Hi All
I'm trying to set up HiperSockets on our Z9 A02 and running Z/VM VERSION 5
RELEASE 3.0, SERVICE LEVEL 0701 and ADCD ZOS 1.10 running as a guest
under VM.
I'm using Redbook HiperSockets Implementation Guide March 2007.
When I try to define IQD Page 26 Add Channel Path I get error
On Tue, 2010-01-05 at 08:45 -0600, Mohammad Khan wrote:
In other words more lipstick is being applied here. When are they going to
realize that it's a pig ?
Hard to argue ... :-))
Shane ...
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe /
Sam Golob wrote:
Does anyone know what happened to Eric Loriaux' web site? It doesn't seem
to be there anymore.
I did a quick check, but both sites http://phpnuke.loriaux.com/
and http://www.ping.be/~ping1475/ are unavailable or DSN unresolved...
This very OLD one is working:
In other words more lipstick is being applied here. When are they going to
realize that it's a pig ?
Hard to argue ... :-))
So what's your alternative? Abandon Java on Z?
Bob Shannon
Rocket Software
--
For IBM-MAIN
Could you please be more explicit about the message you did see, and
possibly about the messages you eventually found in the hardcopy log
(SYSLOG)?
You wrote
But when NIP was waiting for my reply, I could not see what was wrong so
that I could fix it
What message was it waiting for you to
IIRC - the first Hipersocket channel must be FF, then FE, etc.
On Wed, Jan 6, 2010 at 6:28 AM, Stuart Willis stuart.wil...@willdata.comwrote:
Hi All
I'm trying to set up HiperSockets on our Z9 A02 and running Z/VM VERSION 5
RELEASE 3.0, SERVICE LEVEL 0701 and ADCD ZOS 1.10 running as a
I have tried FF FE get the same
+---+
| Channel path type IQD is not supported by channel path ID FF. |
+---+
Stuart.
Here is the definition from my HCD.
Processor ID . . . . : Z9
Configuration mode . : LPAR
Channel Subsystem ID : 0
Channel path ID . . . . : FF PCHID . . . . . :
Channel path type . . . : IQD
Operation mode . . . . . : SHR
Managed . . . . . . . . : No I/O Cluster . . :
Description .
Hello Stuart,
I use 0F and 7F for my IQD chpids.
I usually use F* and *F for my ICP chpids.
(legacy...ESCON 16 port cards only had 15 usable chpids...so last *F chpid
unused.)
But I haven't tried using FF.
But this is on a z10does your z9 actually support IQD chpids??
On Wed, 6 Jan
There is no requirement for HiperSocket chipd.
I use any (unused) number I want.
--
Radoslaw Skorupka
Lodz, Poland
Stuart Willis pisze:
I have tried FF FE get the same
+---+
| Channel path type IQD is not supported by channel
Hi Stuart,
Pressing F1 do you get an extended help message?
On Wed, 6 Jan 2010 05:28:44 -0600, Stuart Willis
stuart.wil...@willdata.com wrote:
snip
+---
| Channel path type IQD is not supported by channel path ID F4. |
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
[mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of Peter Relson
Sent: Wednesday, January 06, 2010 6:55 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: useless message at IPL
snip
What message was it waiting for you to reply to?
It's
Don,
If your firewall folks just recently upgraded the firewall, it could be that
the
upgrade defaulted, or reset some configuration settings. For FTPS, the
firewall cannot do what's referred to as stateful checking. I know ours does
that, and if it does that on the control connection
Hi Bruce
I did that it tells me that the device is not supported on the system
but if If display supported devices it tells me IQD is supported?
+--- Supported Control Units
---+
|Row 1 of 134 More:
|
|
Bruce Hewson pisze:
[...]
i.e. 2 PCHID == 2 CHPID, and 2 CU per CHPID as CUADD=0 and 1.
Bruce,
You cannot do it. Dot.
Caution! For OSD chpid type you can define multiple CUs (using CUADD),
but all of them are tied to CHPID, not the port!
Multiple CUs are needed only if you want to have many
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of McKown, John
[ snip ] . . . I guess what it really
means is that I should never update an in-use member of PARMLIB, but
copy it to a different suffix,
modify it, then point to the modified PARMLIB member.
