Hello listers,
does anybody remember this old product?
VPW. formely VIRTUAL PAPER WRITER was, even is, an IBM product in the 80's to
recover data automatically from JES2-SPOOL and put into PO libraries.
We abandon using it in 2001 but now we want to recover for a simple and
specific
I just found an interesting nice tool. It's called QCBTRACE and the menu looks
like this
SP7.0.4 HBB7707 -- MAIN REQUEST PANEL -- V6.M04B User Id =>
Enter selection number =>
1 QCB search
2 PAGING options
3 I/O options
4 STORAGE displays
On 6/1/2006 4:51 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I just found an interesting nice tool. It's called QCBTRACE and the menu looks
like this
SP7.0.4 HBB7707 -- MAIN REQUEST PANEL -- V6.M04B User Id =>
Enter selection number =>
...snipped...
The author info returns
AUTHOR=> Richard S. B
In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, on
05/31/2006
at 07:50 PM, "Arthur T." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>I've been in the position of having to delete a member which had a
>lower case letter as part of its name.
"SMP made the sky
Fall" (James Blish, Cities in Flight)
gd&r
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Me
Thanks for your help. I tried it out and it worked as usual. Thanks.
P.S. Regarding the % parm can I safely assume it picks up both alpha and
numeric characters? When I ran my test since there were no numeric characters
I cannot be sure.
"McKown, John" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
Munif,
I'm just curious, but can you elaborate on what you don't like
about sftp. Was it:
- lack of direct support for MVS datasets?
- batch invocation problems (BPXBATCH issues)?
- key authentication setup?
- logging?
- performance?
- other?
We are ourselves working on some solutions t
Thanks, Chris, but the mist is too heavy for me to locate any targets
:-)
Besides, I had one IBMer describe IBM as the monolith from 2001, with
the same degree of imperviousness :-)
Anyway, FWIW, with the information you provided and some additional
poking around, I did find this location, which ma
I run certain daily RMF report class reports, the output of which I
process with REXX. I pull out the values I need and graph them. Today I
ran into a problem that I have been unable to resolve so far. When
looking at the service units of a report class report, I see this:
---SERVICE
IOC
Michael Schmutzok wrote:
To date, I've only had to deal with a 'K' when dealing with the
numbers. Now, I'm faced with an 'M', a 'P', and a 'G'. To now, I've gone
with the assumption that 'K' has meant thousands (a reasonable
assumption I felt). I'm willing to assume that 'M' means millions.
Howev
Re: the "unused" IFL, could I suggest a use for it? If you have DB2, and
you have ODBC or JDBC access to it, it's almost always a really, really
good idea to put DB2 Connect on mainframe Linux. Just makes so much sense
in nearly all such situations.
There are other possibilities, but that's as c
Steve,
... which all means that, in your CONFIGxx member, you must specify the TRL
member names before any major nodes which will need to refer to them. This
then is probably what Abdullah needs to do.
This same principle can also be applied to similar relationships such as
model definitions and
NOTICE:
All information in and attached to the e-mail(s) below may be proprietary,
confidential, privileged and otherwise protected from improper or erroneous
disclosure. If you are not the sender's intended recipient, you are not
authorized to intercept, read, print, retain, copy, forward, or
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Timothy Sipples
> Sent: Thursday, June 01, 2006 9:21 AM
> To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
> Subject: Re: Using Java in batch on z/OS?
>
>
>
> Re: the "unused" IFL, could I suggest a use for it?
It appears that Google architecture is the antithesis of conventional
mainframe application achitecture in all aspects.
http://labs.google.com/papers/googlecluster-ieee.pdf
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access in
I opened a question to IBM on why editors work and the answer I got was the
editor had to edit the file in place and couldn't make a
copy and edit the copy.
