Re: Opcode tables

IBM Mainframe Discussion List wrote on 10/26/2010 09:16:41 PM: > are, in fact, macros still distributed in SYS1.MACLIB (even z/OS 1.11). I > know what PGOUT used to be, and I am surprised IBM has left it in > SYS1.MACLIB for so long. PGOUT continues to be documented and supported. Jim Mu

Re: PHP on z/OS

Check this : http://www-03.ibm.com/systems/z/os/zos/features/unix/ported/php/index.html Nagesh On Wed, Oct 27, 2010 at 1:02 AM, Arye Shemer wrote: > Hello Forumers, > > Anyone out there is using PHP on z/OS ? > > Would like to know if you just playing, testing or actual production, > > no need

Re: CA-OPS/MVS to IBM's System Automation?

Binyamin Dissen writes: >If ALERTs are issued for normal events, they no longer have value >as ALERTs. Ah, but who decides whether they're "normal" or not (and then what actions, if any, to take)? Any even moderately capable console that collects SNMP alerts also has the capability to triage and

Re: Opcode tables

CHI and DSG both belong to EMI2220 - MICR/OCR for MVS/SP 2.2.0 (5740-XC6/5665-291) Microfiche SJB2-9017-00 (16 OCT 86) -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with t

Re: Opcode tables

- Abe F. Kornelis noted: I have all but completed the updates of the opcode tables on hlasm.com There's a peculiarity I'd like to discuss here. I have discovered some additional ones. After adding all the new zWhateverR

Re: Opcode tables

Abe F. Kornelis noted: > I have all but completed the updates of the opcode tables on hlasm.com > There's a peculiarity I'd like to discuss here. I have discovered some additional ones. After adding all the new zWhateverR mnemonics to my SPF/SE color tables, SPF/SE complained about duplicate wor

Re: How to know the usage frequency of my FORTRAN program ?

Go to CBTTAPE.ORG and download and install DAF. It will help you filter SMF data for many things. This is very helpful program. Lizette > -Original Message- > From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On > Behalf Of Tsai Laurence > Sent: Tuesday, October 26, 201

Re: How to know the usage frequency of my FORTRAN program ?

On 10/26/2010 6:34 PM, Tsai Laurence wrote: We have some FORTRAN programs on "OS/390 2.9" , would like to know "which job" and "the usage frequency" of the programs. Any idea about how to know these information ? tks ! The data may be derived from your SMF files. Either write a custom progra

Re: How to know the usage frequency of my FORTRAN program ?

Look at the description of the type 4, 30, and 34 SMF records. -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of Tsai Laurence Sent: Tuesday, October 26, 2010 3:35 PM To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu Subject: How to know the usage frequency of my FO

How to know the usage frequency of my FORTRAN program ?

> > Dears listers, > We have some FORTRAN programs on "OS/390 2.9" , would like to know "which job" and "the usage frequency" of the programs. Any idea about how to know these information ? tks ! Regards, Laurence > > -- > Fo

Re: z/os 1.11 and low private

Even though it is not the default with appropriate testing no one should be afraid of setting USEZOSV1R9RULES(NO). This is going to have a positive impact on performance in select tasks. We went to production this way VSM USEZOSV1R9RULES(NO) and have kept this setting. I do hope IBM eventually

Re: Necessity of UID zero.

On Tue, 26 Oct 2010 22:08:22 +0200, R.S. wrote: >2. Since serverpac installation is (should) never been done on >productions system as a driver then auditors requirements are plain STUPID. Why not? Your driving system isn't affected. Performance may be much better also. Other reasons could

1.12 SDSF Problem

This one bit us today. We saw very bad performance looking at jobs on other systems in a MAS from a 1.12 system. It turns out all down-level JES2 systems must be warm-started with USE_XCFGRPNM=YES specified in JES2PARMs. To make matters worse, if you code USE_XCFGRPNM=YES on the 1.12 system JES2

Re: Necessity of UID zero.

>I just wanted to add that many applications which run as STCs and claim to >require UID0 (e.g. because they do not issue "su") will run perfectly well if >you indicate "trusted" in the STDATA segment associated with the STC's >"started" resource. Do you want to take the chance, on your own, an

Re: Necessity of UID zero.

W dniu 2010-10-26 21:09, Hal Merritt pisze: Cross posed to MVS. Sorry, I don't have an account in the UNIX list. I am in the crossfire between auditors insisting that nothing needs UID 0 and sysprogs insiting that everything in their serverpac jobs must have UID zero as coded. Any suggestio

Re: Necessity of UID zero.

