Kees,
"About your answer above: why do you check a single PGDS utilization? I
think it hardly hirts when one PGDS is over some limit if the total
configuration is within limit? ... Besides that, the question is what
we can do about it, as Barbara already mentioned."
thanks for basically asking th
In many cases it has to do with not being to access web email accounts
and they've turned off outgoing smtp and incoming pop3, imap, etc. ports
for security reasons, which leaves one company email only by default.
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAI
I'm in that category.
But that's not why I'm always civil.
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> Behalf Of FRASER, Brian
> Sent: 12. syyskuuta 2007 5:50
> To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
> Subject: Re: The future of IBM Mainframes [just thinkin
I'm thinking of changing PLPA to the minimum size of 1 cylinder and letting it
overflow into the COMMON page dataset. Is there any issues with allocating
a huge COMMON page dataset? For example, if my LPAR only requires a
combined PLPA and COMMON size of 800 cylinders, can I used an entire 339
It is too late and I spent too much time with z/VM lately. You are correct.
On 9/11/07, Ted MacNEIL <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >If you have 4 CPs there, it dispatches four logical CPs on three physical
> >CPs. Not a good idea.
>
> Also, not possible.
> Unlike VM, PRSM/LPAR does not virtualise
>That's funny. My company forbids me from using anything other than my company
>email address !!
That (officially, or unofficially) makes you a spokesman.
My former company only wanted corporate communications (or legal) to be
spokesmen.
In your case, there are a TON of legal issues!
-
Too b
That's funny. My company forbids me from using anything other than my
company email address !!
>Please remember that a lot of us work for companies who forbid our use
of company email addresses to post on public forums.
-
---
>If you have 4 CPs there, it dispatches four logical CPs on three physical CPs.
>Not a good idea.
Also, not possible.
Unlike VM, PRSM/LPAR does not virtualise CP's.
If the physical CEC has 'n' CP's, no LPAR can have more than 'n' LP's.
-
Too busy driving to stop for gas!
--
Hal,
what is in your LPAR definition ? If you have 4 CPs there, it
dispatches four logical CPs on three physical CPs. Not a good idea.
Marian
On 9/11/07, Hal Merritt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> We just upgraded our z/890 from a model 450 to a model 370. That
> translates to one less CP, but the
I created a SSA on a driving system, then created the PAGE datasets. I think
I found my issue. I used IDCAMS to ALTER the cluster names, but not the
components. I will try another IPL tomorrow and report back.
--
For IBM-MAIN
What he said!
>Please remember that a lot of us work for companies who forbid our use of
>company email addresses to post on public forums.
-
Too busy driving to stop for gas!
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access
Hello Herbie,
Please remember that a lot of us work for companies who forbid our use of
company email addresses to post on public forums.
Which is why this mail is from a .hotmail.com address.
On Mon, 10 Sep 2007 18:12:14 +0100, Van Dalsen, Herbie
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>David,
>
>I half
I'd like to make folks aware that I just finished refreshing the IBM
Migration Checker for z/OS tool with z/OS V1.9 information!
This "as is" tool can be found on the z/OS download Web page
(http://www.ibm.com/servers/eserver/zseries/zos/downloads/ ).
We've added 13 new migration programs (for 1
Thompson, Steve wrote:
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Behalf Of John Eells
Sent: Tuesday, September 11, 2007 11:47 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: ServerPac Installs and dataset allocations
Without the APAR numbers, it's a bit
Tom, and anothers.
Thanks very much about your help.
Now I think good idea put my question under CICS List.
Thanks again.
Sergio
Tom Marchant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escreveu:
On Tue, 11 Sep 2007 11:12:37 -0300, Sergio Lima wrote:
> The problem, sound like, the users do something, t
Double check the certificate and key data base path you are specifying.
Are you able to display the certificate with gskkyman? If so, open your
key data base, check what labels are already in use and try the import
again.
Regards,
Kevin
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion
On Tue, 11 Sep 2007 14:23:14 -0400, Gary Green wrote:
>He probably did that from memory or had a finger-check while typing.
>
No, it was just to get the OP into the habit of reading the manual.
Didn't work.
-- gil
--
For IBM-MA
>I can't justify a mod-27 since about 60% of it would be empty - multiplied >by
>all our sysres sets: 2 for maintenance (one for each company), 6 for one
>>company environment, 3 or 4 sets for 3 other environments and a few more
>>sets for sandbox environments. So at least 20 or so mod-27s in
>
I can tell you that when you activate an on/off capacity upgrade on demand
order, the processors that were status of "N" (not available) change to "-"
(offline) in the display command, same is true when the capacity is removed.
