We are installing PeopleSoft on z/OS 1.8 with DB2 V8. When we try to
start the process scheduler we get the following messages:
Time allotted to check status of Scheduler expired.
This may be due to the time to load all the libraries.
The process scheduler actually starts and we can run proces
> Nicely worded, Ed. Maybe I'm not imagining things when I believe IBM is more
> interested in closing open problem records than in solving the underlying
> problems. It didn't used to be this way.
You mean IBM has been lying to me when they tell me I am the only obstinate
one?
>There does seem
>>> >If you use the same userid on all systems, your users are going to
>>complain as there can be only one userid with the same name in the
>>sysplex,
>
>Huh? I've been using the same userid on multiple systems in a sysplex
>since sysplex was invented.
Then your setup was quite clearly different
Thanks for the compliment. The company name is Syzygy :), but it's
frequently misspelled.
The web site for the automation products is www.SyzygyInc.com
Brian
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
se
Thank you! As the original poster, I got a bit confused with Allan's
recommendation, as I could have sworn others were recommending one Sysplex
owning both PROD and TEST/DEV. Thought maybe I had misinterpreted everything
and had to start over! :-)
--
Frank Swarbrick
Applications Architect -
Hi Dana,
we had a similar problem and looked at both freeware and alternative low
cost solutions for this. In our case we have two CEC each with four LPARs.
After experimenting with TSSO our management rejected it, because we could
not afford to make a system programmer resource available to update
Does the ISPF PROFILE_SHARING feature address this issue?
On 8/12/2009 at 3:00 AM, in message
<3310ac9d797ec94db8d89ccabdea47a7010a0...@kl1221tc.cs.ad.klmcorp.net>,
"Vernooij, CP - SPLXM" wrote:
> "Ted MacNEIL" wrote in message
> news:1940869721-1250064774-cardhu_decombobulator_blackberry.rim.n
>>> On 8/12/2009 at 12:02 AM, in message
, Barbara Nitz
wrote:
> You will need to define GRS RNLs. You will need to combine your separate WLM
> policies. If you use the same userid on all systems, your users are going to
> complain as there can be only one userid with the same name in the sysple
On Tue, 11 Aug 2009 14:34:17 -1000, Stephen Y Odo
wrote:
>We have 3 LPARs configured as monoplex. One for our Production
>environment, one for our Test/QA environment, and one for our
>Application Development environment.
>
>From this discussion, it sounds like everybody is saying even we would
I will be out of the office starting 08/12/2009 and will not return until
08/17/2009.
-
The information contained in this communication (including any
attachments hereto) is confidential and is intended solely for the
personal and confidential use of the i
Jantje,
I am intrigued. Can you elaborate a bit on this idea?
[Doc pointers, code samples, etc.]
TIA,
-Victor-
==
Date:Mon, 10 Aug 2009 05:40:50 -0500
From:Jan MOEYERSONS
Subject: Re: Trigger CICS transaction from Batch Job
But instead of conn
In the old days, a CICS subsystem's capacity was limited by
the amount of CPU TCB time needed for that single QR TCB.
Based on my analysis when OTE was brand new, of the CPU time
consumed by each of these new CICS TCBs, I planned this post
to argue that going to OTE didn't help much, because most
Remember in theory there is no difference between theory and practice, in
practice there is.
On Wed, 12 Aug 2009 11:54:40 -0500, McKown, John
wrote:
>
> Theoretically that is true. The reality sometimes varies. In most
cases that I've seen in the US, it is about making the CEO's and other "
On Wed, 12 Aug 2009 08:50:29 -0700, Edward Jaffe
wrote:
>...
>There does seem to be much more emphasis on getting PMRs
>closed than before. Someone's performance appraisal is
>probably based on the number of open (or closed) PMRs. ...
I've also noticed a tendency for PMRs to be put on the cus
Todd Last wrote:
According to IBM, in z/OS 1.10, we can no longer define a VSAM dataset with
the data CA track sizes of 2, 4, 6, 8, or 10 thru 14 tracks.
