Hey, John.
We're both having trouble with mosaics it seems. My post lies just below
yours on this list. I described a workflow in it that might be helpful to
you. Basically, it's likely the optimizing step that needs some changes.
Give it a go and see how you get on with it. If you still
Hi,
On 26 Mai, 11:12, Frederic Da Vitoria davito...@gmail.com wrote:
it took me some time to discover that b was barrel
hover over the column header to get a longer description. There is
also barrel mentioned. In the header itself there is not enough space
for the longer captions.
I still
2013/5/26 T. Modes thomas.mo...@gmx.de
Hi,
On 26 Mai, 11:12, Frederic Da Vitoria davito...@gmail.com wrote:
it took me some time to discover that b was barrel
hover over the column header to get a longer description. There is
also barrel mentioned. In the header itself there is not enough
Just tried with relative TrX,TrY,TrZ and yaw. Also, I understand that units
must be pixels.
Now results make more sense. It seems I actually have problems that could
be related to
sync errors between the camera and the gps and optimizing using CPs will be
useful.
Nevertheless, using cpfind I
I had to do the same and I ended up doing each line seperately, there is a
multiline option as well in hugin that might work for you if your overlap
is good enough.
Le lundi 28 janvier 2013 08:50:09 UTC-9, mqui...@utah.gov a écrit :
I have 38 aerial images of a site. I am trying to use Hugin
Hi Thomas. Just getting back to this. Worked great. I guess its more
intuitive, but it sure takes some getting used to the new interface when
I've been working manually all these years. I guess its a bit like leaving
DOS behind and going to a gui interface. Thanks. Battle
On Thursday,
Select group by lens and display the lens parameters. Then open
context menu (right mouse button) where the field of view is displayed
and select unlink.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Hugin and other free panoramic software group.
A list of
Ok, will play with it.
Wouldn't some kind of filtering based on geometry be possible in the mosaic
case although it won't be as unambigous?
Like using the asumption that all images are depicting a planar world from
different viewpoints.
Cheers
/O
2011/12/5 Bruno Postle
Allright, Is there documentation on how this logics works somwhere to read.
I'm guessing by the name that it is assuming a single flat plane that the
images is should be projected on in order for the CP to match. Right?
So if the reality is different, it is better to search for CP in groups of
On 5 Dec 2011 13:29, Oskar Sander wrote:
Allright, Is there documentation on how this logics works somwhere to
read.
I'm guessing by the name that it is assuming a single flat plane that the
images is should be projected on in order for the CP to match. Right?
'hom' isn't a special mosaic
On 2 Dez., 22:58, Bruno Postle br...@postle.net wrote:
what preset do you mean? Something in hugin? Is this something new?
It was new I think, but it seems to have gone in the current
2011.5.0 snapshots. Basically you need to add '--ransacmode hom' to
the default cpfind parameters to get
Thats really nice Bruno!
Is is rightly understood that you optimize all ZYX at once together (for
all viewpoints) then ypr for all together? Is that always stable?
I've missed the fact you should give different parameters for mosaic CP
find, what does that do?
Cheers
/O
2011/11/16 Bruno
On Fri 02-Dec-2011 at 17:23 +0100, Oskar Sander wrote:
Is is rightly understood that you optimize all ZYX at once together (for
all viewpoints) then ypr for all together? Is that always stable?
This might work, but really you have to optimise rpy and XYZ
together - Ideally you already
On 2 Dez., 21:40, Bruno Postle br...@postle.net wrote:
On Fri 02-Dec-2011 at 17:23 +0100, Oskar Sander wrote:
Is is rightly understood that you optimize all ZYX at once together (for
all viewpoints) then ypr for all together? Is that always stable?
I've missed the fact you should give
On Fri 02-Dec-2011 at 13:25 -0800, kfj wrote:
On 2 Dez., 21:40, Bruno Postle br...@postle.net wrote:
cpfind does filtering of control points by default, but the filter it
uses assumes you are building a 'normal' panorama. If you have a
mosaic this filter will delete all your control points -
Seems like that's what we told him already.