Should be able to do that with the proper UNIXPRIV profiles, which all start with FILESYS.SUPERUSER . I do mkdir commands and chown command for files all over the filesystem using my ID (which is non-zero UID) without doing an su command. -- John McKown Systems Engineer IV IT Administrative S

Re: Necessity of UID zero.

And, of course, Third party software that installs into the filesystems may require you to be UID(0) to perform the install. Hal, What do your auditors say about UID(0) on the non Mainframe *NIX systems? -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu

Re: Necessity of UID zero.

I should state that when I installed the Ported Tools (Outside of ServerPac (I haven't done it in a ServerPac yet). They had a couple of scripts to run where you needed to be UID(0) or SU before you ran the script. But that was just for setting up the directory structure. -Original Message-

PHP on z/OS

Hello Forumers, Anyone out there is using PHP on z/OS ? Would like to know if you just playing, testing or actual production, no need for names. Thanks for any info. Arye. -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access

Re: Necessity of UID zero.

Ken provided just about all the information that one could need. I just wanted to add that many applications which run as STCs and claim to require UID0 (e.g. because they do not issue "su") will run perfectly well if you indicate "trusted" in the STDATA segment associated with the STC's "starte

HMC network connexions security

Hello - I'm in the process of reviewing the security of System z HMC network communications, in the context of putting together a mainframe security cookbook for our installation's technical staff. After reading the HMC books (Operations Guide, Installation Manual), relevant Redbooks and white p

Re: Necessity of UID zero.

Are you talking about the install jobs themselves or the various tasks that are part of a running system. The user submitting the install jobs (actually the USER= associated with the job) does not need UID(0) but they must have BPX.SUPERUSER. The jobs themselves will issue an SU as needed. Quite

Necessity of UID zero.

Cross posed to MVS. Sorry, I don't have an account in the UNIX list. I am in the crossfire between auditors insisting that nothing needs UID 0 and sysprogs insiting that everything in their serverpac jobs must have UID zero as coded. Any suggestions? Thanks. NOTICE: This electronic mai

Re: EntireX and LOCALHOST

Dave You are quite right that either GLOBALIPNODES or DEFAULTIPNODES would get the job done. It's entirely up to you which you think is best. I just "tossed a coin" when I suggested DEFAULTIPNODES. Chris Mason On Tue, 26 Oct 2010 09:58:49 -0700, Gibney, Dave wrote: >Hi Chris, > > One fina

Re: IBM Announcements URL

Hi John, >I'll try it with Firefox on Linux when I get home tonight. IBM has been >pretty good about coding their web pages to be browser-agnostic. > Did you ever try this URL with Firefox on Linux? Thanks -- Craig Dudley Systems & Communications Sciences, Inc. 244 Poor Farm Rd. New Ipswich, NH

Re: EntireX and LOCALHOST

Hi Chris, One final question. It seems to me, that for my purposes, GLOBALIPNODES is a better choice than DEFAULTIPNODES. The only purpose I know I have for the file at all is to resolve LOCALHOST. Everyone else should be using DNS. Dave Gibney Information Technology Services Washington State

Re: IEC145I 413-18 error

Norbert, thanks. that is the reason.. -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/i

Re: PDSE versus PDS

On 26 Oct 2010 04:34:49 -0700, in bit.listserv.ibm-main you wrote: >>I will forgive him his SYS1.NUCLEUS jibe, since the rest of his post >>makes it clear that he knows very well where the real problem lies. > >Maybe I don't know. The only problem that I know of, and the reason that I >created d

Re: PDSEs versus PDSs

On 26 Oct 2010 07:30:50 -0700, in bit.listserv.ibm-main you wrote: >On Tue, 26 Oct 2010 13:14:19 + john gilmore >wrote: > >:>In his most recent post in this thread Peter Relson speaks of > >:>> . . . massive restructure to allow multiple address spaces before LPA is >built . . . > >:>and

Re: IEC145I 413-18 error

On Tue, 26 Oct 2010 09:32:49 -0500, Wang Xiaobing wrote: >Thanks for reply.. >That's what I can not understand with.. > >>If you're just creating the dataset, why does Image Copy think it's for input? > It's not a "normal" copy-job, it's a restart of a copy-job that abended (see msg "DSNU021I -D

Re: IEC145I 413-18 error

Thanks for reply.. That's what I can not understand with.. >If you're just creating the dataset, why does Image Copy think it's for input? Wang Xiaobing. -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send e

