In eca05fed-2f46-42eb-be35-50536de31...@yahoo.com, on 04/12/2012
at 12:34 PM, Scott Ford scott_j_f...@yahoo.com said:
What about folks not running Z9 for z/os 2.1 ?
Preumably like any levelset; stay backlevel or upgrade.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT
ISO
Hi,
I am getting S0C4 04 within a wait which leads me to believe that the
storage key of the ECB storage key is not the same as the PSW STORAGE KEY
8- 11
Does the following code make sense to resolve this address
TESTAUTH FCTN=1 TEST APF AUTORIZATION
No, because if you arbitrarily use the key as determined by IVSK, why not
simply do it in Key 0?
On Sun, 15 Apr 2012 13:29:55 -0400 Micheal Butz michealb...@optonline.net
wrote:
:Hi,
:
:
:
:
:
: I am getting S0C4 04 within a wait which leads me to believe that the
:storage key of the ECB
Being in PSW Key 0 is good for any storage 0 - 16
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf
Of Binyamin Dissen
Sent: Sunday, April 15, 2012 1:42 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: 0C4 pic 4
No, because if you arbitrarily use
Exactly. Why overcomplicate?
On Sun, 15 Apr 2012 14:48:20 -0400 Micheal Butz michealb...@optonline.net
wrote:
:Being in PSW Key 0 is good for any storage 0 - 16
:
:
:
:-Original Message-
:From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf
:Of Binyamin Dissen
Hi All,
Apology for asking a basic question and Being Ignorant. We know that GO TO
statments are a big NO in many production sites and one of the reason
being it monopolizes the entire CPU. Are there any documentation explaining
about the GO TO statements which clearly describes how it effects
On Sun, Apr 15, 2012 at 8:49 PM, Jake anderson justmainfra...@gmail.comwrote:
Hi All,
Apology for asking a basic question and Being Ignorant. We know that GO TO
statments are a big NO in many production sites and one of the reason
being it monopolizes the entire CPU. Are there any
On 4/15/2012 9:49 PM, Jake anderson wrote:
Hi All,
Apology for asking a basic question and Being Ignorant. We know that GO TO
statments are a big NO in many production sites and one of the reason
being it monopolizes the entire CPU.
Really? Well, as they say, It ain't what you know, it's what
Even a structured IF THEN ELSE END-IF or SELECT WHEN WHEN OTHERWISE
END-SELECT does gotos at the object code levels. This is why
hyperthreading is so helpful. One thread starts processing the GOTO
instructions and the other thread starts processing the fall through
instructions. Once the branch
Dear Lister
We are replacing our mainframe i.e. Power off old mainframe, rip it apart,
move power supply, I/O cages, OSA cards on to the new box and IML/IPL new CF
and other LPARs.
I have defined brand new Coupling datasets , ARM, BMPXMCDS, CFRM, SFM, LOGR,
WLM dataset and have updated
For devotees of Jackson Structured programming, the GOTO is a must for
POSIT and ADMIT processing. Otherwise it can be messy avoiding a GOTO.
I'm a devotee FWIW
On Mon, Apr 16, 2012 at 2:43 PM, Mike Schwab mike.a.sch...@gmail.com wrote:
Even a structured IF THEN ELSE END-IF or SELECT WHEN
11 matches
Mail list logo