In checking editor here is what I have found
Editors that work with WSA - Notepad, PFE, THE, txtedit, vim, context, Crimson
Editor
Editors
On Thu, 1 Jun 2006 23:20:57 +0900, Timothy Sipples
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
Re: the "unused" IFL, could I suggest a use for it? If you have DB2, and
>you have ODBC or JDBC access to it, it's almost always a really, really
>good idea to put DB2 Connect on mainframe Linux. Just makes so much se
On 01/06/06, Bill Richter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
It appears that Google architecture is the antithesis of conventional
mainframe application achitecture in all aspects.
http://labs.google.com/papers/googlecluster-ieee.pdf
You may find this an interesting readd too...
http://labs.google.co
These are nothing but truncated versions of the IEC/NIST standard
binary-multiple prefixes, constructed by analogy with the corresponding SI
prefixes, since 2^10 = 1024 is approximately equal to 10^3 = 1000.
2^10 kibi Ki (SI decimal prefix is kilo)
2^20 mebi Mi (SI decimal prefix is mega)
>P=1024 x 1024 x 1024 x 1024 x 1024
Is is 1024 or 1000?
Remember, we have had this discussion before.
In memory it is 1024.
On disk it is 1000.
For service units, I have always assumed 1000.
-
-teD
300,000 Kilometres per Second
Not only is it a good idea!
It's the LAW!!!
From: Gray Maddry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
I opened a question to IBM on why editors work and the answer I got was the
editor had to edit the file in place and couldn't make a
copy and edit the copy.
I'm not sure this is the full reason. I tried using UltraEdit (which makes a
copy of the file and
> It appears that Google architecture is the antithesis of conventional
> mainframe application achitecture in all aspects.
>
> http://labs.google.com/papers/googlecluster-ieee.pdf
>
Yup. That's what I've been telling you guys for the last couple of
years. There are other approaches out there th
But in the example given it doesn't add up (assuming the sample is from
one interval)
3870M+39599K+0+9232K would not equal 18447P
---SERVICE
IOC 3870M
CPU 39599K
MSO 0
SRB 9232K
TOT 18447P
/SEC 640512G
-Original Message-
Edward Jaffe
Michael Schmutzok w
Greetings group. We have a bit of a puzzlement here and we're hoping
someone can shed
a little light on this.
We've got an application that is working on becoming 31-bit capable. We
got involved
when they had a program using more cpu than before. By equalizing the
compile options
and re-comp
Hi Guys..
Just a few points here because at least, we have a few brain cells on this
list. Even that bored IBM'er in Japan some where..
DB2 : Just quickly... Not sure if any of you where involved in the first
release of DB2. Most of the code and ideas was "copied" . I did some DB2
course recent
I agree that editing in place may not be the whole answer CPE from Compuware
also had the option to edit in place and it wouldn't
work either. I get use CPE as the browse option. I just couldn't save a file. I
don't think the command invocation is the issue. All
the editors I know can be started
Al,
Been a while .. Off the top, I'd say there's more than likely data24
modules. I do not think RMODE bears weight on where storage is obtained
instead, if AMODE is 31, I think WS and TGT are above the line.
>From a Strobe standpoint, I'd say, 'index' both, a DATA24 profile and
a DATA31 prof
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Anton Britz
>
> Hi Guys..
>
> [ snip ]
>
> Last point on DB2 : I hope you are aware that the current
> DB2 customer base did not even go for V8. I am not sure what
> V9 offers you yet but IBM could not sell V8 to
Acutally financial query might use this architecture, except that the
significant difference between this workload and "typical commercial"
workloads -- they do no updates. Therefore no data integrity issues.
Even a bankcard authorization requires the recording in a reliable way of
the details
Probably one major impediment to its "early" implementation was the
**requirement** for a z/Box (64-bit architecture) on which to run it.
another major impediment to its "early" release (at least for us) was the
12-month install deadline. We need to wait until we have non-distractable
resource
Jorge,
You may also find the "z/OS Automatic Restart Manager" redpaper useful and,
for those programs which have not been "ARMed" yet, there is a handy
utility, ARMWRAP, which goes with it.
Just enter ARMWRAP in the www.ibm.com Search box.
Chris Mason
- Original Message -
From: "Jorge
Walt, tnx seems I have to wait for others.
I'll also try to contact Jim. I just played a bit with this tool
and it's very nice. Wonder why *SOME* customer have it and others don't.