That's
Clark Morris wrote:
On 5 Jan 2010 09:54:17 -0800, in bit.listserv.ibm-main you wrote:
Clark Morris wrote:
On 5 Jan 2010 07:17:48 -0800, in bit.listserv.ibm-main you wrote:
Mike Myers wrote:
Steve:
I do know that the formatter in IPCS (TCBEXIT IECDAFMT - at least I
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On
Behalf Of Don Poitras
Sent: Wednesday, January 06, 2010 8:44 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: Where have the control blocks gone?
SNIPPAGE
There's nothing stopping any programmer changing his
snip
It should be noted that early IPL messages can be written to the HMC
system console in addition to/or instead of the z/OS NIP console. While
the HMC
system console has a number of usability problems, it does allow scrolling
backward to see messages.
/snip
I'll bite, how do you make
In a message dated 1/6/2010 8:42:15 A.M. Central Standard Time,
r.skoru...@bremultibank.com.pl writes:
You cannot do it. Dot.
Caution! For OSD chpid type you can define multiple CUs (using CUADD),
but all of them are tied to CHPID, not the port!
Multiple CUs are needed only if you want to
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
[mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of John Kelly
Sent: Wednesday, January 06, 2010 9:21 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: useless message at IPL
snip
It should be noted that early IPL messages can be written to
Hi Folks,
If you go to www.cbttape.org, I've straightened out the CBT
directory and the Updates directory so things are less confusing. The
CBT directory now contains the contents of Version 478 of the CBT Tape,
cut on Dec 27, 2009. The Updates directory now contains updated files
that
On Tue, 05 Jan 2010 18:52:59 -0500, Walter Bushell pr...@panix.com
wrote:
They weren't really beaten, either. They ran out of fuel, food and
ammo.
That constitutes being beaten.
Logistics is a major, major component of warfare.
And business.
On 5 Jan 2010 14:08:59 -0800, pgil...@pc-link.com.au (Paul Gillis)
wrote:
I used Jol from 1970 through 1988 and was very happy with it, then
when I changed jobs I had to relearn JCL. Jol certainly provided much
of what has been discussed here since the early 70s.
Never tried a parm greater
I have found command SETOMVS SYNTAXCHECK=(xx) to be useful when making
changes to BPXPRMxx members.
It checks syntax as well as the existence of HFS and zFS data sets specified
in the catalog. Mount points are not verified.
--
--
Don Imbriale
On Wed, Jan 6, 2010 at 9:04 AM, McKown, John
Hi,
I'm about to update a chart I'm using to illustrate the
relative speed of various actions like CP cycle, storage
access, etc.
Does it still hold true that an I/O from controller cache (cache
hit) takes about 1ms and and I/O from the platter (cache miss)
takes about 5ms. All I want is two
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On
Behalf Of Thompson, Steve
Sent: Wednesday, January 06, 2010 10:08 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: Where have the control blocks gone?
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe
Have you checked the processor definition? ISTR that on ours there are 2
choices and whether IQD is supported is one of them
- Original Message -
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Sent: Wed Jan 06 05:28:44 2010
Subject:
In d9d0c4681001051505w592508dfh92c302da9e77f...@mail.gmail.com, on
01/05/2010
at 03:05 PM, Donald Russell russell@gmail.com said:
Is USS the same thing as OMVS?
Officially USS is Unformatted System Services, but many people
unofficially misuse the acronym to refer to Unix System Services.
In dad7k5phqf6bsfl326rt7pqvng1cgpc...@4ax.com, on 01/05/2010
at 05:57 PM, Clark Morris cfmpub...@ns.sympatico.ca said:
Which then got fouled by DOS360 being substantially different from OS360.
To say nothing of a host of new lines announce *after* the S/360, e.g.,
S/3.
--
Shmuel
In a6b9336cdb62bb46b9f8708e686a7ea005bde01...@nrhmms8p02.uicnrh.dom, on
01/05/2010
at 05:57 PM, McKown, John john.mck...@healthmarkets.com said:
Why not use BPXWUNIX to run a UNIX command in REXX?
That should work if he has an OMVS segement; my best guess is that he only
has it on one of his
In listserv%201001041743394524.0...@bama.ua.edu, on 01/04/2010
at 05:43 PM, Paul Gilmartin paulgboul...@aim.com said:
Does that mean before there were PROCs?
No.
