Just curious if you find the problem ?
On 18.03.2013 09:38, jan de decker wrote:
Hi,
In the copy/paste from my preious mail, I skipped the line:
LR RB,RF so that RB points to the top of my CSECT
Sorry about that.
Best regards,
j@n
Not really rings the bell, but we have here some UDP applications, and
the TCP/IP UDP settings maybe different,
We had to change some maxudp... values in the TCP/IP or OMVS definition .
On 19.03.2013 20:16, Charles Mills wrote:
I've got a problem that is defying my ability to find it. I have a
Miklos Szigetvari wrote:
Not really rings the bell, but we have here some UDP applications, and the
TCP/IP UDP settings maybe different,
We had to change some maxudp... values in the TCP/IP or OMVS definition .
Hmmm, which leads me to some things:
Charles:
In TCP/IP, do you collect SMF
Has anyone come up with a better way to convert a 64 bit binary number to
decimal then the way I did it?
Here is what I did:
LGR1,WKCELLD
CVDG R1,LONG
* UNPK 0(11,R7),LONG(6) FIRST
Why not use ED with a 24-byte mask : (example with lengths on field names to
make things clear)
LG GR1,WA_BINARY_8
CVDGGR1,WA_PACKED_16
MVC WA_ANSWER_24,LC_MASK_24
ED WA_ANSWER_24,WA_PACKED_12
LC_MASK_24 DC X'40',22X'20',X'21'
It was the UDPQUEUELIMIT we have set.
On 20.03.2013 09:33, Elardus Engelbrecht wrote:
Miklos Szigetvari wrote:
Not really rings the bell, but we have here some UDP applications, and the
TCP/IP UDP settings maybe different,
We had to change some maxudp... values in the TCP/IP or OMVS
I heard that IBM is going to announce a new box soon. Do you think it's going
to be the BC12 or something else. Anyone heard of anything down the line?
==
This email, and any files transmitted with it, is confidential and intended
solely for the use of the individual or
On 3/20/2013 3:03 AM, Donald Likens wrote:
Has anyone come up with a better way to convert a 64 bit binary number to
decimal then the way I did it?
Here is what I did:
LGR1,WKCELLD
CVDG R1,LONG
* UNPK 0(11,R7),LONG(6) FIRST 6 BYTES ARE ALWAYS ZERO
Two points...
(1) Remember that when IBM invented CCA back in the late 1980s, there really
were no other HSMs - thus, there were no other crypto architectures in the
banking world to be compatible with. I suppose other vendors who came along
and developed HSMs could have adopted CCA, but
On 3/20/2013 6:22 AM, Steve Comstock wrote:
On 3/20/2013 3:03 AM, Donald Likens wrote:
Has anyone come up with a better way to convert a 64 bit binary number to
decimal then the way I did it?
Here is what I did:
LGR1,WKCELLD
CVDG R1,LONG
* UNPK 0(11,R7),LONG(6)
On Wed, 20 Mar 2013 06:22:29 -0600, Steve Comstock wrote:
CVDG R1,LONG
The field LONG must, of course, be 16 bytes
on a quadword boundary.
Certainly it must be 16 bytes, but the POO does not
specify a quadword boundary. It also does not say that
a specification exception can occur.
According to tradition, I would expect a zBC12 (baby zEC12) circa
August/September. Usually with delivery avail in December.
No idea on the specs
HTH,
snip
I heard that IBM is going to announce a new box soon. Do you think it's going
to be the BC12 or something else. Anyone heard of
On Wed, 20 Mar 2013 12:19:37 +, Ward, Mike S wrote:
Anyone heard of anything down the line?
Nothing has yet been announced, so if anyone has heard,
they are likely unable to say.
--
Tom Marchant
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe
Host Security Module.
Date: Wed, 20 Mar 2013 07:52:04 -0500
From: elardus.engelbre...@sita.co.za
Subject: Re: IBM Mainframe (1980's) on You tube
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Todd Arnold wrote:
no other HSMs -
vendor's HSM architecture,
What is HSM in this context?
Of
HARDWARE Security Module.
On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 9:09 AM, J R jayare...@hotmail.com wrote:
Host Security Module.
Date: Wed, 20 Mar 2013 07:52:04 -0500
From: elardus.engelbre...@sita.co.za
Subject: Re: IBM Mainframe (1980's) on You tube
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Todd Arnold
On 3/20/2013 6:52 AM, Tom Marchant wrote:
On Wed, 20 Mar 2013 06:22:29 -0600, Steve Comstock wrote:
CVDG R1,LONG
The field LONG must, of course, be 16 bytes
on a quadword boundary.
Certainly it must be 16 bytes, but the POO does not
specify a quadword boundary. It also does not
It would be more helpful if everyone would reply with what they know to be
a fact. It has been stated that every RACF ID must have a password. I added
a new user to my system and only created a password phrase.
I was able to logon to TSO using the password phrase. So, it does not seem
to be true
Correct. Hardware Security Module is the more generic term.
Host Security Module is the Racal/Thales offering. Many still use the term
generically.
