t the output
report into the DELETE NONVSAM statements to clean up the old catalog
entries.
Russell Witt
CA 1 Flexible Storage Developer
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On
Behalf Of Richard McIntosh
Sent: Tuesday, August 20, 2024 1:
.
Russell Witt
Broadcom
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On
Behalf Of Jousma, David
Sent: Tuesday, April 16, 2024 11:17 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Anyone exploiting ZEDC?
Is anyone exploiting ZEDC data compression
yet. And when they do, often times
they do not compress the data first (which makes cache usage increase since the
data will never be able to be compressed after encryption).
Russell Witt
Broadcom
CA 1 Architect
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN
ass any security checking when the VOLCAT/TCDB is updated.
Russell Witt
CA 1 Architect
Broadcom
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Juan Mautalen
Sent: Tuesday, October 5, 2021 2:22 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subj
Carlos,
Open a Broadcom support ticket and we will get you a new EARL report that is
similar to the CA 1 TMETPUSE EARL report. It will give you the size as
written by the application and the size as stored in cache (after IDRC
compression). Haven't published it yet, sorry.
Russell Witt
Bro
compression.
3. zEDC use very few CPU cycles. Thing are better in z15 because of
completely re-engineered the zEDC.
BTW: I *love* zEDC for PS data.
I've been using it on z13, z14 and now on z15.
Regards
--
Radoslaw Skorupka
Lodz, Poland
W dniu 10.07.2021 o 20:19, Russell Witt pisze:
frame Discussion List On Behalf Of
Russell Witt
Sent: Saturday, July 10, 2021 2:17 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Report on total tape usage?
[External Email. Exercise caution when clicking links or opening attachments.]
If the next Virtual Tape Server is an IBM TS7700 - mak
have
it at hand now.
By the new "z" compression, do you mean zlib?
- KB
‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
On Saturday, July 10th, 2021 at 7:55 PM, Russell Witt
<025adb32e6d7-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote:
> Dave,
>
> Actually, with CA 1 you had that ability w
izing of the next virtual
tape server 😊
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On
> Behalf Of Russell Witt
> Sent: Saturday, July 10, 2021 7:25 AM
> To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
> Subject: Re: Report on total tape usage?
>
> Dave,
> Actual
Dave,
Actually, with CA 1 you had that ability with the supplied EARL report call
TMETPUSE. That EARL report would give you the amount of data actually written
by the application (not just block-count times block-size) and also the amount
of data stored in cache (or physical tape) after compress
need further assistance with the TMOKEYxx member, feel free to
contact me at the office.
Russell Witt
russell.w...@broadcom.com
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On
Behalf Of Lizette Koehler
Sent: Tuesday, October 20, 2020 2:30 PM
To
John,
But what happens if the virtual tape environment itself was over-written? That
is where the concept of "virtual WORM" devices can help. A virtual WORM volume
cannot be over-written. And if your tape management system itself is protected,
the tapes will not be scratched until they should be
ords, WHO is running TMSINIT as a started task.
If the SECWTO option is set to NO, we won't ask and will simply allow anyone
to run TMSINIT at any time (not exactly a secure way of running, but that is
an option).
Russell Witt
CA 1 Architect
Broadcom
-Original Message-
From: IBM
But what about the AI that develops autonomously? Remember Mike (Mycroft) from
The Moon is a Harsh Mistress (Heinlein) and TANSTAAFL (still true today - so
many people forget). AI might not be "developed" directly, which then rules out
having any "rules".
Russell
-Original Message-
Fro
f-sync with the other 2 is simply reports
it. No updating is performed. It is very useful when the problem is between the
TCDB and the LM (which should never happen, but does) as well as between CA 1
and either of the IBM data bases.
Russell Witt
CA 1 Architect
Broadcom
-Original Message
That would cut your DR time down to "how
long to restore my backups" instead of "how long to ship my tapes".
Price it out yourself.
Russell Witt
CA 1 Architect
Broadcom
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On
ssion List on behalf of Russell Witt"
wrote:
> EXTERNAL: Do not open attachments or click on links unless you recognize and
> trust the sender.
