[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
In a recent note, Darren Evans-Young said:
Date: Mon, 15 May 2006 10:24:32 -0500
I am *seriously* considering changing IBM-MAIN (2001-2006) archive
access to subscribers only, and I may not have a choice. We have
It appears this is already in effect. I just attempted to
view this month's archive index, and was required to log in.
I was required to log in, just to view this message (I get the digest
through e-mail and then click the message number for those messages, I want
to read).
Will this mean
Hi
How can I get back the result of a TSO/REXX command if I call under
IKJTSOEV /IKJEFTSR ?
(instead of SYSTSPRT )
--
Mit freundlichen Grüßen / Best regards
Miklos Szigetvari
ISIS Information Systems GmbH
Alter Wienerweg 12
2344 Maria Enzersdorf
Austria
Franz Josef Pohlen wrote:
thank you all for your valuable answers. Another business partner told the
customer that a second escon channel is not possible on 3590. This I could
hardly believe because there was a feature code FC3312 called second escon
adapter for 3590. Now I'm sure that the
Hi
I came across this in the archives and wondered if anyone had an answer. I
am trying to do exactly the same - and having exactly the same lack of
success as the original poster!
Thanks
Andy Chillman
Lead Systems Programmer
euroConex Technologies Ltd
On Wed, 17 Oct 2001 15:11:44 -0500,
3.4? I abandoned 3.4 nearly ten years ago.
Now I use the ISPF workplace instead.
Tom Marchant
On Mon, 15 May 2006 20:49:15 +, Dave Salt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Bruce A. Black wrote:
IMHO, its not so simple. You are assuming that by installing such a tool,
it would automatically and
Since this is a VTS stacked volume it might not be/need not be defiend to
your tape management system. If defined to RMM, RMM will have no
information about the volume or its contents other than it is a stacked
volume and the library it should be in.
Others have answered the 'vts' aspect of
We have recently seen overall system slowdowns while application programs
wait on an MQ response to a PUT or GET. When this occurs, we also see high
CPU delays in the MQ MSTR and CHIN.
We run high-volume (1200 tran/sec) transactions through a CTG/CICS/DB2
structure, and are debating how the MQ
I get used equipment price lists monthly, from one of the last ones:
3590-A50 w/2 escon $675
3590-A60 w/2 escon $4700, 2 more escon $795
3590-B11 $3500
3590-E11 $4550
Rack mounting hardware for above $475
These are for example only, sent in email and not verified.
Hi Clark,
Check the IBM doc of course for the definitive documentation. We found
that we needed to make the CHIN non-swappable as well in order to
protect it from being swapped out shortly after IPL when all subsystems
were coming up at once or when we were doing large scale subsystem
recycles.
I can assure you that you can connect more than 1 ESCON channel to 3590
B's. A few weekends ago at DR our set-up was 16 3590 B's with 2 ESCON
per/module or 4 UCB's (I don't know, are they still called a module?).
This was verified by looking at RMF on the floor system, and well before I
On 5/16/2006 3:12 AM, Vernooy, C.P. - SPLXM wrote:
isn't it useless to protect your archives? The newsgroup version of the list is
fully available in Google archives, so what is your purpose of protecting the
list archives?
As I read Darren's posting, the purpose is to avoid a load on his
On Tue, 16 May 2006 08:42:46 -0400, Knutson, Sam [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Clark,
Check the IBM doc of course for the definitive documentation. We found
that we needed to make the CHIN non-swappable as well in order to
protect it from being swapped out shortly after IPL when all subsystems
Simple. Use the switch to read the command file. The free Windows FTP
will read everything from the command file except the password, for which it
will prompt.
Example:
Testftp.txt contains:
userid
Stat
Quit
Sample run:
C:\DOCUME~2\Charlesftp 12.34.56.78 testftp.txt
User
Hello Clark,
Follow that data.
Defuse the wait conditions as much as possible. (is it a valid wait ?)
Place the MSTR and CHIN s started tasks, but by all means use ENCLAVES for
the actual transactions or programs that treverse the MQ/CICS/DB2 address
spaces.
