Re: Current production abend of SMTP

2010-08-23 Thread Ed Finnell
In a message dated 8/23/2010 4:12:58 P.M. Central Daylight Time, ggard...@gmail.com writes: Not sure, but I think Windows based mailers can be front-ended with a gateway that can pace the email volume. >> Lionel gives instructions on how to set up UDP with XMITIP. We block incoming and ma

Re: Current production abend of SMTP

2010-08-23 Thread Guy Gardoit
If on z/OS 1.11, replace SMTP with CSSMTP and let your email folks worry about it. SMTP on the mainframe isn't designed to handle that kind of volume. Not sure, but I think Windows based mailers can be front-ended with a gateway that can pace the email volume. On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 3:28 PM, L

Re: Current production abend of SMTP

2010-08-17 Thread Anthony Thompson
ooney Sent: Wednesday, 18 August 2010 9:47 AM To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu Subject: Re: Current production abend of SMTP Thanks Anthony and Dale, We will review the parameters you mentioned.  Thank you both very much.  I'm curios though, does the recipient get any sort of message to tell the

Re: Current production abend of SMTP

2010-08-17 Thread Gibney, Dave
On > Behalf Of Linda Mooney > Sent: Tuesday, August 17, 2010 5:17 PM > To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu > Subject: Re: Current production abend of SMTP > > Thanks Anthony and Dale, > > > > We will review the parameters you mentioned.  Thank you both very > much.  I'm

Re: Current production abend of SMTP

2010-08-17 Thread Linda Mooney
ut if they didn't. Thanks, Linda Mooney - Original Message - From: "Anthony Thompson" To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu Sent: Tuesday, August 17, 2010 4:04:19 PM Subject: Re: Current production abend of SMTP Review the MAXMAILBYTES and CHECKSPOOLSIZE parameters

Re: Current production abend of SMTP

2010-08-17 Thread Ulrich Krueger
bject: Re: Current production abend of SMTP Hi Ulrich, We used to have PKZIP, but lost it to the budget woes. I also found out that the LRECL on the file was 2300 bytes - clearly not something that should/could be emailed. Our network sysprog also found some info on IBMLINK about SMT

Re: Current production abend of SMTP

2010-08-17 Thread Linda Mooney
4:21:16 PM Subject: Re: Current production abend of SMTP In addition to everything that has been said by the other posters already ... Even if you change SMTP to be able to handle this large email size, other mail servers down the line may choke on it and refuse to handle this monster mail.

Re: Current production abend of SMTP

2010-08-17 Thread Linda Mooney
August 17, 2010 4:07:46 PM Subject: Re: Current production abend of SMTP Linda Mooney wrote: > Greetings All, > > > > Just had a production abend of SMTP.  One of our application  programmers > ran a job to email a few (1.2 million) records to a customer.  SMPT crashed,

Re: Current production abend of SMTP

2010-08-17 Thread Ulrich Krueger
, 2010 15:29 To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu Subject: Current production abend of SMTP Greetings All, Just had a production abend of SMTP. One of our application programmers ran a job to email a few (1.2 million) records to a customer. SMPT crashed, SB37 on SMTP.TEMP.NOTE. I renamed that file to

Re: Current production abend of SMTP

2010-08-17 Thread Gibney, Dave
> -Original Message- > From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On > Behalf Of Steve Comstock > Sent: Tuesday, August 17, 2010 4:08 PM > To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu > Subject: Re: Current production abend of SMTP > > Linda Mooney

Re: Current production abend of SMTP

2010-08-17 Thread Steve Comstock
usa.com Linda Mooney Sent by: IBM Mainframe Discussion List 08/17/2010 03:30 PM Please respond to IBM Mainframe Discussion List To IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu cc Subject Current production abend of SMTP Greetings All, Just had a production abend of SMTP. One of our application pr

Re: Current production abend of SMTP

2010-08-17 Thread Steve Comstock
Linda Mooney wrote: Greetings All, Just had a production abend of SMTP. One of our application programmers ran a job to email a few (1.2 million) records to a customer. SMPT crashed, SB37 on SMTP.TEMP.NOTE. I renamed that file to SMTP.TEMP.NOTE .OLD after the offending job was deleted

Re: Current production abend of SMTP

2010-08-17 Thread Dale McCart
PM Please respond to IBM Mainframe Discussion List To IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu cc Subject Current production abend of SMTP Greetings All, Just had a production abend of SMTP. One of our application programmers ran a job to email a few (1.2 million) records to a customer. SMPT crashe

Re: Current production abend of SMTP

2010-08-17 Thread Anthony Thompson
ent production abend of SMTP Greetings All, Just had a production abend of SMTP.  One of our application  programmers ran a job to email a few (1.2 million) records to a customer.  SMPT crashed, SB37 on SMTP.TEMP.NOTE.  I renamed that file to SMTP.TEMP.NOTE .OLD after the offending job was dele

Re: Current production abend of SMTP

2010-08-17 Thread Linda Mooney
Whew!  Thanks anyway.  We got it started again. - Original Message - From: "Linda Mooney" To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu Sent: Tuesday, August 17, 2010 3:28:40 PM Subject: Current production abend of SMTP Greetings All, Just had a production abend of SMTP.  One of our a

Current production abend of SMTP

2010-08-17 Thread Linda Mooney
Greetings All, Just had a production abend of SMTP.  One of our application  programmers ran a job to email a few (1.2 million) records to a customer.  SMPT crashed, SB37 on SMTP.TEMP.NOTE.  I renamed that file to SMTP.TEMP.NOTE .OLD after the offending job was deleted from JES2 and we start