@BAMA.UA.EDU
04/24/2006 05:41 AM
Please respond to
IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
To
IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
cc
Subject
Re: FTP PUT of a temporary dataset
On 4/24/2006 7:28 AM, Steve Flynn wrote:
Can I PUT a temporary dataset using FTP... For example, I have a job
where
, 2006 11:22 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: FTP PUT of a temporary dataset
The DD: option can be useful for solving other problems as well. We had
case recently where an application occasionally failed in FTPing a
'normally named' data set. The message would be something like 'file
In a recent note, Charles Mills said:
Date: Thu, 27 Apr 2006 11:40:24 -0700
The //DD: option also supports DD * and SYSOUT, and all of those other
wonderful little features of JCL like DEFER and RLSE and so forth.
I know I had a lot of trouble when //DD: referred to an allocation
with no harm done?
Charles
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Paul Gilmartin
Sent: Thursday, April 27, 2006 12:27 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: FTP PUT of a temporary dataset
In a recent note, Charles Mills said:
Date
Can I PUT a temporary dataset using FTP... For example, I have a job
where the last thing it should do is slap some results over to a GDG
on another machine. I'd really like to be able to:
PUT TEMPDSN 'SOME.REMOTE.GDG.BASE(+1)'
However, TEMPDSN doesn't appear to get resolved to it's real
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: FTP PUT of a temporary dataset
On 4/24/2006 7:28 AM, Steve Flynn wrote:
Can I PUT a temporary dataset using FTP... For example, I have a job
where the last thing it should do is slap some results over to a GDG
on another machine. I'd really like to be able
In a recent note, Walt Farrell said:
Date: Mon, 24 Apr 2006 08:41:59 -0400
On 4/24/2006 7:28 AM, Steve Flynn wrote:
...snipped...
PUT DD:REPFILE 'SOME.REMOTE.GDG.BASE(+1)'
Is FTP GDG-savvy? There's a long litany of problems accessing
GDG generations by any method other than
In a recent note, Steve Flynn said:
Date: Mon, 24 Apr 2006 12:27:51 +0100
PUT TEMPDSN 'SOME.REMOTE.GDG.BASE(+1)'
However, TEMPDSN doesn't appear to get resolved to it's real
temporary name.
I had believed the name construct is a JCL interpreter facility,
available in no other
10:08 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: FTP PUT of a temporary dataset
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives
On Monday 24 April 2006 08:58, Charles Mills wrote:
... the short version is //DD:REPFILE
The earlier (current?) versions of the FTP manual manage to hide this
feature like they were ashamed of it or something, .
My understanding (I may be wrong) is that support for //DD:ddname was a
In a recent note, Gilbert Saint-Flour said:
Date: Mon, 24 Apr 2006 12:03:42 -0400
My understanding (I may be wrong) is that support for //DD:ddname was a
by-product of a change in one of the C routines used by the FTP client,
i.e. it's not something that resulted from a change in
11 matches
Mail list logo
