Re: WebSphere SMF records

Hello, We would like to review the SMF120_5 and SMF120_6 record and we have customized WAS v.5 following described steps at WAS docs: +BBOM0001I server_SMF_container_activity_enabled: 1. +BBOM0001I server_SMF_container_interval_enabled: 1. +BBOM0001I server_SMF_interval_length: 0. +BBOM0001I

Re: Catalog reaching 94%

On Wed, Mar 01, 2006 at 06:54:58PM -0600, Ed Gould ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: REPROMERGECAT (IDCAMS) Beware it can be time consuming. I think agonizingly slow would be a fair characterization. It's been a long time since I had to do that, but what I discovered is that if I temporarily turned

Re: SMPE Question

You could adapt the technique described at http://members.tripod.com/billlalonde/back/mvsh006.htm If you change the selection to: INCLUDE COND=(18,6,CH,EQ,C'W32759') then I think that it should find any superceding APAR for OW32759 (for example). Sorry about the annoying pop-ups if you have

hello

Hi, I am Surendar bolla, completed my B.Tech in 2005, in Computer science and Engineering branch. Now i have decided to join in Mainframes coaching in Maples Institute, which is located in Hyderabad. So I have to know about the Mainframe course and about the Maples Institute also in

Re: Australian Tax Office chooses dead language

-Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Hank Oerlemans What's COOBL ? :) Common Object Oriented Business Language. :-D -jc- -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access

Re: MVS CONSOLE REXX

Glen - First, to be really seen, your message needs to go to the list, not the newsgroup mirror, see http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html to get started. Second, although MSYS/OPS uses bits from various licensed products, their use is restricted to the MSYS provided functions only. Users

Re: WebSphere SMF records

I don't have any of the 120s turned on (I'm keeping them off for performance reasons), but, perhaps (just guessing), if you are not running an EJB container, you won't have this type of record activated? Aaron On Thu, 2 Mar 2006 02:26:02 -0600, Christian Blesa [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello,

Re: Mainframe DASD Calculator Availability

Joel Wolpert Director - Performance and Capacity Planning Shared Data Center Securities Industry Automation Corporation 2 Metrotech Center New York, NY 11201 (212) 383-3323 [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Original Message - From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 03/01/2006

Re: Catalog reaching 94%

On Mar 1, 2006, at 7:12 PM, ibm-main wrote: From: Ed Gould REPROMERGECAT (IDCAMS) Beware it can be time consuming. Ain't that the truth. Presumably you'll be trying to move (at least) the biggest alias - this can take many hours. When I was recently tooling around with catalogs, I found

Re: CLEAR SUBCHANNEL INTERRUPT MISSING on OSA ICC

At time it is not the master and it is not available. -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Desi de la Garza Sent: Wednesday, March 01, 2006 5:40 PM To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU Subject: Re: CLEAR SUBCHANNEL INTERRUPT MISSING on OSA ICC

Re: CLEAR SUBCHANNEL INTERRUPT MISSING on OSA ICC

We had a similar incident where we lost our ICC consoles. It took a call into IBM and a complicated procedure to get them back. Afterwards, we received an email which admitted there was a known bug and gave us a work around (unknown when patch would be out). Don't know if this will help you or

Re: Data Set Name Hiding

In a recent note, Leonard Woren said: Date: Wed, 1 Mar 2006 11:25:37 -0800 On Wed, Mar 01, 2006 at 01:04:31PM -0500, Walt Farrell ([log in to unmask]) wrote : Eight character tokenization is Mickey Mouse - suggested for SHARE in Anaheim. Likewise so for z/OS data set

Re: Australian Tax Office chooses dead language

In [EMAIL PROTECTED], on 03/02/2006 at 01:36 PM, Hank Oerlemans [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: What's COOBL ? It's Common Object Oriented Business Language, an attempt by the CODASYL short range committee to merge the features of COMMTRAN, FACT and Smalltalk in the late 1950s and early 1960s. --

Re: Data Set Name Hiding

In [EMAIL PROTECTED], on 03/01/2006 at 08:08 AM, Paul Gilmartin [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: Likewise so for z/OS data set name qualifiers. And there it's an artificial and senseless limitation, persisting only because of inertia. Point of curiosity: does anybody remember when they removed CVOL

Re: Catalog reaching 94%

Martin, If your user catalog was defined with secondary extents and you haven't reached the limit, you should just take an extent when it gets full. You may not need to do a MERGECAT or a re-org. Make sure there is enough space on the pack. Richard Habres AVP; Enterprise Storage Technology

Re: Esoterics set in SMS we are very quick to make HCD changes.

