On Sat, 17 Nov 2007 00:15:03 -0600, Joel C. Ewing wrote:
I can't conceive of any rational reason why a sysadmin or auditor would
want to restrict batch TMP usage. It buys you no power or data access
that could not be derived by other means, except perhaps for the
somewhat dubious ability to
How can I remove the enqueue so I can increase and copy the file.
Removing the ENQ is easy. Increasing the size of an existing data set for
which the system has obtained ENQs is not supported, and you do so at your
own risk. The ENQ's are in place so that you do NOT do this.
If the system is
why the FTP command does not works.QUOTE SITE RDW RECFM=VB LRECL=1024
anyone know why
On 11/16/07, McKown, John [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David Magee
Sent: Friday, November 16,
I'm just curious, what sorts of things can a Rexx program can do that
doesn't interact with TSO or ISPF (or...)?
I tried, but I couldn't think of much, so I must have something wrong.
Lindy
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of
On Sat, 17 Nov 2007 19:05:50 +0100, Lindy Mayfield
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm just curious, what sorts of things can a Rexx program can do that
doesn't interact with TSO or ISPF (or...)?
I tried, but I couldn't think of much, so I must have something wrong.
Lindy
The same sort of things you
On Sat, 17 Nov 2007 19:05:50 +0100, Lindy Mayfield wrote:
I'm just curious, what sorts of things can a Rexx program can do that
doesn't interact with TSO or ISPF (or...)?
I tried, but I couldn't think of much, so I must have something wrong.
See:
Title: z/OS V1R7.0 Using REXX and z/OS UNIX
Ok fair enough. (-: I misunderstood then. I made the assumption that
no TSO commands included EXECIO and that no TSO segment included also no
OMVS segment.
---
(You can call Rexx programs from SAS very easily by the way. For
example I made a simple hack to IGGCSIRX where you can wildcard
I got a bounce on this, so resending. Apologies if it made it through the
first time.
On Fri, Nov 16, 2007 at 2:18 PM, in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED], Edward Jaffe
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-snip-
Ummm Hopefully, you are aware that you are addressing ex-NIU
Professor and long-time SHARE
On Nov 17, 2007, at 12:15 AM, Joel C. Ewing wrote:
I've always assumed there was slightly less overhead in running
batch REXX without the TSO TMP, provided you didn't need any TSO
commands or ISPF services - but I suspect this overhead is
minimal. I believe you also avoid the need for
At 10:46 AM 11/16/2007, you wrote:
...
Hopefully, you are aware that IBM does not control SHARE in any
way. It is a user group, made up of volunteers who are constantly
scrambling for other volunteers to help out. If any faculty from
NIU would like to help, I'm very sure they won't be
On Sat, 17 Nov 2007 13:27:49 -0700, Mark Post [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...
I listen to everybody, until I'm shown they're not worth listening to, so
that's not a problem for me. I'm just a lowly Deputy Project Manager for
SHARE, so I haven't run into Mike in that arena. Given his long term
Patrick O'Keefe wrote:
Being a Deputy Project Manager you would at lease run into Mike at
SHARE's Team Time, but perhaps you are not associating the name
and face.
A recent picture of the Professor: http://www.kcats.org/
--
Edward E Jaffe
Phoenix Software International, Inc
5200 W Century
On Sat, Nov 17, 2007 at 4:46 PM, in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED], Michael Stack [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
-snkp-
It wasn't the zNextGen Project itself to which I referred. The
session I had in mind was run by the Academic Initiative IBMers, and
NIU faculty were, in fact, turned away by the
On Sat, Nov 17, 2007 at 6:03 PM, in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED], Edward Jaffe
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-snip-
... but perhaps you are not associating the name
and face.
A recent picture of the Professor: http://www.kcats.org/
Oh, Jeez. He was our last Board Buddy. :( I liked him. Hi
Ya know... This is NOT the first time that I failed to think of that. :(
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Steve Comstock
Sent: Saturday, November 17, 2007 9:34 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Are any of us this
Based on the input of some user I made a large change to COBANAL (file321 at
www.cbttape.org)
As of these weekend it's been mailed to my betateam.
Feel free to contact if you like this and would be also join the betateam.
Regards Roland
At 06:22 PM 11/17/2007, you wrote:
...
Your note only talked about an MP3K at NIU. Does NIU currently have
a z/Architecture machine?
No, and it likely never will, as the last NIU mainframe will probably
be gone in a couple of years. In fact, my new job is my first
opportunity to write code
But the whole point it seems to me is that with batch TSO we are talking
about what can be done by someone who already has the ability to submit
a batch job. If you have batch job capability you don't have to execute
batch TMP to be able to allocate datasets, as that can already be done
via
.. repeating part of a post from back in July '07,:
*
** Follow the link and watch the video **
*
Sounds like a way to prove there is no one to fill technical jobs in
America so they NEED to either send the job
We don't turn REXX or batch TMP loose as a general tool for Applications
development to write code for production batch, but batch REXX,
including batch REXX that runs in batch TSO or batch ISPF environments,
has been frequently used by Technical Services to quickly implement a
number of
On Nov 17, 2007, at 11:05 PM, Joel C. Ewing wrote:
We don't turn REXX or batch TMP loose as a general tool for
Applications development to write code for production batch, but
batch REXX, including batch REXX that runs in batch TSO or batch
ISPF environments, has been frequently used by
Ed Gould wrote:
Interesting. I guess that works in your environment. In the
environments I have worked in there is too much political stuff going
on and the finger pointing gets rather well pointed. (sorry about the
pun).
They were probably holding their pointing fingers and thumb in the
22 matches
Mail list logo
