On March 31, 2010 01:17:42 pm Bruno Postle wrote:
Hugin is already overly complex, and users don't appreciate the
possibilities of infinite combinations of options. Just because we can
show the control points in Drag mode, it doesn't mean we should
+1
for the occasional user less is better
2010/4/7 Yuval Levy goo...@levy.ch
On March 31, 2010 01:17:42 pm Bruno Postle wrote:
Hugin is already overly complex, and users don't appreciate the
possibilities of infinite combinations of options. Just because we can
show the control points in Drag mode, it doesn't mean we should
+1
Hugin is already overly complex, and users don't appreciate the
possibilities of infinite combinations of options. Just because we can
show the control points in Drag mode, it doesn't mean we should - I
would rather enhance Show Points into a separate mode that also
highlights areas of the
Bruno Postle wrote:
On 30 March 2010 23:03, Darko Makreshanski dmakreshan...@gmail.com wrote:
Bruno Postle wrote:
like the idea of a view of a globe showing the entire sphere around
the camera
With all this info, I think remapping the photos is superfluous and
would confuse
On 29 March 2010 16:27, Darko Makreshanski dmakreshan...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm actually still not sure what is the general opinion about this feature,
since apart from James, no one else has commented on it.
Some thoughts from me, though there are more ideas already in this
thread than can be
Bruno Postle wrote:
Fancy effects are a good thing, the more fun Hugin is to use the
better. So I really like the idea of animating the transitions between
projections.
The idea with the transitions was actually to animate unfolding of the
sphere to explain the nature of projections.
The
On March 29, 2010 11:27:09 am Darko Makreshanski wrote:
This system would contain both the spherical model without
Tr parameters and the mosaic model with Tr parameters. In the mosaic
model the hypothetical plane would also be rendered.
sorry, my confusion. I mixed up Tr parameters with
I have been going through the code for fast preview and I have come up
with some initial ideas how to tackle the problem for zooming in the
preview.
1. Meshes:
Upon each remapping of a mesh, the remappers (or something else) would
also create a bounding box for each mesh which will be used
On March 21, 2010 05:44:49 pm Darko Makreshanski wrote:
this mode wouldn't represent the output, but would represent an
overview of the panorama in 3D space
if you want to represent the panorama in 3D space properly, a Photosynth-like
approach is better than the panosphere.
Each picture is
Darko Makreshanski wrote:
James Legg wrote:
On Tue, 2010-03-23 at 00:57 +0100, Darko Makreshanski wrote:
Yes, the equirectangular would be most suitable to convert to a 3D
mesh.
Basically I was thinking of projecting all of the images separately,
each with its center as the center of
James Legg wrote:
On Sun, 2010-03-21 at 22:44 +0100, Darko Makreshanski wrote:
This means
that the remappers would need to be refactored or reimplemented to
return a 3D texturized mesh.
You should set up an equirectangular projection that is 360 degrees by
180 degrees, then either:
On Tue, 2010-03-23 at 00:57 +0100, Darko Makreshanski wrote:
Yes, the equirectangular would be most suitable to convert to a 3D mesh.
Basically I was thinking of projecting all of the images separately,
each with its center as the center of projection. Then to convert each
projection into
Hi,
Thanks a lot for your reply.
First, just let me clarify something for everyone, which I should have
done in the previous mail.
The 3D panosphere mode would have very little in common with the current
projection mode. So it will not use the current projection techniques to
display the
On Sun, 2010-03-21 at 22:44 +0100, Darko Makreshanski wrote:
The 3D panosphere mode would have very little in common with the current
projection mode. So it will not use the current projection techniques to
display the result (rectilinear for inside and orthographic for outside
look) but
Hi,
I have some ideas which I would like to present and get feedback of you
for a project. It basically includes the Zooming for Fast Preview and
other improvements to Fast Preview
My ideas are mostly concerned for users that are just beginning with
hugin, and users with not much knowledge
On Sat, 2010-03-20 at 17:15 +0100, Darko Makreshanski wrote:
Hi,
I have some ideas which I would like to present and get feedback of you
for a project. It basically includes the Zooming for Fast Preview and
other improvements to Fast Preview
My ideas are mostly concerned for users that
16 matches
Mail list logo