Re: PDSEs versus PDSs

On Tue, 26 Oct 2010 13:14:19 + john gilmore wrote: :>In his most recent post in this thread Peter Relson speaks of :>> . . . massive restructure to allow multiple address spaces before LPA is built . . . :>and I am not dubious. :>His argument is, I am sure, a sincere and not a disi

Re: PDSEs versus PDSs

No, it is only certain parts of the world where people can't start the day without scrambled eggs. I can well live without them, and also without my personal NIP modules in PDSE LPA. Kees. "Rob Scott" wrote in message news:<295ed806ab479944b1217cc84a173de007c24...@nwt-s-mbx2.rocketsoftware .com>

New DFSORT/ICETOOL Features (Oct, 2010)

(Darren pre-approved this post.) PTF UK90025 for z/OS DFSORT V1R10 and PTF UK90026 for z/OS DFSORT V1R12 (Oct, 2010) provide important enhancements to DFSORT and DFSORT's ICETOOL for resizing records (RESIZE operator); updating the trailer record (IFTRAIL); processing subsets (ACCEPT); translation

Re: PDSEs versus PDSs

Will not having scrambled eggs at breakfast stop people staying in the hotel? Rob Scott Lead Developer Rocket Software 275 Grove Street * Newton, MA 02466-2272 * USA Tel: +1.617.614.2305 Email: rsc...@rs.com Web: www.rocketsoftware.com -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion

Re: PDSEs versus PDSs

In his most recent post in this thread Peter Relson speaks of > . . . massive restructure to allow multiple address spaces before LPA is > built . . . and I am not dubious. His argument is, I am sure, a sincere and not a disingenuousd one. It is nevertheless an argument of the form, '

Re: IEC145I 413-18 error

"Ted MacNEIL" wrote in message news:<1888448853-1288095264-cardhu_decombobulator_blackberry.rim.net-933 5095...@bda506.bisx.prod.on.blackberry>... > >IEC145I 413- > 18,IFG0194A,IMGCOP3,IMGCOPY,SYSCOPY1,07CA,,BACKUPP1.SIT2CBS.IMG.TS > XREF.MON2314.M0930 > > >Would you pls advise..thanks a lot. >

Re: IEC145I 413-18 error

Hi, Xiaobing, http://www-01.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=swg1PQ99304 User ran DB2 COPY or COPYTOCOPY utility on a list of objects and defined their output datasets with a template specifying UNIT TAPE, STACK YES, and with a disposit

Re: IEC145I 413-18 error

Thanks, mace. I think the IDI0078E means the IEC145I 413-18 error occured, Fault Analyzer detected the error, and then try to record it in fault history file, but no Write access allowed. -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff /

Re: IEC145I 413-18 error

Hi, Xiaobing, http://www-01.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=swg1PQ99304 User ran DB2 COPY or COPYTOCOPY utility on a list of objects and defined their output datasets with a template specifying UNIT TAPE, STACK YES, and with a disposit

Re: IEC145I 413-18 error

Why are you specifying space for a tape dataset? -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of Wang Xiaobing Sent: Tuesday, October 26, 2010 8:37 AM To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu Subject: Re: IEC145I 413-18 error Thanks Ted for you reply..

Re: IEC145I 413-18 error

>The specified data set was opened for input, but no volume serial number was specified on the DD statement. >A recovery attempt request may be specified. in the DCB ABEND exit routine. >But the dataset is new create, the DD statement code as following: Then you've got a conflict. If you're j

Re: IEC145I 413-18 error

Thanks Ted for you reply.. IEC145I 413-18 form IBM manual means: The specified data set was opened for input, but no volume serial number was specified on the DD statement. A recovery attempt request may be specified in the DCB ABEND exit routine. But the dataset is new create, the DD stateme

Re: IEC145I 413-18 error

> Luo, > > No any mount message... > > Attached pls find the job log...thanks.. > > 23.16.26 JOB98181 MONDAY,25 OCT 2010 > 23.16.26 JOB98181 IRR010I USERID BAAP033 IS ASSIGNED TO THIS JOB. > 23.18.10 JOB98181 ICH70001I BAAP033 LAST ACCESS AT 23:18:04 ON > MONDAY, OCTOBER 25

Re: IEC145I 413-18 error

Looks like a racf (or what ever security you are using) error: IDI0078E Open of fault history file ADIBM.FA710.HIST failed because: MVS SAF check shows no Write access allowed mace -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive a

Re: IEC145I 413-18 error

Luo, No any mount message... Attached pls find the job log...thanks.. 23.16.26 JOB98181 MONDAY,25 OCT 2010 23.16.26 JOB98181 IRR010I USERID BAAP033 IS ASSIGNED TO THIS JOB. 23.18.10 JOB98181 ICH70001I BAAP033 LAST ACCESS AT 23:18:04 ON MONDAY, OCTOBER 25, 2010 23.18.10 JO