In [EMAIL PROTECTED], on 03/01/2006 at 09:14 AM, Greg Shirey [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: In the JES2 JCL Reference manual, The what? Don't you mean the z/OS JCL Reference manual? I've never seen a release where JES2 and JES3 had distinct JCL manuals. JES3 may function differently. If it does

Re: Fw: Tax chooses dead language - Austalia

In [EMAIL PROTECTED], on 03/01/2006 at 09:59 AM, Jon Brock [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: C is often described, with a mixture of fondness and disdain varying according to the speaker, as a language that combines all the elegance and power of assembly language with all the readability and

Re: SYST

In [EMAIL PROTECTED], on 03/01/2006 at 08:25 PM, Chris Mason [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: I wonder if there is some aspect of the system task other that being free of time constraints and requiring to be initiated by a START command which at least prefers a single step. Long ago, in a release far

Re: Max # of SYS1.MAN datasets

In [EMAIL PROTECTED], on 03/01/2006 at 09:24 PM, Gibney, Dave [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: In base 13, the answer really is 42 '42'13 = '54'10 = 9*6, not 9*5. -- Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT ISO position; see http://patriot.net/~shmuel/resume/brief.html We don't care.

Re: Security Erase Feature on DASD

But to get back at the original question many (12+ years) years ago I thought that is why IBM came out with the minimal init in ICKDSF. At least that is what one CR told me when we went through the 3380 to 3390 conversion. Ever since I have been using that before releasing drives back to the

Re: IXFP Pack Rename

Can a pack be renamed on the fly via IXFP. I'm not quite sure what you are asking. Do you mean renamed in the sense of changing its volume serial? What do you mean by on the fly? I am not sure about IXFP, but ICKDSF can change the volser of a volume (the REFORMAT command). -- Bruce A.

in re: New White Paper Roundup: Enabling the Real-Time Enterprise, the Future of the Mainframe and more.

[Charlie Wang, if alive, must be roflmao right now. A quote form the link (written by CA)] The natural progression of a business is to either acquire or be acquired. [Charlie shakes head yes vigorously.] This continual consolidation has significantly impacted the number of mainframe

Re: Esoterics set in SMS we are very quick to make HCD changes.

Hmm. Would you believe my fingers typed that without my knowledge?? Yes, it's actually the z/OS [version release] MVS JCL Reference. Greg -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.) Sent: Thursday, March 02, 2006

inetd to take telnet request

I was trying to get inetd to take control for telnet sessions (otelnetd and/or tso telnet) but so far I can only get vtam (msg10) to get control. Netstat show mvs tcpip task listening on port 23 (from tcp profile). inetd is listing on port 513 and 540 (from /etc/services). I?ve removed the

Re: Data Set Name Hiding

Point of curiosity: does anybody remember when they removed CVOL support? It was part of Y2K. I think it officially died on 1/1/2000 but there may have been a PTF that killed it shortly before that. -- Bruce A. Black Senior Software Developer for FDR Innovation Data Processing 973-890-7300

Re: inetd to take telnet request

-Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jack Kelly Sent: Thursday, March 02, 2006 9:56 AM To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU Subject: inetd to take telnet request I was trying to get inetd to take control for telnet sessions

Re: Catalog reaching 94%

Strudwick, Martin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... Group, We currently have a user catalog (CAT A) which has reached 94% utilization. I have created another user catalog (CAT B) and attached it to the master. How can I migrate specific alias and all of their

Re: Max # of SYS1.MAN datasets

FSVO 9 and 5 and 6 and 13 and 10. g,d,r This is a PRIVATE message. If you are not the intended recipient, please delete without copying and kindly advise us by e-mail of the mistake in delivery. NOTE:

Newbie DASD sharing question

I have a 3494 tape library that I now need to share temporarily between 2 systems. An OS390 2.8 and a zOS 1.7. As I understand it I need share SYS1.VOLCAT.VGENERAL. In VSE we share DASD pretty easily using a common lock file. I have read some about GRS, is this what is required to share DASD in