At least that is what I saw on a 2084 and 2094.
My theory would be
The model number is correct. I think it odd that the upgrade
instructions did not include any steps needed to completely consummate
the change.
My working theory is that a lot of this information is gathered at IPL
and not refreshed.
I also thought it odd that the operating system did not seem
On Tue, 11 Sep 2007 15:59:44 -0400, Robert Justice <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>we were using two mod 9's, and finally went to mod 27 for the sysres at z/OS
>1.8
>
I recently spilled to a 2nd mod-9 under 1.6 due to XML toolkit, so all
HFS/zFS is
on its own mod-9 now. z/OS 1.8 grew a little bit m
Is the model type that is returned from the D M=CPU command correct on that
system?
I would think (just a logical guess - so proceed at your own risk) that if you
issued the CF CPU(03),OFFLINE it would go offline and the status of the CPU in
the D M=CPU would change from + to N. You probably w
We just upgraded our z/890 from a model 450 to a model 370. That
translates to one less CP, but the overall power increases from 97 to
158 MSU's. There was no requirement for an outage (IPL, POR) given, so
we elected to do it concurrently. (We IPL/POR only when we have to.)
There was no visible
Eric:
Great article. I'll bet they'll even give him a $50 savings bond.
Bill
From: Eric Bielefeld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Future Possible New Storage Techniques
Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2007 13:53:56 -0500
The following article
I know that when I worked at P&H Mining, I wanted 6 or 8 mod 9s for my IPL
packs and Dlib packs for prod and test and new developement. In 1999, when
we had EMC dasd, my boss said no because a potential hot site might not give
us any mod 9s. Then, several years later when we got new Hitachi Li
we were using two mod 9's, and finally went to mod 27 for the sysres at z/OS
1.8
- Original Message -
From: "Mark Zelden" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.ibm-main
To:
Sent: Tuesday, September 11, 2007 3:45 PM
Subject: Re: ServerPac Installs and dataset allocations
On
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ed Gould
> Sent: Tuesday, September 11, 2007 2:45 PM
> To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
> Subject: Re: IEF195I
>
>
> On Sep 11, 2007, at 12:08 PM, Ulrich Krueger wrote:
>
> > Duane,
> > How big's
On Tue, 11 Sep 2007 12:32:40 -0500, Mike Feeley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>I'm changing the paging volumes and dataset names on out tech (z/OS 1.8)
>lpar. When I try to IPL, I get an IEA924D message. The text says, "iea924d
>volume mbgpg1 needed for page data set was not mounted; new plpa data
On Tue, 11 Sep 2007 12:36:18 -0500, Eric Bielefeld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>Mark,
>
>Do you really get your whole Sysres on one 3390-3? I
No. Not sure what I was thinking. I probably was thinking one 3390-9.
But the balance between too big and too small has to do with how many
volumes are
Ted MacNEIL wrote:
I put the heavily hit loadlibs such as SYS1.LINKLIB on one side of the VTOC,
and the ISPF libraries on the other side of the VTOC. With todays heavily
cached dasd, that probably will buy you very little anymore.
Very little.
Especially, since it's been over 15 years since
On Sep 11, 2007, at 12:08 PM, Ulrich Krueger wrote:
Duane,
How big's the database?
What's the JCL for //DD1 look like and how much space are you
asking for?
How much space is available on the volumes that you're writing to?
Looks to me like you are asking for insufficient space to begin with.
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Robert Justice
> Sent: Tuesday, September 11, 2007 2:41 PM
> To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
> Subject: Re: IEF195I
>
>
> Hmmm, 120 volumes?
>
> here's an interesting idea, how about using some
"His idea is to stand billions of ultrafine wire loops around the edge
of a silicon chip - hence the name racetrack - and use electric current
to slide infinitesimally small magnets up and down along each of the
wires to be read and written as digital ones and zeros."
Almost sounds like an updated
Hmmm, 120 volumes?
here's an interesting idea, how about using some mod 54s perhaps?