=
=
Date: Wed, 20 Mar 2013 09:41:54 -0400
From: zedgarhoo...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: IBM Mainframe (1980's) on You tube
To:
On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 9:09 AM, Tom Marchant m42tom-ibmm...@yahoo.comwrote:
Nothing has yet been announced, so if anyone has heard,
they are likely unable to say.
My money's on zB1296CDEF, given the crack the System z marketroids seem to
be smoking lately...
--
zMan -- I've got a mainframe
On Wed, 20 Mar 2013 09:57:34 -0400, Keith Smith wrote:
I was able to logon to TSO using the password phrase. So, it does not seem
to be true that a password is required unless RACF created some random
password, but the bottom line is there is no password that I can use to
logon except the
Keith Smith wrote:
It has been stated that every RACF ID must have a password.
Statement is correct. From RACF Command Language Ref: AU command:
Every user that you assign a password phrase must have a password. When you
specify PHRASE for a user without specifying PASSWORD, the user is
I have been working with EMC on this issue for the last couple of weeks. We
just upgraded from 5875 to 5876. Prior to the upgrade I had on a daily
basis about 100 OBR Long records. After the upgrade I am now seeing 30,000+
records on a daily basis.
I am just curious if anyone else that either
The only case I remember having trouble with was moving a IEFJOBS data set to a
new volume.
Don
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU]
On Behalf Of Andrew Metcalfe
Sent: Thursday, March 14, 2013 9:00 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
What specific level of 5876 are you running?
I have been working with EMC on this issue for the last couple of weeks.
We
just upgraded from 5875 to 5876. Prior to the upgrade I had on a daily
basis about 100 OBR Long records. After the upgrade I am now seeing
30,000+
records on a daily
Paul Gilmartin wrote:
Is there any requirement that a password phrase be longer than 8 characters?
Yes. Syntax rules for password phrases:
* Maximum length: 100 characters
* Minimum length:
* 9 characters, when ICHPWX11 is present and allows the new value
* 14 characters, when
When I get in the office I will check. But I think it is 5876.269.??
We just did the upgrade in early March 2013, so I am fairly certain we had
what is current installed.
Lizette
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On
Behalf
Of
In my experience password phrase must be at least 14 characters.
On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 10:10 AM, Paul Gilmartin paulgboul...@aim.comwrote:
On Wed, 20 Mar 2013 09:57:34 -0400, Keith Smith wrote:
I was able to logon to TSO using the password phrase. So, it does not seem
to be true that a
jayare...@hotmail.com (J R) writes:
Correct. Hardware Security Module is the more generic term.
Host Security Module is the Racal/Thales offering. Many still use the term
generically.
re:
http://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2013d.html#1 IBM Mainframe (1980's) on You tube
Last decade, I had
On 3/20/2013 7:55 AM, Gerhard Postpischil wrote:
On 3/20/2013 8:48 AM, Steve Comstock wrote:
edpat dcx'4020202020202020202020202020202020'
All three tries at an edit mask so far have been flawed.
FSVO 'flawed'
If the OP really wants UNPK with leading zeroes,
Ah, there we are in
I stand corrected. The password is, in fact, the default group. There are
way too many gotchas popping up... What happens if the password is expired?
Will the password phrase still work? I guess I should test this too.
On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 10:18 AM, Elardus Engelbrecht
From the Thales manual titled 'SRM for IBM zOS' document 1270A516-006 page
11 1.1 introduction
Many applications, particularly in the banking area, require security to
be integrated into their design. Generally, this security is best provided
by adding hardware based Host Security Modules
Keith Smith wrote:
In my experience password phrase must be at least 14 characters.
By default, that's true. But you can allow it in an ICHPWX11 exit if
you choose to (and there is a sample exit and accompanying REXX exec
that runs under SYSREXX).
--
John Eells
z/OS Technical Marketing
On Wed, 20 Mar 2013 10:37:04 -0400, Keith Smith wrote:
In my experience password phrase must be at least 14 characters.
From the RACF System Programmer's Guide:
quote
8.6 New-password-phrase exit (ICHPWX11)
A password phrase is an alternative to a password that allows a longer length
and a
Anne Lynn Wheeler wrote:
(as an aside, after power-on/test sequence ... those circuits get destroyed).
Destroyed after such sequence? I'm having trouble swallowing your statement. ;-D
If you, for example, do that in the factory just to test it out before shipping
to the customer, it is
On Wed, 20 Mar 2013 10:50:25 -0400, John Eells wrote:
Keith Smith wrote:
In my experience password phrase must be at least 14 characters.
By default, that's true. But you can allow it in an ICHPWX11 exit if
you choose to (and there is a sample exit and accompanying REXX exec
that runs under
Thanks all.
Filling in some gaps and answering some questions.
I've added additional trace code within the product to make certain that the
socket, sockaddr, and record length are as expected. (I already know that
the sendto() is getting issued with the correct record.) I changed the error
check
I was so close. The level is 5876-159
That is what I get from doing it from memory.