Re: SYST

IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU wrote on 03/02/2006 09:53:34 AM: In [EMAIL PROTECTED], on 03/01/2006 at 08:25 PM, Chris Mason [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: I wonder if there is some aspect of the system task other that being free of time constraints and requiring to be

edit macro that won't

Hi Folks, I had a guy ask me for a way convert a flat file from mixed to uppercase only, in place, in batch. I’m probably overthinking this request but I came up with a batch job that calls an edit macro. And although the macro works in ISPF EDIT just fine, it doesn’t work in batch. Any ideas

Re: Newbie DASD sharing question

The short answer is that sharing tape is a whole lot different than DASD. And the 3494 is a beast unto itself. I think a reasonable answer to your specific question in your assumed context is that sharing cannot be done. For example, there is a way to share the *unit*, but sharing the tape

Re: edit macro that won't

Show us your EDITREXX exec. It looks like the macro is not being invoked as a macro, but rather as a TSO command. Don Imbriale -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bob H Sent: Thursday, March 02, 2006 12:21 PM To:

Re: edit macro that won't

If you've got TSO Pipelines installed, you can run the file through a pipe like this: PIPE 'your.dataset.name' | XLATE UPPER | 'your.dataset.name' Which will do the trick in a tiny amount of time. On 02/03/06, Bob H [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi Folks, I had a guy ask me for a way convert a

Re: edit macro that won't

Here is EDITREXX /* REXX */ PARSE ARG FILENAME MACRO1 ADDRESS ISPEXEC EDIT DATASET('FILENAME') MACRO(MACRO1) -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message:

Re: Data Set Name Hiding

NOTE: On October 31, 1995, IBM announced Year 2000 Support which stated that, for any S/390 platform running MVS or OS/390 to be considered as Year 2000 Ready, all data sets must use Integrated Catalog Facility (ICF). It will not be possible to access data via a VSAM Catalog or CVOL when the

Re: edit macro that won't

On Thu, 2 Mar 2006 12:30:30 -0500, Imbriale, Donald (Exchange) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Show us your EDITREXX exec. It looks like the macro is not being invoked as a macro, but rather as a TSO command. Agree - show us. I have an exec that can be used to run an edit macro against all members

Re: edit macro that won't

Try removing the CAPS ON from your edit macro. Don Imbriale -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, March 02, 2006 12:50 PM To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU Subject: Re: edit macro that won't Here is

Commands in Batch

Hello, What is the best method of issuing vary online/offline commands in the batch. TIA Philip A. Miscione Sr Project Leader Barnes Noble, Inc. email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Phone: 516-338-8227 Fax : 516-338-8487

Re: Commands in Batch

Philip, The most efficient (and safest) way is to interface to the IEEVARYD service. I have a sample program called VARYDASD that uses IEEVARYD that you can download from : http://www.mximvs.com/utility-programs.shtml Source code is included. Rob Scott Rocket Software

Re: Commands in Batch

I typically do this via batch MXI: //MXIBATCH EXEC PGM=MXI,PARM='BATCH,TITLES' //SYSPRINT DD SYSOUT=* //SYSIN DD * /V ,OFFLINE /... /* Hth

Re: Commands in Batch

Thanks, Thanks to all I am going to use the /*$vs,' ' command in the batch. B4 the JOBCARD -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jakubek, Jan Sent: Thursday, March 02, 2006 1:17 PM To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU Subject: Re:

ARCRPEXT exit and Common Recall Queue

It appears that this exit get invoked twice for a dataset requested for recall when CRQ is active. Is there anyway to prevent the second ARCRPEXT invocation from occurring? Or is there a way to get rid of the second MWE? Thanks, Dan Moshief [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Commands in Batch

In a message dated 3/2/2006 12:30:49 P.M. Central Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: am going to use the /*$vs,' ' command in the batch. B4 the JOBCARD The initiator that it runs in need AUTH=ALL and if opercmds. is active the submitting user needs authority to the

Re: Commands in Batch

as long as you don't have security too tight, kiss //BR14001 EXEC PGM=IEFBR14 // COMMAND 'V 501,ONLINE ' Jack Kelly LA Systems @ US Courts x 202-502-2390 -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send