- Original Message -
From: "Duane Shields" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.ibm-main
To:
Sent: Tuesday, September 11, 2007 3:25 PM
Subject: Re: IEF195I
Ulrich,
//DD1 DD DSN=DBA.M
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kelman, Tom
> Sent: Tuesday, September 11, 2007 2:10 PM
> To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
> Subject: Re: Future Possible New Storage Techniques
>
>
> Well, a similar article to this was posted ab
Ulrich,
//DD1 DD DSN=DBA.MIC105.USA.ULRL002,DISP=OLD
After receiving the IEF195I trying to pre-allocate the file using
IEFBR14, the dataset was cataloged to 120 volumes using IDCAMS as a work
around. However, the IEF195I reappeared on the attempt to reload the
dataset.
Duane
---
This highlights one of my concerns about outsourcing. Here we have
companies that are making contractual arrangements to outsource the
system programming of their systems to another company in another
country that they have no direct control over. They are handing the
keys to the kingdom to peopl
>Have you checked VATLSTxx to make sure they are mounted correctly?
I don't believe VATLSTxx is processed before the page dsns are allocated and
opened.
-
Too busy driving to stop for gas!
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff /
>I put the heavily hit loadlibs such as SYS1.LINKLIB on one side of the VTOC,
>and the ISPF libraries on the other side of the VTOC. With todays heavily
>cached dasd, that probably will buy you very little anymore.
Very little.
Especially, since it's been over 15 years since IBM stopped recomme
Well, a similar article to this was posted about a week ago. However, I
would like to know where I can get that mainframe that'll fit in my
pocket. I think their definition of a mainframe and mine aren't quiet
the same.
Tom Kelman
Commerce Bank of Kansas City
(816) 760-7632
> -Original Mess
>(off-list to hide my ignorance)
No it wasn't!
-
Too busy driving to stop for gas!
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the
The following article is in todays New York Times. Very interesting.
Note - you may have to register to view it, but it is free.
http://www.nytimes.com/2007/09/11/technology/11storage.html?th&emc=th
Eric Bielefeld
Sr. z/OS Systems Programmer
Milwaukee, Wisconsin
414-475-7434
--
I have a very good documented process for using gskkyman to create a
self signed certificate which out TN3270 and FTP servers use. We
haven't had problems with it until we wanted to use TLS to transfer a
file from one mainframe to another. Most FTP clients have an option
telling them what to do i
I know it's not Friday but it's another case of foreign workers stealing
information.
http://www.computerworld.com/action/article.do?command=viewArticleBasic&articleId=9035278&source=NLT_VVR&nlid=37
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / s
I'm changing the paging volumes and dataset names on out tech (z/OS 1.8)
lpar.
Hope that this is germaine.
I ran into this problem using our 1.4 page dsn on 1.7. I ended up
recreating the page dsn with a HLQ alias in the driver to the target's
master cat and then the IPL went OK. Any kind of cat
COPYMOD will reblock if necessary but I don't think it relinks. In any
case, if the BLKSIZE of the target PDS is at least as large as the
source PDS, then COPY will work and you don't need COPYMOD.
-Original Message-
From: George D Dranes [mailto:snip]
Sent: Tuesday, September 11, 2007 9
John Norgauer wrote:
Got it to work John. Thanks
Is there also a batch jcl I can use to delete the HFS file which I just
created?
John Norgauer
John,
Instead of doing this a piece at a time, why not bring
us in to do some training and get all the pieces in
one integrated package?
Introduct
Thanks again John. Delete worked
John Norgauer
University of California Davis Medical Center
2315 Stockton Blvd
ASB 1300
Sacramento, Ca 95817
916-734-0536
SYSTEMS PROGRAMMING.. Guilty, until proven innocent !! "JN 2004
"Hardware eventually breaks - Software eventually works"
I'm use to seeing IGD17279I for diabale volumes, storage groups,DADSM
failure, etc but have one for being on the 'exclude list'.
IGD17279I 3 VOLUMES WERE REJECTED BECAUSE THEY WERE ON THE EXCLUDE LIST
Msg & Codes says
THEY WERE ON THE EXCLUDE LIST The volumes were already in use by this data
set.
He probably did that from memory or had a finger-check while typing. PATHOPTH
should be "PATHOPTS'
On Tue Sep 11 11:00 , John Norgauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> sent:
>Thanks John,
>
>However, got this error:
>
> // FILEDATA=TEXT,PATHOPTH=(OCREAT,OWRONLY,OEXCL),
> // PATHDISP=(KEEP,
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John Norgauer
> Sent: Tuesday, September 11, 2007 1:12 PM
> To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
> Subject: Re: Need JCL's to copy MVS file to HFS
>
>
> Got it to work John. Thanks
>
> Is there also
Which reminds me:
Wikipedia Celebrates 750 Years of American Independence!
http://www.theonion.com/content/node/50902
It's a classic.