Snipet of II14458 (dated 12/14/08):
"When a VSAM data set or ICF Catalog is defined or redefined on
z/OS version 1 release 10 the index cisiz
I use DBSYNC for that kind of thing ...
run DBSYNC on the system that you want to copy from, edit the output
REXX that it generates to make sure it's doing what you want and then
run it on the system you're copying to ...
--Stephen
Jim McAlpine wrote:
> I need to take our existing RACF profil
The QUERY command does have an ODS operand. Remove it and the output will go
to SYSTSPRT.
-Original Message-
From: John Dawes [mailto:jhn_da...@yahoo.com.au]
Sent: Wednesday, August 12, 2009 10:26 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: DFHSM QUESTION - RUNNING QUERY COMMAND IN BATCH
Hi,
Yes, but the following note is from the Query syntax section of the reference
manual:
"The QUERY command does not support sending the results of the query to
an output data set; however, it does support extended consoles. Using
TSO/E extended consoles, you can submit programs that can issue a
Tom you mentiond Z/OS 1.10
This sounds like an issue from an earlier release of z/OS...
I could be wrong...
Paul D'Angelo
Enterprise System Software
Easy-to-use, advanced features, flexible phone systems. Click here for more
info.
ht
On Wed, 12 Aug 2009 11:57:30 -0500, Todd Last wrote:
>According to IBM, in z/OS 1.10, we can no longer define a VSAM dataset with
>the data CA track sizes of 2, 4, 6, 8, or 10 thru 14 tracks.
>
>Snipet of II14458 (dated 12/14/08):
>"When a VSAM data set or ICF Catalog is defined or redefined on
>z
Can I run the QUERY command in batch?
--- On Thu, 13/8/09, O'Brien, David W. (NIH/CIT) [C]
wrote:
From: O'Brien, David W. (NIH/CIT) [C]
Subject: Re: DFHSM QUESTION - RUNNING QUERY COMMAND IN BATCH
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Received: Thursday, 13 August, 2009, 3:51 AM
List and Query are not
Rick,
Thanks for the suggestions. I tried them both and I got the information I was
looking for.
--- On Thu, 13/8/09, Adams, Rick wrote:
From: Adams, Rick
Subject: Re: DFHSM QUESTION - RUNNING QUERY COMMAND IN BATCH
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Received: Thursday, 13 August, 2009, 3:52 AM
Jo
While that would solve my problem, wouldn't that cause the same problem
for the users of the original?
My reading seems to indicate that it's possible to have multiple members
of the same name in different libs, which seems to be the point of a
default name of IRFXUSER in the function naming tabl
List and Query are not the same command.
Thank You,
Dave O'Brien
NIH Contractor
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of John
Dawes [jhn_da...@yahoo.com.au]
Sent: Wednesday, August 12, 2009 1:25 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Su
John,
There are a couple of options I can think of.
This will get you a list of all backup volumes that are not full - but only
tape volumes.
HSEND LIST TTOC SELECT(BACKUP NOTFULL) NODSI ODS(output.dataset.name)
This will list all backup volumes - full or not full. Should include disk.
HSEND LI
On 12 Aug 2009 10:00:07 -0700, jmck...@healthmarkets.com (McKown,
John) wrote:
>> But it's now and into the future about share holder
>> value...to coin a phrase I heard while working for Best Foods
>> in Englewoodcliffs, N.J. ... from the President of the
>> North American Division O' by the
Hi,
I am trying to execute the following query command via a batch job. The reason
for this is to create audit trails for our internal inspectors
HSEND Q BACKUP(ALL). If the command is issued via TSO I get the desired
results however via batch (jcl below) I am getting syntax errors
//STEP
According to IBM, in z/OS 1.10, we can no longer define a VSAM dataset with
the data CA track sizes of 2, 4, 6, 8, or 10 thru 14 tracks.
Snipet of II14458 (dated 12/14/08):
"When a VSAM data set or ICF Catalog is defined or redefined on
z/OS version 1 release 10 the index cisize may be increased.
