Lindy,
It sounds to me like everything you need is available from the RMF II
Background session.
Ron Hawkins
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Lindy Mayfield
Sent: Monday, June 18, 2007 4:17 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject
I will say that it is interesting that when I brought the most recent outage
issue up to my IBM rep, he didn't come right back and say, oh, hey, didn't
you know, that was a planned outage?
.
seems like he would have known, considering I've been keeping after him on
these web ibmlink issues and
On Jun 18, 2007, at 2:56 PM, Rick Fochtman wrote:
--SNIP--
---
We took a slightly different approach, Ed. ALL private SVC's and
modules that front-ended or replaced IBM modules had to be provide
I heard nothing about the so-called "planned" outage.
where was this supposedly documented?
Hey, I'll just keep our mainframe systems down for an entire week, but hey,
no worry, I'll make sure to let everyone know it's a "planned outage".
- Original Message -
From: "Ed Gould" <[EMA
Posters on a Google group called the problems "absurd", but a
spokeswoman for IBM told the Reg it was planned maintenance and
publicly announced. She wasn't sure quite where it was publicly
announced though.
Can anyone confirm/deny?
Ed
Mark Zelden wrote:
>It's not what you really want to do with colors, but how about adding a
rule
>that is something like this:
>
>Condition
> When:
> Body contains IBM-MAIN
> AND Body contains sort
>
>Action
> Change importance to High
Thanks, but that really won't do what I want.
Wh
On Mon, 18 Jun 2007 13:18:23 -0500, Kelman, Tom
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>We were informed by CA that the problem has to do with some algorithm
>they use to "compress" the last date accessed. It is date specific.
>They next time it would occur if not fixed is January 6, 2007. Wasn't
>the "com
On Mon, 18 Jun 2007 13:37:46 -0700, Frank Yaeger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>I only see "Sender" and "Recipient" as choices to filter on and the list
>address doesn't
>seem to work for either of those. I don't see anything equivalent to
>"REPLY TO" as a filter.
>
>For now, I'm settling for show
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Dave Kopischke
Sent: Monday, June 18, 2007 3:31 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: IBM mainframe support takes a break
On Sun, 17 Jun 2007 22:35:46 +0100, Phil Payne wrote:
>From the Regist
Mark Zelden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 06/18/2007 01:40:53 PM:
> I set myself to mail and I see the problem. The "sender" field that
> notes uses for the coloring is taken from some other field, not "from".
> I think it may be a field called "PRINCIPAL" and that is what shows
> up under "who" in
Rick Fochtman wrote on 06/18/2007 01:08:43 PM:
> Frank, I don't use Lotus Notes, but could you filter on the "REPLY TO"
> value?
I only see "Sender" and "Recipient" as choices to filter on and the list
address doesn't
seem to work for either of those. I don't see anything equivalent to
"REPLY TO"
On Mon, 18 Jun 2007 12:29:48 -0700, Frank Yaeger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>John P Kalinich wrote on 06/18/2007 11:51:07 AM:
>> I Googled this subject and came up with this...
>>
>> http://citcomputing.unl.edu/monthlytip.html
>
>Well, that's the feature I was trying to use except mine shows Messa
FYI-
IBM has released a new version of the JZOS toolkit which includes new
functionality beyond what has been released in the z/OS SDK version of JZOS.
See: http://www.alphaworks.ibm.com/tech/zosjavabatchtk
New Features:
=
- Batch Launcher jar executables: If the first two argum
On Sun, 17 Jun 2007 22:35:46 +0100, Phil Payne wrote:
>From the Register:
>
>http://www.channelregister.co.uk/2007/06/15/ibm_mainframe_support/
>
It's interesting that the quotes used in this article are from this list. Is
this a
support group ??? Or a BLOG ??? Maybe both ???
-
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Rick Fochtman
>
> ---
>
> We took a slightly different approach, Ed. ALL private SVC's
> and modules that front-ended or replaced IBM modules had to
> be provided to us in
TPX is from CA.
Regards,
Herman Stocker
Technical Specialist
Data Center Operations
avis budget group
Phone: 1973-496-4847
fax: 1973-496-8201
E-Mail:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Rick Foc
-
Didn't CAPEX also market TLMS?
---
IIRC, TLMS came from Gulf Computer Services, a division of Gulf Oil Co.
They also had something UCANDU, if I remember correctly.
-
Frank Yaeger wrote:
I hope this isn't off topic for ibm-main.