Jon
Thats why I never go to Wikipedia to look something up. If anyone can
change it, how can you trust any of it?
I'd recommend re-checking the volume definitions for the master catalog
your are trying to use, just to verify that everything looks good with
the PAGE datasets. Then re-verify your correct LOAD parm address and
LOADxx member, and be sure you're not using a different SYSx.IPLPARM
than you think yo
Actually, I was wondering if he did a CLPA at the IPL. Without it, the
system would look for everything as it was the last time it was running.
Of course, if it cannot find any of the page datasets anywhere, then it
should ask the operator to specify them. That should force the CLPA option
if th
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of John Eells
Sent: Tuesday, September 11, 2007 11:47 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: ServerPac Installs and dataset allocations
Without the APAR numbers, it's a bit hard to say (smile), b
- Original Message -
From: "Eric Bielefeld" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.ibm-main
To:
Sent: Tuesday, September 11, 2007 11:03 AM
Subject: Re: Wikiscanner
> Thats why I never go to Wikipedia to look something up. If anyone can
> change it, how can you trust any of it?
I
Got it to work John. Thanks
Is there also a batch jcl I can use to delete the HFS file which I just
created?
John Norgauer
University of California Davis Medical Center
2315 Stockton Blvd
ASB 1300
Sacramento, Ca 95817
916-734-0536
SYSTEMS PROGRAMMING.. Guilty, until proven innocent !! "
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John Norgauer
> Sent: Tuesday, September 11, 2007 1:00 PM
> To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
> Subject: Re: Need JCL's to copy MVS file to HFS
>
>
> Thanks John,
>
> However, got this error:
>
>
Thats why I never go to Wikipedia to look something up. If anyone can
change it, how can you trust any of it?
Eric Bielefeld
Sr. z/OS Systems Programmer
Milwaukee, Wisconsin
414-475-7434
- Original Message -
From: "Ed Finnell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.ibm-main
To:
Thanks John,
However, got this error:
// FILEDATA=TEXT,PATHOPTH=(OCREAT,OWRONLY,OEXCL),
// PATHDISP=(KEEP,KEEP),PATHMODE=(SIRUSR,SIWUSR)
//* SUT2 DD SYSOUT=*
//* SUT2 DD SYSOUT=L,DEST=U45
STMT NO. MESSAGE
6 IEFC630I UNIDENTIFIED KEYWORD PATHOPTH
John
This is what I use.
//OCPY2LAN EXEC PGM=IKJEFT01,COND=(00,LT)
//*NMVS DD DISP=SHR,DSN=OSS05.TEST.JCL(CMPL3)
//INMVS DD DISP=SHR,DSN=OSS05.REPORT.OUTLIST
//OUTHFS DD PATHOPTS=(OCREAT,OWRONLY,OTRUNC),
// PATHMODE=SIRWXU,FILEDATA=TEXT,
// PATH='/mfgroup/web/ReportOutlist.txt'
//* PATH='/mfgroup
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John Norgauer
> Sent: Tuesday, September 11, 2007 12:33 PM
> To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
> Subject: Need JCL's to copy MVS file to HFS
>
>
> Hello -
>
> Does anyone have a set of JCL's I can
Arthur wrote:
> I've seen users
accidentally bring a system to its knees
Back in the 90's someone that was logging on to a system using a TPX
type product, kept on taking VTAM down. The command she was supposed to
enter was logon applid=tso instead she typed logon applis=tso... and
when she claim
NOTICE:
All information in and attached to the e-mail(s) below may be proprietary,
confidential, privileged and otherwise protected from improper or erroneous
disclosure. If you are not the sender's intended recipient, you are not
authorized to intercept, read, print, retain, copy, forward, or
Mark,
Do you really get your whole Sysres on one 3390-3? I had to go to 2 volumes
back at OS/390 2.8, and maybe even 2.5. I know I usually spent a lot of
time going over allocations and making sure there was enough space for most
maintenance to go on without putting any datasets in multiple
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mike Feeley
> Sent: Tuesday, September 11, 2007 12:33 PM
> To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
> Subject: Can't find Page Volume
>
>
> I'm changing the paging volumes and dataset names on out tech
>
Hello -
Does anyone have a set of JCL's I can use to copy a sequebntial file to my
HFS environment.