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
> [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of Howard Rifkind
> Sent: Wednesday, August 12, 2009 11:45 AM
> To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
> Subject: Re: Can CICS region share more than one processor
>
> John,
>
> Of course you are right
Gil,
That was probably written 20 years ago when a volume meant a SLED and it
would have been prudent to protect yourself against a disk failure. With
RAID the need for separate volumes for these backups is debatable.
To get the same hardware separation with RAID you need a map of Device
Number
John,
Of course you are right.
But it's now and into the future about share holder value...to coin a phrase I
heard while working for Best Foods in Englewoodcliffs, N.J. ... from the
President of the North American Division O' by the way he was from Germany.
--- On Wed, 8/12/09, McKown, John
Lizette Koehler wrote:
>The 3295-1 will only create unencrypted tapes. And due to the way DFHSM
works, you cannot chang the TAPECOPY, for instance, to 3592-2 and leave
ML2 at 3592-1. So both parts, ML2 and TAPECOPY, need to be the same
device type which in our case is the 3592-2 device type.
Edward Jaffe wrote:
Martin Kline wrote:
Nicely worded, Ed. Maybe I'm not imagining things when I believe IBM
is more interested in closing open problem records than in solving the
underlying problems. It didn't used to be this way. Having posted this
publicly, can I assume you don't mind if I
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
> [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of Ted MacNEIL
> Sent: Wednesday, August 12, 2009 10:31 AM
> To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
> Subject: Re: Can CICS region share more than one processor
>
> >Of course, since this requires rewri
I am getting ratios of 30:1 or better of small messages to large, and IIRC
it is even higher when using GRS-Ring. So, ESCON CTCs do very well in a
Basic Sysplex, where the majority of messages are GRS ENQ traffic.
If I had a FICON switch in my environment, I would use single FICON channels
in bou
>There does seem to be much more emphasis on getting PMRs closed than before.
>Someone's performance appraisal is probably based on the number of open (or
>closed) PMRs. After all, closed means resolved. Right?
I've found this behaviour quite common with IBM, at least since I opened my
first pr
On Wed, 12 Aug 2009 08:08:53 -0700, Walter Marguccio
wrote:
>> - Original Message
>> From: Mark Zelden mark.zel...@zurichna.com
>
>> So FICON is better with current technology regardless. But for those
>> using "old" technology, does anyone know what the typical / average size
>> of GR
Martin Kline wrote:
Nicely worded, Ed. Maybe I'm not imagining things when I believe IBM is more
interested in closing open problem records than in solving the underlying
problems. It didn't used to be this way. Having posted this publicly, can I
assume you don't mind if I use the same response
---
I once accidently swapped INDDn with OUTDDn with *predictable* results. ;)
It was one of the longest 5 minutes in my life to fix things... 8-D
---
BTDTGTSS. Makes you really religious about
>Of course, since this requires rewriting, or at least validating, the current
>code to be ThreadSafe, this is not really a good option.
Why?
Since when is improving application code a bad option?
-
Too busy driving to stop for gas!
--
thanks I will check CICS-L for more information
On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 11:23 PM, Ted MacNEIL wrote:
>>We hit a problem that our cics cannot utilized more than one CPU processor
>>and IBM recommend our shop upgrade to CICSplex.
>>Except this, is there any other way to solve this problem?
>
> I su
>Just allocate it in the logon clist with &SYSNAME.
That's what my EXEC did.
But, it also created a new one for a system that you had not signed onto
before, by copying your original ISPPROF dataset.
I last updated the EXEC for a 1.4 system, when profile sharing was not
supported.
It's nice t
I am curious why you would need to take an outage to "harden any dynamic
changes to the IODF"?
It was IODF and microcode. I am limited to a single CEC (a Z/9).
Eventually, dynamic IODF changes will fail when the allocated HSA fills
up. Either that, or an LPAR won't activate because the HSA has
e
Thanks for the info Dave. The section I was reading was in the z/OS
1.9 Admin Guide Chapter 12 page 474 that says:
If you decide to back up the control data sets and journal data set to
DASD, you must preallocate the data sets. Also, allocate the different
versions of the backup data sets on
>We hit a problem that our cics cannot utilized more than one CPU processor and
>IBM recommend our shop upgrade to CICSplex.