PROCs are little use without symbols.
They were quite useful.
Or was everything done with overrides?
Yes. As I recall,
In 4b42276c.90...@trainersfriend.com, on 01/04/2010
at 10:37 AM, Steve Comstock st...@trainersfriend.com said:
* Instead of three (or more) SVRBs, there are only two
Under what circumstances did you see three SVRB's in the past? I'd expect
that for an ABEND in O/C/EOV, but not for an ABEND in
In a6b9336cdb62bb46b9f8708e686a7ea005bde01...@nrhmms8p02.uicnrh.dom, on
01/04/2010
at 02:46 PM, McKown, John john.mck...@healthmarkets.com said:
Any chance that the file is UTF? If so, it might have a BOM (Byte Order
Mark) as the first two (or 4) bytes of the file.
The BOM might legitimately
In listserv%201001051154584348.0...@bama.ua.edu, on 01/05/2010
at 11:54 AM, Paul Gilmartin paulgboul...@aim.com said:
o Issuing HOLDDATA is not syncronized with our test cycle which
drives our cumulative maintenance releases.
Do you build your cum service with the then current HOLDDATA? If
In blu110-w1b72eb1614e390925c7adc6...@phx.gbl, on 01/04/2010
at 04:29 PM, john gilmore john_w_gilm...@msn.com said:
JCL has been criticized by those who have not mastered it since the time
of OS PCP.
ObQoheleth Similar complaints were no doubt made by my Uncle Crow and Aunt
Maggie.
He begins
In a6b9336cdb62bb46b9f8708e686a7ea005bde01...@nrhmms8p02.uicnrh.dom, on
01/05/2010
at 10:51 AM, McKown, John john.mck...@healthmarkets.com said:
Like somebody has a 3287 printer any more? Or any printers?
Virtual 1403 under z/VM?
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT
ISO
On Wed, 6 Jan 2010 10:01:41 -0500, Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.) wrote:
What I'd like to do is invoke sftp from a rexx clist
Rexx and CLIST are completely different animals.
Except that Rexx EXECs and CLISTs may be mingled in a single
SYSPROC library. Magic Numbers.
-- gil
I'm trying to go to the sysplex root filesystem set up. I'm getting the
following messages:
BPXF008I FILE SYSTEM /dev 906
WAS NOT MOUNTED.
THE MOUNT POINT SPECIFIED IN BPXPRMF5 DOES NOT EXIST.
BPXF008I FILE SYSTEM OMVS.LIHT.ETC 907
WAS NOT MOUNTED.
THE MOUNT POINT SPECIFIED IN BPXPRMF5 DOES NOT
On Wed, 6 Jan 2010 10:45:49 -0600, McKown, John
john.mck...@healthmarkets.com wrote:
I'm trying to go to the sysplex root filesystem set up. I'm getting the
following messages:
BPXF008I FILE SYSTEM /dev 906
WAS NOT MOUNTED.
THE MOUNT POINT SPECIFIED IN BPXPRMF5 DOES NOT EXIST.
BPXF008I FILE
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
[mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of Don Imbriale
Sent: Wednesday, January 06, 2010 10:01 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: useless message at IPL
I have found command SETOMVS SYNTAXCHECK=(xx) to be useful when
With a DS8300 Turbo, my overall average response time is around 1ms. It looks
to me like a cache hit is a little less than .5ms, with less than .300ms of
connect time.
Hunkeler Peter (KIUP 4) peter.hunke...@credit-suisse.com 1/6/2010 11:07
AM
Hi,
I'm about to update a chart I'm using to
Ignoring a lot and oversimplifying, I believe that modern DASD should routinely
deliver 0.1ms (hit) and 1ms (miss).
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of
Hunkeler Peter (KIUP 4)
Sent: Wednesday, January 06, 2010 10:08 AM
To:
On 1/6/2010 at 6:28 AM, Stuart Willis stuart.wil...@willdata.com wrote:
Hi All
I'm trying to set up HiperSockets on our Z9 A02 and running Z/VM VERSION 5
RELEASE 3.0, SERVICE LEVEL 0701 and ADCD ZOS 1.10 running as a guest
under VM.
I'm using Redbook HiperSockets Implementation
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
[mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of Mark Zelden
Sent: Wednesday, January 06, 2010 10:57 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: Help with sysplex root filesystem.
snip
Did you follow the procedure to create the
Hi Mark
No if I try and use one that is used it gives me another error message CU
already used.