Thanks.
John Norgauer
University of California Davis Medical Center
2315 Stockton Blvd
ASB 1300
Sacramento, Ca 95817
916-734-0536
SYSTEMS PROGRAMMING.. Guilty, until proven innocent !! "
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ray Mullins
> Sent: Tuesday, September 11, 2007 12:21 PM
> To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
> Subject:
>
>
> Oh.
>
> That is totally embarrassing.
>
> I completely apologize for that last part
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Ed Finnell
>
> course, supposed to be private. And I have embarrassed
> myself, and probably have screwed myself big-time.
>
> Looks like I have a lot of explaining to do
>
> >>
> It's OK, hire a lawyer, a publ
I'm changing the paging volumes and dataset names on out tech (z/OS 1.8)
lpar. When I try to IPL, I get an IEA924D message. The text says, "iea924d
volume mbgpg1 needed for page data set was not mounted; new plpa data
set may be requested; reply 'go' or 'ignore'." I can't find what is wrong.
In a message dated 9/11/2007 12:21:32 P.M. Central Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
course, supposed to be private. And I have embarrassed myself, and probably
have screwed myself big-time.
Looks like I have a lot of explaining to do
>>
It's OK, hire a lawyer, a publicist, take
Oh.
That is totally embarrassing.
I completely apologize for that last part of the e-mail. That was, of
course, supposed to be private. And I have embarrassed myself, and probably
have screwed myself big-time.
Looks like I have a lot of explaining to do
Regards,
Ray Mullins
--
M. Ray Mullin
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Duane Shields
> Sent: Tuesday, September 11, 2007 11:52 AM
> To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
> Subject: IEF195I
>
>
> Our database group is trying to do a unload/reload of a
> database to increa
Howard,
That is the funny thing... The customers is in Europa and sadly, they
are unhappy too, not because the mainframe is moving to the US, but
because the salesman is fluent Nordic / Polish / English / Spanish, but
the moment he has to phone the helpdesk for support on his credit card
machine..
I don't think there is a way to circunvent it.
You can see with your storage administrator to change this database to
a Dataclass with compression.
It will short the database size, but you still have the 59 volumes limit.
You have to evaluate the performance too.
Atenciosamente / Regards / Salu
(off-list to hide my ignorance)
Hello Ed,
Out of curiosity, in a situation where multiple abends occurred, how does
SYSMDUMP processing handle this? Does it write multiple dumps to the
dataset? (I'm guessing "yes" because of the nature of SYSOUT storage.)
We just had a situation where, in a mul
Duane,
How big's the database?
What's the JCL for //DD1 look like and how much space are you asking for?
How much space is available on the volumes that you're writing to?
Looks to me like you are asking for insufficient space to begin with.
As an alternative for space-constrained disk, you could
Duane,
Could you post the dd statement for DD1?
Subject: IEF195I
Our database group is trying to do a unload/reload of a database to increase
the size. While running a job to do this, they received the following error:
IEF195I MIC105GJ PS030 DD1 - MAXIMUM NUMB
Our database group is trying to do a unload/reload of a database to increase
the size. While running a job to do this, they received the following error:
IEF195I MIC105GJ PS030 DD1 - MAXIMUM NUMBER OF DEVICES FOR DD
EXCEEDED
Explanation: The number of units requested by the specified DD state
After further research I see that the 'corruption' is the insertion of carriage
control characters. This is being done by SDSF when using line command
XDC, even if the correct data set attributes are specified for the output data
set.
Instead, I created an appropriate data set, allocated it to
Imbriale, Donald wrote:
Thanks Wayne. I had searched the archives. My tests show that SYSMDUMP
directed to SYSOUT, then copied to a dataset (via SDSF for example),
results in a partially corrupted SYSMDUMP.
I look at many such dumps and have never experienced any corruption
using this tec
yephe got itsomething in his setup...working now.thanks for
your help...
--
Email Disclaimer
This E-mail contains confidential information belonging to the sender,
which may be legally privileged information.
Thompson, Steve wrote:
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Behalf Of John Eells
Sent: Tuesday, September 11, 2007 9:09 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: ServerPac Installs and dataset allocations
The data set space allocations are not
I'm assuming if I go the re-allocate and copy direction I can use IEBCOPY with
the COPY parm (don't really want to use COPYMOD since it will re-link
everything) for PDSs and COPYGRP for the PDSEs?
