Thanks Doug, that *is* nasty looking. Never did like an overlay. :)
See you in Pittsburgh?
MA
On Wed, 28 May 2014 15:06:27 -0500, Doug Henry doug_he...@usbank.com wrote:
On Wed, 28 May 2014 11:40:33 -0500, Mary Anne Matyaz maryanne4...@gmail.com
wrote:
Tim, it is hiper now.
Mary Anne
Belt and suspenders run the FIXCAT, pull the PSP Bucket and match them up --
just in case.
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
IBM's Marna Walle posted a SHARE blog entry yesterday that talks about a new
search capability in IBMLink*, granular APAR search:
http://www.share.org/p/bl/et/blogid=0blogaid=289source=6
Here's the link to the actual search page:
I like it!
I would also like to request an exclude capability.
e.g. Give me all S0C4 abends, exclude JES3,.
(perhaps by a mask of the fmid)
snip
IBM's Marna Walle posted a SHARE blog entry yesterday that talks about a new
search capability in IBMLink*, granular APAR search:
Exactly what I did. I found that in the PSP bucket any PFT for our FMID's were
already in the missing fixcat report. So the fixcat report was all that was
really needed to provide all required PTF's. Thanks to all.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
I hit the same problem a few months back and resolved by just using a
SAC+SYSSTATE to primary mode before the SETFRR and then back into AR mode after.
The SETFRR macro does indeed specifically test for not being in AR when in
64-bit - so I assume it is intentional and the documentation just
I am trying to allocate the first generation of a GDG using BPXWDYN
The command is:
ALLOC DD(NEWGDG) DSN(FULLY.QUAL.DATASET.NAME(+1)) NEW CATLG SPACE(1) TRACKS
UNIT(SYSDA) LRECL(80) BLKSIZE(80) DSORG(PS)
After CALL BPXWDYN USING COMMAND
DISPLAY RETURN-CODE yields 002M
Any help would be
When HOLDDATA are issued, such as:
++ HOLD( pepatch ) ERROR REASON( resolve ) ...
and the hold is first resolved by an APAR fix, does the
SYSMOD ID of the APAR match the REASON ID:
++ APAR( resolve ) ...
or SUPersede it:
++ APAR( interim) SUP( resolve ) ...
Either is syntactically
On Thu, 29 May 2014 06:22:53 -0700, Mike Kovach wrote:
I am trying to allocate the first generation of a GDG using BPXWDYN
The command is:
ALLOC DD(NEWGDG) DSN(FULLY.QUAL.DATASET.NAME(+1)) NEW CATLG SPACE(1) TRACKS
UNIT(SYSDA) LRECL(80) BLKSIZE(80) DSORG(PS)
After CALL BPXWDYN USING COMMAND
Hi,
The installation exit guide says that CSVLLIX1 get control under any task that
issues a link load attach or XCTL
Does that mean I can communicate with the exit via TCBUSER using PSATOLD as the
TCB
Thanks
Sent from my iPhone
Hi,
It seems anytime I use the load using the directory entry format I get the
CSV019I abend load ep= works fine
Sent from my iPhone
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to
Why do I get
+ 12,SETFRR A CANNOT BE ISSUED IN AMODE 64 PRIOR TO Z/OS 1.8
OR IN AR ASC MODE. PLEASE CHANGE TO BE IN AMODE 31 OR PRIMARY
ASC MODE FOR THE INVOCATION AND INDICATE YOUR RELEASE,
AMODE, AND ASC MODE VIA SYSSTATE
Because the messsage is correct. AMODE 64 in AR mode is not an
During my testing I have found that whether my load library is in a APF
authorized steplib or not e.g. TSOLIB having it LLA managed automatically
generates the CSV019I abend
Prove it. It is really wasteful of the time of the good people on this
forum to have continued assertions that do not
Prove it
In the old days we used to figure these things out ourselves. I guess I've
dated myself.
Bob Shannon
Rocket Software
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to
Maybe the question really is, what is the difference between fixcat
(IBM.DEVICE.TAPE.*) and UPGRADE3957DEVICE?
Generally speaking, there should be no difference. That is the intent
of FIXCAT HOLDs, so you don't have to manually review a PSP bucket.
Kurt Quackenbush -- IBM, SMP/E Development
When HOLDDATA are issued, such as:
++ HOLD( pepatch ) ERROR REASON( resolve ) ...
and the hold is first resolved by an APAR fix, does the
SYSMOD ID of the APAR match the REASON ID:
++ APAR( resolve ) ...
or SUPersede it:
++ APAR( interim) SUP( resolve ) ...