I use Lotus Notes to follow ibm-main. I was thinking it would be nice if I
could identify notes from ibm-main in my inbox in some way (e.g. a
different color or a "flag" or ?). Lotus Notes seems to have a facility
for this kind of
New E-week article
http://www.eweek.com/article2/0,1895,2147500,00.asp?kc=EWKNLEIA061807FEA
1
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN I
On 18 Jun 2007 12:40:27 -0700, in bit.listserv.ibm-main you wrote:
>>To the patent issue: Patents are OK as long as they are for new
>>technical development and not business processes.
>
>IMHO, patents are desirable only to the extent that USPTO is familiar
>with prior art and able to recognize wh
--
Can anyone point me to the actual government documents (CMS and DOD)
pertaining to the security requirement for unattended (15 minutes) connections.
There are two interpretations here:
1) kick the user completely out (CICS TSO)
2) require the
---
You hit it on the nail head. I have seen so called sysprogs do things
by the book and never ask any questions. I have on occasion gone over
the install and found questions that *SHOULD* have been asked by the
sysprog. I am talking about SVC's
You are correct - I knew that Gulf originally wrote TLMS but I had
forgotten that CAPEX called it TLMS II. Anyone remember the CAPEX logo
page that always printed?
Gary Garland Gregory, MS
CA
Senior Software Engineer
Tel: +1-214-473-1863
Fax: +1-214-473-1050
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original M
Frank Yaeger of the IBM Mainframe Discussion List
wrote on 06/18/2007 02:29:48 PM:
> John P Kalinich wrote on 06/18/2007 11:51:07 AM:
> > I Googled this subject and came up with this...
> >
> > http://citcomputing.unl.edu/monthlytip.html
>
> Well, that's the feature I was trying to use except min
The following message is a courtesy copy of an article
that has been posted to bit.listserv.ibm-main,alt.folklore.computers as well.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (IBMsysProg) writes:
> Memory.
> Over the years the first exploiters of architecture changes to allow more
> address spaces, more real memory, and
In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, on 06/17/2007
at 12:43 AM, Phil Smith III <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>Let's make this clear once and for all: THERE IS NO LINUX ON Z/OS.
>Not now, not ever.
You write USS when you mean z/OS Unix system Services. Why is one
piece of incorrect nomenclature worse than anot
In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, on 06/14/2007
at 10:23 AM, Tom Marchant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>At a previous job, we once used ASM2 to defrag a pack. I don't know
>what the error was, but we ended up with a pack with nothing left on
>it but the VTOC.
Thank you for helping to recover memories that
In
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
on 06/14/2007
at 01:46 AM, Timothy Sipples <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>If they're written in C or C++, you recompile them and run them on
>z/OS, probably with USS.
Every time someone says "I don't believe in theories", another theory
dies. Portability isn't automatic.
>
In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, on
06/12/2007
at 03:39 PM, "Craddock, Chris" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>Most of the instructions are documented in PoPs, but some very
>significant ones are NOT. Obvious missing examples include DIAGNOSE
>and SIE,
At one time there was an unlicensed manual for SIE. It m
In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, on 06/12/2007
at 08:36 AM, Steve Thompson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>To the patent issue: Patents are OK as long as they are for new
>technical development and not business processes.
IMHO, patents are desirable only to the extent that USPTO is familiar
with prior art a
David Andrews wrote:
On Mon, 2007-06-18 at 14:42 -0400, Gregory, Gary G wrote:
Didn't CAPEX also market TLMS?
Maybe as "TLMS II"? We originally licensed TLMS from Gulf Computer
Sciences.
I don't remember an "II" but our license went from Gulf to Capex to CA.
Bob
--
John P Kalinich wrote on 06/18/2007 11:51:07 AM:
> I Googled this subject and came up with this...
>
> http://citcomputing.unl.edu/monthlytip.html
Well, that's the feature I was trying to use except mine shows Message
Marking -> Senders (I'm on Lotus 7.0). But when I put IBM Mainframe
Discussion
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Ed Finnell
>
> In a message dated 6/18/2007 1:48:50 P.M. Central Daylight
> Time, Steve_Thompson writes:
>
> have found that it actually cost MORE to get a machine W/O
> M/$'s Windows!
>
>
>
> >>
> I don't kno
Tom,
Thanks much.
I think I'm going to be physically ill.
They impose specific mandates on each choke point regardless of
actual need. So a product that simply locks the session.
and accomplishes just as much without killing the productivity of the poor
slob at the
In a message dated 6/18/2007 2:21:04 P.M. Central Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
thought it was "Kurt Quackenbush".
