Re: Serverpac installs January 2022 and beyond - Requests

2021-07-24 Thread kekronbekron
I realized as much. However, that's one way for IBM to build a bridge. zSMB or something. Instead of leaving no option but to get out-of-support older machines (and h/w support from other companies), or getting more MSUs and such... IBM could instead sell software-only small machine. Comparing

Re: Excessive resource use was Re: Serverpac installs January 2022 and beyond - Requests

2021-07-24 Thread Brian Westerman
Not really, the smaller the shop, the less programmers they have performing compiles, even if it takes 4 to 5 times as long to compile LE COBOL compared to something like COBOL-II, there are not enough of them to really matter. A large shop wouldn't see that same problem, because while the

Re: Serverpac installs January 2022 and beyond - Requests

2021-07-24 Thread Brian Westerman
Unfortunately, you can't run a production system on a zPDT, it's not allowed under the agreement with IBM. On Sat, 24 Jul 2021 05:41:56 +, kekronbekron wrote: >And therein begins a new line where some company offers services to move small >machine workloads to zPDT. >Or whatever... > >-

MF talent wanted

2021-07-24 Thread Tsai Laurence
Listers, Would like to seek 1 (ONE) MF system engineer who can perform classical z ,such as z/OS , CICS, DB2/z and capable skills on z/Linux solutions. Mandarin speaking, staying in Taiwan, perform client facing projects. Welcome and thanks recommendation. 從我的iPhone

Re: Mixing C/C++ with LE-conforming IBM HLASM

2021-07-24 Thread Paul Gilmartin
On Sat, 24 Jul 2021 12:01:09 -0500, Kirk Wolf wrote: >Sorry for joining this thread late. > >You are correct Larry - the z/OS C library has very little help for PDS >processing.   I wrote an RFE in 2015, but I don't expect to want it >anymore if/when IBM responds :-)

Re: Mixing C/C++ with LE-conforming IBM HLASM

2021-07-24 Thread Kirk Wolf
Sorry for joining this thread late. You are correct Larry - the z/OS C library has very little help for PDS processing.   I wrote an RFE in 2015, but I don't expect to want it anymore if/when IBM responds :-) https://www.ibm.com/developerworks/rfe/execute?use_case=viewRfe_ID=80811 We

Excessive resource use was Re: Serverpac installs January 2022 and beyond - Requests

2021-07-24 Thread Clark Morris
[Default] On 23 Jul 2021 21:21:19 -0700, in bit.listserv.ibm-main brian_wester...@syzygyinc.com (Brian Westerman) wrote: >Did you think to have even ONE of those early sites be one with a small >processor (single CPU) like a low end single CPU z/13, z14 or z15? Most >likely you didn't and

Re: GDPS Manuals Link

2021-07-24 Thread Jackson, Rob
To be fair, they're really not that hard to get a hold of. We haven't used GDPC/XRC since 2016; they still send me the newsletter and the FTP site password every time they change it. Both the user ID and the password in the same unencrypted email. They don't seem to be too concerned about

Re: GDPS Manuals Link

2021-07-24 Thread Radoslaw Skorupka
W dniu 22.07.2021 o 22:46, fred glenlake pisze: Hi List, I am unsuccessfully trying to locate the hiding spot of the GDPS Manuals for V4R1 so I can download a few. If anyone can share the link of where I could download them please. GDPS is closed. Manuals are not available to anyone. Even

Re: How should I send file to another sysplex securely.

2021-07-24 Thread Radoslaw Skorupka
There are many ways to skin a cat. You can rely on industry standards like certificates and CA's. You can also use your own methods. You can use both. Yes, double security. What I could do: 1. Establish some secure file transfer. It can be FTPS, sftp, commercial MFT applications like Sterling