Really? I did not hear this.
If the reason for the 25/30% rule has gone, what is the new
recommendation from ASM's point of view? Can we now size on 50%
utilization without performance penalties?
This is indeed crucial information we need. However, the paging
configuration only consumes a small
Ron Hawkins wrote:
snip
I may have misunderstood what you wanted, as you did not mention the RLSE
requirement.
If that is the case, then use UNIT COUNT in the DATACLAS, do not specify
secondary extents, and do not use a guaranteed space storage class. As you
write to the file sequentially a
We have them set in PROGA0
?? Perhaps you meant SCHEDxx??
IEAVTDSV's PPT entry is not supposed to be in SCHEDxx; it is within the
IEFSDPPT module shipped as part of z/OS.
There are other entries within IEFSDPPT that also have the NOPASS
attribute.
You should not be changing these entries.
I
greatjust greatpolitics and $$$(as they see it) as well as no
sense wins again ..
From: ibmmain nitz-...@gmx.net
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Date: 11/12/2012 12:08 AM
Subject:Re: z10BC Memory Upgrade All-But Impossible
Sent by:IBM Mainframe Discussion List
On Sun, 11 Nov 2012 20:15:21 -0600, Anthony Fletcher wrote:
Does anyone remember whether there was once a reason to set NOPASS against
programs GIMSMP (or HMASMP before that) or the dump services module IEAVTDSV?
Might this have anything to do with the ever-so-mysterious IO11698?
-- gil
*FYI*
https://www.ibm.com/developerworks/mydeveloperworks/blogs/IBMElectronicSupport/entry/sr25e?lang=en
Updates to the IBM Service Request application coming Nov 14, 2012
Key new functions for IBM Service Request (SR) release 2.5
The IBM Service Request (SR) application has adopted the look
Be Afraid! Be Very Afraid!
snip
https://www.ibm.com/developerworks/mydeveloperworks/blogs/IBMElectronicSupport/entry/sr25e?lang=en
Updates to the IBM Service Request application coming Nov 14, 2012 Key new
functions for IBM Service Request (SR) release 2.5
/snip
Hello there,
I took GTF ENQ/DEQ SVC Trace, but there was no SYSZVOLS/SYSDSN trace
entry in IPCS print output even though D GRS,C indicated there were
resource contentions for SYSZVOLS and SYSDSN. (Other ENQ/DEQ entries
were printed)
GTF Trace parameters are following. (SVC48: DEQ, SVC56:ENQ)
It's actually VOLUME COUNT in the DATACLAS definition. From the (1.12) HELP
panel:
Use the VOLUME COUNT field to specify the maximum number of volumes you
expect to use to store a data set in this Data Class.
Possible values:
We have a script in TMON for DB2 that automatically cancels selected DB2
threads if they exceed certain thresholds. When comparing cancelled thread
messages with SMF 101 accounting records, it does not appear that the
cancelled threads are being logged. Any ideas what might be causing the
I had a problem including html code in the SR text since it interfered with
the html used to process the SR itself.
The gist was that everything after the inserted html data was not visible.
They said that this will be fixed in a future release of SR.
That sounded kind of ridiculous - there
Sounds like something got missed during the SR unit testing
Scott ford
www.identityforge.com
Tell me and I'll forget; show me and I may remember; involve me and I'll
understand. - Chinese Proverb
On Nov 12, 2012, at 11:36 AM, Barkow, Eileen ebar...@doitt.nyc.gov wrote:
I had a problem
1. A given PassTicket may only be used once (source
http://publib.boulder.ibm.com/infocenter/cicsts/v3r1/index.jsp?topic=%2Fcom.
ibm.cics.ts31.doc%2Fdfht5%2Ftopics%2Fdfht516.htm)
2. The PassTicket algorithm is deterministic: given the same time of day
(resolution one second), the same userid, the
I suspect that a front end that makes r---r parametric, but a small
integer--retries will , as a practical matter, solve your problem.
What you of course need are data, an EFD of the differences between
successive sign-on times T(i) and T(i+1). This distribution may
differ greatly from one
Would anyone dare try to run z/OS 1.4 on a Z196 machine? We are also in the
10th year of a 2 year plan to get off of the mainframe. The machine available
for us at DR site is a Z196. I am running 1.4 w/ compatability mantenance. I
REALLY DO NOT dare apply maintenance on the current OS.
It will either work, or fail completely.
Not supported, but I can't see why it would fail.
Good luck!
snip
Would anyone dare try to run z/OS 1.4 on a Z196 machine? We are also in the
10th year of a 2 year plan to get off of the mainframe. The machine available
for us at DR site is a Z196.
