Hello:
We are working in a test project in Montpellier and we have problems with our
DMX-4 DASD (or with z10).
We are sending 20gb by FTP and at the begining the execution is right. But
two minutes later the disconnect time up to 13 milliseconds and when it
reachs 30 milliseconds we cancel
Regarding SPILL area:
These compilers first generate kind of intermediate code for an abstract
target machine, which has an unbounded number of registers. Most
optimizations are done on the code of that abstract machine. These parts
of the compiler are portable across all supported platforms.
I am out of the office until 10/14/2008.
If you require immediate assistance, please contact my backup Fernando Vega
on 404-238-4580. Thanks!
Note: This is an automated response to your message IBM-MAIN Digest - 8
Oct 2008 to 9 Oct 2008 (#2008-283) sent on 10/10/08.
This is the only
We have recently split out TN3270 from TCPIP in preparation for the z/OS 1.9
upgrade.
We are noticing what appear to be additional FTP messages in the system
log. At first I thought it was because some ftps use the debug parameter and
this was causing the additional messages but after several
On Fri, 10 Oct 2008 10:16:47 +0100, Jim McAlpine [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
cross posted to the DB2 list
I've set up the above but I'm getting a JCL error when WLM starts the proc
that I can't understand as follows -
09.09.15 STC00844 FRIDAY,10 OCT 2008
09.09.15 STC00844 IEFC452I
In a message dated 10/10/2008 1:42:59 A.M. Central Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
This situacion ocurrs with ficon director and with connect direct channel
between DMX-4 and z10.
I'd check with both vendors regarding uCode levels.
If that passes I'd try a couple of other
Please retract this question. Apparently I didn't perform my due diligence and
search the archives first. I found several posts with information on the
message BPXF024I so I will investigage the findings.
Thanks and sorry for the fast fingers,
Gil.
On Fri, 10 Oct 2008 07:58:47 -0500, Gilbert
Hi, All,
Has anybody encountered the new FIXCAT HOLDDATA yet? As of today's
download from http://service.software.ibm.com/holdata/390holddata.html I
don't see any; just mention of it in the comment block.
Is there a different download site to obtain it?
TIA,
-jc-
John McKown wrote:
Does anybody know that this really does? I'm running a C++ program in batch.
Basically, it is a program which reads information from a network connection
and is writing it out to a tape dataset. I don't have the source. For those
interested, it is the todsn program in the Co:Z
Started showing up here yesterday...
SOURCEID
BASIC
EURO99
HIPER
IBM.Coexistence.z/OS.V1R10
IBM.Device.Disk.DS8000-2107
IBM.Device.Disk.ESS-Shark-2105
IBM.Device.Disk.StorageControl-3990
IBM.Device.Server.z10-EC-2097
IBM.Device.Server.z10-EC-2097.zAAP
Did you run the SMP UPGRADE command against your CSIs?
I saw a message a day or two ago that reminded me that I had to do it.
Since I did it I noticed the new stuff. Not sure whether they are
related.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Hi,
I sent a similar question to Kurt Quackenbush (SMP/E development), the
FIXCAT HOLDs should be available starting October 8th.
Perhaps, we'll get an answer here.
Chase, John schrieb:
Hi, All,
Has anybody encountered the new FIXCAT HOLDDATA yet? As of today's
download from
Its funny you should bring this up. We are working on our z/os 1.10 order
and I thought id check for fixcat items from what I saw was given out at
SHARE. We upgraded to smp/E 3.5 on our z/OS 1.9 system/ Ran the upgrade
command against the target zone. I checked in smp/E no new categories
added
On Fri, 10 Oct 2008 21:16:53 +0800, David Crayford [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
CELHVnnn is an XPLINK condition handler. For example CELHV003 is the
XPLINK runtime environment. Im not familiar with CELHV002 but it could
be that the SSL hashes are a CPU hog. If you sending a file that's in a
zFS or
Hi,
AFAIK your problem is not a missing UPGRADE of your SMP/E CSIs or
something else in your environment. You have to pick up the FIXCAT HOLDs
from somewhere and to receive it.