>
>Brian and Dean,
>
>Yes, you are correct. If you insert or define a new range of virtual-volumes
>to the VTS; that will dr
ages? If you
get the CBR3770I first, and then the CBR3769I quickly after - that would be
very strange and I would recommend contacting IBM.
Russell Witt
CA 1 Architect
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Brian Fraser
Sent
CA Vtape from Broadcom is another option.
Russell Witt
Broadcom
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Jake Anderson
Sent: Tuesday, October 15, 2019 1:04 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Alternative for VTL ?
Hi
John,
Yes, that is the correct control statements to scratch the tape (assumption
being that it is not an EDM tape).
Russell Witt
Broadcom
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of John Dawes
Sent: Friday, October 4, 2019 6
;s means you are always going to be VERY behind in
maintenance and releases and taking advantage of new features/functions.
Just my opinion. I have a sandbox that I can IPL as often as I want on a daily
basis - lucky me.
Russell Witt
Broadcom
-Original Message-
From: IBM Ma
Lizette is absolutely correct with regard to CA 1. We have a utility (TMSOSCAT)
that will give you a list of all MVS/Catalog tape entries for which there is no
actual record in the TMC for. A great way to eliminate obsolete catalog entries.
Russell Witt
CA 1 Architect
Broadcom
-Original
Skip,
No problem, SMS-managed tape still does NOT have the same catalog requirement
that SMS-managed DASD has. So, having multiple un-cataloged tape data sets with
the same name is perfectly fine. No changes needed.
Russell WittCA 1 Architect
-Original Message-
From: Jesse 1 Robinson
T
unds like you simply need to have your chargeback system start to interface
to your tape management system.
Russell Witt
CA 1 Development
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Benik, John E
Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2019
Rajesh,
I would recommend you go to the CA 7 Community page on the CA Communities site
and ask there.
https://communities.ca.com/
Better chance of getting product-specific questions from the community of users
of that specific product.
Russell Witt
CA 1 Development
-Original Message
or. I hope I understood this idiom correctly.
--
Radoslaw Skorupka
Lodz, Poland
W dniu 2018-12-05 o 14:39, Russell Witt pisze:
> So very true. And the concept of an "air-gap" backup has become a real issue
> and shows one of the problems with replication. And nothing is better
R, CA-Disk)
are one of the biggest users, and together with backup-solutions like DFDSS and
FDR account for the majority of tape usage there are other uses as well. I have
seen some production sites where DB2 backups from the DB2 utility use as much
tape (measured in Mb of data) as either
ently. But the benefits of a VTS solution
doomed that as well.
Russell Witt
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On
Behalf Of Jousma, David
Sent: Friday, November 23, 2018 10:03 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Another IBM ta
? If the I/O Gen says the device must
be in a library, it must be in a library.
Russell Witt
res09...@verizon.net
-Original Message-
From: Nai, Dean
To: IBM-MAIN
Sent: Wed, Nov 14, 2018 2:08 pm
Subject: automatic tape library - DR
Hi,
Did anyone ever run into this problem at
Hey Lizette,
I should be there. Stop by the MVSS Project Opening and say hi.
Russell Witt
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On
Behalf Of Lizette Koehler
Sent: Monday, November 5, 2018 1:34 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject
The SHARE App is now available and working for St. Louis.
See you there
Russell Witt
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Michael Babcock
Sent: Monday, July 2, 2018 8:08 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: SHARE App
ed as 3590's, the block-id
issue is non-existent because the Block-ID is a 4-byte field on the 3590's. So,
if you like to define your virtual-volumes as large volumes; it might actually
be better to define them as 3590's.
Russell Witt
res09...@verizon.net
-Original Mes
? Was it the correct name?
And when you say that CA 1 rejects the access when the DSN is less than
17-characters, what exactly is the rejection message?
Lastly, is the FUNC option enabled (YES or EXT) within CA 1? This would allow
you to control who can use 98000 to bypass CA 1.
Russell Witt
CA 1
My 2-cents; can you imagine if you had to hard-code all user-catalog's into the
CATALOG started task correctly. The chance of missing one, or defining a new
user-catalog and not including it in the JCL for the started task would be
horrible. And if you are using a modern security product (RACF,
management system that
requires you to stop tape processing - ever?