>>
It is, but just checking oh a blah Monday.
** See what's free at http://www.aol.com.
---
Ed Finnell wrote:
In a message dated 6/18/2007 1:44:19 P.M. Central Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
OK thanx. And yes, I'll bite.KQ ?!
He's the IBM lead for SMP/E and a regular contributor to IBM-Main Kirk
Quankenbush.
Errata: Kurt Quackenbush.
--
Radoslaw Skorupka
Lod
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Ed Finnell
>
> In a message dated 6/18/2007 1:44:19 P.M. Central Daylight
> Time, Mark.Young writes:
>
> OK thanx. And yes, I'll bite.KQ ?!
>
> >>
> He's the IBM lead for SMP/E and a regular contributor to
>
In a message dated 6/18/2007 1:48:50 P.M. Central Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
have found that it actually cost MORE to get a machine W/O M/$'s
Windows!
>>
I don't know where you buy machines. newegg.com or tigerdirect.com will sell
you several flavors of fairly strong machi
Thanks John, I've asked our RACF guy to look into it for me.
From: McKown, John [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Mon 6/18/2007 3:02 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Trying to identify issuer of vary command
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Main
In a message dated 6/18/2007 1:44:19 P.M. Central Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
OK thanx. And yes, I'll bite.KQ ?!
>>
He's the IBM lead for SMP/E and a regular contributor to IBM-Main Kirk
Quankenbush.
** See what's free at http://ww
On 18 Jun 2007 11:48:38 -0700, in bit.listserv.ibm-main you wrote:
>How many bought PCs without Windows and then decided to buy Windows?
>
>Or even who bought PCs without DOS and then decided to buy DOS?
>
>
>Better yet, try to buy a NAME computer that doesn't have an O/S, or has
>Linux (any distr
On Mon, 18 Jun 2007 10:22:15 -0600, Anne & Lynn Wheeler wrote:
>as i've mentioned before ... the other market force was that the
>previous personal computers had been do-it-yourself and hobbiest market.
>individuals had to justify the cost of the box for their own personal
>interest ... that inclu
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of O'Brien, David W.
> (NIH/CIT) [C]
> Sent: Monday, June 18, 2007 1:52 PM
> To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
> Subject: Trying to identify issuer of vary command
>
>
> Assuming that we generate the
On Mon, 2007-06-18 at 14:42 -0400, Gregory, Gary G wrote:
> Didn't CAPEX also market TLMS?
Maybe as "TLMS II"? We originally licensed TLMS from Gulf Computer
Sciences.
--
David Andrews
A. Duda and Sons, Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Assuming that we generate the proper SMF records, how can we identify who or
what varied a particular DASD address online?
Is this something that DAF from CBT might help with?
TIA,
Dave O'Brien
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe /
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Thompson, Steve
> Sent: Monday, June 18, 2007 1:48 PM
> To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
> Subject: Re: The Development of the Vital IBM PC in Spite of
> the Corporate Culture of IBM
>
>
> -O
Frank Y of the IBM Mainframe Discussion List wrote
on 06/18/2007 01:20:59 PM:
> Kirk Talman wrote on 06/18/2007 11:19:10 AM:
> > I just added a rule under "Tools" "Mail rules" that if "To" equals
> > "IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU" move to a folder I just created. It took a few
> > minutes but has now ki
On 18 Jun 2007 11:18:55 -0700, in bit.listserv.ibm-main you wrote:
>We were informed by CA that the problem has to do with some algorithm
>they use to "compress" the last date accessed. It is date specific.
>They next time it would occur if not fixed is January 6, 2007. Wasn't
>the "compression"
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Howard Brazee
Sent: Monday, June 18, 2007 12:47 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: The Development of the Vital IBM PC in Spite of the
Corporate Culture of IBM
On Sun, 17 Jun 2007 21:22:24 -
Kirk Talman wrote on 06/18/2007 11:19:10 AM:
> I just added a rule under "Tools" "Mail rules" that if "To" equals
> "IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU" move to a folder I just created. It took a few
> minutes but has now kicked in and is working. We are rel 6.5.4 CCH5
> 2005Sep12.
Thanks. But I wasn't really
On Mon, 18 Jun 2007 14:23:29 EDT, Ed Finnell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>In a message dated 6/18/2007 10:59:51 A.M. Central Daylight Time,
>[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>
>to MVS/XA from MVS/370 without a full sysgen required SMP/E for the
>CSECT delete function. SMP/4 didn't have that capability
Didn't CAPEX also market TLMS?
