, I think the next thing I'll try to > work on for hugin is the webpage. A bit more communication towards the > general public is might be useful. > > Allard > > > Agree absolutely. My opinion is that there should be one webb-point for the hugin

[hugin-ptx] Re: Star panorama

Nice, How long exposure time can you have before the stars blur (circle tracks) because of earth rotation? Or do you counter that effect ? Cheers /O 2009/8/11 Stephen Campton-Jones > > Hi Everyone, > I have been using Hugin for a few months now making panoramas of > constellations which I wo

[hugin-ptx] Re: Hugin crash on exit

I got the same crash. * Installed Hugin, started Hugin and did nothing, closed by clicking close in top right corner. /O 2009/7/17 Henk Tijdink > > Installed it on 2 computers with Windows XP. > One has a fresh installed Windows XP, completely updated. > On both computers is the error message w

[hugin-ptx] Re: Autopano sift running out of memory

The GoSOC project layout view will actually do exactly that integration to the current CP finding, so this is going to be solved very soon, right? What's the state with all the projects currently? Cheers /O 2009/7/10 Bruno Postle > > On Fri 10-Jul-2009 at 11:31 -0700, Tom Sharpless wrote: > >

[hugin-ptx] Re: Bug Triage: priorities?

Excuse my ignorance, but out of interest as a bug-reporter: Is there a one-pager in the wiki on what info and fields that should be entered? Cheers /O 2009/6/24 Yuval Levy > > hi all, > > weather is bad here. son and wife are sleeping. I work on codifying bug > triaging. > > One key issue to

[hugin-ptx] Re: GSoC mosaic mode project

Interesting! The documentation for Hugin and pannotols is not very good at describing the actual model, i.e. what the parameters actually are , so as a spinnoff if you just save your notes you do in the documentation wiki as you go, that would be an execelent spinnof. "To do this, we propose to a

[hugin-ptx] Re: OpenGL slow because of reloading

I concur with Allard and Yuv, Cheers O 2009/6/1 allard > > I see this now and then on WinXP, even with much larger cache > settings. > I think it is a very annoying bug, and will lead new users to turn > away from hugin if they experience it in the first few times of use. > If it is possible

[hugin-ptx] Re: Panotools::Script 0.22 released

I am rusty, I don't manage to run the scripts. I'll try to register the perl dll: regsrv32 c:\xx\perl58.dll But get the error "perl58.dll was loaded but the DllRegisterServer entry point was not found." What am I doing wrong? Cheers O 2009/5/25 Oskar Sander >

[hugin-ptx] Re: Panotools::Script 0.22 released

Ta, I will try and report back. Cheers /O 2009/5/25 Bruno Postle > > On Mon 25-May-2009 at 16:00 +0200, Oskar Sander wrote: > >If anyone here has compiled these for Windows XP already (or is about to), > I > >would be really thankfull for a download link! > > There

[hugin-ptx] Re: Panotools::Script 0.22 released

Hi, If anyone here has compiled these for Windows XP already (or is about to), I would be really thankfull for a download link! Cheers O 2009/5/24 Bruno Postle > > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > Panotools::Script is a perl module for reading/writing and > manipulating hugin

[hugin-ptx] Re: Layout panorama model (GSoC)

2009/4/24 Bruno Postle > > > Photos would be iconised with inter-connections shown as lines, > similar to the undirected graph tests but with the correct relative > positions as in Roger Wolff's ptomap test. Stacks can be shown as a > 'cascade' of images on top of each other. Unconnected photos

[hugin-ptx] Re: Layout panorama model (GSoC)

2009/4/23 James Legg The layout model can be either entered manually, or automatically > guessed after an initial alignment. The model describes the number of > images per stack, the number of stacks in each row, the total field of > view covered by each row, the direction you rotated between the

[hugin-ptx] Re: Visualize imageGraph of a project?

Hi, no I didn't see that. I would not mind trying it, did you add it as a script á la panotools-script or how is it executed? cheers 2009/4/20 r.e.wolff > > > > On Apr 19, 12:53 pm, Bruno Postle wrote: > > On Fri 17-Apr-2009 at 22:33 +0200, Oskar Sander wrote: > &

[hugin-ptx] Autooptimzer hack for linear panoramas?

I've been browsing the code now for a while, and can't really see that It would be a problem to make a variant of Pairwise, which invokes autoOptimize with the parameters "r" "p" and "y" in which I would like to call "d" and "e" in one case and "d" "e" "r" and "v" in another. Reading aut

[hugin-ptx] Visualize imageGraph of a project?

