Markdown support in the MS Office suite and SMTP clients would be gold.
MD supports check boxes, collapsible blocks of text, code formatting, etc.
- KB
‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
On Friday, November 5th, 2021 at 10:21 PM, Bob Bridges
wrote:
> One thing (perhaps the only thing) that I
"But that's what KC4z is for", you will hear...
- KB
‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
On Friday, November 5th, 2021 at 7:39 PM, Michael Watkins
<032966e74d0f-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote:
> Yes, PDFs, not webpages.
>
> Sometimes the network on my end is a little shaky. This might
Wow. That was apparently a close call.
On 11/5/2021 1:53 PM, Pew, Curtis G wrote:
For what it’s worth: https://www.theregister.com/2021/11/05/ibm_redbooks/
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
On Nov 5, 2021, at 6:10 AM, Richards, Robert B. (CTR)
<01c91f408b9e-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote:
>
> This was posted by Bill Bitner (bitn...@us.ibm.com on LINUX-390 a week ago:
>
> "I do my best to stay out of the rumor business. Chris Konarski just tweeted
> that it is a
Dave, HSM has 2 methods to dynamically address volumes going over threshold:
Interval Migration and On Demand Migration. Interval Migration runs hourly and
processes volumes that went over threshold during the previous hour. The
preferred method is the On Demand Migration technique. With
On Fri, 5 Nov 2021 16:57:17 +0100, Radoslaw Skorupka wrote:
>I just re-read Configuring ISPF for Fun and Profit presentation and
>found the following link:
>http://home.roadrunner.com/~pinncons/TSO LOGON with the Same Userid on
>Multiple LPARs in a Sysplex.pdf
>
>However the link is dead.
>Does
IIRC that's correct, there's also a GRSRNL update required to not enq on
the major name
remove qname(SYSIKJUA) from GRS or MIM
Carmen
On 11/5/2021 2:44 PM, Dave Jousma wrote:
On Fri, 5 Nov 2021 16:57:17 +0100, Radoslaw Skorupka
wrote:
I just re-read Configuring ISPF for Fun and Profit
On Fri, 5 Nov 2021 16:57:17 +0100, Radoslaw Skorupka
wrote:
>I just re-read Configuring ISPF for Fun and Profit presentation and
>found the following link:
>http://home.roadrunner.com/~pinncons/TSO LOGON with the Same Userid on
>Multiple LPARs in a Sysplex.pdf
>
>However the link is dead.
>Does
I can, just shoot me an email @ cvitu...@hughes.net
Carmen
On 11/5/2021 2:30 PM, Grant Taylor wrote:
On 11/5/21 12:58 PM, Carmen Vitullo wrote:
I do have a DOC for z/os 1.12 if you want I can provide, this was
from an IBM presentation
I would be interested in a copy of the document if you
This article from awhile ago may be helpful - not sure
http://www.lbdsoftware.com/Logging_OnTo_Multiple_LPARS.pdf
Lionel B Dyck <
Sent from my iPad Pro 10.5
Website: www.lbdsoftware.com
"Worry more about your character than your reputation. Character is what you
are, reputation merely what
On 11/5/21 12:58 PM, Carmen Vitullo wrote:
I do have a DOC for z/os 1.12 if you want I can provide, this was from
an IBM presentation
I would be interested in a copy of the document if you are emailing it
to people. Please and thank you.
--
Grant. . . .
unix || die
I do have a DOC for z/os 1.12 if you want I can provide, this was from
an IBM presentation
On 11/5/2021 10:57 AM, Radoslaw Skorupka wrote:
I just re-read Configuring ISPF for Fun and Profit presentation and
found the following link:
http://home.roadrunner.com/~pinncons/TSO LOGON with the Same
Hello all,
I would like to invite you and your colleagues to our z/OSMF Community Guild,
which will be held on the third Wednesday of the month, starting this November
17, 2021 from 10:00am to 11:00am est. The z/OSMF team will hold regularly
scheduled meetings with z/OSMF users to discuss deep
On Fri, 5 Nov 2021 12:44:59 -0400, Bob Bridges wrote:
>I can't tell, Colin: Is this facetism? Some months ago, or maybe a year, I
>found I was no longer able to access the on-line HTMLs;
>
In recent weeks, less than that year, I've found access to on-line HTMLs much
improved.
A Google search
One thing (perhaps the only thing) that I like about Lotus Notes over MS
Outlook -- and those are the only two ever available at a client site -- is its
ability to create "expandable" paragraphs. When I want to pack a lot of
information into a single email, I can create "optional" paragraphs
I can't tell, Colin: Is this facetism? Some months ago, or maybe a year, I
found I was no longer able to access the on-line HTMLs; I had to content myself
with downloaded PDFs (and hope that I'd remember to download the updates as
often as necessary). It is nice, I agree, to know that the
I just re-read Configuring ISPF for Fun and Profit presentation and
found the following link:
http://home.roadrunner.com/~pinncons/TSO LOGON with the Same Userid on
Multiple LPARs in a Sysplex.pdf
However the link is dead.