Either is
On 5/29/2014 7:12 AM, Micheal Butz wrote:
The installation exit guide says that CSVLLIX1 get control under any task that
issues a link load attach or XCTL
Does that mean I can communicate with the exit via TCBUSER using PSATOLD as the
TCB
If you're writing this for in-house use only, TCBUSER
For such, I would suggest looking at the name/token services. You can
assign a name/token either: (1) image-wide (APF auth needed); (2) per
address space (home or primary); or (3) per TCB. Of course, they you do
need to come up with a unique, 16 byte (better - octet), name. I no longer
see any
On Thu, 29 May 2014 11:21:06 -0400, Kurt Quackenbush wrote:
++ HOLD( pepatch ) ERROR REASON( resolve ) ...
...
++ APAR( resolve ) ...
...
The former; ++APAR name matches the reason-id on the ++HOLD.
And if a PE affects multiple releases of a product, will a single
REASON ID
On Thu, 29 May 2014 11:21:06 -0400, Kurt Quackenbush wrote:
When HOLDDATA are issued, such as:
++ HOLD( pepatch ) ERROR REASON( resolve ) ...
and the hold is first resolved by an APAR fix, does the
SYSMOD ID of the APAR match the REASON ID:
++ APAR( resolve ) ...
or SUPersede
On Sat, 3 May 2014 23:09:01 -0600, Paul Gilmartin paulgboul...@aim.com wrote:
On 2014-05-02, at 12:04, Jousma, David wrote:
As for your question, my suggestion is to instead of using IEBUPDTE
statements, is to copy the entire source program, and make a SMPE
Replacing an elegantly automated
I have observed that it's not the same TCB
Thanks for your help I think can communicate to CSVLLIX1 via the param field on
the CSVDYNEX macro
On the add option
Thanks again
Sent from my iPhone
On May 29, 2014, at 12:06 PM, John McKown john.archie.mck...@gmail.com
wrote:
For such, I would
Hello
We have a user who is running a batch job, using a new utility to copy tapes.
As per the following message log, they issue the LIBRARY command and it fails
with the following error.
IEE345I LIBRARY AUTHORITY INVALID, FAILED BY MVS
Message Log
$HASP373 OPDEXPI2 STARTED - INIT 1
Looking at the MSG IEE345I message:
The MVS command, LIBRARY, failed in authorization, the BY MVS tells us:
FAILED BY MVS
The MVS console command authority was insufficient for this command. Either:
- no security product was active for this function, or
- a security product
Have you contacted your security group?
Lizette
-Original Message-
From: Fred Kaptein fred.kapt...@hp.com
Sent: May 29, 2014 10:41 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: IEE345I AUTHORITY INVALID, FAILED BY MVS
Hello
We have a user who is running a batch job, using a new utility to
Currently we are converting our information to ACSII and sending it to a java
socket server on a windows platform using port 41000. The java socket server
does some processing and then sends information to a syslog daemon using UDP
port 514 and all works well. However when the java socket
using QW I find -24 is key error
Key errors
The low-order two digits are the number of the key that failed the parse,
offset by 20. The first key has the value 21, resulting in a return code
of -21.
The high-order two digits are an internal diagnostic code that indicates
where in the code
I would suggest changing the MNOTE as well.
I also examined the MACRO and saw it was deliberate.
In my case, I wanted the retry to go to the mainline after skipping a few
instructions, where the mainline is AMODE64/AR. So I had to have the retry to
go to an out of line label which reestablishes
I remember my father telling me that core -- REAL memory, a MAN'S memory
(yeah, yeah, sexist) -- was $1/byte. Obviously that would have changed by
the time it all went solid-state, but does anyone remember whether this was
correct or not?
--
zMan -- I've got a mainframe and I'm not afraid to use
http://www.jcmit.com/memoryprice.htm
1960 $5,242,880/M IBM 1401 core memory
1965 $2,642,412/M IBM 360/30 core memory
1970 $734,003/M IBM 370/135 core memory
CIT | Ken Porowski | VP Mainframe Engineering | Information Technology | +1 973
740 5459 (tel) |
Interesting numbers. Latest entry is $.007/MB for PC memory. I wonder what
the average price for z12 memory is today.
Rex
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Ken Porowski
Sent: Thursday, May 29, 2014 2:04 PM
To:
On Thu, 29 May 2014 14:55:47 -0400, zMan wrote:
I remember my father telling me that core -- REAL memory, a MAN'S memory
(yeah, yeah, sexist) -- was $1/byte. Obviously that would have changed by
the time it all went solid-state, but does anyone remember whether this was
correct or not?
I don't
W dniu 2014-05-29 21:21, Pommier, Rex pisze:
Interesting numbers. Latest entry is $.007/MB for PC memory. I wonder what
the average price for z12 memory is today.
Well, today price of zServer memory is approx. 900-1100 USD per GB.
For x series you can have 32GB for the same money.
