Thanks to all of you who have answered - It turns out that the problem is not
related to VTAM, but to a TP monitor that I am working with called Com-plete.
It has a feature that if a print requests arrives to a printer that is not
active,
it queues it, and when the printer becomes active, prints
Slow compared to other I/O methods (UNIX utilities, Fileaid, etc), but usually
I am running under TSO and may be hitting 2nd or 3rd period which might be the
issue.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of
Cris Hernandez #9
Sent:
Good Morning Gentle Readers,
I am trying to find a certain dsn which was backed up by DFDSS. In the job we
create a GDG (6 generations) list of the VTOC on DASD. I go into ISPF 3.4,
type in the HLQ dsns of the VTOC backup lists (3,435 dsns are selected) My
problem is when I issue the
I use SRCHFOR in 3.4 on z/OS 1.11 frequently with no problem like you describe.
If your GDG has only 6 generations, why are you searching 3435 datasets?
Can you provide a more specific pattern to 3.4 so that only a few datasets,
including the one you know contains the desired text, are in the
Why not just use the F(ind) command ?
From: esmie moo [esmie_...@yahoo.ca]
Sent: Wednesday, February 16, 2011 7:16 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: SEARCH FOR QUESTION - ISPF 3.4
Good Morning Gentle Readers,
I am trying to find a certain dsn which was
I am trying to find a certain dsn which was backed up by DFDSS. In the
job we create
a GDG (6 generations) list of the VTOC on DASD. I go into ISPF 3.4, type
in the HLQ
dsns of the VTOC backup lists (3,435 dsns are selected) My problem is when
I issue
the command SRCHFOR SYS2.CDB2.SDTWHFX
On 2/16/2011 5:16 AM, esmie moo wrote:
Good Morning Gentle Readers,
I am trying to find a certain dsn which was backed up by DFDSS.
In the job we create a GDG (6 generations) list of the VTOC on DASD.
I go into ISPF 3.4, type in the HLQ dsns of the VTOC backup lists
(3,435 dsns are selected) My
Ed,
The die hard DOS and VSE following was never about functionality or
consistency. It was always about cost. I have no idea what the economics are
today, but when I was sysprog for a VM/VSE shop in the late 80's and early 90's
the cost of the software for VM/VSE was literally 25% or less
SRCHFOR does indeed work from ISPF 3.4 .
Using 3.4 to list all our PROCLIBs, I just used it to look for a DSN qualifier
in any proc in any lib, and it works just fine. It worked when I typed SRCHFOR
VMA on the command line, but found no results when I typed SRCHFOR VMA.
Stan
On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 12:50 AM, Ed Gould ps2...@yahoo.com wrote:
I cannot remember where my first run in with VSE was. It was a LONG time ago.
Probably im the mid 70's (???). I think it was in St Louis at an IBM school
there.We were trying to set up a 4331 for our New York Office. It was
On 2/16/2011 6:52 AM, Haynes, Stan wrote:
SRCHFOR does indeed work from ISPF 3.4 .
Using 3.4 to list all our PROCLIBs, I just used it to look for
a DSN qualifier in any proc in any lib, and it works just fine.
It worked when I typed SRCHFOR VMA on the command line, but
found no results when I
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Frank Swarbrick
The following detail in the z/OS 1.13 announcement made me curious:
Language Environment is planned to support recovery from additional
abends . . . for C/C++ programs, . . ..
[ snip ]
I am
On Tue, 15 Feb 2011 17:53:30 -0700, Frank Swarbrick wrote:
In my 15 years of application programming I've always hated the need
to check 'status result' fields for conditions that, well, should not occur.
The point of those return codes is that those conditions *do* occur.
Checking them is
On Wed, 16 Feb 2011 08:55:49 -0600, Chase, John wrote:
If the offending field in the above
example would cause both a Protection Exception interrupt and a Data
Exception interrupt, which interrupt is presented first?
It can't cause both. If a protection exception occurs, you can't access
the
Our company recently acquired one that is IBM i Series based. So we (z/OS
guys) are going to become primary support for several IBM i Systems. Just
curious if others wear these multiple hats, and I'm curious of good sources of
info for i that are comparable to IBM-MAIN that we all enjoy.
Yup. Many hats.
MIDRANGE-L is a pretty good mailing list.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu] On
Behalf Of Dana Mitchell
Sent: Wednesday, February 16, 2011 9:30 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Anyone here also do IBM I Series work
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
[mailto:IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of Dana Mitchell
Sent: Wednesday, February 16, 2011 9:30 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Anyone here also do IBM I Series work too?
Our company recently acquired one that is IBM i
Thanks to all who have responded. The SRCHFOR SYS2.CDB2.SDTWHFX (without the
quotes) worked.
Thanks again.
--- On Thu, 2/17/11, Steve Comstock st...@trainersfriend.com wrote:
From: Steve Comstock st...@trainersfriend.com
Subject: Re: SEARCH FOR QUESTION - ISPF 3.4
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Has anyone been able to go directly back to an IBM SR search results list once
you have selected an entry to view? I am finding that I have to go back to the
main Service Link panel and start my search all over again once I select one
entry to view.
Any help would be greatly appreciated.
