Hi Timothy,
Re.
>Speaking of paranoid, what has been your experience with concerns about
>XCF, console, and GRS "risks"?
Yes, w've once had a nasty experience with XCF structures being too small &
hence impacting the whole sysplex (obviously ;-) ).
But this could have been avoided if w
Hi Rick,
How did you sync with PC? ar you using 9037-002 ? how can you connect to PC
server?
thanks for your help
Tommy
On 11/30/06, Rick Fochtman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
---
> hi all,
> Is there any shop use the 9037-002 sysplex timer with ext
Sys1.parmlib should be empty anyway. It's fine on ipl volume.
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tom Marchant
> Sent: Thursday, November 30, 2006 6:14 AM
> To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
> Subject: Re: Moving LOADxx
>
> On Thu,
Ed Gould wrote:
On Nov 30, 2006, at 2:57 PM, Edward Jaffe wrote:
Ed Gould wrote:
Not knowing a lot about desktop publishing ... Why not .PDF ?
PDF is a file format, not a desktop publishing application.
OK so I used the wrong term The application that creates PDF's .
That's *all* PC appl
Rick Fochtman writes:
>My favorites were GRS and JES2 Checkpoint. Unfortunately my senior
>management team would never sign off on it for production use. Paranoid
>about risks.
Speaking of paranoid, what has been your experience with concerns about
XCF, console, and GRS "risks"? This is for the be
Steve,
OK I missed some hidden annoyance that you have against adobe. But it
is at least cross platform (PC & MACs) ..
Ed
On Nov 30, 2006, at 3:02 PM, Steve Comstock wrote:
Edward Jaffe wrote:
Ed Gould wrote:
Not knowing a lot about desktop publishing ... Why not .PDF ?
PDF is a file fo
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> Behalf Of Chase, John
> Sent: Thursday, November 30, 2006 12:35 PM
> To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
> Subject: Z9 CPU "too fast" :-)
>
> On the lighter side
>
> Been getting some change control approva
On Nov 30, 2006, at 2:57 PM, Edward Jaffe wrote:
Ed Gould wrote:
Not knowing a lot about desktop publishing ... Why not .PDF ?
PDF is a file format, not a desktop publishing application.
OK so I used the wrong term The application that creates PDF's .
Ed
--
Edward E Jaffe
Phoenix Softwa
Robert,
The problem I think is with SAS (design issue?) . I believe that with
any other application when you get to the the end of input you would
reasonably close the data set. But I am guessing that SAS does not
close the input until it has completed processing .
I am not familiar with
(Cross-posted to vm,ibm-main, and linux-390)
Register and attend if you're interested...
Wisconsin Linux on System z User Group
Wednesday, December 13th, 2006
1:00-4:00pm
Aurora Healthcare - Aurora Conference Center - Sycamore Room
2920 W. Dakota St. Milwaukee, WI 53234
On Thu, 30 Nov 2006 13:29:49 -0600, Mark Zelden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
>Too bad the support didn't also include defining IEAVXMIT to use the
>Dynamic Exit Facility. That would have made it easy. I wonder if
>there is some technical reason why it can't be.
>
>Mark
>
There is no technical r
On Thu, 30 Nov 2006 11:54:40 -0600, Matthew Stitt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>I don't consider it a good thing, since I have my own IEAVMXIT. Now I
must
>merge it with the one that has MFA into it, or never get to take advantage
>of the improvement. I guess I could modify one of them to call t
The decision to make Message Flood Automation generally available was made
about a year ago as a result of a crit-sit at a large non-GDPS customer.
As recently as July, it was to be a web deliverable; the decision to make
it part of the Consoles component and deliver it as an SPE is therefore
q
Cross-posted to VM,IBM-MAIN,and Linux-390
Here's the details I received on an upcoming System z webcast:
Reap the benefits of virtualization
Consolidating Oracle databases to Linux on the IBM System z platform
Date/Time:
December 7, 2006, 2:00 p.m. Eastern Time
Registration:
http://www
So I suppose you insist the number of the beast are 666.
The phrase following the noun does not change it from singular to plural
or back. There is only one number and it is what it are.
-Original Message-
From: Ted MacNEIL [mailto:snip]
Sent: Thursday, November 30, 2006 3:15 PM
To: IBM-
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Ted MacNEIL
Sent: Thursday, November 30, 2006 5:15 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: MB to Cyl Conversion
>SAY 'THE NUMBER OF TRACKS IS' TRK
UGH!