Try not to hold it against us that we are enjoying a conversation on
theoretical solutions after the question is answered. :-)
Nice example though (but again, it is row houses, and Syv never really
got back to us on wether it was row houses or a more
Hey all, let's get real
Syv wants to make a picture of one block of houses, not build an
experimental slit camera or invent a new technology.
He needs to take a series of overlapping photos from the other side of
the street, each one pointing more or less straight at the house
fronts opposite.
Would Smartblend [which can deal with parallax reasonably well] not be
useful in this application?
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Hugin and other free panoramic software group.
A list of frequently asked questions is available at:
That's interesting. It looks like it uses the camera's orientations
sensor to select the angle of the strip of image it captures. As you
turn the camera the strips stay vertical to the finished panorama. Did
you sweep from right to left?
It would be interesting to hack the software (but don't
These days I usually set that camera to pan in the direction of right to
left, with the camera held portrait.
On 21 November 2011 21:16, JohnPW johnpwatk...@gmail.com wrote:
That's interesting. It looks like it uses the camera's orientations
sensor to select the angle of the strip of image it
That's pretty fun.
Notice how it tried to resolve the parallax problems. It locked onto
the front surface of the the building pretty well, but had a hard time
with distant objects enclosed by the building. The objects seen
through the open door and objects reflected in the window glass appear
Try this one, and its neighbouring pictures, where I intentionally twisted
the camera around the roll axis as I swept it across an arc:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/iantindale/6066091512/in/photostream/
On 21 November 2011 07:28, JohnPW johnpwatk...@gmail.com wrote:
That's pretty fun.
Notice
On 16 Nov., 09:25, JohnPW johnpwatk...@gmail.com wrote:
Ha! Just as I expected someone with a good knowledge of the subject
has responded as I wrote this.
:-)
...
But I really think using a camera that can
take movies might be a good way to go (see below.) The idea being, the
more images
On Thu, 17 Nov 2011 09:29:23 -0800 (PST), kfj wrote:
On 16 Nov., 09:25, JohnPW johnpwatk...@gmail.com wrote:
Ha! Just as I expected someone with a good knowledge of the subject
has responded as I wrote this.
...
But I really think using a camera that can
take movies might be a good way to
Focal plane shutters are really designed for a more rapid exposure.
What is needed is probably more like a photo finish camera:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Photo_finish
Which looks to be very similar tho the line camera Kay has described
(pretty similar idea.)
That PanoScan is cool (much like
On 17 Nov., 21:14, JohnPW johnpwatk...@gmail.com wrote:
What is needed is probably more like a photo finish
camera:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Photo_finish
Which looks to be very similar tho the line camera Kay has described
(pretty similar idea.)
Really, it should be quite simple. A sensor
On Nov 17, 4:13 pm, kfj _...@yahoo.com wrote:
On 17 Nov., 21:14, JohnPW johnpwatk...@gmail.com wrote:
What is needed is probably more like a photo finish
camera:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Photo_finish
Which looks to be very similar tho the line camera Kay has described
(pretty
On 18 Nov., 00:13, JohnPW johnpwatk...@gmail.com wrote:
On Nov 17, 4:13 pm, kfj _...@yahoo.com wrote:
This is why we now try and coerce 2D hardware to do a 1D job.
I actually think using a 2D camera might be superior in many ways.
Besides ready availability of interchangeable equipment, it
Ha! Just as I expected someone with a good knowledge of the subject
has responded as I wrote this.
He has pointed out all the relevant issues and has even brought up the
tutorial that inspired me to experiment (I can never find them again
when I want to!)
The parallax thing is the big issue, and
Syv,
I emailed you a pdf example (not sure how to attach files in the list,
although I have seen that others have done it.)
I don't know how helpful it is, but perhaps it will give you an idea
of what to expect with even very casual hand held shots.