And Skip, we haven't been one record per block for about 15 years now.
Russell Witt
CA 1
-Original Message-
From: Allan Staller
To: IBM-MAIN
Sent: Wed, Oct 25, 2017 11:57 am
Subject: Re: CA1 to RMM conversio
as other things.
Russell Witt
CA 1 Architect
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of esmie moo
Sent: Monday, June 19, 2017 8:27 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: TMS REPORT
Gentle Readers,
I am trying to run a TMS rep
y to see if a simple COBOL program supports the OPTCD=B specification.
Of course, worst situation is you simply read the tape with 98000 specified and
that would disable the CA 1 intercepts that intercept the new Label call from
z/OS.
Russell Witt
CA 1
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainfram
when the new feature was added to z/OS.
Russell Witt
CA 1
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of David Speake
Sent: Saturday, February 20, 2016 11:26 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Standard User Tape Labels in COB
with unique
un-shared MVS/Catalogs but use a single shared TMC. Or for clients that want to
improve the performance of TMSCLEAN (doing thousands of un-catalog's takes a
lot of time, so this off-loads that process).
Russell Witt
CA 1
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion
. Otherwise, once they are in DELETE status you can
simply remove them from the TMC by using the TMSXTEND utility.
Russell Witt
CA 1
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Lizette Koehler
Sent: Friday, February 19, 2016 7:29 PM
To
o, if you only want to look at the active TMC you can eliminate
the DD statement from your JCL and simply have the CA 1 OPEN macro
dynamically allocate the ACTIVE TMC for you.
Russell Witt
CA 1
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On
Beha
The one date I wish I could be around to see is March 1st, 2100. That will be
the first year since 1900 when the old standard "every 4 years" does NOT apply.
No Feb 29th in 2100. But that date I don't have to worry about.
Russell
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [
events the Label Anomaly exit from
getting control and supplying the NEXT-Volume as well. This works fine for an
assembler program (tested with simple IEBGENER), so not sure if it will work
with COBOL.
Russell Witt
CA
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailt
This is actually weird. Even though EMC owns an 80% stake in VMware, VMware
is looking to buy-out EMC. Never heard of a down-stream merger.
http://fortune.com/2015/08/05/report-emc-considering-buyout-vmware/?xid=yaho
o_fortune
Russell Witt
Ok, that brings up some follow-up questions. First of course is why do you want
an XML formatted copy of the TMC records? And second is do other clients want
to see an XML formatted copy of TMC records?
Russell Witt
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM
hat
can be converted into excel spreadsheets or charts and graphs for management
(remember, managers need pictures to understand anything).
Have fun, and don't hesitate to contact me directly if you have any
questions.
Russell Witt
CA 1 Principal Architect
-Original Message-
From
d for you. Would it follow
that tape encryption should also follow and require unique encryption keys that
are only available to authorized users in order to read the data?
Russell Witt
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of
://communities.ca.com/places?filterID=all~tag%5Bglobal%5D&sortKey=all~subjectAsc&sortOrder=1
Russell Witt
CA Technologies
On 03/23/15, Ron Thomas wrote:
Hello. I am new to datacom & in my new project the database used is datacom.
Could some one please let me know how to get the table layout of a da
and later was used-again (after going scratch of course) as a non-encrypted
tape. Just like Virtual-WORM and Replication. If controlled by Data Class it
can switch on and off, so each usage is different.
Russell Witt
On 11/12/14, Pommier, Rex wrote:
Hi list,
We have an existing 3584 tape lib
, which UCB addresses failed and which UCB address was successful? If it
was the same device all 4 times and 3 out of 4 times it failed; then I would be
leaning more to a hardware problem with that specific device.
Russell Witt
CA 1 Principal Software Architect
On 07/31/14, R.S. wrote:
W
g
the data together). But, if you don't have a Virtual Tape solution and are
still relying on physical media; this might be a solution you could look into.
Again, if you use either CA 1 or CA TLMS it is already there. Not sure about
other tape management systems.
