3467
Cell: # 412-519-2592
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of
Ed Gould
Sent: Saturday, April 30, 2011 4:06 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: SMPPTS run out of Space (another approach)
Paul:
AT one place where I worked
In <4dc13f61.4090...@bremultibank.com.pl>, on 05/04/2011
at 01:58 PM, "R.S." said:
>3. Last, but not least: sometimes ACCEPT is simply required.
>Sometimes a product reads from DLIB libraries.
Normally that's from a macro library and including MTS in SYSLIB takes
care of it.
--
Shmuel
W dniu 2011-04-30 06:47, Linda Mooney pisze:
As can be seen from the replies, there are different approaches for handling
the PTS. In my shop, when a z/OS release is installed, the PTS is placed on a
volume where it will have plenty of room. For the life of the install, PTFs
are not purged f
W dniu 2011-04-29 16:45, Mark Zelden pisze:
[...]
I should tell you to RTFM, but I like you. :-)
It means to "consider all the specified zones when doing the REJECT" - so it
is an "AND" condition. If only one zone was specified, it would only look
at that one zone and could delete a PTF from
From: Steve Horein
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Sent: Sat, April 30, 2011 4:19:19 PM
Subject: Re: SMPPTS run out of Space (another approach)
I had thought the same about the IMS guy who had left years ago. Needing to
put in a PTF on IMS for an upcoming OS upgrade, I
At 23:53 -0500 on 04/29/2011, Paul Gilmartin wrote about Re: SMPPTS
run out of Space (another approach):
On Sat, 30 Apr 2011 00:31:12 -0400, Robert A. Rosenberg wrote:
>My favorite broken/bad design is the way RESTORE works. If you
need/want to RESTORE a SYSMOD, SMPE restores that SYS
I had thought the same about the IMS guy who had left years ago. Needing to
put in a PTF on IMS for an upcoming OS upgrade, I was mildly surprised to
find this:
"Use SMP/E to apply and accept IMS™ maintenance before an IMS system
definition.
All IMS system definitions use the IMS SMP/E *distribut
different backout than what
we
had put on. I gave up trying to understand it.
From: Paul Gilmartin
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Sent: Sat, April 30, 2011 2:47:24 PM
Subject: Re: SMPPTS run out of Space (another approach)
On Sat, 30 Apr 2011 10:41:10 -0700, Di
On Sat, 30 Apr 2011 10:41:10 -0700, Dick Bond wrote:
>*Exactly! *This is the correct way of doing RSU maintenance upgrades.
>It also solves some of the objections to the way RESTORE works as well.
>There are those who say they never ACCEPT maintenance which will cause a lot
>of problems which
is works for us.
>
>
>
> *For ACCEPT, we generally run the ACCEPT of previous service just before
> beginning the next maintenance cycle.
> *
>
>
> Regards,
>
> Linda
>
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Mark Zelden"
> To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
&
On Sat, 30 Apr 2011 00:31:12 -0400, Robert A. Rosenberg wrote:
>At 18:08 -0500 on 04/29/2011, Rick Fochtman wrote about Re: SMPPTS
>run out of Space (another approach):
>
>>I'm sure the SMP/E Team would appreciate ny suggestions you might have.
>
>They have proven to
.edu
Sent: Friday, April 29, 2011 7:45:39 AM
Subject: Re: SMPPTS run out of Space (another approach)
On Fri, 29 Apr 2011 15:25:36 +0200, R.S.
wrote:
>W dniu 2011-04-29 15:18, Mark Zelden pisze:
>> On Fri, 29 Apr 2011 12:30:59 +0530, saurabh khandelwal
>> wrote:
>>
>>
At 18:08 -0500 on 04/29/2011, Rick Fochtman wrote about Re: SMPPTS
run out of Space (another approach):
I'm sure the SMP/E Team would appreciate ny suggestions you might have.
They have proven to be unwilling to fix a poor/broken design in the
past so I doubt they would be willing t
--
Saurabh,
One more thing: we haven't discussed yet why your PTS is so big.
PTS is container for PTFs.
It contains all the PTF your RECEIVED and APPLIED. A PTF can be also
ACCEPTed. There are different schools when to ac
On Fri, 29 Apr 2011 15:25:36 +0200, R.S. wrote:
>W dniu 2011-04-29 15:18, Mark Zelden pisze:
>> On Fri, 29 Apr 2011 12:30:59 +0530, saurabh khandelwal
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Hello,
>>> Thanks for reply. I will check in my site about old PTF,
>>> which can be removed from PTS library and d
W dniu 2011-04-29 15:18, Mark Zelden pisze:
On Fri, 29 Apr 2011 12:30:59 +0530, saurabh khandelwal
wrote:
Hello,
Thanks for reply. I will check in my site about old PTF,
which can be removed from PTS library and detail about accepted PTFs.
Regards
Saurabh
Caution: SMP/E opti
On Fri, 29 Apr 2011 12:30:59 +0530, saurabh khandelwal
wrote:
>Hello,
>Thanks for reply. I will check in my site about old PTF,
>which can be removed from PTS library and detail about accepted PTFs.
>
>
>Regards
>Saurabh
>
>> Caution: SMP/E option PURGE(YES) is needed for the above.
Hello,
Thanks for reply. I will check in my site about old PTF,
which can be removed from PTS library and detail about accepted PTFs.
Regards
Saurabh
On 4/29/2011 12:00 PM, R.S. wrote:
Saurabh,
One more thing: we haven't discussed yet why your PTS is so big.
PTS is container for P
Saurabh,
One more thing: we haven't discussed yet why your PTS is so big.
PTS is container for PTFs.
It contains all the PTF your RECEIVED and APPLIED. A PTF can be also
ACCEPTed. There are different schools when to accept and whether to
accept. IMHO you should choose any strategy you want and a
19 matches
Mail list logo