>Except this, is there any other way to solve this problem?
I suggest you ask the CICS-L.
Depending on your needs, there are multiple ways to handle this 'issue'.
CICS has
Gil,
The manual says to allocate the backups on volumes other than the ones
containing the CDSs being backed up.
Thank You,
Dave O'Brien
NIH Contractor
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of
O'Brien, David W. (NIH/CIT) [C
> - Original Message
> From: Mark Zelden mark.zel...@zurichna.com
> So FICON is better with current technology regardless. But for those
> using "old" technology, does anyone know what the typical / average size
> of GRS XCF messages are in a ring? Scott, are you lurking? :-)
Typical
Hal
>> Since you were asking in public, I assumed the reply would be in public.
You could, after all, have asked in private.
> Um, I said I don't discuss off list conversations and gave one reason.
Um, perhaps you didn't notice that I pointed out you asked in public and that
at the very least
On Tue, 11 Aug 2009 16:59:52 -0500, Rick Fochtman
wrote:
Ok. I didn't word things very clearly.
>...
>>QSAM handles individual members just fine so FIND, READ, WRITE
>>and STOW are working under the covers. Seems like that covers
>>most of the functions.
Here I was just trying to say that th
Jim
> I will spare all who have been reading all the history of this on IBMMAIN
about my strong recommendation for those running SNA networks to strongly
consider the need for a "SNA Firewall".
Which means you haven't spared us at all! I recognise a "trick" to which I
succumb myself when the o
Gil,
The requirement to separate by volume refers to the BCDS, MCDS and OCDS not
their Backups.
The jcl to allocate the backup datasets is in Sys1.samplib(ARCSTRST) look for
ALLOCBK1
Thank You,
Dave O'Brien
NIH Contractor
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion
Hello all, I am trying to move the CDS backups currently from tape
using HSM as the datamover and noparallel to disk using DSS and
parallel.
The manual states that I have to preallocate the new dasd backup
datasets but thats all, so do I use the same dcb characteristics as the
current tape d
Ah yes, that was it. That is why I use ESCON for 1k messages, and use my ICF
for larger messages, since I don't have a FICON CTC set up. The vast majority
of the messages in my Sysplex fir in the 1k class.
>>> Walter Marguccio 8/12/2009 10:34 AM >>>
> - Original Message
> From: Scott
Well then, you don't agree with me!
There are many smaller shops which share DASD across PROD/DEV/TEST, and a
Sysplex can be a very appropriate configuration for them.
>>> "Staller, Allan" 8/12/2009 10:01 AM >>>
I agree. 1 sysplex for all is not a good design point for the O/P. I
believe he co
Allan,
I am curious why you would need to take an outage to "harden any dynamic
changes to the IODF"?
Scott
>>> "Staller, Allan" 8/12/2009 8:54 AM >>>
The purpose of a sysplex is z/OS availability. I commonly go 3 months
between outages (production IPL's) and I am in the middle of creating 2
On Wed, 12 Aug 2009 07:34:16 -0700, Walter Marguccio
wrote:
>> - Original Message
>> From: Scott Rowe scott.r...@joann.com
>
>> BTW, for small packets of data, I believe ESCON links are actually faster
than FICON.
>> I think I have seen a paper on this, but I can't remember where.
>
>Yo
> - Original Message
> From: Scott Rowe scott.r...@joann.com
> BTW, for small packets of data, I believe ESCON links are actually faster
> than FICON.
> I think I have seen a paper on this, but I can't remember where.
You are right:
http://www-03.ibm.com/support/techdocs/atsmastr.nsf/
On Wed, 12 Aug 2009 10:54:11 +0100, Jim McAlpine wrote:
>I need to take our existing RACF profiles across to a new z/OS system which
>has an existing RACF database and somehow merge them into the new system.
>Is there a way to accomplish this. I can't simply replace the RACF database
>on the new
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
> [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of Tommy Tsui
> Sent: Wednesday, August 12, 2009 8:45 AM
> To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
> Subject: Can CICS region share more than one processor
>
> Hi ,
>
> We hit a problem that our cics ca
On Wed, 12 Aug 2009 06:55:33 -0400, Mary Anne Matyaz
wrote:
>Jim, it's not the recommended function for this, but you can use irrut400.
