Re: JES SPOOL "quota" by user?

In , on 12/23/2009 at 10:06 AM, "McKown, John" said: >So, what would people think about being able to put a quota on JES2 SPOOL >space by userid? Do you have management buy-in? -- Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT ISO position; see

Re: JES SPOOL "quota" by user?

Hey John, How do you feel about converting to JES3? ;) They've had spool partitions, which provide just what you want, for many many years... On Wed, Dec 23, 2009 at 6:06 PM, McKown, John wrote: > OK, I'm being Scrooge. But we have a person here who loves to use the JES2 > SPOOL as a report rep

Re: JES SPOOL "quota" by user?

ect: Re: [IBM-MAIN] JES SPOOL "quota" by user? > > One of the things that SyzSpool was written to handle is situation like > this. SyzSpool allows you to manage the spool and it's very inexpensive. > You can set up the rules to handle "individuals" like this and

Re: JES SPOOL "quota" by user?

One of the things that SyzSpool was written to handle is situation like this. SyzSpool allows you to manage the spool and it's very inexpensive. You can set up the rules to handle "individuals" like this and have their data be maintained (off the spool) to any age that you want it to be kept, sin

Re: JES SPOOL "quota" by user?

OK, I'm being Scrooge. But we have a person here who loves to use the JES2 SPOOL as a report repository. Most likely due to it being "easy" and not needing to bother with estimating his dataset size requirements. So, what woul

Re: JES SPOOL "quota" by user?

I like that idea. Since this seems to be a problem with one particular user (according to Scrooge), this will free up the spool without being as nasty as purging the output (which would be a waste of resources considering the user would probably run the jobs again to recreate the output). And CR

Re: JES SPOOL "quota" by user?

I do not think that is needed. Instead setup a JES2 Spool Offloader just for that userid. Send it off to tape. If they want it back - make them grovel. In fact, there is a lot of flexibility in the offloader you could use. Lizette > >OK, I'm being Scrooge. But we have a person here who lo

Re: JES SPOOL "quota" by user?

@bama.ua.edu Subject: JES SPOOL "quota" by user? OK, I'm being Scrooge. But we have a person here who loves to use the JES2 SPOOL as a report repository. Most likely due to it being "easy" and not needing to bother with estimating his dataset size requirements. So, what would

Re: JES SPOOL "quota" by user?

Subject Re: JES SPOOL "quota" by user? On Wed, 23 Dec 2009 10:06:49 -0600, McKown, John wrote: >OK, I'm being Scrooge. But we have a person here who loves to use the JES2 SPOOL as a report repository. Most likely due to it being "easy" and not needing t

Re: JES SPOOL "quota" by user?

On Wed, 23 Dec 2009 10:06:49 -0600, McKown, John wrote: >OK, I'm being Scrooge. But we have a person here who loves to use the JES2 SPOOL as a report repository. Most likely due to it being "easy" and not needing to bother with estimating his dataset size requirements. So, what would people t

Re: JES SPOOL "quota" by user?

On Wed, 23 Dec 2009 10:06:49 -0600, McKown, John wrote: >OK, I'm being Scrooge. But we have a person here who loves to use the JES2 SPOOL as a report repository. Most likely due to it being "easy" and not needing to bother with estimating his dataset size requirements. So, what would people think

JES SPOOL "quota" by user?

OK, I'm being Scrooge. But we have a person here who loves to use the JES2 SPOOL as a report repository. Most likely due to it being "easy" and not needing to bother with estimating his dataset size requirements. So, what would people think about being able to put a quota on JES2 SPOOL space by