One place to pick them up should be the FTP server at
ftp://service.boulder.ibm.com/s390/holddata/
Andy White
On Fri, Oct 10, 2008 at 1:54 PM, Mark Zelden [EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote:
Hmmm. Curious. Could there be any case issues not showing up in
you post (double check WLM panels)? What does $DJOBCLASS(STC),LONG
say the proclib concatenation is? Is that concatenation in JES2 JCL or
or dynamic
Thanks for the reply but are the fixcats in their own bucket? We download
the holdata weekly through an automated system we wrote based on what is
installed etc...
Andy S White
Internet: Mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU wrote on 10/10/2008
If you used LRECL=1, then you did have a record boundary of 1, so it
was doing fwrite() with a length of 1.
This is because todsn() always uses QSAM.
As it turns out, even with a rational DCB, the C library is more
expensive than direct QSAM macros.
For this reason, it is likely that a future
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Andy White
Its funny you should bring this up. We are working on our z/os 1.10
order
and I thought id check for fixcat items from what I saw was given out
at
SHARE. We upgraded to smp/E 3.5 on our z/OS 1.9 system/
On Thu, 9 Oct 2008 08:38:43 +0200, R.S. wrote:
How can I find old release of the book?
--
Try the wayback machine:
http://web.archive.org/web/*/http://www.redbooks.ibm.com/redbooks/pdfs/sg245444.pdf
Norbert Friemel
--
For
ftpd sends its messages to the syslog daemon (syslogd).
syslogd seems to be configured to send (some or all)
messages to /dev/console.
--
Peter Hunkeler
CREDIT SUISSE
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access
On Fri, 10 Oct 2008 08:14:05 -0500, Chase, John [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi, All,
Has anybody encountered the new FIXCAT HOLDDATA yet? As of today's
download from http://service.software.ibm.com/holdata/390holddata.html I
don't see any; just mention of it in the comment block.
Is there a
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Jürgen Kehr
Hi,
AFAIK your problem is not a missing UPGRADE of your SMP/E CSIs or
something else in your environment. You have to pick up the FIXCAT
HOLDs
from somewhere and to receive it.
One place to pick
Try using:
http://www-03.ibm.com/systems/z/os/zos/bkserv/find_books.html
and enter your pub number, or other words in the title.
BTW, the keyword sg24-5444 pulled up the -03 rev of the document, which
includes the z/900.
--
Hi,
Sorry to bother you guys with such a boring subject, but here it goes.
My company is starting a project on application interface mapping.
Before reinventing the wheel, what market products do you know that
can collect (and cross-reference) information from COBOL sources, JCL
and
cross posted to the DB2 list
I've set up the above but I'm getting a JCL error when WLM starts the proc
that I can't understand as follows -
09.09.15 STC00844 FRIDAY,10 OCT 2008
09.09.15 STC00844 IEFC452I DB2XWLM - JOB NOT RUN - JCL ERROR 293
-- JES2 JOB STATISTICS --
Kirk Wolf wrote:
If you used LRECL=1, then you did have a record boundary of 1, so it
was doing fwrite() with a length of 1.
This is because todsn() always uses QSAM.
As it turns out, even with a rational DCB, the C library is more
expensive than direct QSAM macros.
For this reason, it is likely
Hal
The current active IOCDS is a bit of a misnomer. It refers to that fact
that it will be the default IOCDS used for the next POR. You always have
to set it manually.
The important thing to remember is that the IOCDS is totally separate
from the IODF and dynamic actvate processing.
David,
Yes, we have used Metal C. It is very cool, although it does have limitations.
What we frequently do instead is to write a routine in assembler with
XPLINK linkage (since our C++ code is XPLINK),
and then with some very careful programming we can set up its
save/workarea on the XPLINK
Antonio,
I will just jump in here - SmartIS is a solution that we provide.
It allows an easy way to build a comprehensive repository on a a
relational database to allow you to view relationships as you describe.
AN added benefit is the ability to flowchart entities as scheduler
and/or
I will be out of the office starting 2008-10-10 and will not return until
2008-10-13.
I will be unable to access network until late of 10/13.
For DB2 Admin/OC Reg Automation issue, JingJiaMin is my backup.
For DB2 Admin/OC APAR test issue, ShenHong is my backup.
For DB2 QM tool issue,
What I would really like to do is to use Metal C with XPLINK linkage.