For
zedgarhoo...@gmail.com (zMan) writes:
I remember my father telling me that core -- REAL memory, a MAN'S memory
(yeah, yeah, sexist) -- was $1/byte. Obviously that would have changed by
the time it all went solid-state, but does anyone remember whether this was
correct or not?
originally
I think I figured it out... I think we need to change the default codepage for
java. Java on USS has a default codepage of IBM-1407 (which is basically
EBCDIC).
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
In the general scheme of things defaults in IEASYSxx are LNKAUTH=LNKLST and
for CSVLLAxx -LNKLST-
And with no parms a FREEZE is done on all LNKLST. Guess I could see where
updates could get out of
SYNC.
From !.13 Init and Tuning ref.:
--- quote ---
-LNKLST- can be used to designate a list
Awesome page! Thank you.
On Thu, May 29, 2014 at 3:04 PM, Ken Porowski ken.porow...@cit.com wrote:
http://www.jcmit.com/memoryprice.htm
1960 $5,242,880/M IBM 1401 core memory
1965 $2,642,412/M IBM 360/30 core memory
1970 $734,003/M IBM 370/135 core memory
Sorry for an elementary question. I've got a customer asking me and I don't
pretend to be a RACF expert. Yes, I know there is a RACF list but this list
is more active.
I know it is possible to monitor access to a group of traditional MVS
datasets with ADDDSD FOO.BAR.** AUDIT(SUCCESS,...) ...
I
year(?) 1980's (early)
1 meg memory for 168 $10,000.00
Ed
On May 29, 2014, at 1:55 PM, zMan wrote:
I remember my father telling me that core -- REAL memory, a MAN'S
memory
(yeah, yeah, sexist) -- was $1/byte. Obviously that would have
changed by
the time it all went solid-state, but does
On 14May29:1904+, Ken Porowski wrote:
http://www.jcmit.com/memoryprice.htm
1960 $5,242,880/M IBM 1401 core memory
1965 $2,642,412/M IBM 360/30 core memory
1970 $734,003/M IBM 370/135 core memory
The handy inflation calculator at the Minneapolis Federal
On 14May29:2005-0400, David L. Craig wrote:
On 14May29:1904+, Ken Porowski wrote:
http://www.jcmit.com/memoryprice.htm
1960 $5,242,880/M IBM 1401 core memory
1965 $2,642,412/M IBM 360/30 core memory
1970 $734,003/M IBM 370/135 core memory
The
On 14May29:2104-0400, David L. Craig wrote:
On 14May29:2005-0400, David L. Craig wrote:
On 14May29:1904+, Ken Porowski wrote:
http://www.jcmit.com/memoryprice.htm
1960 $5,242,880/M IBM 1401 core memory
1965 $2,642,412/M IBM 360/30 core memory
1970
Bob Shannon wrote:
. I guess I've dated myself.
I hope you got a good-night kiss ...
Chris hoelscher
Technology Architect | Database Infrastructure Services
Technology Solution Services
123 East Main Street |Louisville, KY 40202
choelsc...@humana.com
Humana.com
(502) 476-2538 - office
(502)
On Thu, 29 May 2014 10:15:37 -0400, Micheal Butz michealb...@comcast.net
wrote:
It seems anytime I use the load using the directory entry format I get the
CSV019I abend load ep= works fine
Have you investigated the possibility that your DE information may be
incorrect? If so, what have you
On Thu, 29 May 2014 21:34:37 +0300, Binyamin Dissen
bdis...@dissensoftware.com wrote:
I would suggest changing the MNOTE as well.
Why? It seems correctly worded to me.
:+ 12,SETFRR A CANNOT BE ISSUED IN AMODE 64 PRIOR TO Z/OS 1.8
:OR IN AR ASC MODE. PLEASE CHANGE TO BE IN AMODE 31 OR
If I remember correctly, Failed by MVS should indicate that:
(a) you do not have the MVS.LIBRARY command protected by your security product,
because if it was protected and you had authority it would work, or if you did
not have authority it would say Failed by Security Product and there would
I point to the name field I am going to try eploc and see what happens
Thanks
Sent from my iPhone
On May 29, 2014, at 10:09 PM, Walt Farrell walt.farr...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, 29 May 2014 10:15:37 -0400, Micheal Butz michealb...@comcast.net
wrote:
It seems anytime I use the load
Why? It seems correctly worded to me.
:+ 12,SETFRR A CANNOT BE ISSUED IN AMODE 64 PRIOR TO Z/OS 1.8
:OR IN AR ASC MODE. PLEASE CHANGE TO BE IN AMODE 31 OR PRIMARY
:ASC MODE FOR THE INVOCATION AND INDICATE YOUR RELEASE,
:AMODE, AND ASC MODE VIA SYSSTATE
It says, as I read it, that SETFRR
48 matches
Mail list logo