Gary Garland Gregory, MS
CA
Senior Software Engineer
Tel: +1-214-473-1863
Fax: +1-214-473-1050
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Rick Fochtman
Sent: Saturday, June 16, 2007 5
I assume you are talking about the "colors" tab under "tools >> preferences".
I never tried it with outside addresses before, but I just did and it worked.
It will even update existing emails as long as you exit your mail box and
re-enter (perhaps that is your problem).
You might also want to o
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kelman, Tom
> Sent: Monday, June 18, 2007 1:18 PM
> To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
> Subject: Re: CA-TopSecret SP1 (and above) CICS SIGNON Problem
>
>
> We were informed by CA that the problem h
In a message dated 6/18/2007 10:59:51 A.M. Central Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
to MVS/XA from MVS/370 without a full sysgen required SMP/E for the
CSECT delete function. SMP/4 didn't have that capability.
I don't remember when SMP/4 become unsupported however.
>>
Likewise.
I just added a rule under "Tools" "Mail rules" that if "To" equals
"IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU" move to a folder I just created. It took a few
minutes but has now kicked in and is working. We are rel 6.5.4 CCH5
2005Sep12.
IBM Mainframe Discussion List wrote on 06/18/2007
01:54:09 PM:
> Has anybo
We were informed by CA that the problem has to do with some algorithm
they use to "compress" the last date accessed. It is date specific.
They next time it would occur if not fixed is January 6, 2007. Wasn't
the "compression" of dates what got us all into trouble with Y2K. Why
in the world are t
you are right it's INFOMAN 0S/390. can anyone help?
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/a
They just posted this alert notification on their Website:
Important Notice to CA ACF2 for z/OS and CA Top Secret for z/OS Customers.
Release 9.0 SP1, SP2, and Release 12.0 ACF2 and Top Secret customers who
recycle their CICS systems today (June 16, 2007) may experience the
following abend at
I don't know if you can have the color setup for mails you receive from
IBM -main. However, you can set up a rule in your Lotus Notes to move
every email you receive from IBM-Main into a different folder.
here 's the procedure to do it :
1. Go to 'TOOLS' on your left hand side . Select 'Rules'
On Mon, 18 Jun 2007 13:05:51 -0400, Lizette Koehler
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Does anyone know if this affects any version of z/OS/CICS/TSS or is this
specific to a certain combination of z/OS/TSS/CICS?
>
>Neither IBM or CA seem to show any specific software levels other than TSS
9 at SP1/2
>
Yes, it's INFOMAN OS/390.
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
I just use when sender contains ibm-main move to folder.
Walter Davies
DBA / Sys Prog
El Dorado County
Frank Yaeger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent by: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
06/18/2007 10:54 AM
Please respond to
IBM Mainframe Discussion List
To
IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
cc
Subject
Idenitfy
On Mon, 18 Jun 2007 11:54:17 -0500 Ramiro Camposagrado
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
:>Talk about sheer luck !!! We upgraded our production LPAR to CA-TopSecret
:>9.0 SP1, this past Saturday, June 16.
:>Here is the description of the problem:
:>Title: KHC8002: CICS SIGNONS FAIL WITH ABEND AEXZ
:
I hope this isn't off topic for ibm-main.
I use Lotus Notes to follow ibm-main. I was thinking it would be nice if I
could identify notes from ibm-main in my inbox in some way (e.g. a
different color or a "flag" or ?). Lotus Notes seems to have a facility
for this kind of thing (message marking
This also affected CA-ACF2. Fortunately, my first ACF2 R9 upgrade will be
this coming weekend. Missed it by that much!
Description:
PRODUCT: CA-ACF2 MVS RELEASE: 9.0
I did not see any answers to this question so I thought I would give it a
shot.
1. DBMS systems almost always cost additional capacity.
2. The wide deployment of DBMS systems is a good indication that the
benefits out way the total costs, one such cost is capacity requirements.
That being said we
On Sun, 17 Jun 2007 21:22:24 -0700, in bit.listserv.ibm-main you
wrote:
>Microsoft Windows dominates the world today for the same reason - it's
>the _de facto_ standard for which you have the best chance of getting
>software. But it only became a success in the beginning because it
>*did* offer va
David,
You know where to find the DISA STIGs, right? If not:
http://iase.disa.mil/stigs/stig/index.html
Curiously, the Network Infrastructure STIG says this:
"(NET1453: CAT III) The IAO/NSO will ensure that a session that exceeds 30
minutes of inactivity is disconnected."