I think that it can be done with the right user-written prolog/epilog
macros, but it doesn't appear to be ideal because of the system
linkage assumptions made by Metal C.
User-written prolog/epilog is definately the way to
On Fri, Oct 10, 2008 at 2:49 PM, Jim McAlpine [EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote:
Mark, no case issues and AFAICS there is no LONG parameter with the
$DJOBCLASS(STC) command. The proclib concatenation is defined in the JES2
procedure (no dynamic proclibs) and we don't use started jobs. Does WLM
look
My company has a product (Enterprise Application Viewer - EAV) that may
be what you are looking for.
Check it out at: http://www.ateras.com/EnterpriseApplicationViewer.aspx
I will send you some more information offline.
Mark Hammond
Applications Consultant
ATERAS
www.ateras.com | [EMAIL
Hallo To All,
Our ML1 volumes threshold is set to 80%. My question is does the Management
class takes precedence over the threshold. For example, if I change the
threshold to 50% would it result in the ML1 volumes being 50% full (after
Secondary space management has kicked in) or will the
On Fri, 10 Oct 2008 14:49:02 +0100, Jim McAlpine [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Oct 10, 2008 at 1:54 PM, Mark Zelden [EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote:
Hmmm. Curious. Could there be any case issues not showing up in
you post (double check WLM panels)? What does $DJOBCLASS(STC),LONG
say the proclib
We have a large number of modules that have link dates in the 80's and 90's
(still running, can that be done on windows and Unix platform?). We want to
reverse the modules to be able to go to LE and maybe even make changes.
Does any one know of any vendors and/or products on the market that can
ML1 threshold as specified in the HSM Parmlib Addvol statement specifies the
point at which that volume becomes eligible for migration.
If a dataset is on a ML1 volume which is 50% full and your threshold for that
volume is 80% then that dataset will not be migrated to ML2 even though its
Yes, lower the ML1 threshold to 50%. Eligible datasets will migrate. Ineligible
datasets will remain on ML1.
All ML1 volumes will not be reduced to 50% unless you've got a whole lot of
eligible data.
From: willie bunter [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday,
Does any one know of any vendors and/or products on the market that can
be
used to reverse engineer these modules - in COBOL.
Haven't researched this market in a while. Only one I know of is:
http://www.essential-systems.com/resource/index.htm
David,
You have answered my question. I wanted to be sure. We had an incident (ML1
threshold was 80%) ARC0560E NO MIGRATION LEVEL 1 SPACE ARC0560E AVAILABLE.
Since we did not want to add another ML1 volume we decided to reduce the
threshold and forced the Secondary Space Management. It
What I would really like to do is to use Metal C with XPLINK linkage.
Maybe someone more familiar with Metal-C can enlighten me on this.
Kirk, you may want to talk to Chwan-Han Lee. His email address is in his
SHARE presentations, available at
Willie,
It might help to know a bit more about your environment.
What are the following:
From HSM - Days, ML1days (or Migrationlevel1days)
From SMS - Primary Days, Level 1 days
Are your tapes operator mounted or in a Silo? My silo recalls average 27 secs.
Nobody complains. If the same
David,
For ML1 it is MIGRATIONLEVEL1DAYS(18). I am unable to find the Primary Days
(SMS). Could you tell me where to find this info?
Our tapes are on a SILO. I have taken note about your suggestion to perform
the Freevol MVOL(nn) TARGETLEVEL(ML2) and if I am in a bind I will use it.
SMS info is contained in the ISMF panels for Management class. Aren't you the
Storage Admin?
ML1 or ML2, either seems to work.
From: willie bunter [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, October 10, 2008 1:06 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: DFHSM
In ISMF when you display the management classes, there are two columns
in particular to pay attention to 1) Primary Days and 2) Level 1 Days.
The primary days controls how long the data set will live on Level 0
DASD (the volumes it was created on), and the Level 1 days controls how
long it will
I am in the process of trying to find that out. Thanks for your help and
advice.
--- On Fri, 10/10/08, O'Brien, David W. (NIH/CIT) [C] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: O'Brien, David W. (NIH/CIT) [C] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: DFHSM QUESTION - ML1
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Date: Friday,
Norris,
Valid points but Willie's concern is a lack of space in his ML1 pool.