I think this may be somthing for Pablo to comment on. I'm browsing the code to understand atooptimize modes (thinking about the pairwise optimization, but for other parametes than y,p,r). And came to think whether visualizing or searching the imagegraph (that is used in the optimize) is a good

[hugin-ptx] Re: Command-line panorama making a "Linear" pano

> >> Do you also uncheck the previously optimized images in the next >> optimization run to make sure they stay put, or can Hugin handle it >> just doing minor adjustments to them?  I guess "tension" would build >> up in the pano as it grows otherwise? > > No, I keep the previously optimized image

[hugin-ptx] Re: Command-line panorama making a "Linear" pano

doing minor adjustments to them? I guess "tension" would build up in the pano as it grows otherwise? Cheers 2009/4/17 Seb Perez-D : > > On Fri, Apr 17, 2009 at 15:46, Oskar Sander wrote: >> I ran into the same  problem (evidently) with the max-number of images >> f

[hugin-ptx] Command-line panorama making a "Linear" pano

I ran into the same problem (evidently) with the max-number of images for CP-generation in Hugin as have been discussed here the last few days. Tried to create a project with a line of 180something images which is obviously above the limit. The thing is that the actual panorama is 3 parallel li

[hugin-ptx] Re: hugin-0.8.0_beta2 released

I'd just want to say that I much appreciate your publishing of the Windows installer. It works a charm on XP SP3(default settings ticked, what is missing in the implementation?) Cheers /O 2009/3/25 Dedalus : > > An installer for Windows Vista (XP not tested) based on SVN 3757 has > been b

[hugin-ptx] Re: GSoC2009

and I (and probably more with we) would be happy to provide input in testing this. /O 2009/3/20 dmg : > >> I'd like to solve the problems I'm encountering as part of Summer of Code. >> Specifically, I'd like to introduce a mosaic mode to Hugin.  This will >> require the development of the geomet

[hugin-ptx] Re: GSoC2009

Beeing able to optimize for shift in camera coordinates would be excellent I.e. the two suggestions"3D extension of panotools library "or "Implementing a new projection model for the creation of mosaics in panotools" There are commercial tools like photoshop for stiching mosaics with

[hugin-ptx] Re: Script for optimizing "Positions incrementally from anchor.."?

2009/3/13 Bruno Postle : > 'pairwise' is also available on the command-line with the > autooptimiser -p option, but I'm not sure if all parameters can be > optimised 'pairwise' or just roll, pitch & yaw - You need to do some > tests. Thanks, sounds like the way to go! What is the best documentat

[hugin-ptx] Script for optimizing "Positions incrementally from anchor.."?

In the Optimizer tab it is not possible to edit the script for the above optimization strategy. I suspect this is because the PTOptimizer runs several times in succession with incrementally added images to the script, right? Could someone please describe how that strategy works and strengths and

[hugin-ptx] Optimizing and rendering using camera position XYZ?

I'm picking up an idea from another thread: 2009/2/28 Bruno Postle : > Yes optimising X,Y,Z position parameters for each photo in hugin > would be a good SoC project. > > It wouldn't be necessary to output the full polygon mesh initially, > there are plenty of other simpler uses for the X,Y,Z cam

[hugin-ptx] Re: Photo Mosaic (Sort of linear panorama)

2009/2/28 Bruno Postle : > Yes optimising X,Y,Z position parameters for each photo in hugin > would be a good SoC project. > I wouldn't mind providing some testing and brainstorming suggestions to that project in that case. My coding is a bit rusty, but I can probably provide some debugging as w

[hugin-ptx] Re: Photo Mosaic (Sort of linear panorama)

>> >> --dmg >> > What about PTStereo?  It uses X, Y, & Z to define camera position.  I > have never used PTStereo so I don't know for sure how it works. > > # X10          World coordinates of camera position, only used for PTStereo > # Y200            If the camera is aligned (yaw = pitch = roll

[hugin-ptx] Re: Photo Mosaic (Sort of linear panorama)

> The problem is that the d,e parameters define the optical centre of > the image, so the large values you get from sideways camera > displacement misplace the lens and perspective correction. This is the sort of problem you need to discuss in a room with a whiteboard and a lot of coffe. But, I t

[hugin-ptx] Re: Photo Mosaic (Sort of linear panorama)

2008/5/27 Klaus : >> >> So in the suggested work flow; >>  * would it not work to enter the lens parameters for all lenses in >> the linear panorama, and just don´t optimize these any further, > > You first have to produce a set of distortion-free images. > > Hugin's sequence for applying the par

[hugin-ptx] Re: Simple lens calibration

sorry for waking up an old thread. I'd like to use this method to calibrate a UW camera set-up. That is, a camera in a housing with a wide angle lens attached on the housing. Obviously this set-up is very much different from the camera on land so I need to do it in the pool, so I need to plan th

<    1   2