Stuart.
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message:
In a6b9336cdb62bb46b9f8708e686a7ea005bde01...@nrhmms8p02.uicnrh.dom, on
01/05/2010
at 04:11 PM, McKown, John john.mck...@healthmarkets.com said:
Yes, it did go to HARDCPY in the CONSOLnn member. Which is set to SYSLOG.
Which is a SPOOL dataset. Which really means that these messages are kept
In a6b9336cdb62bb46b9f8708e686a7ea005bde01...@nrhmms8p02.uicnrh.dom, on
01/06/2010
at 08:04 AM, McKown, John john.mck...@healthmarkets.com said:
I guess what it really means is that I should never update an in-use
member of PARMLIB, but copy it to a different suffix, modify it, then
point to
On Wed, 6 Jan 2010 11:18:55 -0600, McKown, John
john.mck...@healthmarkets.com wrote:
--
I used the two jobs in SYS1.SAMPLIB to make two new ZFS filesystems. One
problem that I have which might be my problem, is that I need to use my
original root filesystem in this environment. I simply don't
During Add Channel Path do you get a different result using F4 (Prompt) for
Channel Path ID and Channel Path Type? In other words is Type IQD available in
both instances?
Regards,
Kevin
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of
On Wed, Jan 6, 2010 at 07:01, Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.)
shmuel+ibm-m...@patriot.net shmuel%2bibm-m...@patriot.net wrote:
In d9d0c4681001051505w592508dfh92c302da9e77f...@mail.gmail.com, on
01/05/2010
at 03:05 PM, Donald Russell russell@gmail.com said:
Is USS the same thing as OMVS?
*Example 3-1 IOCP statements for the z/OS environment*
*CHPID PATH=(CSS(1,2),F4),SHARED, **
*PARTITION=((CSS(1),(A12),(=)),(CSS(2),(A23,A24,A25),(=))**
*),TYPE=IQD*
*CHPID PATH=(CSS(1,2),F5),SHARED, **
*PARTITION=((CSS(1),(A12),(=)),(CSS(2),(A23,A24,A25),(=))**
*),TYPE=IQD*
*CHPID
FWIW - you should be able to run the sftp client from a z/OS userid
that has an OMVS segment, but has a read-only home directory shared by
multiple userids. It seems unlikely to me that the Unix shell will
work this way, but I haven't tried it.
Kirk Wolf
Dovetailed Technologies
Thompson, Steve wrote:
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On
Behalf Of Don Poitras
Sent: Wednesday, January 06, 2010 8:44 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: Where have the control blocks gone?
SNIPPAGE
There's nothing
This is a how to question. In the SYS1.PARMLIB(PROG00) member I have an
existing library that I really need to delete but I can't. Instead I
want to add a new entry in front of the one that's there now. As they
say a picture is worth a 1,000 word, so here's the net result of what I
want to do:
No no no ... there is no suggestion / advice in my comment. Just an
observation from a bemused observer on the latest installment in this effort.
There was something called High Performance Compiler for Java in mid 90's
IIRC.
Mohammad
On Wed, 6 Jan 2010 07:25:04 -0500, Bob Shannon
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On
Behalf Of Don Poitras
Sent: Wednesday, January 06, 2010 12:10 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: Where have the control blocks gone?
SNIPPAGE
Use FREE=CLOSE on the SYSMDUMP DD.
Snip
That only
George,
I believe that you may need to also do a LNKLST DELETE of the OEM#T
library before you do the LNKLST ADD statements. I'm assuming the OEM#T
library is in the current LNKLST so it would be copied to the new one.
Just doing the LNKLST ADD statements will end up with 2 copies of OEM#T
in
Don,
It's not so much as blocking ftps and allowing normal ftp. The normal ftp's
go thru such that the firewall can do it's stateful checking and not cause a
problem. With FTPS, the datastream is encrypted by the time it hits the
firewall, and does not conform to what the firewall thinks
Thompson, Steve wrote:
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On
Behalf Of Don Poitras
Sent: Wednesday, January 06, 2010 12:10 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: Where have the control blocks gone?