>That will merge
>two databases, you specify the primary and copy in without replace,
>everything from the secondary. You'll have to do a good bit of manual
>che
You can spread in many CICS Region (Address Spaces).
2009/8/12 Tommy Tsui
> Hi ,
>
> We hit a problem that our cics cannot utilized more than one CPU
> processor and IBM recommend our shop upgrade to CICSplex .Except this,
> is there any other way to solve this problem?
>
>
> any comment will be
I dont like electronic training at all.
I Much prefer Class room edcuation.
Save big on Stock Trading Fees. Click Now!
http://thirdpartyoffers.juno.com/TGL2141/fc/BLSrjpTFPBUTRdkCaAqVliS77x2eTnVdPM2QcXcM6pcI5HkOWLnr92NAzWQ/
July poll results
How do you prefer to receive electronic training?
Instructor-Led Online (ILO) classes - 23%
Online / Web-based - 22%
Remote access to public classes - 12%
Self-paced virtual courses - 28%
Never tried electronic training - 15%
---
I agree. 1 sysplex for all is not a good design point for the O/P. I
believe he could still benefit from a 2 sysplex design in the same box.
1 for Prod, and 1 for DEV/TEST/QA. Two LPARs for each.
The OP was asking about using Sysplex to join his three monoplexes into
a single Sysplex. Availabili
I rarely see anything being promoted anymore, which is unfortunate, as it
was usually very good info. Yuri Kritchevers pmr's come to mind. Also Bruce,
forget what area he was in, and Donna in I/O.
Excellent info in them, usually very detailed answers. SIS now seems to be
just a search for apars, an
Hi ,
We hit a problem that our cics cannot utilized more than one CPU
processor and IBM recommend our shop upgrade to CICSplex .Except this,
is there any other way to solve this problem?
any comment will be appreciated
best regards
--
http://www.type80.com/products_syslog.htm
Dennis Barrett
dbarr...@lacledegas.com
> -Original Message-
> From: גדי בן אבי [mailto:gad...@malam.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, August 11, 2009 02:51
> Subject: Sending z/OS Messages to external syslog server
>
> Hi,
>
> Does anyone know of a way to
Allan,
The OP was asking about using Sysplex to join his three monoplexes into a
single Sysplex. Availability may have been the original purpose of Sysplex,
but it can and has been used for other purposes since it's inception. You have
obviously not been following the recent discussion that
On Wed, 12 Aug 2009 08:16:01 -0500, Martin Kline wrote:
>Nicely worded, Ed. Maybe I'm not imagining things when I believe IBM is more
>interested in closing open problem records than in solving the underlying
>problems. It didn't used to be this way. Having posted this publicly, can I
>assume you
Barbara wrote:
>> >If you use the same userid on all systems, your users are going to
>complain as there can be only one userid with the same name in the
>sysplex,
Huh? I've been using the same userid on multiple systems in a sysplex
since sysplex was invented.
>Mark Zeldens instructions in how
Barbara
> No USS in my post!
It was my intention to change the Subject line to your new one - but I forgot!
Sorry.
There are some subject line policemen out there of whom we need to be wary!
Chris Mason
On Mon, 10 Aug 2009 01:04:08 -0500, Barbara Nitz
wrote:
...
-
Nicely worded, Ed. Maybe I'm not imagining things when I believe IBM is more
interested in closing open problem records than in solving the underlying
problems. It didn't used to be this way. Having posted this publicly, can I
assume you don't mind if I use the same response?
>Are you sure you
Sure,
The 3295-1 will only create unencrypted tapes. And due to the way DFHSM works,
you cannot chang the TAPECOPY, for instance, to 3592-2 and leave ML2 at 3592-1.
So both parts, ML2 and TAPECOPY, need to be the same device type which in our
case is the 3592-2 device type.
