Due to our coming late to the table of zOS, we have an enormous load of
ptf's to bring us up to the present day, which I requested from ShopZ. When
they were received it was 4 compressed tapes! Is there a way to have IBM
break this up so we could apply them much easier?
You don't have to apply e
In a message dated 8/2/2005 8:12:19 A.M. Central Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The 2305 is a general-purpose PAV box, so all user I/O can go through
multiple exposures (now called PAV) on it as well as ASM.
My bad. I meant the new ESS 2105 is a general-purpose PAV box, not
Thanks. Would a PMR with a suggestion of FIN APAR increase or
decrease your paperwork?
At this point it would only increase my paperwork, but thanks for the offer.
Kurt
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access ins
Estimeed listers
Thank you all for replies (online and offline). Your help is really
appreciated !
Best regards
M.S.
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the me
Craig Kittendorf sez:
>>Would this be of any use?
>> d tcpip,,net,devlinks
Sweet! Filing this one away...
Cheers,,,Steve
Steve Conway
Systems Programmer
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
703.921.6432
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff /
Article from Enterprise Systems : Mainframe Sales Slump Trigger Workforce
Cuts at
http://www.esj.com/news/article.aspx?EditorialsID=1464
"Just one day after IBM Corp. announced its largest-ever mainframe system,
mainframe mainstay Computer Associates International Inc. (CA) announced a
five perc
In a message dated 8/2/2005 8:11:02 A.M. Central Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
How many editors are there on z/OS? Basically just one -
ISPF/PDF. Well, I guess Roscoe (don't know how popular that is anymore).
Oh, and for the rich people there is WSED.
>>
TSO Edit. Works a lot
In a message dated 8/2/2005 6:16:36 A.M. Central Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
starting
reconfiguration dialog or it can be done via JES2 commands renaming the old
datasets and the new.
>>
RECONFIG dialogs are the way to go. Don't forget to update JESPARMs with new
names. Migh
On Tuesday 02 August 2005 08:56 am, Max Scarpa wrote:
> Which command should I use to 'move' chekpoint1 to 2 and so on ? $T CKPTDEF
> ?
>
> Thank you in advance
>
> M. S.
>
You use the checkpoint recconfiguration dialog to perform tha actual moves.
The $TCKPTDEF command primes the pump.
-
Mark Ja
You mean kind of like stopping a trace by using: trace ct,on
Craig
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Robert Justice
Sent: Monday, August 01, 2005 8:38 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Dilemma of a young Mainframe Systems P
If IBM had designed the ACB to handle QSAM and ALL other access
methods, we wouldn't be having this discussion. The amount of IBM
code requiring contortions or A-Mode 24 in 2005 is a disgrace. There
never should have been a need for a DCBE. The failure to allow ESDS
on tape and provide GDG type
"R.S." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
> David Andrews wrote:
>
> > On Mon, 2005-08-01 at 10:49 -0400, Jousma, David wrote:
> >
> >>Did you leave SORTWKxx allocations on mod-9's?
> >
> >
> > I left SORTWKxx allocations on unmanaged public -9s. Didn't see any
>
Heh. I was thinking the same thing: as part of our shutdown procedure we issue
commands along the lines of "S TESTSHUT," etc.
Jon
Heueueue, don't you ADCD users S SHUTDOWN at the system console to bring
your system down?
--
In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, on 07/28/2005
at 09:59 AM, Bill Fairchild <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>When PAV is involved, other considerations complicate matters. Any
>number of I/Os can theoretically be happening simultaneously within
>the same data set from any number of exposures as long a
Which command should I use to 'move' chekpoint1 to 2 and so on ? $T CKPTDEF
?
Thank you in advance
M. S.
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IB
David Andrews wrote:
On Mon, 2005-08-01 at 10:49 -0400, Jousma, David wrote:
Did you leave SORTWKxx allocations on mod-9's?
I left SORTWKxx allocations on unmanaged public -9s. Didn't see any
good reason for managing them.
Maybe except:
- possibility to keep work datasets on dedicated vo
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Robert Justice
>
> okay, one more, yes, he could learn to use windows where in
> order to "shutdown" the system, you must first hit the START button.
Alt+F4 initiates shutdown without the START button :-)
Would this be of any use?
d tcpip,,net,devlinks
Craig
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Alan C. Field
Sent: Monday, August 01, 2005 4:03 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: OSA Card Display Command
The suggestions to di
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Robert Justice
> Sent: Monday, August 01, 2005 7:32 PM
> To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
> Subject: Re: Dilemma of a young Mainframe Systems Programmer
>
>
> rant mode on
>
> well, speaking of '
Charles Mills wrote:
- This issue affects every developer who wants to write a program that
exploits 31-bit storage (what a concept in 2005!) and still supports
terminal I/O.
