In , on 07/23/2011
at 04:59 PM, "Robert A. Rosenberg" said:
>The description above was part of a hoax
Wiki refers to it as a hoax, but I don't see it as any more of a hoax
than the famous sign offering access to the egress. In fact, the DHMO
site does not match wiki's own definition[1] of hoa
In <20110723171032.521978da@xpfs>, on 07/23/2011
at 05:10 PM, Shane said:
>We've probably all thought that looking (in ignorance perhaps) at
>perl initially.
Not I. Admittedly I thought[1] that Perl was ugly, but I also thought
that it was useful.
[1] In fact, I still think that it's ugly. B
In <4e29ebb7.3000...@ync.net>, on 07/22/2011
at 04:29 PM, Rick Fochtman said:
>But you must admit that sometimes they're mildly amusing. In rare
>instances, they're downright hilarious. :-)
Only if I don't have to clean up after people who listened to them :-(
But, yes, when it's not my dog
In <0316544986728571.wa.elardus.engelbrechtsita.co...@bama.ua.edu>, on
07/23/2011
at 05:12 AM, Elardus Engelbrecht
said:
>Just curious if you don't mind, please - How long and difficult was
>recovery for that [setting] SUN machine?
I don't know, but a fast IPL is still an IPL; it should have
>>> Sent from my iPad
http://mashable.com/2009/07/11/iphone-save-lives/
#3 displays emergency treatment / contact info on top of the screen lock..
--
Mike A Schwab, Springfield IL USA
Where do Forest Rangers go to get away from it all?
On Sat, 23 Jul 2011 22:03:48 -0500 John McKown wrote:
> I have a Xoom tablet and it also sucks. Which is why I bought a
> wireless keyboard for it. And also why I normally use my PC and not
> the tablet. It is fun, but not as useful as I had hoped.
I refused to even look at tablets until the Tran
>> Sent from my iPad
>Sent from my personal mainframe . >WHO CARES? Do you swank?
That message footer is the default/uncustomised one on all iPads.
>(Dicere est argentum, tacere aurum; peech is silver, silence is golden)
ITYM 'speech'
-
Ted MacNEIL
eamacn...@yahoo.ca
Twitter: @TedMacNEIL
-
I have a Xoom tablet and it also sucks. Which is why I bought a wireless
keyboard for it. And also why I normally use my PC and not the tablet.
It is fun, but not as useful as I had hoped.
On Sat, 2011-07-23 at 19:40 -0500, Ed Gould wrote:
> I plead guilty as the damn IPAD sucks for typing.
>
> E
I plead guilty as the damn IPAD sucks for typing.
Ed
Sent from my iPad
On Jul 23, 2011, at 5:30 PM, "R.S." wrote:
> W dniu 2011-07-23 21:24, Ed Gould pisze:
>> Radislow,
>> I didn't say it was just that it was available. If you want to read
>> something and come up with you own idea that is s
At 11:06 -0700 on 07/22/2011, Skip Robinson wrote about Re: JES2 Commands:
OP's motivation is to "find the remaining individual items on the volume
so that they can be purged". In my experience, it's nigh impossible to
completely drain a spool volume without an IPL. There are fragments of
foreve
At 16:37 -0400 on 07/22/2011, Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.) wrote about
Re: running Assembler I/O macro code as AMODE 31, RMODE ANY:
>http://www.dhmo.org/facts.html
But DHMO is a real compound, and the dangers cited are real.
Just (as I posted in a message that crossed with this one) described
W dniu 2011-07-23 21:24, Ed Gould pisze:
Radislow,
I didn't say it was just that it was available. If you want to read something
and come up with you own idea that is something else.
As to reading I do but the fine email system does not necessarily get all the
emails, if you don't like it comp
Where's the Like button in this newsgroup? :-)
Thanks Steve.
Clem
Steve Comstock wrote:
A few people have pointed out to me that the papers on
our website that I said were 'not printable' are, in fact,
printable under certain pdf reader programs: they don't
honor the print security.
Sigh.
So
On Fri, 22 Jul 2011 15:45:13 -0400 "Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.)"
wrote:
:>In <6165059911694373.wa.markmzelden@bama.ua.edu>, on 07/22/2011
:> at 11:12 AM, Mark Zelden said:
:>>Yes, LIBDEF doesn't work for LINK, XCTL, LOAD, & ATTACH.
:>What's left?
