ibm-main wrote:
So, CA still needs their arse kicked. Let's say Ed was right, and the
product has been out there 25-odd years.
And they *still* haven't registered it ...
It's no surprise. The so-called registry is still somewhat informal
and not that well known. Hardly anyone at IBM even
Peter Kvernes wrote:
The answer is Strobe, or?
These alternatives immediately come to mind. There may be others...
http://www.compuware.com/products/strobe/default.htm
http://www.bmc.com/products/proddocview/0,2832,19052_19429_23398_1363,00.html
Up to now, with OS/2-based HMCs attached to z900, we made use of the
Netscape browser to connect from one HMC to the other. This was quite
convenient for us, as we have the first HMC at hand, while the other one is
away from us.
However, with z9 and the new linux+java-based HMC we don't have this
Hi, can someone tell me how can I do to mount a dasd volume as
read-only? (if there is a way).
Thanks.
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET
Hi, can someone tell me how can I do to mount a dasd volume as
read-only? (if there is a way).
Run z/OS as a guest under z/VM.
-
-teD
I’m an enthusiastic proselytiser of the universal panacea I believe in!
--
For IBM-MAIN
On Sun, 19 Feb 2006 00:00:00 GMT Ted MacNEIL [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
:Hi, can someone tell me how can I do to mount a dasd volume as
:read-only? (if there is a way).
:Run z/OS as a guest under z/VM.
I remember, in the ancient past, that there was a switch on the device to make
it read-only.
Ed,
I keep a complete list of all MVS debugging and performance analysis
software I know about here:
http://gsf-soft.com/Documents/MVS-APPL-DEBUGGING.shtml
But I don't believe the OP was looking for alternatives to the IBM APA.
His question was this:
Has anyone made APA an integral tool in
I remember, in the ancient past, that there was a switch on the device to make
it read-only.
How do you physically make a logical device that is spread over umpteen volumes
read-only?
You would need a switch for each cylinder/track on each disk.
-
-teD
I’m an enthusiastic proselytiser of the
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Lucas Morton
Sent: Sunday, February 19, 2006 6:16 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Mount DASD as read-only
Hi, can someone tell me how can I do to mount a dasd volume
as
Gilbert Saint-Flour wrote:
I keep a complete list of all MVS debugging and performance analysis
software I know about here:
http://gsf-soft.com/Documents/MVS-APPL-DEBUGGING.shtml
I didn't know you kept such lists. Useful to know. I couldn't help but
notice your Performance Monitors -
In a message dated 2/19/2006 8:21:44 A.M. Central Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
remember, in the ancient past, that there was a switch on the device to make
it read-only.
There was but probably don't want to do it today. Can control with security
product at VOL and DSN
On Sat, 18 Feb 2006 19:44:52 -0500, Bob Rutledge [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have a job ready to pull PK15432 and a couple relatives but
I doubt that I'll have to use it after two months.
As far as anyone knew, we ran fine with the PK15432 for close to
a month, so time may not be a good
In [EMAIL PROTECTED], on 02/18/2006
at 09:32 AM, Edward E. Jaffe [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
In the USA, we drive on the right. On a freeway (or highway), the
fastest cars are supposed to drive in the left lanes; the slower ones
on the right.
Every time someone says I don't believe in theories
In [EMAIL PROTECTED], on 02/18/2006
at 03:36 PM, Chris Mason [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Incidentally, I once saw a cartoon of US police pulling over a car
because it was going too slowly. This was some years ago and, at the
time, would never have happened in the UK, hence the opportunity for
Please don't send duplicate copies of your replies.
In [EMAIL PROTECTED], on 02/18/2006
at 11:42 PM, Matt Collins [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
My fault, I'm referring to our Z/OS consoles, we have four of them,
each identified by a Tel#. Their different TSO's as I'm told. Is that
like having 4
Rafa Pereira wrote:
Up to now, with OS/2-based HMCs attached to z900, we made use of the
Netscape browser to connect from one HMC to the other. This was quite
convenient for us, as we have the first HMC at hand, while the other one is
away from us.
However, with z9 and the new linux+java-based
Now it's regular bug IMHO.
Did anybody try to import text file with OSA-ICC definitions ?
During validation process it says no client IP address provided
...directly above the line with CLIENT_IP=ip_address.
More: I exported working (generated by HMC) file and then imported it
back. It also
In a recent note, Ron and Jenny Hawkins said:
Date: Sun, 19 Feb 2006 13:52:32 +0800
The main difference between Instant Split and COW is that the Source data
will always be copied to the target location eventually, whereas with Copy
On Write only updated data is moved to the update
On Feb 18, 2006, at 11:44 PM, Bruce Black wrote:
Let me elaborate on what Ron said.
There are essentially 3 technologies out there for instant
replication of data.
1) Snapshot, in the IBM RVA and the StorageTek(Sun) disks, was
truly instant, since the architecture allowed data to be copied
In a message dated 2/19/2006 12:01:15 P.M. Central Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
And
depending on what downstream programs process or people looking at
data see, the condition may not be detected quickly or easily.