Re: Design question for a UNIX facility similar to TSO SEND command

Thanks for the feedback. Once again, I am solving a "problem" that doesn't really exist other than in my own mind. -- John McKown Systems Engineer IV IT Administrative Services Group HealthMarkets(r) 9151 Boulevard 26 * N. Richland Hills * TX 76010 (817) 255-3225 phone * (817)-691-6183 cell

Re: IEC145I 413-18 error

>IEC145I 413- 18,IFG0194A,IMGCOP3,IMGCOPY,SYSCOPY1,07CA,,BACKUPP1.SIT2CBS.IMG.TS XREF.MON2314.M0930 >Would you pls advise..thanks a lot. My first piece of advice is look up what the message means. You make no implication as to whether you did or not. - I'm a SuperHero with neither powers, nor mo

Re: gzip123

dag Luc. http://ibmmainframes.com/about44137.html jan I'm looking for a tool with the program name GZIP123. > -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message

Re: gzip123

http://www.gzip.org/ From: "Luc Martens (KBC)"

Re: PDSE versus PDS

>I will forgive him his SYS1.NUCLEUS jibe, since the rest of his post >makes it clear that he knows very well where the real problem lies. Maybe I don't know. The only problem that I know of, and the reason that I created deferred LPA wait,was the question of how an application, starting after

gzip123

Hi, I'm looking for a tool with the program name GZIP123. It's used for zipping mainframe file. Does someone has an idea if it is still available somewhere? regards, Luc. -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instru

Re: IEC145I 413-18 error

Hi, Xiaobing, Can you give the mount message in job log and the full jcl dd statement? Thanks. Best Regards, Johnny Luo On Tue, Oct 26, 2010 at 5:41 PM, Wang Xiaobing wrote: > Hello list, > > We use DFRMM and STK VSM,when we run DB2 IMGCOPY job to backup data > to tapelib, sometime there ar

Re: z/OS V1R11.0 RMF Performance Management Guide

Hi Jim, Thank you, I believe that I have just woken up -Mensaje original- De: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] En nombre de Horne, Jim - James S Enviado el: martes, 26 de octubre de 2010 12:41 Para: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu Asunto: FW: z/OS V1R11.0 RMF Perfor

FW: z/OS V1R11.0 RMF Performance Management Guide

Alvaro, I don’t check your math. 4:27.519 is 268 seconds. 4*60 = 240. 240 + 27 =267. 267 +0.519 rounded up is 268. Jim Horne Alvaro Guirao wrote: I'm trying to understand the postprocessor report option REPORTS(CPU) with RMF, but this book it's driving me nuts! I explain it: A.1 Understa

z/OS V1R11.0 RMF Performance Management Guide

Hi all, I'm trying to understand the postprocessor report option REPORTS(CPU) with RMF, but this book it's driving me nuts! I explain it: A.1 Understanding the Partition Data report Figure 104. Partition Data Report ___ Report Analysis

z/OS V1R11.0 RMF Performance Management Guide

Hi all, I'm trying to understand the postprocessor report option REPORTS(CPU) with RMF, but this book it's driving me nuts! I explain it: A.1 Understanding the Partition Data report Figure 104. Partition Data Report ___ Report Analysis

AUTO: Steven M Payne is out of the office attending IOD (returning 11/01/2010)

I am out of the office until 11/01/2010. I will be checking and responding to email. For emergenices please call my IBM follow-me number 404-487-1405. Thanks. Note: This is an automated response to your message "IBM-MAIN Digest - 24 Oct 2010 to 25 Oct 2010 (#2010-298)" sent on 10/25/10 22:00:

IEC145I 413-18 error

Hello list, We use DFRMM and STK VSM,when we run DB2 IMGCOPY job to backup data to tapelib, sometime there are IEC145I errors occured as following: IEC145I 413- 18,IFG0194A,IMGCOP3,IMGCOPY,SYSCOPY1,07CA,,BACKUPP1.SIT2CBS.IMG.TS XREF.MON2314.M0930 Would you pls advise..thanks a lot. ---

Re: CA-OPS/MVS to IBM's System Automation?

On Tue, 26 Oct 2010 13:18:03 +0800 Timothy Sipples wrote: :>Glenn Miller asks: :>>Why send out 'alerts' to the 'world' when :>>we are shutting down a Started Task, say for maintenance. :>I can definitely see both sides to the argument. My view is that alerts :>should reflect reality, and that no