IIRC, the only real issue is with some DCB exits e.g., EODAD. They can
be handled by creating a below-the-line "glue
> All(hopefully Frank),
>
> I'm not a DFSORT expert, but have some questions(an ETR has
> Already been opened with IBM on this). We recently
> Started adding MOD27's to our SMS management pool that is used
> For SORTWKxx allocations. Jobs that worked in the past now fail
> Because DFSORT cannot
For those that have an interest in these things; which should be all of
us...
http://www.computerworld.com/hardwaretopics/hardware/story/0,10801,103596,00
.html
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
s
On Mon, 2005-08-01 at 10:49 -0400, Jousma, David wrote:
> Did you leave SORTWKxx allocations on mod-9's?
I left SORTWKxx allocations on unmanaged public -9s. Didn't see any
good reason for managing them.
--
David Andrews
A. Duda and Sons, Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
All(hopefully Frank),
I'm not a DFSORT expert, but have some questions(an ETR has
Already been opened with IBM on this). We recently
Started adding MOD27's to our SMS management pool that is used
For SORTWKxx allocations. Jobs that worked in the past now fail
Because DFSORT cannot switch to BLO
On Tuesday 02 August 2005 07:29 am, Max Scarpa wrote:
> Sorry
>
> I forgot to say we haven't coupling facility we are in monoplex
>
>
> M.S.
>
Same theory then. Move ckpt2 to ckpt1. redefine chkp1. reactivate chkpt1,
move new ckpt1 to primary. redefine chkpt2, reactivate chkpt2.
Do the same for
Sorry
I forgot to say we haven't coupling facility we are in monoplex
M.S.
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archiv
Aw come on. Microsoft has been around a while. Let's stop the way of the
future stuff.
Most of the Microsoft originals are over the hill while us IBM guys are
thinking about super stretch waste bands for out slacks and picking out
assisted living alternatives.
I'm not sure what the way of the fu
"Jan MOEYERSONS" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>okay, one more, yes, he could learn to use windows
where in order to "shutdown" the system, you must first
hit the START button.
Heueueue, don't you ADCD users S SHUTDOWN at the system console to bring
your system do
On Tuesday 02 August 2005 07:16 am, Max Scarpa wrote:
> Estimeed listers
>
> I've the need to enlarge our JES2 checkpoint datasets (the main couple and
> the 'spare' dataset) first in test then in prod.
>
> Is there anyone that can provide a quick procedure to do it ? I read JES2
> tuning and inizi
Estimeed listers
I've the need to enlarge our JES2 checkpoint datasets (the main couple and
the 'spare' dataset) first in test then in prod.
Is there anyone that can provide a quick procedure to do it ? I read JES2
tuning and inizialization guide but I don't understand if I've to define
new datas
I would advise that you try "DELETE VVR" before zapping the VTOC.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of DOMINGUEZ MARTIN, ANGEL LUIS
Sent: 02 August 2005 06:11
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: DELETE of DATA & INDEX entries of a
DOMINGUEZ MARTIN, ANGEL LUIS wrote:
You can choose between two choices:
* RECATALG and then normal delete
* Zap to VTOC converting DATA and INDEX into SEQ files and then
DELETE ENTRIES.
CCHHRR ??
VER53 08
REP
You can choose between two choices:
* RECATALG and then normal delete
* Zap to VTOC converting DATA and INDEX into SEQ files and then
DELETE ENTRIES.
CCHHRR ??
VER53 08
REP53 00
VER5D
Hi,
I have a DATA & INDEX entries of one KSDS in a catalog without a entrie of a
CLUSTER. There's no relevant info in the VVDS.
I would like to Delete theses entries but I can't (IDCAMS DEL NSCR Return
08).
How can I go to this goal ?
Any help will be appreciated.
Thanks.
#
Usage notes of BPX1MPI module says about signal ECB's as :
The user is responsible for initializing all ECBs, including the signal ECB. The
first ECB is the signal ECB.
Usage notes on BPX1MP says ,
When a signal is received, the mvspause service posts the signal ECB and runs
the
Ed Finnell wrote:
In a message dated 8/1/2005 9:30:08 A.M. Central Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
So the drives are software compatible, but the carts are totally
incompatible and cannot be mounted in the other vendors drives.
Yup, but you can order 3590 guts for a 9840.
>okay, one more, yes, he could learn to use windows
>where in order to "shutdown" the system, you must first
>hit the START button.
Heueueue, don't you ADCD users S SHUTDOWN at the system console to bring
your system down?
Jantje.
-
101 - 137 of 137 matches
Mail list logo