Kevin
-Original
I would like to report on those Users who are defined to RACF, who have a
TSO segment and who are not revoked. Unfortunately our RACF DB contains
many revoked Users and many Users without a TSO segment (IMS Users). If I
unload the Database there are different record types for Userid and TSO
I read somewhere that the motivation for support of mixed
case passwords in z/OS v1r7 is an external requirement that
the password space have cardinality at least 10^13. Does
any reader of this list know the source of this requirement?
Sarbanes-Oxley (chapter and verse)? Other (specify)?
While
Hi,
I opened a marketing request with IBM. If you are running IMS please
take time to contact your IBM technical marketing representative and
concur on this. I would appreciate this as having more customers
standing up and saying they want this change to IMS operation and
installation is going
Dave
Have you looked at the RACFICE downloads on the IBM RACF support website?
(Just stick RACFICE into Google if you can't find it)
Brian
-
This e-mail message is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s)and may
contain confidential and privileged information of Transaction
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dave Cartwright
Sent: Tuesday, May 16, 2006 9:22 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Valid TSO Users
I would like to report on those Users who are defined to
RACF, who have a
TSO
Miklos Szigetvari asked:
How can I get back the result of a TSO/REXX command if I call
under IKJTSOEV /IKJEFTSR ? (instead of SYSTSPRT )
Well, you can preallocate (batch or DYNALLOC) SYSTSPRT to somewhere
appropriate before you invoke IKJTSOEV. But if you want to get your output
back on the
I've installed z/OS V1R7. IPLed. When leaving ISPF or logoff I'm getting
the following message:
IRX0157E Routine EAGRTXTR of the run time processor EAGRTPRC was not found.
I did RTFM:
IRX0157E Routine routine_name of the run-time
In a recent note, Edward Jaffe said:
Date: Tue, 16 May 2006 07:57:06 -0700
Bruce Hewson wrote:
I continue to be astonished/annoyed/aggravated etc by how many
sysprogs/developers/operators insist on using basic Mod-2 (24x80) format
3270 emulator screens.
Amen to that, Bro!
On Tue, 16 May 2006 09:21:45 -0500, Dave Cartwright
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I would like to report on those Users who are defined to RACF, who have a
TSO segment and who are not revoked. Unfortunately our RACF DB contains
many revoked Users and many Users without a TSO segment (IMS Users). If I
Dave,
You've been spending too much time reading Dilbert
snip
YOU: I'd like permission to buy a new software tool that upgrades the
ISPF/PDF interface.
BOSS: How much does it cost?
YOU: $5,000.
BOSS: What's wrong with the interface we have now?
YOU: It's slow, cumbersome, difficult to
Just a thought - did you have a usermod applied on your previous release
for IRXCMPTM?
The Compiler Programming Table (CPT) IRXCMPTM is the TSO/E module that
identifies one or more alternate exec processors and their corresponding
interface routines to TSO/E. Your installation uses either the
Peggy Andrews wrote:
Just a thought - did you have a usermod applied on your previous release
for IRXCMPTM?
The Compiler Programming Table (CPT) IRXCMPTM is the TSO/E module that
identifies one or more alternate exec processors and their corresponding
interface routines to TSO/E. Your
That is a TSO/E Customization issue. Check that manual using EAGRTPRC as
a search argument.
HTH and good luck.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of R.S.
Sent: Tuesday, May 16, 2006 10:02 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject:
If you can handle the REVOKEd users, you can simply run a LU command:
LU (*) TSO NORACF
This will list the TSO segment for all users who have the segment and
nothing for those who don't.
Rex
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of
IMHO, there are no known foundations for these 'requirements', legal or
otherwise. The source is simply auditors making things up as they go.
Sooner or later is should occur to someone that auditors spelling out
such 'requirements' is a conflict of interest and not compliant with ISO
9000.
If that did in fact APPLY, and you don't know if you needed it, then,
yes, I think I would consider a RESTORE, and see...
Peggy
Peggy Andrews
Sr. Systems Engineer
Information Technology Department
Technical Support Services Division
City of Sacramento
(916) 808-5438
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Probably doesn't apply here but we were experiencing similar slowdowns and
increased CPU usage in the CHIN. We dumped the address space and found
evidence of a memory leak that was addressed by PTF UQ86724.