Where's your grammar?
Home. Baking cookies
"The number of tracks is 1" is correct in my book. Number is singular. The
number ... is 1. "The number of tracks are 1"? I don't think so.
OTOH, about the all upper-case ...
Charles
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Ted MacNEIL
You certainly got my attention.
I have worked on a number of speedup projects in this life and prior. We
have one right now where we need a vendor to make a change. The vendor
will learn about this.
Previously though, the two techniques were hashing to reduce the length of
queues and the use
>SAY 'THE NUMBER OF TRACKS IS' TRK
UGH!
Where's your grammar?
Home. Baking cookies (or dropping them onto your PC).
I can accept 'The number of tracks are'! Even for 1.
I cannot accept 'IS'!
I actually check for that exception when I SAY something.
When in doubt.
PANIC!!
--
On Thu, 30 Nov 2006 17:08:06 -0500, Petersen, Jim wrote:
>Here we go again. I love these reliable new tools IBM has given us.
>IBM please take us back to the reliable green screen.
IBMLINK was down this morning, too, then it finally came back after about
1/2 hour. It may have been down long
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Jan MOEYERSONS
Sent: Thursday, November 30, 2006 4:12 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: MB to Cyl Conversion
>Is there a formula for this ? Also Gb to cyl.
>Thanks
Here is a little REXX
I just got into IBMLink without problem. Haven't tried Shop.
Don Imbriale
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Petersen, Jim
Sent: Thursday, November 30, 2006 5:08 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: IBMLINK and SHOPZSERIES are Bo
John,,
Could you give us an example, please?
Ed
On Nov 30, 2006, at 8:13 AM, McKown, John wrote:
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kirk Talman
Sent: Wednesday, November 29, 2006 5:06 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
And of c
Thanks Bill,
It's actually my first steps to rectifying a rigid system
structure that's already in place. My true end-goal is to keep a single
IODF, build my LOADxx member(s) so I can use it between both systems. It
boils down to an audit issue where by before I can put it into
Production,
Here we go again. I love these reliable new tools IBM has given us.
IBM please take us back to the reliable green screen.
___
Jim Petersen
MVS - Lead Systems Engineer
Home Depot Technology Center
1300 Park Center Drive, Austin, TX 78753
www.homedepot
I'm not sure what you mean by maintain production integrity, but if it is to
totally separate datasets for your production and sandbox LPARs that sounds
right. If that is what want to accomplish I would start by asking why do you
need separate SYSx.IPLPARMs and IODFs? Is this a management mand
On 11/30/2006 3:42 PM, Shane wrote:
On Thu, 2006-11-30 at 11:39 -0500, Walt Farrell wrote:
Generally I
suggest doing such modelling using a REXX exec that can build the
appropriate RDEFINE command, rather than issuing RDEFINE directly.
Command !!! - panel Walt, panel ...
How am I ever going
Well !
So basically I'm not in a very good position, and back to square one. It
seems to me that to accomplish what I want, and maintain Production
integrity, I need to create an uncataloged copy of .IODFxx (which
is found in HSA) on a new volume. I then create SYSx.IPLPARM on this new
IODF volume
On Thu, 30 Nov 2006 14:02:41 -0700, Steve Comstock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Edward Jaffe wrote:
>> Ed Gould wrote:
>>
>>> Not knowing a lot about desktop publishing ... Why not .PDF ?
>>
>>
>> PDF is a file format, not a desktop publishing application.
>>
>
>Right. After I write the course, I a
John,
Listed are the cards we use to perform logical restores of our SMS
environment.
RESTORE -
INDD(TAPE1) -
DATAS(INCLUDE(**)-
EXCLUDE( -
SYS1.**, -
ICF.** -
)) -
CATALOG
Edward Jaffe wrote:
Ed Gould wrote:
Not knowing a lot about desktop publishing ... Why not .PDF ?
PDF is a file format, not a desktop publishing application.
Right. After I write the course, I actually do produce
PDF files for lecturing and printing from.
Kind regards,
-Steve Comstock
Ed Gould wrote:
Not knowing a lot about desktop publishing ... Why not .PDF ?
PDF is a file format, not a desktop publishing application.
--
Edward E Jaffe
Phoenix Software International, Inc
5200 W Century Blvd, Suite 800
Los Angeles, CA 90045
310-338-0400 x318
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.ph
Steve,
Not knowing a lot about desktop publishing ... Why not .PDF ?