SNIPPAGE
Use FREE=CLOSE on
Ed Finnell pisze:
Most of this should be covered in the SAPR with the z10. Only one session
from Denver SHARE has reference to OSA Express. 2217 Software
Considerations for z10 migration.
SAPR is the thing that were *never* been done here in Poland. BTDT many
times. Even got
Or you can use SYSMDUMP DD SYSOUT=class
And then use your handy dandy sysout management tool to save the dump to a
disk dataset, and use IPCS.
See http://bama.ua.edu/cgi-bin/wa?A2=ind0709L=ibm-mainP=R28921I=1X=-
===
Wayne Driscoll
OMEGAMON DB2 L3
Re: Split Cylinder DASD allocation
I was curious to know if split-cylinder allocation still worked, and tried
submitting a job using the OS/360 syntax:
//SPLITCYL DD DSN=...,DISP=(,CATLG),
// UNIT=SYSDA,SPLIT=(6,CYL,10),
// DCB=(RECFM=FB,LRECL=80)
To my surprise, I did NOT get a
We have a program that has the following in it:
SELECT CVSCATF
ASSIGN TO AS-CVSCATF
ACCESS IS SEQUENTIAL
FILE STATUS IS FILE-STATUS.
FD CVSCATF
RECORD CONTAINS 17 TO 69 CHARACTERS.
01
There's BEFORE and AFTER options on SETPROG LNKLST
Dave Gibney
Information Technology Services
Washington State University
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On
Behalf Of Pommier, Rex R.
Sent: Wednesday, January 06, 2010 10:58 AM
Frank Swarbrick wrote:
We have a program that has the following in it:
SELECT CVSCATF
ASSIGN TO AS-CVSCATF
ACCESS IS SEQUENTIAL
FILE STATUS IS FILE-STATUS.
FD CVSCATF
RECORD CONTAINS 17 TO 69
On z/OS v1.7?
Thanks,
George Rodriguez
Specialist II - IT Solutions
Application Support / Quality Assurance
PX - 47652
(561) 357-7652 (office)
(561) 707-3496 (mobile)
School District of Palm Beach County
3348 Forest Hill Blvd.
Room B-332
West Palm Beach, FL. 33406-5869
Florida's Only A-Rated
I guess it's a matter of interpreting their (security folks) intent. (Which
admittedly I don't know)...
Yes, I understand the technical part of your explanation... but the overall
effect is that FTPS is blocked while FTP is not if their intent is to
block file transfers, or selectively permit
On 1/6/2010 at 12:52 PM, in message 4b44ea14.4010...@trainersfriend.com,
Steve Comstock st...@trainersfriend.com wrote:
My question is, why does it work when the file is VSAM, even without the
RECORD IS VARYING?
Question: are you running your tests under VSE or z/OS?
I tested sequential
I just got it working. Turned out I mixed up two of the filesystems (mounted
on the other's mount point) and one of the filesystems upon which the mounts
failed did not have the necessary subdirectories created. Sheesh!
--
John McKown
Systems Engineer IV
IT
Administrative Services Group
Sorry, only AFTER... From z/OS 1.7 System Commands:
|
|
| SETPROG
LNKLST,{DEFINE,NAME=lnklstname[,COPYFROM=lnklstname][,NOCHECK] }
|
| {ADD,NAME=lnklstname,
|
On Tue, 05 Jan 2010 08:20:46 -0500, jmfbahciv jmfbah...@aol wrote:
The goal of a war is to win to the point of changing
the mindset of the enemy, especially the populace.
That's *a* goal of war.
Goals in business or war are about of costs and benefits. The quoted
goal (which doesn't define
A sister company of mine is attempting to use Control-M to support a new
application.
They have defined 25000 jobs into 3000 schedule groups.
In operation, they have observered that it can take 6 minutes between the
time a job ends and the next job takes off.
Has anyone running Control-M
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
[mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of Donald Russell
Sent: Wednesday, January 06, 2010 12:03 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: PCI and Auditors perceptions thereof
snip
The idea I was trying to convey is I
Since the beginning of dynamic LNKLST - OS/390 R3 (seems like a
life time ago).
BTW, after you copy from current you can delete the old one and
add the new one. ASsuming there are no other duplicate modules
in the LNKLST, the order you specify those delete / add statements
don't matter nor
Frank Swarbrick wrote:
On 1/6/2010 at 12:52 PM, in message 4b44ea14.4010...@trainersfriend.com,
Steve Comstock st...@trainersfriend.com wrote:
My question is, why does it work when the file is VSAM, even without the
RECORD IS VARYING?