Regards
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 05/16/06 8:21 AM
We have recently seen overall system
This sounds like IBM APAR OW55765
Customer noticed they do not receive a KEEP message for a
tape, in this case on a VTS drive. The tape drive was still
allocated to DFSMShsm but the backup task had ended. HSM was
not hung. DFSMShsm had received msgARC0371I ERROR reading the
BVR
I think of the actual priority of my most loved ones as the lowest of
any of the services required.
For example, if your most loved CICS has to wait for MQ, and MQ is
below, say, less important CICS's, then your most loved CICS will be
held up by this less important work. In effect, the priority
Radoslaw,
Had same problem here.
In z/OS 1.7 you need a new FMID for Rexx Alternate which is no
more delivered with z/OS 1.7
New libraries is (SMPE) REXXALT.V140.SEAGALT.
I'll sent you the FMID tomorrow.
Or as workaround, you continue to use REXX.V1R3M0.SEAGALT (or something
like that) from
In a recent note, Miklos Szigetvari said:
Date: Tue, 16 May 2006 10:24:23 +0200
How can I get back the result of a TSO/REXX command if I call under
IKJTSOEV /IKJEFTSR ?
(instead of SYSTSPRT )
And I neglected to mention one obvious option: allocate your DD name
to a POSIX pipe or
Hi
Thank you for he ideas.
I have a program to change the SYSTSIN/SYSTSPRT get/put pointers, but I
neded for this APF auth.
I done the SYSTSPRT access currently with OUTTRAP and a callback routine to
access the results via IRXEXCOM.
The original problem was that the IRXEXCOM has not worked for
On 5/16/2006 10:24 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I read somewhere that the motivation for support of mixed
case passwords in z/OS v1r7 is an external requirement that
the password space have cardinality at least 10^13. Does
any reader of this list know the source of this requirement?
On 5/16/2006 10:22 AM, Dave Cartwright wrote:
I would like to report on those Users who are defined to RACF, who have a
TSO segment and who are not revoked. Unfortunately our RACF DB contains
many revoked Users and many Users without a TSO segment (IMS Users). If I
unload the Database there
I run production MQ in SYSSTC
We had problems with doing that (pre-64-Bit).
Because of the load on the system, MQ was constantly getting its data kicked
into ESTORE.
This caused many slowdowns.
SYSSTC/SYSTEM tasks (except for GRS) have no memory management, because they
have no goals.
With
Good afternoon:
We are looking at implementing z/OS Load Balancing Advisor for z/OS
Communications Server. Are there any gotchas we need to keep an eye out for?
Any installs in Canada?
Thanks
Regards
--
For IBM-MAIN
Are you saying that you were so memory constrained that MQ pages
were stolen, but by giving WLM an unattainable goal the pages
were protected?
On Tue, 16 May 2006 00:00:00 GMT, Ted MacNEIL
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I run production MQ in SYSSTC
We had problems with doing that (pre-64-Bit).
I usually go straight to
http://groups.google.com/group/bit.listserv.ibm-main before I even try IBM.
Jon
snip
I will be most disappointed if indeed the search engines would no longer
have access. I use Google a lot to find information I need to do my job.
And you can rest assured that I tend
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dave Cartwright
Sent: Tuesday, May 16, 2006 9:22 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Valid TSO Users
I would like to report on those Users who are defined to
RACF, who have a
TSO
On 5/16/2006 1:33 PM, Miklos Szigetvari wrote:
I have maybe another question: to use authorised TSO call's , is it enough
to switch off the non auth flag in the IKJTEFTSR parm list ?
You cannot run authorized commands via IKJEFTSR in an environment
established by IKJTSOEV.
Walt
Are you saying that you were so memory constrained that MQ pages
were stolen, but by giving WLM an unattainable goal the pages
were protected?
No.
I am saying, under 31-bit with only 2GB of central, in a large environment, if
you did not have memory isolation (IE: non-SYS* goals), that MQ would
Ted MacNEIL wrote:
should occur to someone that auditors spelling out
such 'requirements'
Auditors neither make rules, nor enforce them.
All they can do is report.
A lot of people ascribe too much power to an auditor.
Maybe I re-phrase it:
Auditors neither SHOULD make rules, nor SHOULD
But seriously: I'm not sure about the above. Who should enforce the rules ?