Ed
On Nov 30, 2006, at 5:07 AM, Steve Comstock wrote:
This year, I have had to convert all my course materials
from Ventura Publisher 4.1 to Ventura Publisher 10.3,
since VP 4.1 does not run under Win/XP. That's around
10,00
In a perhaps too serious vein, one of the merits of using STCKE values in
keys is that they are guaranteed to be unique and in monotone ascending
sequence even when two or more STCKE instructions are executed in immedciate
sequence.
Moreover, UTC date and time values are of course encoded in/e
On Thu, 2006-11-30 at 11:39 -0500, Walt Farrell wrote:
> Generally I
> suggest doing such modelling using a REXX exec that can build the
> appropriate RDEFINE command, rather than issuing RDEFINE directly.
Command !!! - panel Walt, panel ...
How am I ever going to convince the (especially newer
On Thu, 30 Nov 2006 06:38:51 -0600, Tom Marchant wrote:
>On Wed, 29 Nov 2006 16:31:26 -0500, Craddock, Chris wrote:
>
...
>>Oh dear, the thread that will never die.
>...
>That's NOT what it says in the Program Management manual.
>...
I almost responded to Chris, "No. This a new unending thread;
>Date:Wed, 29 Nov 2006 06:18:09 -0500
>From:B Sysprog <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Subject: Single sysplex
>We have two separate zSeries processors, each with its own production
>sysplex.
>CPUX - 2-LPAR basic sysplex with JES2 and ACF2. GRS ring.
>CPUZ - 4-LPAR parallel sysplex with JES3 and RACF,
Dan Espen wrote:
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Don Poitras) writes:
>
> >> Sorry, I did miss that. Unfortunately your example compiles cleanly on my
> >> 1.7
> >> system using the same options except for LOCALE and LSEARCH. Use of the
> >> SHOWINC
> >> option will show what is going on in the header f
Wow...
Next it will be that the job is requiring DATE cards now, because they
finish before 2400 hours.
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-
Thompson, Steve (SCI TW) wrote:
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Steve Comstock
Sent: Thursday, November 30, 2006 1:37 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: ISPF PF Key Mapping
Under help / tutorial the function key assignm
IBM should have one. I worked for a company that just returned one to IBM
Leasing. We had the machine on a 36-month lease. The company had decided
to move the datacenter in one year. I told them that they would not be
able to get that done. They decided to go month to month (which I told
t
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Steve Comstock
Sent: Thursday, November 30, 2006 1:37 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: ISPF PF Key Mapping
Under help / tutorial the function key assignments are
generally these:
F1 /
On Thu, 2006-11-30 at 04:07 -0700, Steve Comstock wrote:
> This past month and a half, I've been updating all the
> courses I'm responsible for to reflect changes brought
> about by z/OS 1.8 in each course's subject area. Since
> most folks don't get a chance to explore the new features,
> thought
Thompson, Steve (SCI TW) wrote:
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Imbriale, Donald (Exchange)
Sent: Thursday, November 30, 2006 12:04 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: ISPF PF Key Mapping
What if you go into Dialog Test,
On the lighter side
Been getting some change control approval requests from the folks who
maintain a rather ancient CICS/VSAM application here. In "Reason for
change" they put "New CPU too fast."
Seems that since we implemented the new z9 processors, parts of the
application that generate VS
On Thu, 30 Nov 2006 11:54:40 -0600, Matthew Stitt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>I don't consider it a good thing, since I have my own IEAVMXIT. Now I must
>merge it with the one that has MFA into it, or never get to take advantage
>of the improvement. I guess I could modify one of them to call the
On Thu, 30 Nov 2006 11:51:20 -0600, Matthew Stitt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>I find it to my advantage to keep SYS1.PARMLIB on the IPL volume. I catalog
>it with VOLSER of ** so I can find it on whichever volume I IPL from.
>
>I also don't change or put anything into it that IBM did not prov
If at all possible you may want to bypass L1 migration and go directly to
L2, even if it means keeping some data on L0 longer. SSM will kill your
mips.
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send ema
Howard Brazee wrote:
On Thu, 30 Nov 2006 13:04:55 -0500, Dan Espen
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I'm not sure what you're missing.But key maps are not global for
me - moving from menu to menu, I find that my changes aren't all there
if I haven't made them there.
Try entering "keylist off".