George Dranes
Western Illinois University
University Information Management Systems
Manager-Tec
Wayne Driscoll wrote:
Search the archives for some details from Ed Jaffe regarding pointing
the SYSMDUMP DD to a SYSOUT dataset, and then saving it to a dataset if
and only if you need it.
SYSMDUMP to sysout. The only way to fly! (Or, at least, the only way I
fly.) ;-)
http://bama.ua.edu/
Thanks Wayne. I had searched the archives. My tests show that SYSMDUMP
directed to SYSOUT, then copied to a dataset (via SDSF for example),
results in a partially corrupted SYSMDUMP.
Don Imbriale
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf
Search the archives for some details from Ed Jaffe regarding pointing
the SYSMDUMP DD to a SYSOUT dataset, and then saving it to a dataset if
and only if you need it.
Wayne Driscoll
Product Developer
JME Software LLC
NOTE: All opinions are strictly my own.
-Original Message-
From: IBM
_http://www.tuscaloosanews.com/article/20070910/NEWS/709100325/0/FRONTPAGE_
(http://www.tuscaloosanews.com/article/20070910/NEWS/709100325/0/FRONTPAGE)
Shows to go ya...
** See what's new at http://www.aol.com
-
We need to collect a SYSMDUMP from a DB2 SP WLM task. The SYSMDUMP
DD needs to point to a disk data set. There can be multiple instances of the
DB2 SP WLM task running concurrently, so there is a need to uniquely name
the data set for the SYSMDUMP. GDGs don't work because there is an
enqueue
Chris Mason wrote:
Robert
I thought I'd dig further into this IUCV point and I found a reference
in the IP Configuration Guide. It appears that IUCV, VMCF and TNF
"stuff" is still available, you just don't necessarily need it. It would
appear to have become an *optional* bit of preparation fo
Ron
Tell him to download the redbook. It's quite small and to the point. It's
designed mainly for the AS/400 person as far as I can tell - which perhaps
explains why it's a bit weak in the VTAM area!
http://www.redbooks.ibm.com/abstracts/gg244382.html
Chris Mason
- Original Message
Robert
I've send you a file which summarises the search order issue.
You'll see from the end of the document that not everything was clear but
this is "par for the course" in regard to CS IP documentation.
-
I have a tentative recommendation which goes as follows:
- Set up a resolver proced
The ISPF Data Set List Exit gets invoked once after the Data Set List
Utility Panel is filled in and then again for each data set that is
about to be displayed in the list.
The first invocation provides an opportunity for the exit to change the
data set name and/or the volume.
The subsequent invo
Sheila
According to my reading of the Communications Server IP Configuration
Reference, the TCPCONFIG default for RESTRICTLOWPORTS or UNRESTRICTLOWPORTS
is the latter - which is as expected since this was the behaviour before
this pair of parameters was introduced. It is, in general, good prac
Robert
I thought I'd dig further into this IUCV point and I found a reference in
the IP Configuration Guide. It appears that IUCV, VMCF and TNF "stuff" is
still available, you just don't necessarily need it. It would appear to have
become an *optional* bit of preparation for the use of the Com
Sheila
You raise the matter of the use of the gethostid() call by DB2. I have an
ancient scar associated with gethostid() - and DB2 may have been the
reason - "may" because my memory is failing not because the complaining
software wasn't identified.
In another thread recently I suggested tha
Sheila
You should check you understanding of names and IP addresses. The IP address
is the entity that really matters, each one associated with one interface -
even if some interfaces are virtual. There is an "official" host name but
its usage is whatever you like to make of it - in conjunctio
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of John Eells
Sent: Tuesday, September 11, 2007 9:09 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: ServerPac Installs and dataset allocations
The data set space allocations are not the result of a logic
Robert
This whole discussion should really have been started in the IBMTCP-L
list[1] rather than the IBM-MAIN list. As far as the IP component of
Communications Server (CS) is concerned, in IBMTCP-L scintillate the
brightest stars.
In your original post you asked whether or not it was possib
I hate to gloat, but in FDR you can simply specify NEWI=+TARGSYS to
prepend TARGSYS to all the dataset names.
--
Bruce A. Black
Senior Software Developer for FDR
Innovation Data Processing 973-890-7300
personal: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
sales info: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
tech support: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
we
1 - 100 of 143 matches
Mail list logo