While the MQ s
On Mon, 18 Jun 2007 13:05:51 -0400, Lizette Koehler
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Does anyone know if this affects any version of z/OS/CICS/TSS or is this
specific to a certain combination of z/OS/TSS/CICS?
>
>Neither IBM or CA seem to show any specific software levels other than TSS
9 at SP1/2
>
Does anyone know if this affects any version of z/OS/CICS/TSS or is this
specific to a certain combination of z/OS/TSS/CICS?
Neither IBM or CA seem to show any specific software levels other than TSS 9 at
SP1/2
Lizette
>
>Talk about sheer luck !!! We upgraded our production LPAR to CA-TopSecr
On 18 Jun 2007 07:32:06 -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Knutson, Sam)
wrote:
>
>First IBMLink and now CA- SupportConnect too it seems the Gremlins are working
>overtime.
Who was the airline president who said that if the customers saw dirty
ashtrays, they assumed the engines weren't safe?
-
Hello: Shortly after upgrading to v1.7, but not necessarily connected to that
migration, one of our busier systems experienced a number of IEE178I
messages during heavy batch processing.
We added to IEAOPTxx: mccafcth=(4000,4500)
varying the actual numbers (our capacity planning tech made th
Talk about sheer luck !!! We upgraded our production LPAR to CA-TopSecret
9.0 SP1, this past Saturday, June 16.
Here is the description of the problem:
Title: KHC8002: CICS SIGNONS FAIL WITH ABEND AEXZ
Description :
PRODUCT: CA-TOP SECRET MVS RELEASE: 9.0
APAR #: QO8
Announced November 1982
General Availability April 1983
EMEA Ann Letter ZP82-0800
Birger Heede
IBM Denmark
Mark H. Young wrote:
OK all you folks on this here LIST. Please put your thinkin' and rememberin'
hats on. When did IBM first introduce SMP/E to replace SMP4?
SMP/E GA? And when was SMP
Greetings everyone.
I have uploaded a new version of Jol, and documentation.
Jol can replace JCL and offers may advantages over JCL.
A brief description is here:
http://members.ozemail.com.au/~oscarptyltd/oscar_jol_desc.html
The Concept and Facilities Manual is here:
http://members.oz
Steve,
I didn't think that it (maybe AR39 - check DISA) was that detail to
logoff with 15 minutes of inactivity. I though it just stated to lock
the terminals and have the users be revalidated.
Checking my memory backs for the documents now. Maybe GAO..
Kevin
-Original Message-
From
On Mon, 18 Jun 2007 09:36:28 -0600, Jeffrey D. Smith
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> -Original Message-
>
>I hope you realize that when IBM provides a $100 mainframe-in-a-box to
>its employees, that IBM *owns* the products developed on thoses boxes.
>
>Do you want to give up your intellectu
The following message is a courtesy copy of an article
that has been posted to bit.listserv.ibm-main,alt.folklore.computers as well.
Frank McCoy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Yup ... As *would* have happened with the PC itself if they'd been
> that tight-assed with it. They just didn't *get* the
Can anyone point me to the actual government documents (CMS and DOD)
pertaining to the security requirement for unattended (15 minutes) connections.
There are two interpretations here:
1) kick the user completely out (CICS TSO)
2) require the user to enter a (Secure Serve Validated) passwor
I think that this is related to InfoMan, so it could be z/OS-related.
Bill
On Mon, 18 Jun 2007 10:49:23 -0500, Mark H. Young
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>On Mon, 18 Jun 2007 10:35:59 -0500, Rich Smrcina <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>wrote:
>
>>OK, thanks, John. I'm glad I'm not the only one... :)
>>
>>Mc
McKown, John wrote:
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Sal Mukbil
Sent: Monday, June 18, 2007 10:16 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Time calculation
I am new to mainframe and looking for some help.
I would like to create
Mark H. Young wrote:
OK all you folks on this here LIST. Please put your thinkin' and rememberin'
hats on. When did IBM first introduce SMP/E to replace SMP4?
SMP/E GA? And when was SMP4 dropped completely (support wise, that is)?
Any other history on this topic would be appreciated.
Yeah, I'
OK all you folks on this here LIST. Please put your thinkin' and rememberin'
hats on. When did IBM first introduce SMP/E to replace SMP4?
SMP/E GA? And when was SMP4 dropped completely (support wise, that is)?
Any other history on this topic would be appreciated.