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Imbriale, Donald (Exchange)
Sent: Thursday, November 30, 2006 12:04 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: ISPF PF Key Mapping
What if you go into Dialog Test, set breakpoints (DISPLAY, SELECT,
On Thu, 30 Nov 2006 11:35:16 -0700, Howard Brazee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
>What does this do?I'm unfamiliar with keylist, and don't see that
>typing keylist off and keylist on does anything. (I called up two
>different keys with keylist off and with keylist on)
Ahh, I exited TSO and r
Edward Jaffe wrote:
Jon,
Please be sure to include the name of the person you are quoting as I
have done with your statement above You removed Matthew Stitt's name
from the above post and my name from the prior one. Poor attribution
makes a discussion hard to follow ...
Oops. Meant to wri
Veilleux, Jon L wrote:
I don't consider it a good thing, since I have my own IEAVMXIT. Now I
must merge it with the one that has MFA into it, > or never get to take
advantage of the improvement. I guess I could modify one of them to
call the other.
That would be an issue. I am not thri
On 30 Nov 2006 09:47:14 -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
(Thompson, Steve , SCI TW) wrote:
>I have an option line displayed from within HELP, where I can enter
>KEYS and change F7 & F8 to LEFT & RIGHT (which is what you want).
>
>
>The problem is, this in house application is based on a program (not
>REX
Is there a reasonable way for a program to tell if an allocated input
dataset was located via a catalog, or OTOH from a DD statement VOLSER?
Yes, I could look up the DSN with LOCATE and CAMLST, but it's not quite the
same thing (it's whether a DS of that name is cataloged, not whether THIS DS
w
Henry Willard wrote:
>
> Michael Knigge wrote:
>
> > On Wed, 29 Nov 2006 09:31:12 -0800, Henry Willard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > wrote:
> >
> > >How about reading the manual?
> >
> > How about reading my posting? Or am I blind?
> >
> > > #define _OE_SOCKETS
> > > #define _OPEN_MSGQ_EXT
> >
On Thu, 30 Nov 2006 13:04:55 -0500, Dan Espen
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I'm not sure what you're missing.But key maps are not global for
>> me - moving from menu to menu, I find that my changes aren't all there
>> if I haven't made them there.
>
>Try entering "keylist off".
>
>This keylist
>
> I don't consider it a good thing, since I have my own IEAVMXIT. Now I
must merge it with the one that has MFA into it, > or never get to take
advantage of the improvement. I guess I could modify one of them to
call the other.
That would be an issue. I am not thrilled with the implementati
On 11/30/2006 12:38 PM, Charles Mills wrote:
Walt, thanks. I would respectfully suggest that the JCL Ref is wrong and
should be changed.
Yes, in both cases, the program in question is "the last step that needs the
DS" but that's kind of an imprecise and circular definition. I would submit
that t
Have you tried disabling keylists from the ISPF SETTINGS menu?
Jon L. Veilleux
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(860) 636-2683
-
This e-mail may contain confidential or privileged information. If
you think you have received this e-mail in error, please advise the
send
What if you go into Dialog Test, set breakpoints (DISPLAY, SELECT, VGET,
anything just to get it to stop), run the app, then use the dialog test
functions to see what's going on?
Don Imbriale
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Tho
The following message is a courtesy copy of an article
that has been posted to bit.listserv.ibm-main as well.
Dan Espen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Back in my insurance days on an IBM 1440, I was able to
> demonstate impossibly fast state lookup times with the
> simple expedient of putting NY, N
I don't consider it a good thing, since I have my own IEAVMXIT. Now I must
merge it with the one that has MFA into it, or never get to take advantage
of the improvement. I guess I could modify one of them to call the other.
On Thu, 30 Nov 2006 10:52:39 -0500, Veilleux, Jon L <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
I find it to my advantage to keep SYS1.PARMLIB on the IPL volume. I catalog
it with VOLSER of ** so I can find it on whichever volume I IPL from.
I also don't change or put anything into it that IBM did not provide when
the system was installed. Since I have multiple systems, each system has
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Howard Brazee
Sent: Thursday, November 30, 2006 11:27 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: ISPF PF Key Mapping
On 30 Nov 2006 08:51:58 -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
(Thompson, Steve , SCI TW) wrot
Michael Knigge wrote:
> On Wed, 29 Nov 2006 09:31:12 -0800, Henry Willard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>
> >How about reading the manual?
>
> How about reading my posting? Or am I blind?