Corporate compliance officers.
-
-teD
O-KAY! BLUE! JAYS!
Let's PLAY! BALL!
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send
A faucet dripping while you are trying to sleep does not make you get up
and turn it off. But if you cannot sleep, you are likely to do it.
Ditto auditors.
If you are a financial institution or one of their business partners,
the size of the, uh, uh, flow is quite large and can dampen your
You can rest assured, I make typos all the time, but there are none
in this message :)
Dave Gibney [EMAIL PROTECTED]
System Programmer(509) 335-7359
Information Technology
Washington State University
Pullman, WA 99164-1222
-Original
Gibney, Dave wrote:
You can rest assured, I make typos all the time, but there are none
in this message :)
Dave Gibney [EMAIL PROTECTED]
System Programmer(509) 335-7359
Information Technology
Washington State University
Pullman, WA
For those of you who haven't experienced it, it is quite un-nerving to walk
into your
computer room and it is Dead Silent. Well, not totally dead.
This is quite a famous little story. Someone will doubtless find an old
version in the
archives.
Many years ago (early 1980s) I had a customer
Wow. One can only dream about such a stable commercial supply. Since
the
event I wrote about, we already have had one hit big enough to trigger
the generator. It is the rare month the generator does not earn its
keep. The UPS log of minor hits is quite lengthy.
Here in southeast Texas the
Amen. Although my voltage does not seem to fluctuate quite so much, at
least once a week my UPS kicks in. The drop is so quick and resumes so
quickly that I only see the little APC Windoze agent saying You are back on
utility power. (In fact, it just did this 2 minutes ago, while composing
an
We are thinking of putting our TSM backup system on an IFL running z/Linux
on our new z BC box.
Anybody out there doing this? We'd like to hear you comments and
expieriences
If you care to respond you can email me privately at my work address
HarolddotZbiegienatamgreetings.com
tia
CA catches z/OS data for encryption
IBM left as the Betamax of mainframe tape crypto?
http://go.theregister.com/news/http://www.theregister.co.uk/
2006/05/15/ca_mainframe_crypto/
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive
On May 16, 2006, at 10:01 AM, R.S. wrote:
I've installed z/OS V1R7. IPLed. When leaving ISPF or logoff I'm
getting the following message:
IRX0157E Routine EAGRTXTR of the run time processor EAGRTPRC was
not found.
I did RTFM:
You could try adding the REXX Alternate Library ('hlvlq.SEAGALT') to the
Linklist. I don't know if that will fix the problem, but it certainly
couldn't hurt.
HTH,
Dave Salt
SimpList(tm) - The easiest, most powerful way to surf a mainframe!
http://www.mackinney.com/products/SIM/simplist.htm
Hello,
In the below givn article reagrding Static/Dynamic calls in Cobol at
http://www.naspa.com/PDF/2000/0600%20TS%20PDFs/T0006010.pdf, it is given
how to retrieve the list of programs loaded into the memory. Is there any
way to retrieve the library name also along with the program name? I
Ted MacNEIL wrote:
should occur to someone that auditors spelling out
such 'requirements'
Auditors neither make rules, nor enforce them.
All they can do is report.
A lot of people ascribe too much power to an auditor.
Perhaps, but auditors have indirect powers. I can request detail
Provocative subtitle to that article, isn't it? Well, at least they put a
question mark on it. :-)
FWIW (and not speaking officially for IBM or anybody else), it's excellent
that customers have lots of choices for tape encryption. It's a good idea
to consider all options.
Also FWIW, I've
Radoslaw,
FMID is HWJ9143 and can be order on ShopZseries.
Pierre
On 5/16/06, R.S. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've installed z/OS V1R7. IPLed. When leaving ISPF or logoff I'm getting
the following message:
IRX0157E Routine EAGRTXTR of the run time processor EAGRTPRC was not
found.
I did RTFM:
Why not control? Bying Market Share just like big companies buy other
companies to increase market share, why that is not controlling? IBM
bought Informix to increase database market share, Oracle bought
Siebel, etc.
Just to fulfil shareholders requests to groth. This is pure control,
nothing
63 matches
Mail list logo