On 11/12/12 15:17, Melissa Perry wrote:
Would anyone dare try to run z/OS 1.4 on a Z196 machine? We are also in the
10th year of a 2 year plan to get off of the mainframe. The machine available
for us at DR site is a Z196. I am running 1.4 w/ compatability mantenance. I
REALLY DO NOT dare
Does the DR site have VM available?
Regards,
John K
Allen Staller of the IBM Mainframe Discussion List
IBM-MAIN@listserv.ua.edu wrote on 11/12/2012 02:20:40 PM:
It will either work, or fail completely.
Not supported, but I can't see why it would fail.
Good luck!
snip
Would anyone dare
AFAIK the oldest OS that will IPL on a z196 is 1.10. On our z196 the oldest
IPLable OS is 1.8 (this under VM). (And on a z10 it was 1.6). On older
operating systems WLM causes a WAIT. If you are on one of the extended support
programs this may vary slightly, but 1.4 isn't going to work.
Bob
On Mon, 12 Nov 2012 13:49:50 -0600, Mike Schwab wrote:
Wait 0.5 seconds and retry, 2 times, wait 0.4 seconds and retry, 3
times, wait 0.3 seconds and retry, 4 times, wait 0.2 seconds and
retry, 6 times, wait 0.1 seconds and retry, ? times.
I suppose if you're doing this to avoid secondary
Or if you have CEX cards ... RNG is available.
On Nov 12, 2012 6:46 PM, Paul Gilmartin paulgboul...@aim.com wrote:
On Mon, 12 Nov 2012 13:49:50 -0600, Mike Schwab wrote:
Wait 0.5 seconds and retry, 2 times, wait 0.4 seconds and retry, 3
times, wait 0.3 seconds and retry, 4 times, wait 0.2
On Mon, 12 Nov 2012 20:00:21 -0500, Rob Schramm wrote:
Or if you have CEX cards ... RNG is available.
Isn't that still a PRNG, seeded at IPL (IML?) (by STCK?) But I believe all
processes sample from the same stream, so there will be no duplicates.
But a quick search finds physical RNGs, USB
Hi Melissa,
I am curious, why would you not want to at least maintenance your 1.4 system?
Linda
Sent from my iPhone
On Nov 12, 2012, at 12:17 PM, Melissa Perry mpe...@cumberlandfarms.com wrote:
Would anyone dare try to run z/OS 1.4 on a Z196 machine? We are also in the
10th year of a 2
http://www.zdnet.com/beyond-raid-ibm-adds-big-data-friendly-
affordable-servers-to-line-up-707218/
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message:
I took GTF ENQ/DEQ SVC Trace, but there was no SYSZVOLS/SYSDSN trace
entry in IPCS print output even though D GRS,C indicated there were
resource contentions for SYSZVOLS and SYSDSN. (Other ENQ/DEQ entries
were printed)
GTF Trace parameters are following. (SVC48: DEQ, SVC56:ENQ)
On Mon, 12 Nov 2012 22:56:32 -0600, Ed Gould wrote:
http://www.zdnet.com/beyond-raid-ibm-adds-big-data-friendly-affordable-servers-to-line-up-707218/
[ URL wrap repaired -- gil ]
So, of course, the topical question: Does z/OS support it? Is its
interface CKD? FBA? Other (specify)?
Thanks Jim, this is what I assumed now ASM does.
My question is: how many concurrent I/Os will/can ASM do if it does a
heavy dump? I have determined the needed slots and therefor the size of
the 10 paging volumes.
If I put 1 page dataset on each volume, ASM can do 20 concurrent I/Os.
If I
Gil,
The picture *LOOKED* like it was a MF type box Large and black).
I suspect that new channels will be needed to support it (but it is
only a guess).
Ed
On Nov 12, 2012, at 11:26 PM, Paul Gilmartin wrote:
On Mon, 12 Nov 2012 22:56:32 -0600, Ed Gould wrote:
Some bits need to be massaged (STCP) but all old releases of z/OS and
OS/390 for that matter will run under z/VM.
Regards,
Andre
En réponse à Bob Shannon bshan...@rocketsoftware.com :
-- Début du message d'origine
AFAIK the oldest OS that will
If the DR site is running you under VM (as most do because it allows you to
keep your CPUID the same as your production system), then things will work
perfectly and you can not worry about anything. If on the other hand you are
going to run on some z/196 LPAR directly, then the success will
I don't get Repro working, although my settings say it is ON.
I started to see the same behavior some time ago. Couldn't find a
solution nor a definite reason for this behavior. I am still believing
that some mechanism has been activated on our inbound mail gateway that
drops those mails as the
31 matches
Mail list logo