>
> > #define _OE_SOCKETS
> > #define _OPEN_MSGQ_EXT
>
> Both are defined using the following Compiler-
Walt, thanks. I would respectfully suggest that the JCL Ref is wrong and
should be changed.
Yes, in both cases, the program in question is "the last step that needs the
DS" but that's kind of an imprecise and circular definition. I would submit
that the phrase in the JCL Ref, which I quote here ex
On 30 Nov 2006 08:51:58 -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
(Thompson, Steve , SCI TW) wrote:
>However, from the application panel if I hit PF1 [HELP] the panel that
>is displayed is only scrollable by PF10/11! I just can't seem to figure
>out how that is happening. And since there is no command line in the
On Thu, 30 Nov 2006 11:56:14 -0500, Dan Espen
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Back in my insurance days on an IBM 1440, I was able to
>demonstate impossibly fast state lookup times with the
>simple expedient of putting NY, NJ and CA first in the table.
That probably wouldn't be optimal with the Unive
On 30 Nov 2006 08:02:14 -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
(Thompson, Steve , SCI TW) wrote:
>While pondering this, could someone tell me, where in the Fine ISPF
>Manuals, I can find how to control scrolling in a help panel. I grow
>rather tired of the PF10/11 being jammed down my throat instead of PF7/8
>
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Howard Brazee
Sent: Thursday, November 30, 2006 11:14 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: ISPF PF Key Mapping
Does someone have a list of various places that we need to go to to
change a key
I'm not sure what you're missing.But key maps are not global for
me - moving from menu to menu, I find that my changes aren't all there
if I haven't made them there.
I also recommend that you vary as little as possible from the default
standards, making your keyboard useable to all. When you
The following message is a courtesy copy of an article
that has been posted to bit.listserv.ibm-main as well.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Rick Fochtman) writes:
> There are similar references for all the "newer" DASD since that time,
> as well. But they're hard to find.
i would be happy to update gcard s
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Stocker, Herman
Sent: Thursday, November 30, 2006 10:30 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: ISPF PF Key Mapping
The keylist that controls HELP are ISPHELP, ISPHLP2 & ISPKYLST. If you
change
---
As many of you know, to qualify for Parallel Sysplex software pricing
aggregation there are a few requirements. One requirement is that you have
to run at least one qualifying service from a list of about 20.
I'm working with a couple
On 11/30/2006 9:18 AM, Charles Mills wrote:
Well, the code is now working and the answer is Yes, the ENQ ***is***
released. I am allocating a dataset with SVC 99 DISP=NEW and FREE=CLOSE, and
writing into and the closing it. Then I am submitting a job that allocates
the dataset with JCL DISP=SHR a
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Rick Fochtman
>
>
>
> > I am in the midst of installing z/OS V1.7 and having troubles
with the
> >IXGLOGR task. . . .
> >
> >
>
On 11/29/2006 3:40 PM, Shane wrote:
Does anybody have an explanation why STDATA isn't included in a new
STARTED entry if it is modelled on an existing entry ??.
Catches our RACF people out damn near every time.
Only certain information is modeled by RDEFINE ... FROM, as documented.
I can
I am in the midst of installing z/OS V1.7 and having troubles
with the IXGLOGR task. The following messages are issued when starting
CICS T/S V3.1. Similar messages are issued when IPL'ing while logger
functions are starting and
There used to be reference cards that gave the formulas for calculating
DASD device capacity. The one I have stashed away is for 3350 and is
GX20-1983. It details the variables needed to accurately calculate space
needed based on track size, blksize,
The keylist that controls HELP are ISPHELP, ISPHLP2 & ISPKYLST. If you
change them it should correct your problem, or disable keylist.
Regards, Herman Stocker
avis budget group
Phone:1973-496-4847
fax:1973-496-8201
E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
F
I user "PF21 . . SWAP PREVIOUS " and having no problems. On z/OS 1.4
Regards, Herman Stocker
avis budget group
Phone:1973-496-4847
fax:1973-496-8201
E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On B
And can someone tell me why I get this message: "Line command error";
(hit PF1) gives me this message " A command is already in the line command
field." This is after I created this PFKey:
:listc ent(/) all LONGlistc
I asked this question a couple of months
"Before you get too excited, understand that the new implementation
isn't much better than what's been shipped with GDPS since 2003. The MFA
code is inserted directly into IEAVMXIT. :-(
Hopefully, a future z/OS release will make MFA functionality an
integrated part of the system and not something
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Chase, John
Sent: Thursday, November 30, 2006 9:54 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: ISPF PF Key Mapping
Hi, All,
Having a bit of a problem getting SWAP PREV mapped to PF18. I've
previously m
Hi, All,
Having a bit of a problem getting SWAP PREV mapped to PF18. I've
previously mapped SWAP NEXT to PF21 and SWAP LIST to PF24 and they both
work, but PF18 only returns "Command Not Active" error message. I've
updated both the non-keylist and "active keylist" settings and the
updates show i
In a message dated 11/30/2006 9:17:01 A.M. Central Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I don't know who else is affected by this UA madness, and
>I suspect my
>emails to Darren aren't getting through either.