Are there more of such "hidden" and useful tools? Why didn't IBM make the public
on ASIS base (load-only) or put th
1) Same here but using BPXBATCH. The z/OS R7 version is close to AOPBATCH.
One large application and a small one.
2) DB2 via JDBC Type2 driver.
3) No not yet. Run some tests on CTS 2.3 in the past without any problem.
Need to verify on CTS 3.1 current release
4) Same here code once runs every
On Thu, 1 Jun 2006 18:24:45 +0200, Schiradin,Roland HG-Dir itb-db/dc
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Why didn't IBM make the public on ASIS base (load-only) or put
>them on the CBTTAPE?
>
Never have.. doubt they ever will. But many of them are avialable
via IBM web sites.
IBM tools are not "freew
Bill Richter wrote:
It appears that Google architecture is the antithesis of conventional
mainframe application achitecture in all aspects.
http://labs.google.com/papers/googlecluster-ieee.pdf
and the difference between that and loosely-coupled or parallel sysplex?
long ago and far away, my
I forgot who the original poster of this was, but when you said you had an
unused IFL engine, did you mean there was an IFL engine on your machine that
was just there, and if you used it you would then have to pay extra, or was
it an IFL that you actually paid for or IBM threw in the deal when y
Hi Ituriel,
Did you find a way to know how deep the allocation queue is?
Regards,
Carles Aris
La Caixa
Spain
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message:
IMHO it is quite common, that production environment runs not on the
newest version available. It is a matter of migration, quality, etc.
It is also quite obvious the IMS is dying in some sense.
Yeah, it's fast, it's reliable ...like TPF.
Have you heard about new mainframe customer lately ? May
I'm with Ken on that one. The numbers I give in the example are real
numbers - I cut and pasted them into the email. They represent an 8 hour
period (second shift). Using the definitions stated earlier by others,
I can't get the numbers to add up either. What has also got me
scratching my head are
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Eric N. Bielefeld
> Sent: Thursday, June 01, 2006 11:49 AM
> To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
> Subject: Re: Using Java in batch on z/OS?
>
>
> I forgot who the original poster of this was, but wh
I wonder how valid the report data is. I've had problems with SCPER
reports and CPU reports, for intervals where one LCPU was only online
for a fraction of a second in the reporting interval, and RMF "freaked
out" and reported unusually large numbers and other anomalous output. I
coded my REXX wi
Lynn Wheeler wrote:
>
> > http://labs.google.com/papers/googlecluster-ieee.pdf
>
> and the difference between that and loosely-coupled or parallel
sysplex?
GOOGLE is certainly a loosely coupled architecture, but as you of all
people would know, there are significant differences between that and
SMF type 119 subtype 03 recs are written as expected with batch ftp.
However, when invoking ftp client through tso, evidently no 03 recs are cut
to SMF. Subtypes 70 and 72 for server and login failures come through
fine, but we're wanting to audit ftp client activity. The TCPIP SMFCONFIG
has TY
If this is a "normal" event in your shop and it is causing serious delays,
you might look at running JES3 rather than JES2. JES3 has a process called
High Watermark Setup which prevents this problem and JES3 also requires all
volumes to go through fetch before the JOB can be scheduled. The switch
Yep Mark, but currently this tool is a hidden tool. Not available via
IBM website or whatever. I saw this on one of my clients and it's a very nice
tool. Seems some few customer have it and many don't. But who know's about it??
Of course I have a copy of it regardless I'm allowed or not.
As Walt
> Last point on DB2 : I hope you are aware that the current
> DB2 customer base did not even go for V8.
Is this another on of your 'facts'?
I know a lot of shops are now going to V8.
This is the biggest DB2 conversion effort since 1.2 to 1.3.
You need:
z/OS 1.4
Enterprise COBOL 3.3 (3.2 will
Carles,
No, i could not determine queue length nor who is using it.
I've opened a pmr at IBM but and the answer was "there is no way
of doing that".