Yeah this could get nasty. Feeds to Data Warehouse, Data
On Feb 18, 2006, at 11:50 PM, Bruce Black wrote:
OK but it is far from *INSTANT* the propagation delay is still there,
no matter how fat (big) of pipline you may have, right?
Ed, I don't quite see your point.
In the technologies that Ron and I described, when you access the
data on the
(Attn: old post resurrection warning...)
Thomas, I'm using the Long Displacement Facility quite a bit in a piece of
code I'm writing now. It's not so much that I need it for the CSECT, but
for the DSECT.
Overall, I'm pretty satisfied with it. There is however, one consideration
that I'll point
On Feb 19, 2006, at 12:00 AM, Ted MacNEIL wrote:
I remember, in the ancient past, that there was a switch on the
device to make
it read-only.
How do you physically make a logical device that is spread over
umpteen volumes read-only?
You would need a switch for each cylinder/track on each
John D. Slayton wrote:
Are ALL Mainframe systems have the Military or hour format?
Please advise...thanks
I beleive that all clocks in all computers use a 24 hour clock
internally. How it display's is up to whomever writes the software and
the OS. I personally perfer 24 hour time, as it
In the *OLD*, *OLD* days, the 1311(1401/1441/1460-series machines), 2311 AND
the 2314 disk drives had a read-only switch. For operators, it was a great
way to get rid of a nuisance programmer by convincing him he had a problem
with his program's logic since it would cough-up a very cryptic error
This topic has been discussed ad nauseam. Consult the archives!
John Gilmore
Ashland, MA 01721-1817
USA
_
On the road to retirement? Check out MSN Life Events for advice on how to
get there!
John D. Slayton wrote:
Are ALL Mainframe systems have the Military or hour format?
Please advise...thanks
360s had a 32bit, binary timer ... located at location 80 (hex '50') in
real storage. it was about 15hr period ... and most machines updated it
about 3milliseconds. some machines had
I have been using a FileAid Step in JCL to check for an empty file and then
executing a subsequent block of JCL if the return code is 0. This works
great for RECFM=FB datasets. For some reason it will not work on RECFM=FBA
or RECFM=VB datasets. Is there a way to make these work?
Gene Cash wrote:
I never understood the reasoning behind this implementation. So it had
to go across the bus to increment the clock? It wasn't just a hardware
counter with an increment line tied to an oscillator?
originally, why i don't know.
360/67 had high-resolution timer option
Haven't seen any IBM-DSECT which is longer then 4096 bytes (z/os R4 and R7) Or
do you think about you own DSECT for working storage or static areas?
Perhaps you can substitude the instruction like COPY IEABRC does? Oh well
haven't spend so much time to look at it. You may post this to the
In a recent note, Anne Lynn Wheeler said:
Date: Sun, 19 Feb 2006 16:47:43 -0700
370 introduced 64bit hardware clock ... hardware spec called for
machines to update the timer on approx. same period as instruction
execution time ... but as if bit 51 represented one microsecond (bit
Quick pet peeve alert(*): the term open systems as currently applied.
For example, I fail to see how a Microsoft Windows server is an open
system and a mainframe running Linux (an open source operating system,
after all(**)) is not.
Could we all agree to call them distributed systems? Seems a
But I don't believe the OP was looking for alternatives to the IBM APA.
His question was this:
Has anyone made APA an integral tool in the software development
cycle? If so, where are you getting the most bang for the buck?
Yes, that's how I read the question too, but perhaps the original poster
Timothy,
Open Systems is Hitachi parlance for drives formatted in FBA format and used
by Linux, UNIXen, and Windows. I don't see that we need to change 10 years
of convention.
BTW I thought that the term Open Systems was for those that complied with
Open Systems Foundation standards, and that
Moving the CF from external to internal might introduce
single points of failure which may lead to data loss. So,
careful planning is due. Some apply only to multi system
sysplex, some also to single system environments.
Peter Hunkeler
CREDIT SUISSE
Schiradin,Roland HG-Dir itb-db/dc wrote:
Haven't seen any IBM-DSECT which is longer then 4096 bytes (z/os R4 and R7) Or
do you think about you own DSECT for working storage or static areas?
Perhaps you can substitude the instruction like COPY IEABRC does? Oh well
haven't spend so much time to
Hi Steve,
A similar question was asked before on a different list:
http://mvshelp.net/vbforums/showthread.php?t=21311
Maybe a different utility such as DFSORT/SyncSort or IDCAMS might be the
answer
Regards, UK Mikey.
On Sun, 19 Feb 2006 17:46:28 -0600, Steve Burks [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I
If you need to better customize RC you could use a REXX. Let me know if you
need the very simple code.
Best regard.
-Messaggio originale-
Da: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Per conto di Steve
Burks
Inviato: lunedì 20 febbraio 2006 0.46
A: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
38 matches
Mail list logo