Question: are you running your tests under VSE or z/OS?
On Wed, 6 Jan 2010 14:46:07 -0600, Mark Zelden mark.zel...@zurichna.com wrote:
Since the beginning of dynamic LNKLST - OS/390 R3 (seems like a
life time ago).
BTW, after you copy from current you can delete the old one and
add the new one. ASsuming there are no other duplicate modules
in the
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On
Behalf Of Mark Zelden
Sent: Wednesday, January 06, 2010 12:49 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: LNKLST APF Help
On Wed, 6 Jan 2010 14:46:07 -0600, Mark Zelden
mark.zel...@zurichna.com
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On
Behalf Of Frank Swarbrick
Sent: Wednesday, January 06, 2010 2:44 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Cobol rewrite variable length record
We have a program that has the following in it:
Some of us exchange data with outside business partners (customers). The
strategy has to be the same on both ends. Some partners are willing to
negotiate, some insist on a specific solution.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf
In d9d0c4681001061003p5a67c4ek10365bb17379c...@mail.gmail.com, on
01/06/2010
at 10:03 AM, Donald Russell russell@gmail.com said:
Which is the correct noun to refer to a program, read from SYSEXEC in a
TSO address space?
Command[1] procedure, optionally preceded by an expletive. But see
In listserv%201001061043523972.0...@bama.ua.edu, on 01/06/2010
at 10:43 AM, Paul Gilmartin paulgboul...@aim.com said:
Except that Rexx EXECs and CLISTs may be mingled in a single SYSPROC
library. Magic Numbers.
Well, magic comments. If it makes you feel better, in CMS there are three
script
In z/OS 1.11, a new option was provided for the DD statement
FILEDATA parameter: FILEDATA=RECORD; this implies data is
stored with each record having a 4 byte prefix that specifies
the length of the following data (different format than RDWs
for RECFM of VB).
When reading such a file using QSAM,
On 1/6/2010 at 1:47 PM, in message 4b44f6c6.1010...@trainersfriend.com,
Steve
Comstock st...@trainersfriend.com wrote:
Frank Swarbrick wrote:
On 1/6/2010 at 12:52 PM, in message 4b44ea14.4010...@trainersfriend.com,
Steve Comstock st...@trainersfriend.com wrote:
My question is, why does it
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On
Behalf Of Frank Swarbrick
Sent: Wednesday, January 06, 2010 5:24 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: Cobol rewrite variable length record
On 1/6/2010 at 1:47 PM, in message
On 1/6/2010 at 3:48 PM, in message
053f2631ec9c584883847c8b4970a22805bcc...@josqems1.jsq.bsg.ad.adp.com,
Farley, Peter x23353 peter.far...@broadridge.com wrote:
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On
Behalf Of Frank Swarbrick
Sent:
If your handy dandy sysout management tool happens to be SDSF, be sure to
use line command XFC (or its command line equivalents) to maintain proper
formatting of the output data set.
--
--
Don Imbriale
temporarily retired
On Wed, Jan 6, 2010 at 2:32 PM, Wayne Driscoll wdri...@us.ibm.com
SAPR is the thing that were *never* been done here in Poland. BTDT many
times.
Even got (unofficially) SAPR manual for some of IBM devices.
Many things are different here...
The SAPR guides are publicly available.
I've used them in Canada, before the reps start the process.
I don't know all the
Hi Sam,
Not a major issue, but I cannot access any of the cbttape.org links using
Safari, but it does work OK on I.E.8. This is accessing the updates page
etc.
Cheers, Paul
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access
Back in OS/390 R5 days I was presented a standalone dump where the exact
same problem (a syntax error in bpxprm on a test system that nobody cared
about but that *was* part of a productive parallel sysplex) had brought down
a productive system due to the fact that the message prompting for the
Ted MacNEIL pisze:
SAPR is the thing that were *never* been done here in Poland. BTDT many
times.
Even got (unofficially) SAPR manual for some of IBM devices.
Many things are different here...
The SAPR guides are publicly available.
Not exactly. They are available for customer (not secret),
91 matches
Mail list logo