Atenciosamente / Regards / Saludos
Banco Bradesco S/A
4254/DPCD Alphaville
Suporte Técnico - Software Básico Mainframes
Ituriel do Nascimento Ne
On Thu, 1 Jun 2006 19:53:32 +0200, Schiradin,Roland HG-Dir itb-db/dc
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Yep Mark, but currently this tool is a hidden tool. Not available via
>IBM website or whatever. I saw this on one of my clients and it's a very nice
>tool. Seems some few customer have it and many don'
McKown, John wrote:
[...]
I am the original poster. We have an IFL engine enable on our z890. We
got it because we had one on our z800. Our z890 is an "upgrade" to our
z800. It actually would have cost more in upgrade fees to upgrade to the
z890 and disable the IFL than to continue to have the I
John,
Thanks for the info. I think its really cool that once you buy an IFL on
one machine, when you upgrade you don't have to pay for another one. I
don't think anyone else does that with hardware. Does that mean then that
IFLs are so useless that IBM can't even give them away? That's pro
>IBM tools are not "freeware". I've always seen disclaimers that say they are
>owned and copyrighted by IBM. I think this is SOP for anything written by an
>IBM employee while employed at IBM and using their machines.
Stop that sentence at "... while employed at IBM".
When I was out-sourced t
>I know this will start a logical argument in this discussion group.
I worked at a JES3/JES2 shop many aeons ago.
Two sites were JES2 and one was JES3.
They were connected by NJE/NJP with many complications if jobs were submitted
on one node and had to execute on a node with a different JES.
Thi
Eric,
*All* specialty engines benefit from a model type change. When we got
our z9s, our ICFs, zAAPs and IFLs are now faster. The zIIPs will also
benefit from this.
They are not useless. Real shops are saving real dollars! Just ask any
shop that has zAAPs and runs WebSphere or SAP on z/OS. Plus,
That was done. The person working on this conversion agrees with us that
the section of Cobol code using the most cpu is:
17490 PERFORM 0222-MULTIPLE-LOSS-WRITES.
17494 PERFORM VARYING ACCUM-R FROM 1 BY 1 UNTIL
17495 ACCUM-R GREATER THAN
17496 MOVE ZERO TO WS-LOSS-
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Eric N. Bielefeld
>
> [ snip ]
> Its a very strange market. I keep coming
> back to the same point - why doesn't IBM just cut its prices
They don't have to.
> instead of making you jump through hoops to keep your
Hello EveryOne,
I just IPL Z/OS 1.7 on my test LPAR and am using the new CEEPRMxx PARMLIB
member. My first try was unsuccessful. The system did not like my OVR
parameters. We currently (under Z/OS 1.4) allow users to overwrite the
majority of our default settings and we need to continue to
Yes
-Original Message-
From: willie bunter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, June 01, 2006 6:03 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: DFDSS Question - THANKS
Thanks for your help. I tried it out and it worked as usual. Thanks.
P.S. Regarding the % parm can I safely as
This brings to mind on old issue I had at a previous employer.
The issue came down to inappropriate defintions of numeric fields and
data conversion.
First the subscripts were display format. This caused the folloing
sequence of instructions to
be executed for each iteration of the subsript (per
>From APAR PK18558:
PROBLEM #2 Description:
Beginning at z/OS 1.7 (R720 HLE7720) CEEPRMxx members can be
used to specify system wide default run-time options. However,
the syntax for specifying the run-time options in CEEPRMxx
does not allow for the OVR / NONOVR keywords to be specified.
Chase, John wrote:
Why is gasoline nearly $3.00 / gallon?
Because you don't live in California. We passed the $3 mark ages ago. :-(
--
Edward E Jaffe
Phoenix Software International, Inc
5200 W Century Blvd, Suite 800
Los Angeles, CA 90045
310-338-0400 x318
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.phoenixs
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Liliane L. Clever
>
> Hello EveryOne,
>
> I just IPL Z/OS 1.7 on my test LPAR and am using the new
> CEEPRMxx PARMLIB member. My first try was unsuccessful. The
> system did not like my OVR parameters. We current
And what about the Europeans? Two years ago the Irish were paying .899 per
liter. Do the math to determine how many liters per gallon.