He has a choice, either add ML1 volumes (already rejected) or expedite
migration by lowering ML1 days both in his HSM parmlib for non-SMS dayasets and
in his Management classes. It would help to know which of his
x3270 http://x3270.bgp.nu/
It runs on all platforms and is opensource and free.
--
Ian
http://www.cicsworld.com
On Tue, Oct 7, 2008 at 1:20 PM, Ram Balaji [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all,
Is there any free?Mainframe(JCL,CICS) simulators available for desktop PC?
They say NEXUS terminal is
We recently migrated to DB2 8.1 and are almost complete in converting all
subsystems to New Function Mode. There was an issue where a developer
terminate all DB2 utilities in one of the DB2's. This is a known documented
change in DB2 8.1 (here is a link describing it:
On Fri, 10 Oct 2008 13:13:01 -0500, Ian [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
x3270 http://x3270.bgp.nu/
It runs on all platforms and is opensource and free.
...
If I understand the original poster, he wants a mainframe emulator,
not a 3270 emulator. You're giving him the wrong end of the
connection.
Pat
In a message dated 10/10/2008 2:05:17 P.M. Central Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
not a 3270 emulator. You're giving him the wrong end of the
connection.
What ever happened to the old XPL thing from UCLA? It
was a PL/1(One card box) pgm that would take an instruction
set and
My bad!
yes I had my Friday glasses on :-)
On Fri, Oct 10, 2008 at 2:05 PM, Patrick O'Keefe [EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote:
On Fri, 10 Oct 2008 13:13:01 -0500, Ian [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
x3270 http://x3270.bgp.nu/
It runs on all platforms and is opensource and free.
...
If I understand the
That's okay, not to worry. I was looking for a free 3270 emulator, just hadn't
posted yet. You anticipate my query. :-) Might be best to keep those Friday
glasses...
So, have you used this one? Did it work for you? I'm looking for mod4 screen
support, maybe better - would love mod4 depth
I use the x3270 emulator, normally as a mod3 but have used it as a mod4 and
with custom screensize. I can be configured as a 3279 and you can still
change the colors after that. There is a BRIGHT color setup and a REVERSE
setup that I use regulaly.
There was a packaging (from State of Alaska or
Tom Brennan's VISTA 3270 is very good. It isn't free, but you can test
it for free and then you can decide to buy it.
Christopher Y. Blaicher
Senior Software Developer
Austin Development Lab
phone: 512.340.6154
moble: 512.627.3803
fax: 512.340.6647
10431
In a message dated 10/10/2008 2:14:23 P.M. Central Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
was a PL/1(One card box) pgm that would take an instruction
set and run it.
I found it on WIKI as XLP. The descriptive link is to Toronto.edu
as:
_http://www.cs.toronto.edu/XPL/_
The XPL that I have was/is used to inscruct is yser in generating compilers.
Ed Finnell wrote:
In a message dated 10/10/2008 2:05:17 P.M. Central Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
not a 3270 emulator. You're giving him the wrong end of the
connection.
What ever happened
And when you've decided to buy it, it's dirt cheap. Note that I say
WHEN, not IF. :-)
Blaicher, Chris wrote:
Tom Brennan's VISTA 3270 is very good. It isn't free, but you can test
it for free and then you can decide to buy it.
Christopher Y. Blaicher
Senior
I'll second that. I work in an Extra! shop, but I still use Vista,
paid for out of my own pocket. You don't have to dig very deep...it
costs less than a case of 24 beers.
On Fri, Oct 10, 2008 at 5:29 PM, Rick Fochtman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
And when you've decided to buy it, it's dirt cheap.
1. what is the RAID config ?
2. what is the microcode level
3. there is an e-pack needed to support z10 - was that applied ?
we're also moving to z10 ...
applying the e-pack this weekend to the boxes on test systems.
- ravi
On Fri, 10 Oct 2008 01:42:48 -0500, Jorge Garcia [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Linda,
I use QWS3270p for access to our development systems and I also have x3270
on Linux. Either work very well..
Scott Ford
Senior Systems Engineer
[p] 678.266.3399 x304[m] 609-346-0399 identityforge.com
This message is for the designated recipient only and may contain
privileged,
62 matches
Mail list logo