Russell Wit
ed data. So the physical block
of 256k on the tape might actually control 5 blocks of compressed data where
each un-compressed block of data is about 200,000k in size. So the operating
system "block" written down the channel has nothing to do with the physical
"block" of compressed
lling into this
category.
Russell Witt
On 05/02/14, John McKown wrote:
http://www.itworld.com/storage/416783/sony-develops-tape-tech-could-lead-185-tb-cartridges
Just how long would it take to _find and restore_ an individual file backed
up on such a monster? Or even just do a backup to it?
robotic
information.
Russell Witt
CA 1 Architect
On 04/29/14, baby eklavya wrote:
Hi ,
We are implementing a new VTS on our shop , and trying to get OAM started
. I have the CBR exits (CA 1 version
to make it a full hour
presentation.
Either use the SHARE web-site's Call for Presentations at
https://share.confex.com/share/123/cfp.cgi
or feel free to send an email directly to David Astemborski at
daste...@visa.com or myself.
Russell Witt
MVSS Project Manager
res09...@verizo
Why would you say that MF customers are too paranoid for Cloud storage? How is
sending encrypted data to the Cloud any more or less dangerous then sending
encrypted cartridges to an off-site vault via a truck? Personally, I would
think that a TCP/IP connection that gets the data to a secure Clo
quot;big enough" for your growth. And of course, you can get to your data from any
location that has TCP/IP connectivity (as long as you have your
passwords/credentials of course).
Russell
we found out yet another
>little set up (the new system) task that could have been oh-so-easily
>avoided. ...
>
Yup.
On Sat, 15 Mar 2014 23:10:27 -0500, Russell Witt wrote:
>
>1) If you code VOL=SER=1234,UNIT= does that mean it is leading blanks or
>trailing blanks? In either
equest for 00-00 (base 36) and even 1 request for 00-00 (base
16). But as long as the Alpha's are on the left and numerics on the right; no
exit is needed.
Russell Witt
CA 1 Principal Architect
On 03/14/14, John McKown wrote:
There is a thread over on TSO-REXX about
Arthur is correct. Back at my JCP days, that is one reason they broke the
"SYSPROG" job into 3 different jobs. You had the assembler programers who wrote
the exits and any assembler user-mods or in-house applications; the SMP jockeys
that applied IBM maintenance and also tested the assembler ex
Roger,
In addition to reviewing your SMF14/15 records; you might also check what
information might be available from your Tape Management System. Many record
creating-program; and even better would be creating-DDNAME. I would do a test
using TAPE as your SORTWK01; find the records created in y
Lizette,
Yes, with that in mind you are correct. Of course, the whole business with DASD
files is that there IS a backup on TAPE. So, if you have "special" files that
you also want protected and move them to TAPE as the primary media, does that
mean that the backup requirement is gone? If it i
ld be retained for a minimum of 7
days and only then would be put under CATALOG control.
I believe what Kees is looking for is some way to have tapes under CATALOG
control but kept for an extra xx days after they have been un-cataloged.
Russell Witt
CA 1 Principal Software Arch
d" to be
applied to only selected tape files. This however then brings up the question
of which files do you want protected with a "long grace period" and which ones
do you not care about and want to scratch as soon as they are un-cataloged?
That might then become another large
been used. So, once a tapes gets
beyond 90 or 95% full you might want to stop adding additional data to it.
Russell Witt
CA 1 Principal Architect
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send emai
already in SCRATCH and never have notified the LM. Which is probably where
your problem lies.
If you have any further problems, please contact CA 1 support. Even though
this is an out-of-support release; they should be able to help.
Russell Witt
L2 Support Manager
-Original Message-
sible and then test (run an IEBGENER or
IDCAMS-PRINT or Tapemap) to see if the data is still there.
And of course, you will have to re-catalog as the scratch process most
likely caused the file to become un-cataloged as well.
Russell Witt
TLMS L2 Support Manager
-Original Message-
From
use either. CBRUXVNL
is a simple link-list module, so your first step is to find out whose
version is installed. If you have some type of link-list search tool
(LNKSRCH for example) that can tell you which link-list library it is found
in, you can then look for some eye-catcher.
Russell Witt
CA 1
68 matches
Mail list logo