>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 6/1/2006 3:11:54 PM >>>
Chase, John wrote:
> Why is gasoline nearly $3.00 / gallon?
Because you don't live in California. We passed the $
Edward Jaffe wrote:
Chase, John wrote:
Why is gasoline nearly $3.00 / gallon?
Because you don't live in California. We passed the $3 mark ages ago. :-(
Just to keep off-topic: Here, in Poland we pay $5.2 per gallon (assumed
US gallon = 3.8 litre). Avg salary is $1 per year (brutto, yo
Richard Pinion wrote:
And what about the Europeans? Two years ago the Irish were paying .899 per
liter. Do the math to determine how many liters per gallon.
Quite so.
http://www.inc.com/slideshow_INC/slideviewer.cgi?list=gas-prices&refresh=8
--
Edward E Jaffe
Phoenix Software Internati
What is the definition of WS-LOSS-PAID-REINS, WS-LOSS-EXP-REINS? What
does generated code look like?
The SET implies ACCUM-R is an index, which is optimal.
I once solved a problem like this by defining a pre-initialized parallel
structure to one being cleared and using a group level move.
I a
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Edward Jaffe
>
> Chase, John wrote:
> > Why is gasoline nearly $3.00 / gallon?
>
> Because you don't live in California. We passed the $3 mark
> ages ago. :-(
And you continue to pay whatever is demanded, because th
Good idea. We'll see if this applies. Thanks
Alan Schwartz
Assurant Shared Business Services
Lead Systems Programmer
Phone: 651-361-4758
Fax: 651-361-5625
Kirk Talman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent by: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
06/01/2006 02:29 PM
Please respond to
IBM Mainframe Discus
Thanks. Jump the gun on this one, did not do enough homework. That's
what happens when you are a staff of one!
Liliane
At 03:09 PM 6/1/2006, Greg Shirey wrote:
From APAR PK18558:
PROBLEM #2 Description:
Beginning at z/OS 1.7 (R720 HLE7720) CEEPRMxx members can be
used to specify syste
>And you continue to pay whatever is demanded, because the suppliers know you
>still consider the alternatives to be too burdensome.
Can you say "CA", "BMC", or "IBM", boys and girls?
You summarised the mainframe price model in one sentence.
(This thread just got back on topic)
-
-teD
300,000
Just a note: Anyone who plans on or uses the RECEIVE ORDER feature
of SMP/E 3.4 will be using Java in batch.
Mark
--
Mark Zelden
Sr. Software and Systems Architect - z/OS Team Lead
Zurich North America / Farmers Insurance Group
mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Systems Programming expert at http://expert
This was supposed to go to the list!
Has something changed?
Today, I have been finding almost every response going to the poster, rather
than the list.
--Original Message--
To: Wayne Driscoll
Sent: Jun 1, 2006 16:57
Subject: Re: IMS at the Crossroads?
>As Ted says, yes, the conversion
DB2 V8 :
Some of the reasons I can recall :
a) You could not upgrade to V8 unless you have a 64 bit machine..
Where in the World have you heard that a Software supplier forces you to run
a 64 but machine before you can "Upgrade". The concept of 64-bit machines is
basicly to allow you to move so
--Original Message--
To: Anton Britz
Sent: Jun 1, 2006 17:33
Subject: Re: Fw: IMS at the Crossroads?
>Where in the World have you heard that a Software supplier forces you to run a
>64 but machine before you can "Upgrade". The concept of 64-bit machines is
basicly to allow you to move som
NO other DATABASE vendor FORCES you to change your hardware box to get
additional "software" performance functionality for your SAP/PeopleSoft
systems, which is not performing because the SAP/PeopleSoft vendors decided
to use DB2.
Now, before you start swearing/shooting/spitting again, this is
Ted MacNEIL wrote:
IBM no longer supports 31-bit operating systems.
So, why should they insist on that for their sub-systems?