On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 8:25 AM, zMan zedgarhoo...@gmail.com wrote:
Desert west of LA? As Marisa Tomei said in My Cousin Vinny, Are you
shooo-ah?? Maybe they shot you full of happy-juice and took you to
Area 51, then made you forget most of it...
--
zMan -- I've got a mainframe and I'm not
Did some baby sitting of it, but not alot.
There was a site,but when I was relieved of the iSeries I removed it from my
favs.
I'll see if I can't refind it.
Mace
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
Sure, I know about the alternatives to using a CEEUOPT CSECT, but does
anyone have such a sample?
Now, for extra credit :-)
Are there tricks for doing this when the program object that you are rebind
is part of a vendor supplied FMID, but it is a zFS/HFS binary?
Thanks for any tips, my SMP
If I click the back button I get page expired.
If I click cancel within the viewed SR, it took me back to the results
list.
When I clicked cancel after having encountered the expired page, then
clicking forward, I got an error.
I have nothing to update at this time so I can't step through that,
In a6b9336cdb62bb46b9f8708e686a7ea005d9901...@nrhmms8p02.uicnrh.dom,
on 02/14/2011
at 11:51 AM, McKown, John john.mck...@healthmarkets.com said:
Or that AIX port that ran on the S/390 whose name I can't recall
off-hand.
My recollection is that there was an AIX/370 and an AIX/ESA, neither
of
Kirk, there is a sample CEEPRM00 and CEEWUOPT in CEE.SCEESAMP...
MA
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at
Thanks, CANCEL seems to be working to get me back to the search list, but it
seems unintuitive to me.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of
Stone, Sandy
Sent: Wednesday, February 16, 2011 1:05 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
On Wed, 16 Feb 2011 13:59:04 -0500, Veilleux, Jon L
veilleu...@aetna.com wrote:
Thanks, CANCEL seems to be working to get me back to the search list, but
it seems unintuitive to me.
Has anyone been able to go directly back to an IBM SR search results list
once you have selected an entry to
Mary,
Thanks. I know how to do the assembly and relink of CEEUOPT, for either a
PDS LMOD or zFS binary.
I'm more interested in the SMP/E USERMOD control statements for a relink
usermod against a zFS binary.
Kirk Wolf
Dovetailed Technologies
http://dovetail.com
On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 12:54
The retirement for ETR isn't till March 26, 2011 so for now you can use either.
O None of our users have been able to complete the registration process for SR
without assistance from IBM support despite being credentialed and working in
IBMLink
O Output functions to email copy of PMR's, APARs,
incomplete extracts from exec I use to process PDS' but just to supply some
actual rexx code to go with the psycho code:
pds = 'fully.qualified.dsn'
x = OUTTRAP(amems.,,'NOCONCAT')
cmd = LISTD pds MEMBERS
cmd
x = OUTTRAP('OFF')
sellist = ' '
DO i = 7 to amems.0
member =
There are likely to be many different approaches depending on the objective
being speed or ease of use. I believe in the ease of use, and have attached
two Rexx programs to assist:
$1EMAC is an edit macro that can add the two lines to the bottom of every
member
$2ALLMEM is the driver program that
On 2/16/2011 8:54 AM, Veilleux, Jon L wrote:
Has anyone been able to go directly back to an IBM SR search results list once
you have selected an entry to view? I am finding that I have to go back to the
main Service Link panel and start my search all over again once I select one
entry to
Simply clicking IBM Service Request takes us back to the search
window, not the results list window.
But we're using IE here, not Firefox.
s
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu] On
Behalf Of Edward Jaffe
Sent: Wednesday, February 16,
There are additional Problems with E C Handle Condition
1) Every Handle Condition has a Storage Control Getmain inside it
2) This command introduces a GOTO Depending on structure which throws the
Structure Programming of PERFORMs out the window
3) Maintaining a Program with Handle
On 2/16/2011 at 8:00 AM, in message
listserv%201102160900125806.0...@bama.ua.edu, Tom Marchant
m42tom-ibmm...@yahoo.com wrote:
On Tue, 15 Feb 2011 17:53:30 -0700, Frank Swarbrick wrote:
In my 15 years of application programming I've always hated the need
to check 'status result' fields for
snip
I'm not suggesting (god forbid!) that status codes not be checked. I am
suggesting that status codes not be used at all; rather exceptions should be
generated that cause everything to come to a halt, with some useful messages
and a useful dump. That way the users of routines need not
Rob
Yes, I know I'm not dealing with topics you have raised sequentially.
I could be accused of being facetious if I were to reply that, from my home
PCs, I use a name server implementing BIND for the purposes of resolving the
names in the URLs I and my wife select throughout the day. But,
Dave
Went to RESOLVER with 1.9. Actually, I seem to remember first starting
RESOLVER at 1.7 but it has become blurred in my mind.
You went to RESOLVER in z/OS V1R2[1] which was when the RESOLVER
address space appeared whether you liked it or not!
I guess the significance of what you say here
Hi Sandy,
I had the same experience that you did on IE7, IE8, and Firefox 3.6. Home or
office made no difference. After try this, try that clicking, I got an
entitlements page that said I wasn't entitled, but it showed the correct
customer number for my shop. Down at the bottom of the
39 matches
Mail list logo