Re: edit macro that won't

You need to write an intermediate REXX or CLIST proc - say CALLMACR - which issues an ISPEXEC EDIT DATASET('TTSMV14.TEST MAKEUC') MACRO(EDITREXX). Then invoke CALLMACR instead of EDITREXX in your batch job. e.g. TSO Clist: PROC 2 MACRO DATASET DEBUG

Re: I/O Retries

Well, there is 'off line' and there is 'off line'. I seem to recall a CE/SE/HMC procedure to put them off line to the box such that they appear to the operating system(s) as defined but don't actually exist. This is one step short of a physical removal. After that is done, the op sys should make

Re: Commands in Batch

Also might also be aware that the commands are executed immediately upon submission on that LPAR. There is no delay or routing. There is no relevance where the commands appear; they can appear anywhere in the job. I think I read in some IBM doc that the // COMMAND ' ' was the 'preferred'

Re: edit macro that won't

Readable version :-) You need to write an intermediate REXX or CLIST proc - say CALLMACR - which issues an ISPEXEC EDIT DATASET('TTSMV14.TEST MAKEUC') MACRO(EDITREXX). Then invoke CALLMACR instead of EDITREXX in your batch job. e.g. TSO Clist: PROC 2 MACRO DATASET DEBUG

FTP PUT corruption (was RE: Finding embedded short blocks)

Changing the subject line because I've verified that embedded short blocks are not involved here. Had another instance of data corruption in the production FTP job overnight, so I reran it first thing this morning with DEBUG and TRACE options enabled and got the same kind of corruption at the

Re: Datacenters Going Away

I think the post quoted below is in response to my post, but I can't tell for sure because you didn't quote anything. I won't be around next year to tell you if the budget goes up or down. I never really knew what the budget figures are now, and I doubt whether management would want me to

Re: Commands in Batch

Hal, Here's what you can find in z/OS V1R7.0 JES2 Commands, SA22-7526-05: quote 5.243 $VS - Enter MVS system commands through JES2 Function To enter an MVS system command in a job stream, through an automatic JES2 command, or within the JES2 initialization data set. Syntax

Re: SYST

Back then there was no SMF timing for system tasks. I suspect that despite the name SYST has nothing to do with whether a started task is a system task, and only controls timing. Then along came MVS SP1.1 (affectionately known as SP1). We capacity types spent aeons determining what it meant when

The edit macro that won't (redux)

I am reposting this as I left out a piece, and made a few changes... that didn't help I had a guy ask me for a way convert a flat file from mixed to uppercase only, in place, in batch. I’m probably overthinking this request but I came up with a batch job that calls an edit macro. And although

Re: Commands in Batch

There is a command on the CBT site called COMMAND. It works very well for issuing commands from a jobstream. You can issue any command as a parm. The commands can also be in a PDS member. I use the program COMMAND to shut our system down. Eric Bielefeld Sr. Systems Programmer PH Mining

Re: JES2 JCL

JCL statements applicable only to JES2, followed closely by chapter 28 with JES3 control statements. Yes, but it's still only ONE manual for either JESx. - -teD I’m an enthusiastic proselytiser of the universal panacea I believe in!

Re: edit macro that won't

Chris - will give your suggestion a try. -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at

Re: The edit macro that won't (redux)

-Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of rhensel I am reposting this as I left out a piece, and made a few changes... that didn't help I had a guy ask me for a way convert a flat file from mixed to uppercase only, in place, in batch. I'm probably

Re: The edit macro that won't (redux)

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] /* REXX */ TRACE I PARSE ARG FILENAME MACRO1 ADDRESS ISPEXEC EDIT DATASET('FILENAME') MACRO(MACRO1) I'd suggest adding a line just above and below your last line (shown above) so it looks like this: ADDRESS ISPEXEC CONTROL ERRORS RETURN ADDRESS ISPEXEC EDIT

Re: Commands in Batch

What is the best method of issuing vary online/offline commands in the batch. By NOT doing them! (8-{} - -teD I’m an enthusiastic proselytiser of the universal panacea I believe in! -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff /

Re: edit macro that won't

From: Bob H [EMAIL PROTECTED] //SYSEXEC DD DISP=SHR,DSN=TTSMV14.REXX //SYSPROC DD DISP=SHR,DSN=TTSMV14.REXX Further to my previous message, I just noticed you have the same data set attached to both the SYSEXEC and SYSPROC ddnames. This doesn't make sense; one is searched before the other

Re: SYST

Isn't this the setting that keeps certain tasks from showing up in the D A,L list? Other than in the SYSAS counter? See the doc for IEE114I. For instance, you'd hate to have an operator try and shut down CATALOG. Jim Mulder wrote: I would agree, as I am unaware of any concept of a system

Re: The edit macro that won't (redux)

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Hi Dave - it is getting call ok, I did a CHANGE '1' '$' ALL after the case change and it worked fine... but still lower case. I'll try the WRITE THE CHANGE COMPLETED WITH RETCODE = LASTCC In that case, your macro must be recognized as REXX and not CLIST, even though

Re: the edit macro that won't

John Chase's suggestion to use one of the sorts to do this tiny job is eminently sensible. My concern is with a different issue. A routine that accomplishes this triivial operation could be written in few minutes. Instead, a number of able people have devoted considerable attention to

Re: Commands in Batch

On Mar 2, 2006, at 12:29 PM, Philip Miscione wrote: Thanks, Thanks to all I am going to use the /*$vs,' ' command in the batch. B4 the JOBCARD Philip, I hope you have these protected or just anyone can use it to do just about anything you want, including canceling production jobs

Re: the edit macro that won't

From: john gilmore John Chase's suggestion to use one of the sorts to do this tiny job is eminently sensible. Kenny gets my vote. Shane ... -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to

the edit macro that won't

I went with John Chase's sort, thanks John. The edit macro still bugs me. Added a line after the case change to do a character change. THAT works, but not the case change. Again the complete macro works in 'real' ISPF edit. And the profile used in the jcl was a copy of my current profile so am

Re: IXFP Pack Rename

Bruce, I am just going to have to delete the functional device definition from IXFP and then re-define the same unit with a new vol=ser name. Does a delete from IXFP totally delete a device from the system or is there other work involved? Thanks, Desi de la Garza Systems Programmer Bexar

Re: The edit macro that won't (redux)

-Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Chase, John Sent: Thursday, March 02, 2006 4:18 PM To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU Subject: Re: The edit macro that won't (redux) -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion

Re: Catalog reaching 94%

Also, just to set the record straight, with Mainstar's Catalog Recovery Plus (CR+), the REORG command can reallocate the catalog as part of the REORG, changing any attribute of the catalog, including the primary and secondary allocation values of the data and/or index component. This can all be

Re: edit macro that won't

Bob, I've quick-written and checked that the following works OK. (Apologies if the JCL, REXX etc. source have been reformatted by Big D. ;-) ) JCL: //CALLMACR EXEC PGM=IKJEFT01, // REGION=8192K,

Re: inetd to take telnet request

Jack: I have to extrapolate from my knowledge of Linux here a little, but ... /etc/services simply =names= the services and equates them to a port and protocol. The file usually known as /etc/inetd.conf (you said inetd.config?) tells inetd which ports to listen on, and when an incoming

Re: Australian Tax Office chooses dead language

Aaaww, you took me seriously. Tom Ross's comment surely looks like a typo to me. Hank -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search

Re: IXFP Pack Rename

Unless you are changing device geometry or size, you should be able to acomplish the same result with ICKDSF only. Bruces way: Vary offline to all systems, run ICKDSF REFORMAT, vary online to all systems. Your way: Vary offline, IXFP Delete, IXFP Define, ICKDSF INIT, vary online. IXFP has a

in re: New White Paper Roundup: Enabling the Real-Time Enterprise, the Future of the Mainframe and more.

About mainframe software vendor consolidation: it's gotten more interesting. There's a pretty strong argument that vendor consolidation was the *only* trend until about 5 or 6 years ago. But then a few things happened. One is that IBM entered the tools/utilities software business and went

MVS NFS mvslogin for RH Linux x86

[This item is cross-posted from IBMTCP-L] An internal customer at my shop wants to connect to my MVS NFS server (z/OS 1.6) from a Red Hat Linux on an Intel server. I asked IBM a question regarding the availability of a Linux port of the mvslogin/mvslogout/showattr code and was told that the