Lizette
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO
Paul Gilmartin wrote:
On Wed, 20 Mar 2013 10:50:25 -0400, John Eells wrote:
Keith Smith wrote:
In my experience password phrase must be at least 14 characters.
By default, that's true. But you can allow it in an ICHPWX11 exit if
you choose to (and there is a sample exit and accompanying
http://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=936:_Password_Strength
--
Donald Grinsell
State of Montana
406-444-2983
dgrins...@mt.gov
The reward of a thing well done is to have done it.
~ Ralph Waldo Emerson
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
Charles,
Where was the routine compiled? Under which version of z/OS? If z/OS 1.12 or
newer, make sure that you check the updates to the compiler and the library.
They were significant.
Lloyd
- Original Message
From: Charles Mills charl...@mcn.org
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
On Wed, 20 Mar 2013 10:44:41 -0400, Keith Smith keith.sm...@shawinc.com wrote:
I stand corrected. The password is, in fact, the default group. There are
way too many gotchas popping up... What happens if the password is expired?
Will the password phrase still work? I guess I should test this too.
On 3/20/2013 10:43 AM, Steve Comstock wrote:
FSVO 'flawed'
Many decades ago I worked for a company that offered 1401 and 1410
program conversion to 360 assembler. I was given a three-box card deck,
JCL for their conversion program, and sample data. I had to call the
bank we were doing this
Manuals... we don't need no stinkin' manuals... :-)
On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 2:38 PM, Walt Farrell walt.farr...@gmail.comwrote:
On Wed, 20 Mar 2013 10:44:41 -0400, Keith Smith keith.sm...@shawinc.com
wrote:
I stand corrected. The password is, in fact, the default group. There are
way too
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU]
On Behalf Of Elardus Engelbrecht
Sent: Wednesday, March 20, 2013 7:19 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Long Passwords
Snip
True, you can use either password or password phrase to
Did you check APAR OA36338 ?
***
Dale McCart - Senior Systems Programmer / zSeries, z/OS, SAP
Kawasaki Motors Corp., U.S.A. 949-770-0400 ext 2316
--
For IBM-MAIN
Interesting. Thanks. I will look into that. I don't own that part of things.
Compiling and linking on 1.13.
Charles
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On
Behalf Of Lloyd Fuller
Sent: Wednesday, March 20, 2013 10:33 AM
To:
And the answer is ... that I am not a very happy camper here.
I sent version 1.3 off to the customer. The only changes are diagnostic,
not functional. And guess what -- the problem has gone away.
So either
- the customer is confused and/or was also making firewall or router changes
at the same
Someone privately suggests that the diagnostic code may have slowed things
down *just* enough to make it work.
Good thought, but when we turn the diagnostics off it still works.
My trace code is pretty good if I do say so myself. IIRC the path is only
about four machine instructions if the
Fred,
For Hitachi, if you select the PARTNERS tab at WWW.HDS.COM the first item on
the action bar is BUY THROUGH A PARTNER.
Selecting this launches a new window where you can search for a partner in your
country, state and city.
Or you can just click on this link after checking for text
Barry Schwarz wrote:
Elardus Engelbrecht wrote:
To avoid this exposure always enter a password value and never tell your
users what the password is.
Except the user can usually change his password after he has logged on with
the phrase.
Really? How would he do that, if he doesn't know
In
caklc0fjpqbovia+1jdfyr3ai9txwo1pamq6gre-27xfe_sn...@mail.gmail.com,
on 03/20/2013
at 09:57 AM, Keith Smith keith.sm...@shawinc.com said:
It would be more helpful if everyone would reply with what they
know to be a fact.
Indeed.
I added a new user to my system and only created a password
In 51473f0d.3080...@bremultibank.com.pl, on 03/18/2013
at 05:21 PM, R.S. r.skoru...@bremultibank.com.pl said:
I think, you don't need the list, otherwise you would be
interested in polish partners - are you? ;-)
Nonsense. The OP didn't indicate his geography, and the list isn't
limited to
In 8646586792164199.wa.victor.gilbroadridge@listserv.ua.edu, on
03/19/2013
at 10:48 AM, Victor Gil victor@broadridge.com said:
Answering my own question [for the archives] - LE expects a COBOL
MAIN entry [subtasked or not] to be invoked via the EXEC PARM=...
convention.
That
In 2d14e7856646224aacdda13ab1d3555734a3bbb...@wdcv7exvs2.opm.gov, on
03/18/2013
at 10:19 AM, Richards, Robert B. robert.richa...@opm.gov said:
If you have looked at a bug for 30 or more minutes, get that second
set of eyes to look at it pronto.
Sometimes I spot the error myself when I ask
In 5149bf1a.3080...@trainersfriend.com, on 03/20/2013
at 07:52 AM, Steve Comstock st...@trainersfriend.com said:
Well, you're right. I went and checked the -08 and -09
versions of the POO and no mention was made of alignment; wonder
where I got that idea.
S/360 PoOps, presumably. The
55 matches
Mail list logo