--
You received this message because you are
On Tue 15-Nov-2011 at 21:25 -0800, Syv Ritch wrote:
I want one long photo that is like standing in front of each house,
perpendicular, for the whole street.
I thought of doing many small panos of 2 images and each one covering
3 to 4 houses. I was going to do the panos to simplify, there are
Nice!
I knew it was possible. Good point on the manual editing of control
points. I meant to mention that too.
It looks like on a slant one might want some downward shots at the
high end and some upward shots at the low end (if one is seeking to
make a conventional crop.) Obviously this has it's
At the risk of sounding like a moron (as I usually do) I'll respond.
I've only recently experimented with this myself. But my initial
thought is, Do you want a mosaic or a pano?
Actually, it really sounds like you might want a linear pano rather
than a mosaic. Or possibly a series of partial panos
On 11/15/11, JohnPW johnpwatk...@gmail.com wrote:
At the risk of sounding like a moron (as I usually do) I'll respond.
No you are not.
I've only recently experimented with this myself. But my initial
thought is, Do you want a mosaic or a pano?
Actually, it really sounds like you might want a
On 16 Nov., 06:25, Syv Ritch elfrog...@gmail.com wrote:
On 11/15/11, JohnPW johnpwatk...@gmail.com wrote:
I've only recently experimented with this myself. But my initial
thought is, Do you want a mosaic or a pano?
Actually, it really sounds like you might want a linear pano rather
than
On 10 Dez., 23:59, T. Modes thomas.mo...@gmx.de wrote:
No equation, but a description can be found in the wiki:
http://wiki.panotools.org/Stiching_a_photo-mosaic
Thank you very much! I was confused, because I thought the Z axis was
going the other way. Now it all became clear: you can have Z
Hi all!
Maybe my request was overlooked, so I take the liberty to push it up
to the top of the list again before I try again under a different and
maybe more tempting heading ;-)
I did try to look into the code, and gave up after half an hour - I
just couldn't find where the calculation is done.
No equation, but a description can be found in the wiki:
http://wiki.panotools.org/Stiching_a_photo-mosaic
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Hugin and other free panoramic software group.
A list of frequently asked questions is available at:
Yes, agree. The idea with deliberate selections sounds really good.
Is there a way today to make an image to end up on top in the
preview? This would help draging as well as verifying
alignment/contribution of one specific image without having to turn
off adjacent images.
Cheers
/O
You can put a photo 'on top' in the preview by using the Identify mode, move
the mouse pointer over the image numbers and each appears on top in turn. You
can permanently put a photo on top by rearranging the list of photos in the
Images tab.
--
Bruno
--
You received this message because
Hi Darko,
On October 29, 2010 10:59:44 am Darko Makreshanski wrote:
On 10/29/2010 10:22 AM, voschix wrote:
5. the possibility to move, and zoom in and out in the preview window
without changing the X, Y parameters.
Hi, you can use the new 'Overview' in mosaic mode and zoom in/out and
Cool Darko, should I enter a bug for it?
How about the translation ratio? Is that an effect of the x,y movement from
the mouse translating to something different on the panosphere?
Cheers
/O
2010/10/29 Darko Makreshanski dmakreshan...@gmail.com
Hi,
On 10/29/2010 10:22 AM, voschix wrote:
I also have started playing with the new mosaic features. In my case I
am trying to assemble horizontal one-line pseudo-panoramas of the
waterfront in Venice, shot from a moving vaporetto.
In addition to Oskar's points 1, 2, and 3 I would like to add two
other points to the wish list:
5. the
Hi,
On 10/29/2010 10:22 AM, voschix wrote:
5. the possibility to move, and zoom in and out in the preview window
without changing the X, Y parameters.
Hi, you can use the new 'Overview' in mosaic mode and zoom in/out and
move around the scene. Also I believe you can use the Overview to
I could have also easily added the TrZ parameter, however this would
help much.
I meant wouldn't help much
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
hugin and other free panoramic software group.
A list of frequently asked questions is available at:
45 matches
Mail list logo