Exactly so! Every z/OS release since September 2004 requires
z/Architecture. And, a mere nine months from now, the ESA/390 platform
will be completely desupported b
Anton,
You clearly have an anti-IBM bias. Yes, DB2 V8 requires 64 bit hardware.
However, current IBM operating systems also REQUIRE 64 bit hardware, so the
requirement was coming, its just that DB2 V8 was ahead of the curve. With
DB2 V7, if you went from a 31 bit operating system to a 64 bit oper
I know that others have pointed you to the place in the documentation that
explicitly states that OVR/NOOVR is not supported via PARMLIB.
HOWEVER, I thought that I would mention that it is my understand that not
only is this intentional, but that IBM has an "undocumented statement of
direction" t
Wayne,
Not sure what you are smoking but the last time I looked, z/OS had a
switch in parmlib that says "31 bit mode or 64 bit mode.
You can run z/Os in any of the two modes and it works but some how DB2 V8 on
the z/OS platform did not have that capability. Not talking about My/Sql on
your
> DB2 V8 : Some of the reasons I can recall :
>
> a) You could not upgrade to V8 unless you have a 64 bit machine..
> Where in the World have you heard that a Software supplier forces you
to
> run a 64 but machine before you can "Upgrade".
That happens all the time and not just in the mainframe a
>Not sure what you are smoking but the last time I looked, z/OS had a switch
>in parmlib that says "31 bit mode or 64 bit mode.
First, could you stop with the ad hominem?
Second, that switch went away with 1.5 (1.6 at the latest).
You have no choice with supported OS but to run with 64-bit.
Anton Britz wrote:
Not sure what you are smoking but the last time I looked, z/OS had a
switch in parmlib that says "31 bit mode or 64 bit mode.
The last time you looked??! Dude, that must have been years ago! The
Bi-Modal Accommodation feature was applicable to z/OS 1.2, 1.3, and 1.4
only!
In a message dated 6/1/2006 2:38:03 P.M. Central Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
what happens when you are a staff of one!
>>
All the glory and all the blame? Seems like staffing would be an auditor
requirement just like backups and UPSes?
--
In a message dated 6/1/2006 4:53:27 P.M. Central Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
will be completely desupported by z/OS. Why on earth would those
involved in a major DB2 rewrite, targeted for generally availability
*after* September 2004, waste time "dual pathing" all of their co
Ed Finnell wrote:
It is my understanding there are far-eastern companies paying IBM millions
per month for DB/2 1.3 support! Stuff happens. Mergers don't, staff gets
rerouted, education plans get sidetracked. Projects get dropped and then the new
stuff turns out to be the application from Vo
Anton,
A few points, on this message, and others by you in this thread.
1 - Yes, as recently as 3 years ago, current z/OS releases had a "switch" to
designate 31 bit or 64 bit. This switch was in the OS, not in application
code. In addition, this switch allowed a customer to perform 1 install of
At my shop the main reason we did not like it because of the lack of
support for MVS files.
We have found that if you have FTP servers and clients that support the
EPSV4 command NAT is not an issue.
Kirk Wolf wrote:
Munif,
I'm just curious, but can you elaborate on what you don't like
abo
I am writing a number of IPCS clists and and I have a question about the
EVALUATE command. I am using the command to extract a character string from
the dump for use in a NOTE command. However, the character string contains
mixed case data, yet the CLIST variable always contains an uppercased
ver
Standard CLIST processing might be doing this translation. Does the CLIST
command CONTROL ASIS help? This CLIST command is mentioned in the IPCS
manual as well
>From the IPCS Commands manual:
"If you use this subcommand in a CLIST, the message text is
normally translated to upperc
In a message dated 6/1/2006 6:18:53 P.M. Central Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
True. But, such paid product support extensions have absolutely no
bearing on new development.
>>
Define new development? Most small to medium businesses evolve current
working/paying applications
Brian,
Thanks for the suggestion, I saw that note as well.
Clist has CONTROL ASIS as the first line, and the NOTE commands use ASIS as
well, I think that their needs to be an ASIS option on the EVALUATE command.
Wayne
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL P
89 matches
Mail list logo