Lizette
>
>Lize
Mary Anne Matyaz wrote:
>Um, YES, It IS true! I have done it! ;)
You can indeed use IRRUT400 to join different RACF DBs into one. The
prefered input for such an operation is where the different RACF DBs were
previously split by IRRUT400.
>I did state that it is not the recommended use.
I di
Afterword:
And what about the non-IBM components? We run ADABAS/Natural from
Software Ag.
Most major software vendors have had to coexist in or with a SYSPLEX
environment for at least 10 years. I would expect them to be able to
cope!
Check with the vendor for specific information.
HTH,
-
We have 3 LPARs configured as monoplex. One for our Production
environment, one for our Test/QA environment, and one for our
Application Development environment.
>From this discussion, it sounds like everybody is saying even we would
benefit from Sysplex.
The purpose of a sysplex is z/OS avail
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
> [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of Jim McAlpine
> Sent: Wednesday, August 12, 2009 4:54 AM
> To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
> Subject: moving RACF profiles to a new system
>
> I need to take our existing RACF profiles across t
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
> [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of ??? ?? ???
> Sent: Tuesday, August 11, 2009 11:46 PM
> To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
> Subject: Re: Sending z/OS Messages to external syslog server
>
> Hi everyone,
>
> I ended up using the
Um, YES, It IS true! I have done it! ;)
I did state that it is not the recommended use.
MA
On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 7:41 AM, Elardus Engelbrecht <
elardus.engelbre...@sita.co.za> wrote:
> Mary Anne Matyaz wrote:
>
> >Jim, it's not the recommended function for this, but you can use irrut400.
> >
On Tue, 11 Aug 2009 14:58:18 -0500 "Patrick O'Keefe"
wrote:
:>On Tue, 11 Aug 2009 10:37:31 -0500, Rick Fochtman
:> wrote:
:>
:>
:>>... I was told that if you couldn't master the concepts of
:>>blocking/deblocking in BSAM, you had no business "messing
:>>around" with BPAM, which was designed as
>> Yes, there is a tendency to drift; so what?
>
>The downside of that is that the ISPPROF datasets will have different contents.
That's what I meant by 'drift'.
And, I still say: "So what"?
-
Too busy driving to stop for gas!
Mary Anne Matyaz wrote:
>Jim, it's not the recommended function for this, but you can use irrut400.
>That will merge two databases,
No! It is NOT true! IRRUT400 will NOT do that intended merging.
As documented in Security Server RACF System Programmer's Guide:
"Restriction: Do not use IRRUT400
Lizette Koehler wrote:
>Once we changed the device definition on both ML2 and TAPECOPY to 3592-
2 it worked. The 3592-1
>So, we are now having DFHSM ML2 and TAPECOPY tapes [ ... snipped ... ]
Sorry Lizette, but could you be very kind to tell us what you wanted to write
in the sentence starting
Jim, it's not the recommended function for this, but you can use irrut400.
That will merge
two databases, you specify the primary and copy in without replace,
everything from the secondary. You'll have to do a good bit of manual
checking and accomodating, but it's a start.
Mary Anne
On Wed, Aug 1
Denis,
Thanks for the excellent argumentation. I basically concur with you.
I'd like to reply to a few arguments, though:
1. Today's JVMs offer the option to have the byte code compiled on the
fly when certain conditions are met. So, these JVMs already have the
capability to run "machine code" i
I need to take our existing RACF profiles across to a new z/OS system which
has an existing RACF database and somehow merge them into the new system.
Is there a way to accomplish this. I can't simply replace the RACF database
on the new system with my existing one because it contains profiles whic
"Ted MacNEIL" wrote in message
news:1940869721-1250064774-cardhu_decombobulator_blackberry.rim.net-1268
4658...@bxe1287.bisx.prod.on.blackberry...
> >If you use the same userid on all systems, your users are going to
complain as there can be only one userid with the same name in the
sysplex, Mark
>If you use the same userid on all systems, your users are going to complain as
>there can be only one userid with the same name in the sysplex, Mark Zeldens
>instructions in how-to-overcome that not withstanding.
I've used the same ID on multiple systems for years. I even wrote a REXX EXEC
to
88 matches
Mail list logo