>
>>
Right. Since it's at the domain level, can't send to anybody to repor
On 29 Nov 2006 13:37:33 -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Arthur T.) wrote:
> In 1989 a well-known hacker was asked what the
>biggest problem of computing in the 1990s would be. He
>replied, "There are only 17,000 three letter acronyms."
As long as we don't demand uniqueness, the number is unlimi
Veilleux, Jon L wrote:
FYI...Message Flood Automation has been made available. It has the
potential to save a system from programs that are looping and issuing
WTOs.
Before you get too excited, understand that the new implementation isn't
much better than what's been shipped with GDPS since
Tom Marchant wrote:
On Wed, 29 Nov 2006 15:16:12 -0800, Jerry Whitteridge
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Why not just use something like LOADPx for the production LOADxx and
LOADSx for the sandbox ?
You can't do that. The xx in LOADxx is a hexadecimal value: 00-FF.
You're confusing
I'm sending this on to the Listserv because,
apparently, Phil can't but would like to.
On 29 Nov 2006 22:58:55 -0800, in bit.listserv.ibm-main
(Message-ID:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>)
"Phil Payne" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Well, I've sent three messages via the email interface and
none has
a
On Thu, 30 Nov 2006 07:29:01 -0600, Tom Marchant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>On Wed, 29 Nov 2006 15:16:12 -0800, Jerry Whitteridge
><[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>>Why not just use something like LOADPx for the production LOADxx and
>>LOADSx for the sandbox ?
>
>You can't do that. The xx in LOADxx
Thanks...
FYI... APAR in SUBJECT is correct,APAR in the text has a type-o. APAR IS
OA17514.
-Original Message-
This morning, we made available SPE OA17154 z/OS Message Flood
Automation.
z/OS Message Flood Automation is based on the Message Flood Automation
that has been shipped with GD
On Thu, 30 Nov 2006 15:48:16 +0900, Timothy Sipples
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>As many of you know, to qualify for Parallel Sysplex software pricing
>aggregation there are a few requirements. One requirement is that you have
>to run at least one qualifying service from a list of about 20.
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of john gilmore
>
> Tom Marchant writes:
>
> >I seriously doubt that TRTO is faster than 50 compares on a modern
> >superscalar processor. I hope you mean faster by a factor of 10x,
not
> >by a factor of 10k. The lat
Ok, that part looks incorrect.
Kees.
"Charles Mills" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
> Because (as I said in the OP) the documentation for SVC 99 DALCLOSE in
z/OS
> 1.7 Authorized Assembler Services Guide says "See the description of
> FREE=CLOSE in z/OS MVS JCL R
Chase, John wrote:
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of R.S.
Tom Marchant wrote:
On Thu, 30 Nov 2006 15:05:27 +0100, R.S. wrote:
Tom Marchant wrote:
[...]
I _strongly_ suggest that you move SYS1.PARMLIB off the IPL
volume.
Why ???
So that you don't h
Tom Marchant writes:
I seriously doubt that TRTO is faster than 50 compares on a modern
superscalar processor. I hope you mean faster by a factor of 10x,
not by a factor of 10k. The latter is absurd, the former unlikely.
in response to my
. . . Maintaining/replacing ad hoc code of this sor
FYI...Message Flood Automation has been made available. It has the
potential to save a system from programs that are looping and issuing
WTOs.
Jon L. Veilleux
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(860) 636-2683
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Kevin Kelley
Sent: Wednesday, Nove
Ahhh,
of cource, my fault...
I've specified the "#include-Datasets" using the SYSLIB DD-Statement and not
with the "SEARCH" Compiler-Option.
So... by coding "#include " the Headerfile "time" was taken from
the first dataset in the SYSLIB-Concatenation, which is "CEE.SCEEH.H" - but
time.h from CE
1 - 100 of 134 matches
Mail list logo