Does anyone have the presentation?
Or any other presentation on the
IMHO a master catalog requirement is a show stopper. To me that says that
LNKLSTxx is not a viable option.
FWIW, I wouldn't have spent the resources to enhance LNKLSTxx either.
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List on behalf of
Radoslaw Skorupka
Sent:
I do that sometimes with multiple items, or at least put each item on a
single line. I remember one time where (yes I was being a jerk) I had
so much trouble with a particular person I emailed them a URL to a quick
web page I made with check boxes and input fields. I was surprised it
worked!
Last 20+ years LNKLST can be defined using PROGxx members.
Old documentation say " Instead of using LNKLSTxx to specify the LNKLST
concatenation, consider using PROGxx. " - that's what I read in 1999 (in
the times of OS/390).
And some PDSE libraries on the LNKLST are really obvious, example:
Yes, PDFs, not webpages.
Sometimes the network on my end is a little shaky. This might especially be the
case in a disaster situation.
Having the documentation in PDF form and downloaded onto the C: drive of my
laptop gives me a warm and fuzzy feeling.
-Original Message-
From: IBM
I used to think that Redbooks were an admission that product documentation
was not very good.
I explained to someone; the product documentation tells you how to adjust
your tappets. What red books did was to say this is how you unlock the
car, put the seat belt on (not always obvious), and tell
Some of the OS/360 documentation was excellent. Of course, some was appalling.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] on behalf of
Lionel B. Dyck [lbd...@gmail.com]
Sent:
Are you saying that LNKLSTxx can now specify a PDSE? If so, in which release
was that added? Thanks.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] on behalf of
Peter Relson
In loathing IBM, Apple became it.
Now it's time for IBM to become Apple by enriching their walled garden, and let
only 'Kyndrd' souls tend to the zOS garden.
Hoover up all docos, talk to our salesman instead.
- KB
‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
On Friday, November 5th, 2021 at 7:01 PM,
"if IBM is going to transition the Redbooks into something better"?
It looks like IBM is transitioning to ibm.com/docs, where an isolated piece of
documentation is given to you without any of the surrounding related
information. This is hardly better. The most expensive part of z/OS TOC is
On Fri, 5 Nov 2021 05:24:17 +, kekronbekron wrote:
>On covering multiple things in a mail, I often find that listing numbered
>things help.
>Even if something is missed, you can just ask, what about #2, for example.
>
I prefer to insert each answer in conversational order, *after* the
Excellent! That's the only secure way to do it. Be sure to erase the keys
ASAP.
On Friday, November 5, 2021, Cameron Conacher <
03cfc59146bb-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote:
> Hello there,
> We decided to encourage our security folks to install the encryption
> master keys in the new
>I thought that you could only have a PDSE after MSI.
Nope. You can have PDSEs in the LNKLST. Modules in any data set in the
LNKLST can be used whenever the LNKLST is available.
Peter Relson
z/OS Core Technology Design
--
Good. The best (most secure) solution.
Lennie Dymoke-Bradshaw
https://rsclweb.com
‘Dance like no one is watching. Encrypt like everyone is.’
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Cameron Conacher
Sent: 05 November 2021 12:40
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Hello there,
We decided to encourage our security folks to install the encryption master
keys in the new environment and proceed from there.
Thanks to everyone who responded.
…….Cameron
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Ron
Hawkins
Sent: Friday,
We had a 084 RC 0C wait state on that lpar, and no I didn't take a SAD. I can
fully grok that one of our developers overlayed storage. Thanks for the
information.
Mark Jacobs
Sent from ProtonMail, Swiss-based encrypted email.
GPG Public Key -
Robert - thank you - good to know.
Lionel B. Dyck <><
Website: https://www.lbdsoftware.com
Github: https://github.com/lbdyck
“Worry more about your character than your reputation. Character is what you
are, reputation merely what others think you are.” - - - John Wooden
-Original
This was posted by Bill Bitner (bitn...@us.ibm.com on LINUX-390 a week ago:
"I do my best to stay out of the rumor business. Chris Konarski just tweeted
that it is a misunderstanding"
https://twitter.com/ChrisKonarski/status/1454110707096637442
Chris is the IBM VP WW Technical Sales and Lab
I agree with Cheryl that Redbooks have been some of the BEST documentation
available from IBM. What I am curious about is if IBM is going to transition
the Redbooks into something better. With the web there are many more
opportunities to provide documentation that contains the Redbook content
Cameron,
I have forgotten more than I knew, and searching manuals no longer comes easy.
Someone earlier mentioned using REPRO to decrypt the file as you back it up.
DF/dss will use REPRO for a logical backup, and the backup file is not
encrypted.
The question then is, "When restoring, does
36 matches
Mail list logo