SELECT PGM, for one.
--
Binyamin Dissen
Radislow,
I didn't say it was just that it was available. If you want to read something
and come up with you own idea that is something else.
As to reading I do but the fine email system does not necessarily get all the
emails, if you don't like it complain to the Internet.
Ed
Sent from my iPa
A few people have pointed out to me that the papers on
our website that I said were 'not printable' are, in fact,
printable under certain pdf reader programs: they don't
honor the print security.
Sigh.
So, what I have done is gone and made all the papers on
our main technical papers page officia
>But since GDG-ALL processing effectively creates a concatenated set of DDs,
>what about the limit of 255 DDs per jobstep? How to do GDG-ALL of a DSN with
>1000 entries?
Unless things have changed the maximum number of (catalogued) GDG entries is
(also) 255.
-
Ted MacNEIL
eamacn...@yahoo.ca
Twi
XTIOT is not required, TIOT is enough to have 3000+ DDs.
It was already answered and explained. (Read The Fine Answers?)
BTW: TIOT-XTIOT is not a choice for people who run programs. I did not
write IEBEGER, IDCAMS and thousands COBOL programs present in my shop.
As far as I know, COBOL develope
John,
I believe that you can have more than 255 dd statement by using XTIOT, the
reverse order was IMO because of CVOL design issues. The order is reasonably
important ( to me anyway) is that I have. Had to do a sort the file,
programmers were not happy ( but understood) about the additional ste
I shouldn't reply to messages while playing "Angry Birds". You're right.
I was thinking of steps per job. Or something like that. And even "steps
per job" is not exactly 255 any more, thanks to UNIX fork()ing and
"substeps". Although the fork()ed process does run in a separate address
space, usuall
John,
There is no such limit!
Limit of DDs per jobstep is much higher, it's over 3200 datasets (single
volume ones).
So, you can concatenate much more datasets (single volume) than 255.
Many moons ago, in the dark ages of OS/390 (or MVS?) there was a limit
for concatenation, it was 123 for PS d
W dniu 2011-07-22 20:21, David Andrews pisze:
So I'm riffling the SHARE Orlando agenda and I find *this* guy:
"Dave Andrews is the IBM Development Director
of the CICS product family based in Hursley, UK."
My reputation can only improve.
(keeping Friday mode on)
Once upon a t
You can expand the headers in the listing by adding the SHOW compiler
option.
In article <3910630036250514.wa.henrique.seganfredobcb.gov...@bama.ua.edu> you
wrote:
> Hello,
> I?ve been trying to compile a C CICS program that uses sockets.
> After the translation with DFHEDP1$ (ends with RC=00)
>But does the IBM documentation explicitly say that the parent
>TCB cannot do this? "That which is not specifically forbidden,
>is allowed."
Wrong. 100%. That which is not specifically allowed is not supported and
you do at your own (system's) risk..
>DCB parameter
Mention is made of the ATT
Heretic!
I love Perl. But REXX is very good too. But I would like ooREXX on z/OS.
And I want Perl regular expressions put into legacy z/OS facilities,
including REXX. I'd love the PDF editor to be able to do Perl, or even
POSIX, regular expression finds and changes! It already has the p'...'
for
I agree entirely. I understand the 255 limit in the past when all we had
were CVOL catalogs and a 1 byte field. ICF catalogs don't work that way.
And, again, the reverse order made sense in the days of CVOL due to the
way that GDGs were actually implemented in CVOLs. Again, ICF catalogs
don't work
> I´ve been trying to compile a C CICS program that uses sockets.
>
> After the translation with DFHEDP1$ (ends with RC=00) the program is
compiled with
> CCNDRVR.
>
> For my surprise, the compiler starts complaining the folllowing:
>
> ..(CICS definitions put by the translator)...
>56
John McKown wrote:
>The open people are amazed (and some refuse to believe) that I can literally
>lose a CPU on the z with ZERO impact on operations.
Tell them about (via parmlib or command) this: CONFIG CPU(x), (and CHP, etc)
:-D
And pleaze report back with their reactions for grins... :
On Sat, 23 Jul 2011 00:27:13 -0500 "Justin R. Bendich"wrote:
> No matter what the version, perl is an abomination
We've probably all thought that looking (in ignorance perhaps) at perl
initially.
Once having learnt it to some extent, it is astoundingly efficient and
flexible. When was the last ti
29 matches
Mail list logo