Yeah, I'm in reminisce mode rig
On Mon, 18 Jun 2007 10:35:59 -0500, Rich Smrcina <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>OK, thanks, John. I'm glad I'm not the only one... :)
>
>McKown, John wrote:
>>
>> Uh? What is a TSX? What OS are you running on? z/OS, z/VSE, z/Linux,
>> z/TPF???
>>
>> --
Well, we can be pretty sure TSX isn't:
Toron
That and a *reasonable* fee for operating systems and associated
optionals and I could crank out code all day long. I'm with you, brother...
Dave Jones wrote:
The USB hardware device is an IBM 1090 (a.k.a, the IBM System z Personal
Development Tool Adapter (zPDTA)), and the software is called
OK, thanks, John. I'm glad I'm not the only one... :)
McKown, John wrote:
Uh? What is a TSX? What OS are you running on? z/OS, z/VSE, z/Linux,
z/TPF???
--
--
Rich Smrcina
VM Assist, Inc.
Phone: 414-491-6001
Ans Service: 360-715-2467
rich.smrcina at vmassist.com
Catch the WAVV! http://www
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> Behalf Of Dave Jones
> Sent: Monday, June 18, 2007 9:31 AM
> To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
> Subject: Re: Patents, Copyrights, Profits, Flex and Hercules
>
> As a (very) small ISV (in the z/VM space, not z
As a (very) small ISV (in the z/VM space, not z/OS or VSE), I would be much
more inclined to accept IBM's statements that "they feel our pain" with
respect to the problems we are all now having with the PWD program and lack
of small development systems availability if I didn't keep running into
thi
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Sal Mukbil
> Sent: Monday, June 18, 2007 10:16 AM
> To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
> Subject: Time calculation
>
>
> I am new to mainframe and looking for some help.
> I would like to create a T
I am new to mainframe and looking for some help.
I would like to create a TSX that will check "implementation time" field and if
the time entered is between 06:00 and 18:00 then to display a warning
message. Can anyone help me out. thanks
-
Sam (and all) - I was able to enter SupportConnect on the first try and
paruse open issues, and perform a knowledgebase keyword search (10:37 EDT)
The information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity to which
it is addressed and may contain CONFIDENTIAL material. If you receive
Silicon-based job action. Their extra baryons are acting up/out.
IBM Mainframe Discussion List wrote on 06/18/2007
10:31:55 AM:
> First IBMLink and now CA- SupportConnect too it seems the Gremlins
> are working overtime.
> Sam Knutson, GEICO
-
The in
"Knutson, Sam" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> CA-SupportConnect is down and has had a series of problems lately with
> availability for us. No estimated uptime.You can call the SupportConnect
> line directly at (631)342-6364 and open a ticket or try to
CA-SupportConnect is down and has had a series of problems lately with
availability for us. No estimated uptime.You can call the SupportConnect
line directly at (631)342-6364 and open a ticket or try to get status.
First IBMLink and now CA- SupportConnect too it seems the Gremlins are worki
>From a personal perspective I believe that IBM was late to the game with
GUI and WAS capability for the mainframe. Our mid-range counterparts were
working on web alternatives, in test, just prior to Y2K. We didn't take
delivery of WAS 3.02 until sometime in 01 if memory serves. By this time
it
The last time I saw one of these, we determined the root cause was a tape
mount that never got resolved. Is there any indication that the ABARS
task started at all?
dd keller
//
Kevin,
I found that the job which triggers DFHSM to submit the aggregate
restore abended on
On Sat, 16 Jun 2007 22:55:54 +1000, Greg Price <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
>Warning: the way I did it makes no allowance for SYSPLEX or shared SPOOL
>(Didn't JES2 enforce unique TSU job ids in a MAS? Was this ever changed?)
Yes. The dup check was removed from JES2 in z/OS 1.4. JES3 still hasn
Oh yes, now I've found it, thanks.
http://publibz.boulder.ibm.com/cgi-bin/bookmgr_OS390/BOOKS/erbzpg50/1.5
That looks nice, and it runs unauthorized. I'm playing with the sample ASM
code now. (-: Maybe I could make a nice Rexx function out of it...
Lindy
-Original Message-
From: IBM
There's an extensive discussion sparked by this topic which is quite
invisible to e-mail users of the list. I know only because I get a digest of
IBM-MAIN.
If anyone wants to check what's being said, here's the Google Groups URL for
supposedly "Today's most active topic":
http://groups.googl
1 - 100 of 101 matches
Mail list logo
