of the
way that should not bite me in the near future. :-)
Bob
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of
Knutson, Sam
Sent: Friday, June 17, 2011 8:07 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: 1.12 upgrade, required PTFs I missed.
We did
, 2011 11:16 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: 1.12 upgrade, required PTFs I missed.
We switched the testplex about a week ago, and did a few 'back and forths'
just to verify we could. We'll put it in prod in a couple weeks. No problems
so far
,MODE
Bob
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of
Ken Klein
Sent: Thursday, June 16, 2011 3:42 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: 1.12 upgrade, required PTFs I missed.
z/OS V1R10.0 MVS Planning Operations
SA22-7601-09
z/OS
-MAIN@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of
Richards, Robert B.
Sent: Friday, June 17, 2011 7:44 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: 1.12 upgrade, required PTFs I missed.
I am curious. Has anyone performed the dynamic on the fly switchover of
*SETCON MODE=DISTRIBUTED* and had any problems
Thanks for the info, Sam.
Bob
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of
Knutson, Sam
Sent: Friday, June 17, 2011 8:07 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: 1.12 upgrade, required PTFs I missed.
We did this in 4Q2009
We switched the testplex about a week ago, and did a few 'back and forths'
just to verify we could. We'll put it in prod in a couple weeks. No problems
so far.
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
06/14/2011 11:57 AM
Please respond to
IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
To
IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
cc
Subject
Re: 1.12 upgrade, required PTFs I missed.
never heard of either. where is that specified?
On Tue
(Email)
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of
John McKown
Sent: Friday, June 17, 2011 1:24 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: 1.12 upgrade, required PTFs I missed.
Thank you very much. I'm now on partial work from status
Hi John,
Very cool - but don't do too much too soon ;-)
Linda
- Original Message -
From: John McKown joa...@swbell.net
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Sent: Friday, June 17, 2011 11:23:48 AM
Subject: Re: 1.12 upgrade, required PTFs I missed.
Thank you very much. I'm now
To
IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
cc
Subject
Re: 1.12 upgrade, required PTFs I missed.
never heard of either. where is that specified?
On Tue, 2011-06-14 at 11:18 -0400, Ken Klein wrote:
Interesting John, as we are migrating v.10 to v.12 as well. But we are
still running con=shared and not con
-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
06/13/2011 04:35 PM
Please respond to
IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
To
IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
cc
Subject
1.12 upgrade, required PTFs I missed.
Someone asked what PTFs I missed that stopped our 1.10 to 1.12 upgrade.
APAR OA32522. PTF ua54267 for 1.12
kenneth klein tema toyota com
John McKown joa...@swbell.net
Sent by: IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
06/13/2011 04:35 PM
Please respond to
IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
To
IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
cc
Subject
1.12 upgrade, required PTFs I
Someone asked what PTFs I missed that stopped our 1.10 to 1.12 upgrade.
APAR OA32522. PTF ua54267 for 1.12 and ua54265 on 1.10 . I had neither
one applied.
This is my first sysplex upgrade and I am ignorant. Our test sysplex is
a singe image sysplex and my usual tests showed no problems. I
Turns out 1.12 was ACCEPTED. 1.10 was RECEIVED. I have applied the PTF on
1.10 test system with GROUPEXTEND. It's been SUPD. Test 1.10 IPL'ed OK.
Needs testing.
--
John McKown
Maranatha!
Sent from my Vibrant Android phone.
On Jun 13, 2011 3:34 PM, John McKown joa...@swbell.net wrote:
Someone
14 matches
Mail list logo
